Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4, The journey continues...
|
|
 Mar 15 2008, 09:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005   
|
QUOTE(pmmonkey @ Mar 15 2008, 09:10 PM) I posted at the end of v3... you can easily tighten them for CL4 with that kind of voltage Rams are 5-5-5-15 (default) on 2.2v Saving for better rams.    |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 20 2008, 10:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
hey to all doods with a Q6600 GO.
need to know your temps at 3.6Ghz please. load and idle would be great |
|
|
Mar 21 2008, 11:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(a1098113 @ Mar 20 2008, 11:07 PM) you can check on the gigabyte thread dude. there are too many replies.hard to see |
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 12:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Apr 5 2008, 07:21 PM) chill la... the proc is not with me atm... my friend who help me buy the proc is having it atm cuz he also wants one... will get it from him on monday... cuz kinda busy lately... actually i really want to see how far you can push this proc. |
|
|
Apr 6 2008, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(irenic @ Apr 6 2008, 02:13 PM) act i've rough idea how far can it go.. just i want to see more direct comparison between q9450 and q6600.. well, ive seen around 470FSB on the Q9450. that sounds pretty promising.coz i already own a q6700.. so wanna know how big the performance i'll gain if i ever move to this new 45nm quad might get one soon. need to get rid of my X6800  |
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 12:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Apr 7 2008, 08:59 AM) quaddy very hot la... don't think can reach 4ghz... somemore fsb wall quite low and the voltage for that speed need to be high... from q6600 to q9450 there is a overall 10-20% increase in performance due to the large system cache... no actually the 45nm procs stand a very high chance to touching 4ghz given the smaller dieAdded on April 7, 2008, 11:01 amshit... bad news... q9450 out of stock in malaysia... have to wait for a while... dang... |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Apr 7 2008, 07:32 PM) but u risk damaging from overvolting ur proc... well looking at the mad voltage you pumped on your E8400, i'd say for a short period its fine  besides, who would run 4ghz everyday? even those jokers with the QX9650 dont do 4ghz daily. irenic, what are your temps with your E8400? since your on WC, wanna get a rough idea |
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 07:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Apr 7 2008, 07:46 PM) heh ... 4ghz daily on e8400 is okay la... with C1E and EIST enabled won't be that bad... was referring to your staggering 1.7XX V for 4.725GHZ same thing applies ma your overvolt was temp, not for the long run |
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 08:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ Apr 7 2008, 07:32 PM) but u risk damaging from overvolting ur proc... QUOTE quaddy very hot la... don't think can reach 4ghz... somemore fsb wall quite low and the voltage for that speed need to be high... from q6600 to q9450 there is a overall 10-20% increase in performance due to the large system cache... yeah thats why we come back to this post when you said that haha.im trying to prove my point quaddies can touch 4ghz given the smaller die and what not. yes you risk overvolting you proc, but we do it for such a short while ma |
|
|
Apr 8 2008, 11:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(Sanko @ Apr 8 2008, 11:26 PM) 1st Try, Clock and Run seems like the E8400 runs pretty hot.what hsf are you on? |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 08:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
haha really?
sorry i guess im using a very bad comparison shucks, im wondering how an E8400 will perform under watercooling. |
|
|
Apr 9 2008, 11:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(Sanko @ Apr 9 2008, 10:55 PM) Not really. From my understanding the hotter the proc is the higher clocking potential it has. Only if you can control the heat well. Correct me if i'm wrong. haha seems like you're applying the 2900XT concept here its true, but sadly the efficiency is less |
|
|
Apr 12 2008, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Apr 12 2008, 03:03 PM) just go ahead.... ive been running 1.387v 24/7 @ 500x8 with no sign of degradation after a retest in two weeks time woah thats a little on the high side for 45nm though.but ah well, as long as you are within intel's reccomendation of 1.45V max |
|
|
|
|
|
May 10 2008, 09:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ May 9 2008, 02:08 PM) lol... x48 doesn't support ddr2 ?... besides, the DDr3 price coming down liao good luck my future board fight hard...  |
|
|
May 23 2008, 09:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ May 23 2008, 09:06 PM) why q9550?... its more expensive leh for +0.5 multi.. now q9450 is priced at RM1200... price drop how much and how soon?  im eager to get 1...  Q3 2008 |
|
|
May 23 2008, 11:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ May 23 2008, 10:18 PM) huh? the price going down in q3?... but currently q9450 priced at RM1200 and q9550 priced at RM1900+... RM700+ for .5 multiplier... you asked when its going down its in Q3 2008 |
|
|
May 27 2008, 01:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ May 27 2008, 01:03 PM) maybe 3.6ghz with ifx-14 and 4ghz with wc.. if it doesnt hit fsb wall.. the safe spot is actually 3.8 for both WC and air.its kinda weird cause the cooling does not impact it as much as it did on the 65nm |
|
|
May 27 2008, 07:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(clawhammer @ May 27 2008, 02:14 PM) I think it's due to the faulty thermal sensor. My chip idles at 44C irregardless whatever speed or voltage im not sure whether it is faulty or not but i guess its time for a new IR sensor!QUOTE(IcEMoCHa @ May 27 2008, 02:35 PM) kinda.. but at 3.6 the temperature is quite high with air cooling.. well actually if you notice the temp diff between the two speeds are not that significant and its probably due to the fact you dont have to pump up that much voltage for that small bumpwell, atleast that's what i see on XS as of now |
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 11:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
im still waiting for 4ghz over here.
mine is still not here yet haih |
|
|
Jul 13 2008, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
VIP
4,809 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
asus formula 2 i suppose
apparently, the people at XS are mad over it |
| Change to: |  0.0294sec
 0.26
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 10:50 AM |
Quote