Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4, The journey continues...
|
|
 Sep 4 2008, 06:19 PM
|
 
Senior Member
2,009 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: My house 
|
QUOTE(DaRkSyThE @ Sep 4 2008, 06:00 PM) i just poped my E8400 under water. mm..this almost same with my temperaturenow im getting 38 idle with asus probe and 50 with coretemp. delta is 10degrees. woah, seems my temp sensor is totally off  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 4 2008, 10:07 PM
|
 
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005  
|
yeah its weird
i know the temp sensor is inaccurate and everything, but this is insane |
|
|
Sep 4 2008, 11:25 PM
|
Senior Member
857 posts Joined: Feb 2007
|
TS, can u collect the vcore reading as well.Thank you.
|
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 12:01 AM
|
VIP
8,788 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur 
|
My friend's E8400 idle's at 60C+ and the moment he starts Orthos, temp warning comes up. I guess it's the dead thermal sensor on chip again.
|
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 09:51 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,009 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: My house
|
err..60`c then full stress 80++ ady la
how can we fix it?send back to intel? |
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 05:23 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
the new steppings apparently have a better thermal sensor however i think the problem will still be there because some people are reporting really low temps that doesnt even make sense haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 06:34 PM
|
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 
|
New sensor system, I guess? Let's wait for more updates with those temp readers >.<
|
|
|
Sep 6 2008, 10:20 AM
|
 
Forum Admin
44,415 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(uzairi @ Sep 2 2008, 09:32 AM) That Level 3 Cache is a bug from cpuz i guess..  Another thing to take note is the orthos, min fft should be 8k and max should be 32k. That way it will stress the proc even more under my test with E8400 and Q6600. E6300 procs have no problem with the default max fft which is 32k. Not sure whether orthos needs an update on newer procs or not because stressing it at 8k only would not stress it that much even if you run hundreds of loop if u noticed.. thanks! noted.  |
|
|
Sep 6 2008, 03:27 PM
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Sep 5 2008, 06:34 PM) New sensor system, I guess? Let's wait for more updates with those temp readers >.< but it seems that the E8200s are well under controland not to mention the new EO ones. delta is 11 now without aircond, 9 with |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 04:12 PM
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
my E8500 E0, running at 4Ghz @ 1.25vbios/1.232vdroop...vdrop didnt notice...idle around 43-44c...load at 60c...the room has no ac...
is it a normal temp for 45nm running at that speed/voltage? |
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 04:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,009 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: My house
|
for me 65 and above consider high..
|
|
|
Sep 8 2008, 11:25 PM
|
Senior Member
6,744 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: World Wide Web Status: Banned
|
QUOTE(remysix @ Sep 8 2008, 04:12 PM) my E8500 E0, running at 4Ghz @ 1.25vbios/1.232vdroop...vdrop didnt notice...idle around 43-44c...load at 60c...the room has no ac... E0 stepping temp sensor have no problem so it should be accurate.is it a normal temp for 45nm running at that speed/voltage? |
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 10:01 PM
|
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: P J
|
Hi guys,
I'm abit lost in the Intel OC world at the moment. I noticed that the demand is for the E0 stepping for the 45nm procs, may i know if there's a link to show wat r the codes for all the procs with E0 ? Like the E8500, Q9550 and etc. Sorry guys, uncle google was friendly today.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 11:09 PM
|
 
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule
|
QUOTE(jy14 @ Sep 9 2008, 10:01 PM) Hi guys, E8500=SLB9KI'm abit lost in the Intel OC world at the moment. I noticed that the demand is for the E0 stepping for the 45nm procs, may i know if there's a link to show wat r the codes for all the procs with E0 ? Like the E8500, Q9550 and etc. Sorry guys, uncle google was friendly today. E8400=SLB9J(?) |
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 11:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,311 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong/Deep Beach
|
QUOTE(OC4/3 @ Sep 9 2008, 11:09 PM) E8600 = SLB9L E8500=SLB9K E8400=SLB9J 
Source :: http://processorfinder.intel.com/List.aspx...2558&SearchKey= |
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 03:09 AM
|
Junior Member
241 posts Joined: Oct 2004
|
owh now... i just bought an e8500 CO! SLAPK...
noooooooooooooooo! |
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 02:49 PM
|
Junior Member
433 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Hi all, recently i just overclocked my E6600 to 3Ghz, (333Mhz * 9 )
however in CPU-z the FSB:RAM ratio is 2:3 which my RAM running at 800Mhz I heard that the ratio 1:1 is better performance, is that true ? Can i know how to set the ratio to 1:1: ? (the ram option is 533,667,800 ONLY) I have tried to set the RAM running at 667, but it seem failed to boot zzz FYI, I am using 4x1GB kingston 800Mhz value RAM and MSI p965 neo board =.= This post has been edited by hvaly: Sep 10 2008, 02:50 PM |
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 05:33 PM
|
Senior Member
2,547 posts Joined: Oct 2007
|
QUOTE(hvaly @ Sep 10 2008, 02:49 PM) Hi all, recently i just overclocked my E6600 to 3Ghz, (333Mhz * 9 ) to set it to run at 1:1 just set the ram to 533 however in CPU-z the FSB:RAM ratio is 2:3 which my RAM running at 800Mhz I heard that the ratio 1:1 is better performance, is that true ? Can i know how to set the ratio to 1:1: ? (the ram option is 533,667,800 ONLY) I have tried to set the RAM running at 667, but it seem failed to boot zzz FYI, I am using 4x1GB kingston 800Mhz value RAM and MSI p965 neo board =.=  ohya btw, 4x1gb is harder to OC.... u can try with 2x1gb first n see what result u got... 4x1gb will give u less achievable speed on the same voltage compared to 2x1gb... |
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 11:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,009 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: My house
|
if (333Mhz * 9 ) ram set to 667 bro..then it become 1:1
|
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 11:08 PM
|
|
Junior Member
433 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(fesick @ Sep 10 2008, 11:00 PM) if (333Mhz * 9 ) ram set to 667 bro..then it become 1:1 so is that true that 1:1 is better than 2:3 ratio ? any logic behind it ?is it necessary that i change to 667Mhz ? coz it seem that my pc running smoothly now   |
| Change to: |  0.0287sec
 0.76
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 08:42 AM |
Quote