From the topic http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/967243 it made me think deep why are girl money minded.

Thousands of years ago, money do not exist, girl will choose their partner base on security, they look for well built male who can protect them from wild animals and wild man or whatever wild things,they're vulnerable when they;re pregnant, and the years when they need to raise children. This has been genetic in female.

Fast forward to today, we no longer require mr. muscle to protect us, security took a new meaning, security = money. So girl will marry a guy when he is rich and this is why the quote ada wang ada amoi.

So girls, be proud when you choose a rich husband, and to those girl who insist love is more important, they're just immature and the mother instinct not kick in yet, after few years of marriage they'll regret of their choice.

to avoid repeating myself 1000X

I'm not saying choose money but no love, no romance, your husband only love you for sex, and so on, I'm saying you hv a normal couple life just that your husband is rich.

I'm not saying when he is rich you flaunt his wealth and spend lavishly, as pointed up there, the intention is SECURITY.

I'm not saying aim for DATUK!

The purpose of the wealth is SECURITY, so you can have children with him and knowing he is capable.

This post has been edited by moorish: Oct 7 2009, 09:32 AM

There is another side of the story, thousands of years ago, male are like dogs(they still are) , they will do who ever they can, this has been in male genetic, male can do 365 girls a year, but girl can only afford to do 1 time with guy a year, meaning girls will get pregnant.

So male do not need to think much to do a girl, whereelse girl need to think a lot before letting him do, so back to the male problem, how many male will stay loyal throughout marriage?

The male instinct has always been on the hunt, in modern times male find it a huge challenge to stay loyal and faithful, its like a joke god put on them, their eyes will keep scanning and temptation will be an everyday issue, bcoz girls are made to attract guy thats why girl shops and dressed up.

So back to topic, male will stray at least one time after marriage be it chicken or mistress. And they think its an acceptable tolerance when girls who stray once are classified as sluts.

So to girls who choose on love.... wait till you grow up, its always wiser like our ancestor has put the genetic on our blood, go for security!

To girls, money is a great temptation.
To guy, pretty sexy girls are great temptation.

Prostitute dont love you la.

you guys still dun get it la:

100 thousand years ago girls would be cracking their head with I love A, but he is so short and skinny and always get sick cannot hunt for food and B is tall and strong and will be able to hunt and protect me and the children.

2009: I love A but he is poor, but B is rich and can provide security (money)

no la, but if you're poor and you manage to get a pretty girl, then its like a time bomb la, coz so many rich guys will chase her. Its only a matter of time she run off.

You're 13 year old kid...wait till you grow up and you'll know what is ada wang ada amoi.

why do you think rich ppl get all the chicks?
why do you think actress and modals, beautiful singers, beautiful celebrities all married rich dude?

---

Added on March 18, 2009, 7:42 pmi'm not saying love do not exist, i'm only saying girl who goes for money is not as bad as guys portrait them to be...its in their instinct

This post has been edited by moorish: Mar 18 2009, 07:42 PM

wait...if you read post #1, i was refering to the other thread, the girl was confuse to choose A or B, I was not encouraging girls to be a rich mans slut. Some guys says if she choosed A they would feel she is not worth it of respect and degrading her like some kinda slut.

What I'm saying is modern girls replaces security with money bcoz this world are fueled by money. And why I was saying if the girl who chooses love if she was given a choice with a rich guy who loves her is immature:

You're not thinking of your future, worse you allow your children to suffer just bcoz of your impulses on love. Love grows thinner in most cases.

2nd, Rich dude chances of having mistress is high, but poor dude 2 timing is equally high, poor dude cannot afford to have mistress and not because they're more loyal.

Guys are guys, you think rich guys are freak? and poor guys are saint?
why do we see chicken with so many price and standard? Some cater for poorer dude and rich guys go for higher class, its just that simple,

so if you choose and suffer with the poor dude, your chances of heart breaking is equal for the 2. But if you pick the rich guy, he may keep his mistress and still provide for you and the children.

If marriage I would pick A
If pak toh I would choose B.

But what I'm trying to emphasize is, its not shameful or social b**** if I were to pick A, I'm only thinking of security. But guys in there kept saying the rich fella will not be faithful la, blah blah, so are they trying to say

guys earring below 4K are very faithful and loyal?
Guys earning below 4K cannot afford to have a mistress and not bcoz they dun want to have a mistress.
Guys earning below 4k are as potential heart breaker as a rich guy.

---

Added on March 18, 2009, 8:31 pmguys earring below 4K are very faithful and loyal?
Guys earning below 4K cannot afford to have a mistress and not bcoz they dun want to have a mistress.
Guys earning below 4k are as potential heart breaker as a rich guy.

Are you saying poor guys are loyal and a saint?

This post has been edited by moorish: Mar 18 2009, 08:32 PM

nope...I'm not a b****. You're not getting my point, and you're not believing what I'm saying. Security takes up 60% of a womans decision when comes to choosing husband. And its perfectly normal.

The thread is about,
Both guys love you, one is rich and one is not. which do you choose to marry.

I'm not talking about those girls that goes after rich dude

you said this bcoz you've never had the opportunity.

And you actually believe that poor guys are all faithful and saint?
These girls wanna marry the poor dude and pray hard he become rich one day, but earlier they say the rich one is unfaithful.
So why take the unknown route?
you duno if your husband will ever be rich
but you do know that if one day he is rich he will have a mistress like your earlier prospect?

self advertisement? or lack of opportunity?

I've seen plenty of poor family where the wife have to work and in the end find out the husband is 2 timing, she come crying to me and duno what to do, I've also seen rich woman find out their husband keeping mistress.

You see in both scenerio the wifes heart is crushed, but the rich woman can still enjoy splashing the husbands money in revenge, and strange thing is these guys all dun jump ship, they will continue to provide.

Exactly what I'm trying to say, these guys are just talking about the extreme.

correction, the lack of money is the real devil,
poor people rob
poor people kidnap

Yes I can see you're person who speak of the real world, and not some kid still dreaming of their fairytale white knight on a horse back taking them to happily ever after.

yup.

This post has been edited by moorish: Mar 19 2009, 09:44 AM

what logic? the girl had 2 guys after her.

its not about girl blindly hunt for rich man, pls read first post

thats why i said security should be one of the important factor when choosing a husband

yup, you know how the real world is coz you personally have divorcee frens, but these kids still in fantasy land.

I'm not implying every female should be like this, I'm saying if female put security as high assessment on thier would be husband, there is nothing wrong with the decision (provided they qualify with a rich guy hot on their trail).

Same like if you're guy and there r 2 woman crazily in love wit you, 1 wild super sexy and beautiful, another just normal ah lian but very religious, there is nothing wrong if you choose beauty over character.

my long term would be over 5 years, this is when love starts to cool down and reality kicks in, this is when finance plays a part in the rship.

her husband play around she still have a datin title under her belt and tons of money to splash around.

If you marry a poor dude and all your hope is on his misearable EPF, then one day when its time to take the loot opps the retired saving you realize he gave the cash to some prc!!!!

I've known plenty of poorer husband still play around, why do all those cheaper karaaoke and chicken farm existing?

nothing can assure a secure family, money is only a complimentary... but no money can lead to family disharmony.

ask your self this...what is the odd of a normal RM3000/mth salary guy at hitting on a super sexy chick?