O, nvm ts wants money only. but i think it is ok for her rich husband to spanaring other girls without her knowledge

They love money not the guy ...

"having standards" + "getting a life" = "social dominance"

You may have used different words, but it still means the same thing..

In the modern world, "getting a life" and "having standards" is difficult too achieve without money

Nice way you've got for conforming new ideas to your beliefs, Ezra.

many ppl will think that most pretty girls dont have good personality, materialistic la.. in fact, it doesnt mean that ugly or less pretty girls are surely better.. some their heart is ugly as their face. no offence here, just based on some ppl i know

Ok how bout this
U get a very good (and rich) husband, u got lots of money, ur husband care bout u and ur money income are stable (and high),
is ur life happy then?
Girls are money minded, theres nothing to be proud of
Human are money minded because everyone need to live, theres nothing special to open a thread to discuss bout it
cause its like u trying to discuss bout "human need food to survive?"
And does it matter when an individual need lots of food or lesser food?

Ok another thing is,
if thinking that money minded is something to proud of,
just imagine one thing, now u got infinite amount of money,
how are u going to be happy with it?
Me guess....get this&that,eat this/that,enjoy tis/that....
But how long all this will last?
Till die u have no regret?
Think again ROFL

How would it be different if I had no money? Are you saying if I had no money I wont have regrets?

Same a normal except I would be able to afford anything I want.

chill ppl who replied on my long post which hurts your eyes.

what i am trying to say is, everyone of us here is different.
whether one is successful or not, is based on their own mindset n all.
of cuz no one wants to be with one who is lazy + bad attitude + no money, this person is totally hopeless unless he/she wants to change.

what im saying is, we cannot judge the whole society. whether one has money or not, or if she is pretty or not, is based on their will and the spirit to work it for the best.

girls are money minded. so what? if we were to say that girls are all money minded, girls with brains will get the most guys.
girls with brains are those who work hard to be pretty and all, get it?
there is no ugly woman, only lazy ones.

Women who behave like whores will be treated like whores - used for pleasure, then tossed away.

You say lots of big things, but there are plenty of words you used that show you have not understood anything. Just because you have set your own standards, and your own life, doesn't mean you're socially dominant. It just means you're being who you are. Some people want to be the beta male instead of the alpha. Some guys want women to take care of them rather than the other way around. You do not understand this at all... and I think you don't understand what you write as well.

Look at the words you use to describe things. "settle for less", "can do better", "willing to go out with me", etc. All these phrases carry a negative connotation and still place the qualifier externally rather than coming from within. In time I hope you can understand this.

wait a sec...
"having standards" and "getting a life" could mean different things to different people.

Im not going to argue on that, I'll leave it to the readers to think about it.

I think it's important is that we do not get caught up in semantics.

Just for the record: I have never claimed to be anything. I believe that just like one cannot claim to be beautiful/handsome/attractive, I believe that a guy cannot claim to be socially dominant - for that is for others to judge.

Regarding the bolded part, please do read in context. Anyway, assuming the most negative connotations of the phrases:

What i I were to rephrase (still carrying the same meaning) the sentence. Im also going to make it gender neutral (non-sexist).

"Everybody wants the most attractive compatible partner possible. If one thinks that he/she has not reached his/her full potential for attracting a partner, then he/she has all the right to strive and do better in the game of love - for by doing so will make more attractive partners available to him/her."

This happens all around us. Guys strive to be successful and thrive in life - becoming good providers. Girls strive to thrive and look their best (cosmetics and clothes are big industries!) - proving themselves worthy to guys (subconsciously) as potential partners.



Btw, regarding green bolded quote: If that is really your definition of "having standards" and "getting a life", then it really runs contrary to the title of your thread "how to get the girl that you want". Because often people cant get the girl they want because THEIR STANDARDS ARE TOO HIGH or they dont have the means (physical/material/emotional/social) to "get a life".

I understand those phrases with the connotation that it involves somehow raising one's standards and setting the bar higher: eg to "get the girl that you want".


This post has been edited by ezralimm: Apr 30 2009, 10:42 PM

I did not mention that but i did not mean that at the same time
And im replying to ts title, money minded is the middle thing, not the final thing, so i ask if get money adi, and then?
not talking bout got money & no money will have regret or not

edit: nothing

---

Added on April 30, 2009, 10:34 pmActually u two also got the point, but it always up to ppl how to think
so no need to argue bout which right and wrong there


This post has been edited by anti-informatic: Apr 30 2009, 10:34 PM

when you get money edi then mission accomplish ... like people get thomas gold cup, they happy achieve their dream.

wah so long the story still haven't ended, 41 pages until I also lazy to argue with everyone.

like that also can...?

but in relationship is different unless that guys is damn loaded should be no problem geh...

Please don't think that guys provide money is a very big deal, this is just a very basic that guys need to do!

Exactly, it means different things to different people


Normally, no, but in this case the semantics are important because it reveals the underlying mentality.


You still don't understand

There is no contradiction, you just don't understand it. Its all explained in my topic, I don't think I need to repeat the points here. Perhaps it might help you understand if you threw away all the stuff you've learnt and start fresh. As Mr. Poonani pointed out to you earlier, you're taking new ideas and fitting them into your little box. Free yourself from that box, and you might understand.


A forum without a discussion or debate is boring

And the very basic you can do is..?

I can make your wildest dream come true, elevating you to godhood, when you soak your head down between the valley of my twin peaks, squeezing and bouncing the mammaries off your eyeballs, titillating your oral sensories to the next spiritual plane, while extracting your manhood out into my Cave of Enlightenment, thereby joining our body in one unison, gyrating our pelvis in the same frequency, squirting the heavenly excrements of my feminine body into your lips, tasting heaven and engulfed in womanly embrace of love and joy, making you vibrate violently in when you reach the Climax of Millennium, dispensing your excretion into my Cave to form a union of two flesh into one, sharing fluids of love in heavenly embrace.


Does this answer your question, sayang?

Without woman, all men will be gay.

You're definitely a tranny.

This is seriously disgusting prose.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: May 1 2009, 05:19 AM