Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
Silverfire
post Oct 12 2011, 11:14 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(sasaug @ Oct 12 2011, 09:07 PM)
Somehow I feel this new architecture is just a beginning for AMD. They say it scales pretty well when u go into more cores etc.

This was just the 1st batch of a new design. They got more plans and stuff ahead so perhaps, that was their plan.
*

Seen the benchmark that utilises all threads? Still below i7 2600K. So I've no idea how a new new design can beat SB-E or IB.
CultTech
post Oct 12 2011, 11:23 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Oct 2011
Kinda confuse, does "Bulldozer" processor include graphic chips? like the SB does.

This post has been edited by CultTech: Oct 12 2011, 11:24 PM
1024kbps
post Oct 12 2011, 11:26 PM

李素裳
*******
Senior Member
6,009 posts

Joined: Feb 2007



QUOTE(CultTech @ Oct 12 2011, 11:23 PM)
Kinda confuse, does "Bulldozer" processor include graphic chips? like the SB does.
*
No, but thier APU "Llano" have GPU inside if im correct.
Eugene91
post Oct 12 2011, 11:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,109 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Mike India Romeo India


user posted image
shocking.gif shocking.gif shocking.gif
i3 2100 ftw rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by Eugene91: Oct 12 2011, 11:45 PM
khelben
post Oct 13 2011, 12:06 AM

I love my mum & dad
*******
Senior Member
6,056 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Suldanessellar



Really no reason not to get a Sany it seems.

Oh well.
satmerchant
post Oct 13 2011, 12:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


think better go to i7 now...
waste of time waiting for new proc...

Beatmasta
post Oct 13 2011, 02:20 AM

Drummer Guy
****
Senior Member
577 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Borneo Headhunters



waited so long for this bulldozer jst to find there's not so much difference performance with my X6 haish...dissapointed wait, Power consumption chugged alot of watts under full load
QUOTE
quote taken from AMD on BD "AMD also shared with us that Windows 7 isn't really all that optimized for Bulldozer, Windows 7's scheduler isn't aware of Bulldozer's architecture and as a result sort of places threads wherever it sees fit, regardless of optimal placement Windows 8 is expected to correct this"


This post has been edited by Beatmasta: Oct 13 2011, 03:50 AM
izzat80
post Oct 13 2011, 06:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
261 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
I'm using Athlon X2 4200+ ... runs most apps ok but not as fast as I want sometimes sluggish

was hoping bulldozer will be impressive... but its ok AMD try again I will wait for Bulldozer2, should be out early next year right?

I don care about having the fastest, just fast enough to run everything available today @ good price...

hope "AMD the smarter choice" will get back its meaning soon! NEVER INTEL, I will wait AMD just get busy and make a nice chip Ktkxbye

what about the improvements seen in windows 8?

what if bulldozer is not really bad, just that the software needs updates to use the new functions/hardware acceleration/whatever that is in the processor??

theres hope for some recovery?
MichaelJohn
post Oct 13 2011, 07:32 AM

Pan Paka Pan <3
*******
Senior Member
2,514 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: [Confidential]

Demmit... should've gone for the i5 2500K or i7 2600K sad.gif
dstl1128
post Oct 13 2011, 07:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Bulldozer actually looks good as it inline to the kind of workloads I do often - lots of integer calculation.


The only disappointment is the power consumption.

fr0sti3
post Oct 13 2011, 07:56 AM

F0NZz1e
******
Senior Member
1,095 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
i think AMD's heading for entreprise market instead...
najmul
post Oct 13 2011, 08:02 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
526 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


hey guys,i really need your opinions..i'm clueless on what to do now,i already have a 990fx board for months now,i dont wanna have to change to sb coz then i'd have to buy a new board as well and thats gonna cost a lot..should i just buy a bulldozer just to complete my setup,or should i just change to intel? its still gonna be an upgrade for me tho,currently using a phenom ii x3 710. -was really hoping bulldozer would blow my mind,but it didnt sad.gif

This post has been edited by najmul: Oct 13 2011, 08:09 AM
Beatmasta
post Oct 13 2011, 08:28 AM

