QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
This does not make sense.
You could also say, the chances for true love to blossom are equal whether or not one is left-handed or right-handed, so why not take your chances with the right-handed ones?
And if that falls into someone's criteria when choosing a soulmate, you cant exactly say he/she is wrong can you?
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
The chances for true love to blossom are equal whether or not one is short or tall, so why not take your chances with the tall ones?
See, you agreed.

QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
The chances for true love to blossom are equal whether or not one is Asian or Western, so why not take your chances with the Western ones?
Ofcoz, but will the westerners choose you?
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
If you choose to narrow your prospects so, you are expressing a bias. You are saying that you cannot look beyond your biases to love a person who does not meet them. You are being superficial.
All attractions work on a superficial level. Exceptions do happen. But exceptions are rare. And when they happen, obviously one would be powerless to uphold their so-called 'standards'.
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
But when your bias is for money, there's another word for it. It's called greed. You see, to be superficial is to be immature. You can grow out of it, or you can let the world knock some sense into you.
Now you are being generalised here. To imply that those who are bias towards money are greedy imply that ALL rich and successful are greedy. $$ = success. And success is attractive. Immaturity = generalization.
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Oct 6 2009, 04:23 PM)
But greed is ingrained. Greed is a
lot harder to get rid of. Greedy people are a lot less likely to change.
False in more ways that you can imagine.