QUOTE(sonyman @ Dec 28 2011, 08:52 AM)
these numbers are combined? they look quite ok. u can take vw numbers as a bench mark, but some will say it is not fair. but i feel it is how a company makes the engine. merc e class coming soon with hybrid is about 4.9 or so L/km. for those who ask lower or higher better, this one lower better.nissan on sylphy uses km/L another way of calculating, so with this avante shoulkd get about 13 to 15km / L i assume. in fact the more the better.
'Extra urban'. Before someone say I am using Chinaman's term.
QUOTE(kulatkia @ Dec 28 2011, 09:51 AM)
I guess this 6.7/100km(1.6 Auto) was quote by Hunydai manufacturer and no surprise is only the same wat Kia quote their Forte as 6.6 litre/100km(1.6 Auto). but when come to real life everything should expect slightly higher. Personal thought i just wish Elantra can have lower FC as compare to Forte so that i have to kick out my consideration on forte

I have not yet test driven the Elantra before, but from past experience I am able to get 20% more fuel efficiency out of the Sonata and Tucson, I am quite confident I am able to do the same with the Elantra.
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Dec 28 2011, 10:34 AM)
Isnt re-education the key word in your Korean car world? Why follow a customer's whims when its clearly the wrong way? Re-education doesnt happen overnight the same way you cant expect people to suddenly jump over to Korean makes despite its better looks and specs. This will take time. But if you give up after the first few tries then whats the point? Those customers of yours are used to the WRONG system of measuring FC as many ppl are. The same with the full tank issue. But slowly you can educate them and they in turn will educate others and within a few years you'll get many ppl on the same page. But going back on your efforts and stating sen/KM will only take that re-education process back another 5 years. Stop doing it.Besides, are those FC rates for combined driving or 100% highway drives? It looks like 100% highway drives. If its for combined i would find that very hard to believe. Just for comparison, the 2003 model Vios (which is known for its good FC) only gets 6.5L/100km for 100% highway drives.

Combined, or should I say, extra urban?
The thing about re-education is, you need to apply old knowledge to your 'reeducation'. Forcing people to accept a new thinking without adapting them to their current state of mind is called brainwashing. Before you say I am using the wrong system, you should check back a few pages where I posted a picture of me driving the Tucson at 8.8L/100km. That is the same picture I show to my real life customer whenever the questions of fuel efficiency comes up, they'll then ask how much is that in term of cent/km which I'll then tell.
No point using terms that will only confuse customers, even though it the 'correct' way of saying it.
Same for fuel tank, I always answer in litres, then in $ term if they asked, and I don't go all technical Nazi telling my customer that he or she must use litre capacity and not how much per full tank.
You guys are sure fast to jump to the conclusion that I used the wrong term

. I've always used L/100km since... Forever? Same goes for English, if your friend is not fluent in english, do you expect him to speak a perfect sentence before you accept his words?