Drummer Guy
****
Senior Member
577 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Borneo Headhunters



I'd stick with Amd Phenom II unless there's a big improvement in gaming on the bulldozer which when it came time to play games the BD FX range was really no better than the Phenom II. Making me to wonder how well is the BD 6100 FX performs against Phenom II X6 hmm.gif

This post has been edited by Beatmasta: Oct 13 2011, 08:30 AM
bai1101
post Oct 13 2011, 08:34 AM

I am Pervert
******
Senior Member
1,613 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Sg Long/Serdang


QUOTE(najmul @ Oct 13 2011, 08:02 AM)
hey guys,i really need your opinions..i'm clueless on what to do now,i already have a 990fx board for months now,i dont wanna have to change to sb coz then i'd have to buy a new board as well and thats gonna cost a lot..should i just buy a bulldozer just to complete my setup,or should i just change to intel? its still gonna be an upgrade for me tho,currently using a phenom ii x3 710. -was really hoping bulldozer would blow my mind,but it didnt sad.gif
*
well for me if u want save some buck u can stick with bulldozer but not for now because of insane price. Wait a while for the price to drop to level that consider fair compare to US.

Searingmage
post Oct 13 2011, 08:44 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,809 posts

Joined: Feb 2010


QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Oct 12 2011, 05:28 PM)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/AMD-Bulldoz...ps-203267.shtml
This could be the reason.
It was initially running @ 2.5GHz (3.5GHz turbo mode).
The performance could be so bad until it did not make a single sense to market it at all.
*
Then AMD should've stopped the hype telling people that it's a FX revive.. AMD keep claiming that the performance will be mind blowing..
Yes, is indeed mindblowing, in a different way though.
izzat80
post Oct 13 2011, 08:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
261 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
QUOTE(najmul @ Oct 13 2011, 08:02 AM)
hey guys,i really need your opinions..i'm clueless on what to do now,i already have a 990fx board for months now,i dont wanna have to change to sb coz then i'd have to buy a new board as well and thats gonna cost a lot..should i just buy a bulldozer just to complete my setup,or should i just change to intel? its still gonna be an upgrade for me tho,currently using a phenom ii x3 710. -was really hoping bulldozer would blow my mind,but it didnt sad.gif
*
wait for enhanced bulldozer, i think it will come out by beginning of 2012...

user posted image

ur CPU is good enough for most things now.. unless u r into very heavy gaming.. just wait smile.gif

all people blame and curse AMD, not knowing that global foundaries (the fab company amd uses) had serious issues, and bulldozer was one of the victims..

AMD always comes back ...

user posted image

rclxms.gif
shinjite
post Oct 13 2011, 09:08 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,306 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Just go on with PII and wait for Bulldozer 2 and see how it goes for now
ben_panced
post Oct 13 2011, 09:10 AM

PC and MotorBicycle Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
962 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kulai


QUOTE(izzat80 @ Oct 13 2011, 08:52 AM)
wait for enhanced bulldozer, i think it will come out by beginning of 2012...

user posted image

ur CPU is good enough for most things now.. unless u r into very heavy gaming.. just wait  smile.gif

all people blame and curse AMD, not knowing that global foundaries (the fab company amd uses) had serious issues, and bulldozer was one of the victims..

AMD always comes back ...

rclxms.gif
*
pfft.. u mean just 10% improvement on performance next year? while SB is already 40% more efficient and powerful clock for clock compared to current BD? how many years does it take amd to have a comparable cpu compared to current SB?

Turnip
post Oct 13 2011, 09:14 AM

bonjour beau là-bas
******
Senior Member
1,111 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: UK


AMD, im not impressed. unsure.gif

All the hype, gimmicks... sad.gif
dawho
post Oct 13 2011, 09:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
782 posts

Joined: Oct 2009



come on guys....atleast they did a new chip....dont need to marah2 to amd....they're working hard...lets just wait for the new gen to come out..but i think i'll just wait for the BD to price drop then i'll buy it...been waiting for long time...

115 Pages « < 61 62 63 64 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0668sec    0.49    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 09:24 AM