AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
Aug 26 2010, 11:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Well, to me its technology so hope for the best for AMD
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 27 2010, 12:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
I think its definitely the Athlon FX series
This post has been edited by shinjite: Aug 27 2010, 12:57 AM |
|
|
Jan 21 2011, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2011, 01:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Aarrgghh, no support for 790FX
|
|
|
Jun 20 2011, 09:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Basically new platform just to support the newer techs....aagghh
Anyway, I am still fine with the current AM3 mobos functionality |
|
|
Jul 11 2011, 09:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Too early to say but really nice figures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 14 2011, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
|
|
|
Jul 29 2011, 09:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
QUOTE(saturn85 @ Jul 29 2011, 03:08 AM) Same like 1090T when it first came out....less than RM1k |
|
|
Aug 10 2011, 07:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Even a single core also can fold ma
|
|
|
Sep 13 2011, 08:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Hmmm.....Phenom II X6 way way higher in CPU score in 3DM06
|
|
|
Sep 27 2011, 08:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Hopefully the live up to the FX moniker....
|
|
|
Oct 11 2011, 03:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Hmmm....the price between the FX-8120 and 8150 is a lot as well >_>"
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 09:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
It is because with lesser cores, the better the chances of getting higher clocks
It is about the clockspeeds, not the amount of cores |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 09:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Guess I'll keep my X6 for now
|
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 09:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Just go on with PII and wait for Bulldozer 2 and see how it goes for now
|
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 09:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
AMD will have no choice but to slash the price of their current BD
What worries me is the amount of power consumed when stress at OC levels, it is astonishing high Thanks to its 2 B transistors This post has been edited by shinjite: Oct 13 2011, 09:20 AM |
|
|
Oct 13 2011, 10:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Well, at least I won't upgrade to another FX as I think my 'fake' FX can hold on its own
|
|
|
Oct 17 2011, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
QUOTE(Najmods @ Oct 17 2011, 09:41 AM) I don't know if this been posted before, I came upon this stating the real culprit could be the test kit motherboard, the Crosshair V Formula. Apparently true....have to wait for our own in-house LYN benchmarks with different boards and compare |
|
|
Oct 17 2011, 11:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Apparently ASUS CH5's BIOS is being blamed for the performance drop, we will see later how it goes
Asrock 990FX Extreme4 already shown us that BD can rival the 2600k in gaming, awaiting other boards |
|
|
Oct 17 2011, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,313 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
Guess you should be the first then
|
| Change to: | 0.0502sec
0.56
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 08:27 PM |