Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
Silverfire
post Mar 9 2011, 11:12 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



Lets see if this can hold up to Ci7 biggrin.gif
Silverfire
post Jun 10 2011, 06:00 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



So is there any new bench for the 8 cores monster?
Silverfire
post Jun 12 2011, 12:07 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



Got new SuperPI 1M result?
Silverfire
post Jun 12 2011, 02:52 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jun 12 2011, 02:31 AM)
I think it should be faster than Phenom II.
Do you expect it slower than Phenom II?

I hope it is faster than Sandy Bridge too, clock to clock.
Bulldozer is AMD's biggest project ever. A big hoo-haa since 2005.
I expect it to blow Sandy Bridge out of water. It would be a bit of turn-off if this AMD's "greatest" architecture fails to beat Intel's.
I don't expect it to be cheap though. I think the price doesn't matter as long as it's faster than Sandy Bridge - the performance justifies the price.
*

I don't think its faster than Sandy B. clock to clock, judging on bench posted by kingkingyyk above.
user posted image
Silverfire
post Jun 12 2011, 03:06 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(Racerx @ Jun 12 2011, 03:03 AM)
@ALeUNe and Silverfire,that's Llano not Bulldozer.


Added on June 12, 2011, 3:04 am@ALeUNe and Silverfire,those pictures you guys quoted/posted are Llano not Bulldozer
*

Oh I see. The release of Bulldozer is around the corner right?

Found this after going through almost 20 pages in LGA1155 thread, good reference when BD bench out.
user posted image

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 12 2011, 03:12 AM
Silverfire
post Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM)
Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead.
And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1  rolleyes.gif
*

He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake.

1.57.1
http://www.sevenforums.com/software/147063...z-1-57-1-a.html
http://www.filehippo.com/download_cpuz/

1st link looks authentic. Files are hosted in cpuid.com.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 13 2011, 05:29 PM
Silverfire
post Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(shin gouki @ Jun 13 2011, 08:19 PM)
Wanna ask pro here,
How can a software/game utilize all core of the cpu e.g. 8 cores
Izzit by programming language or game engine or the OS?
Sorry for the noob question tongue.gif
*

All. OS then game engine then programming language to support the multi-threading/core.
Silverfire
post Jun 17 2011, 01:55 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(hakunamatata @ Jun 17 2011, 12:55 AM)
What is EOL? Can bulldozer fit into my MSI 870S-G46 mobo?
*

End Of Life. End of product support. Can read more at Wiki.
Silverfire
post Jun 17 2011, 05:32 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(everling @ Jun 17 2011, 12:39 PM)
I choose the wrong words. The gist I wanted to share was that while some games, not all, do show loading improvements, they benefit less from SSDs than most other applications.

One of the more amazing examples of such was Neverwinter Nights (2002). When loading, for some modules it will extract thousands of tiny temporary files to disk. You'd think that with an SSD, NWN's load times would have improved like ten fold or something. Well, it didn't, I didn't felt a difference and the Windows Task Manager didn't show a difference either. I don't know how they managed that little bit of sorcery, but there you go.

On more current games, I and some other S2TW players can say that it doesn't significantly effect S2's long load times. I haven't checked against the Task Manager, so it might actually be a little faster, but it certainly doesn't feel like it. For multiplayer games, like L4D or Killing Floor, I can't say whether SSDs are better or not as my laptop's i5 CPU is also better than my friends older machines.
Systems still on SATA 1.5Gbps are not old, they are ancient. sweat.gif
*

Whilst your drive affects game load time, it can be bottlenecked by either the drive or processor or graphic memory or physical memory.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 17 2011, 05:33 PM
Silverfire
post Jun 19 2011, 04:00 AM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(billytong @ Jun 18 2011, 02:05 PM)
Neverwinter knights 1 is a pretty old game. Unless u are running P4 2.0GHz and below system there is no way the current destop would bottleneck the game.
*

Oh sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm not referring to one game but all on general.
Silverfire
post Jun 25 2011, 11:19 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



hmm.gif IMHO Intel is the underdog with IGP as AMD acquired ATI. Anyhow, if a full machine can be built at around RM1k, it'd make a good HTPC.
Silverfire
post Oct 12 2011, 11:14 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(sasaug @ Oct 12 2011, 09:07 PM)
Somehow I feel this new architecture is just a beginning for AMD. They say it scales pretty well when u go into more cores etc.

This was just the 1st batch of a new design. They got more plans and stuff ahead so perhaps, that was their plan.
*

Seen the benchmark that utilises all threads? Still below i7 2600K. So I've no idea how a new new design can beat SB-E or IB.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0473sec    0.61    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 07:54 PM