AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
Mar 9 2011, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
Lets see if this can hold up to Ci7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 10 2011, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
So is there any new bench for the 8 cores monster?
|
|
|
Jun 12 2011, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
Got new SuperPI 1M result?
|
|
|
Jun 12 2011, 02:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(ALeUNe @ Jun 12 2011, 02:31 AM) I think it should be faster than Phenom II. I don't think its faster than Sandy B. clock to clock, judging on bench posted by kingkingyyk above.Do you expect it slower than Phenom II? I hope it is faster than Sandy Bridge too, clock to clock. Bulldozer is AMD's biggest project ever. A big hoo-haa since 2005. I expect it to blow Sandy Bridge out of water. It would be a bit of turn-off if this AMD's "greatest" architecture fails to beat Intel's. I don't expect it to be cheap though. I think the price doesn't matter as long as it's faster than Sandy Bridge - the performance justifies the price. ![]() |
|
|
Jun 12 2011, 03:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(Racerx @ Jun 12 2011, 03:03 AM) @ALeUNe and Silverfire,that's Llano not Bulldozer. Oh I see. The release of Bulldozer is around the corner right?Added on June 12, 2011, 3:04 am@ALeUNe and Silverfire,those pictures you guys quoted/posted are Llano not Bulldozer Found this after going through almost 20 pages in LGA1155 thread, good reference when BD bench out. ![]() This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 12 2011, 03:12 AM |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM) Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead. He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake.And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1 1.57.1 http://www.sevenforums.com/software/147063...z-1-57-1-a.html http://www.filehippo.com/download_cpuz/ 1st link looks authentic. Files are hosted in cpuid.com. This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 13 2011, 05:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 17 2011, 01:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 17 2011, 05:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(everling @ Jun 17 2011, 12:39 PM) I choose the wrong words. The gist I wanted to share was that while some games, not all, do show loading improvements, they benefit less from SSDs than most other applications. Whilst your drive affects game load time, it can be bottlenecked by either the drive or processor or graphic memory or physical memory.One of the more amazing examples of such was Neverwinter Nights (2002). When loading, for some modules it will extract thousands of tiny temporary files to disk. You'd think that with an SSD, NWN's load times would have improved like ten fold or something. Well, it didn't, I didn't felt a difference and the Windows Task Manager didn't show a difference either. I don't know how they managed that little bit of sorcery, but there you go. On more current games, I and some other S2TW players can say that it doesn't significantly effect S2's long load times. I haven't checked against the Task Manager, so it might actually be a little faster, but it certainly doesn't feel like it. For multiplayer games, like L4D or Killing Floor, I can't say whether SSDs are better or not as my laptop's i5 CPU is also better than my friends older machines. Systems still on SATA 1.5Gbps are not old, they are ancient. This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 17 2011, 05:33 PM |
|
|
Jun 19 2011, 04:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2011, 11:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 11:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(sasaug @ Oct 12 2011, 09:07 PM) Somehow I feel this new architecture is just a beginning for AMD. They say it scales pretty well when u go into more cores etc. Seen the benchmark that utilises all threads? Still below i7 2600K. So I've no idea how a new new design can beat SB-E or IB.This was just the 1st batch of a new design. They got more plans and stuff ahead so perhaps, that was their plan. |
| Change to: | 0.0473sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 07:54 PM |