Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

113 Pages « < 44 45 46 47 48 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Intel® Core™2 Duo/Quad Overhauled Rev. 4, The journey continues...

views
     
Alienwarez
post Sep 10 2008, 11:26 PM

Protégé
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: May 2008
1:1 is better than others...
coolice
post Sep 10 2008, 11:35 PM

Team OCD!
******
Senior Member
1,857 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: ocdrift.com


QUOTE(Alienwarez @ Sep 10 2008, 11:26 PM)
1:1 is better than others...
*
not always
uzairi
post Sep 10 2008, 11:43 PM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned



QUOTE(hvaly @ Sep 10 2008, 11:08 PM)
so is that true that 1:1 is better than 2:3 ratio ? any logic behind it ?
is it necessary that i change to 667Mhz ? coz it seem that my pc running smoothly now  rclxub.gif  whistling.gif
*
Your pc running smoothly bcoz u oced the proc already, and better if you use 1:1. You can do some benches for the mem bench for other divider and see which one gives more bandwidth.
hvaly
post Sep 10 2008, 11:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(uzairi @ Sep 10 2008, 11:43 PM)
Your pc running smoothly bcoz u oced the proc already, and better if you use 1:1. You can do some benches for the mem bench for other divider and see which one gives more bandwidth.
*
i failed to set my memory back to 667Mhz(DDR2) , it will unable to logon windows zzz

abit confusing here....
so the DRAM:FSB ratio is still 3:2, or 500Mhz:333Mhz .. seem like the ram is faster than the cpu. Do i need to oc my proc to 500*9 ? XD
tkh_1001
post Sep 11 2008, 12:01 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



nonit la bro...

ur e6600 fsb is 1066 ma...

then u set ur ram to 533 ma run at 1:1 liao lo...
hvaly
post Sep 11 2008, 10:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Sep 11 2008, 12:01 AM)
nonit la bro...

ur e6600 fsb is 1066 ma...

then u set ur ram to 533 ma run at 1:1 liao lo...
*
no la. .. now my rated FSB is 1333 according to CPu-z ...
and duno y, my DRAM frequency set to AUTO at BIOS now, it is better bechmark compared to what is manually set to 800Mhz previously
Alienwarez
post Sep 11 2008, 05:08 PM

Protégé
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(coolice @ Sep 10 2008, 11:35 PM)
not always
*
can u explain,which situation dont need 1:1....i'm still learning to oc...newbie here.hope otai like u can explain.. notworthy.gif notworthy.gif
DaRkSyThE
post Sep 11 2008, 08:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
4,809 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



QUOTE(Alienwarez @ Sep 11 2008, 05:08 PM)
can u explain,which situation dont need 1:1....i'm still learning to oc...newbie here.hope otai like u can explain.. notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
he just means that sometimes, 1:1 isnt the way to go.
like lets say your rams arent that good, you need something to bump it up.
or if you wanna run your rams at a higher speed, but you want your fsb to be lower.
xixo_12
post Sep 16 2008, 09:17 PM

i!Retired!i
*******
Senior Member
7,318 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Pulau Sipadan

QUOTE(Alienwarez @ Sep 11 2008, 05:08 PM)
can u explain,which situation dont need 1:1....i'm still learning to oc...newbie here.hope otai like u can explain.. notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
u dun need to run 1:1 when u ram cant cope with the speed same like FSB.. e.g, when u use super duper value ram that cant overclock well above 400mhz, but u want to run ur FSB higher than that.. then no need to do it..
i juz give example, but most DDR2 now can clock above 400mhz wub.gif

This post has been edited by xixo_12: Sep 16 2008, 09:17 PM
Alienwarez
post Sep 17 2008, 01:26 AM

Protégé
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: May 2008
ooo...thank you for explain...btw,1:1 is the best rite...
xixo_12
post Sep 17 2008, 10:14 AM

i!Retired!i
*******
Senior Member
7,318 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Pulau Sipadan

rclxub.gif u still didnt get what we say.. maybe laugh.gif
Alienwarez
post Sep 17 2008, 10:32 AM

Protégé
****
Senior Member
546 posts

Joined: May 2008
haiyya..so no problem la if not get 1:1?
-pWs-
post Sep 17 2008, 11:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


It depends on your preference and ram capabilities.

Preference
If let say you only use 400 (FSB), your ram will run @ 800MHz 1:1.
From here, if you want to overclock ram, you can use other divider.

Ram Capabilities
If you use 500(FSB), your ram will run @ 1000MHz++ on 333/800
Now, most of the ram can run more than 1000MHz. But if take for example, the ram cannot run more than 1000MHz. So you will forced to use 1:1 to lower down the ram speed.

-pWs-


phunkydude
post Sep 17 2008, 01:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



and and...

if ur cpu is 1066,
when u run @ stock -> 266fsb
if u run 1:1 , ur ram runs ddr533
if u run 2:3 , ur ram runs ddr800

for above 2 case, (provided ram timings stay constant)
run @ 2:3 , gives u more bandwidth on ram's read & copy as well as lower latency
though fyi the write bottlenecks by nb, so it didn't increase proportionately with others.

Unwind
post Sep 19 2008, 12:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
Hey im kinda nub in this forum, looking forward of upgrading my cpu to the Q9550, anyone can supply the stats.. notworthy.gif Thanks =)
mfcm
post Sep 19 2008, 12:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,765 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: **Hornbills**



QUOTE(Unwind @ Sep 19 2008, 12:17 AM)
Hey im kinda nub in this forum, looking forward of upgrading my cpu to the Q9550, anyone can supply the stats..  notworthy.gif Thanks =)
*
u lookin bout wat bro? hmm.gif
tkh_1001
post Sep 19 2008, 12:50 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,547 posts

Joined: Oct 2007



i think he is looking for review.... btw, here are some reviews for q9550 thumbup.gif

http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/view....2521&cid=2&pg=1

http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,657976/...eviewed/?page=1

This post has been edited by tkh_1001: Sep 19 2008, 12:50 AM
kelvin_hata
post Sep 20 2008, 02:43 AM

V.S.O.P
*******
Senior Member
2,696 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Butterworth,Penang Status: Available

hmmm.. sorry is out of topic here..

jus bought a new server.


2.83ghz, 1x quad xeon, 24gb ram 1tb 10k sas hdd, dual 1100w redundent psu.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
uzairi
post Sep 20 2008, 04:56 AM

Team almostthere
*******
Senior Member
6,744 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: World Wide Web Status: Banned



Wow, one hell of a rig.. 24gb ram ? ohmy.gif
IcEMoCHa
post Sep 20 2008, 04:40 PM

~本田~
******
Senior Member
1,988 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



QUOTE(uzairi @ Sep 20 2008, 04:56 AM)
Wow, one hell of a rig.. 24gb ram ? ohmy.gif
*
its a server... sweat.gif

113 Pages « < 44 45 46 47 48 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0197sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 01:50 AM