Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

43 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LOTR & Hobbit Movies Thread, NOW: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

views
     
maranello55
post Dec 19 2012, 08:46 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 06:07 PM)
how would i know? you're the one who read the book LOL
*
u d one said its draggy....and tell one part too long....which one?
soitsuagain
post Dec 19 2012, 10:06 PM

Let's do it together!
*******
Senior Member
3,804 posts

Joined: Mar 2007


QUOTE(khairullz @ Dec 19 2012, 07:12 PM)
just got back from gsc garden

yes, THX + 48fps,

sound quality is superb, can hear everything with good clarity and punchy bass

but the fluidity 48fps made the movie less enjoyment, like watching cartoon, and it made the movie not as serious as the scene should be.

and the storyline maybe is not my type, didnt like it, fall asleep few times.

great movie, but feeling i waste my money for this

no more 48fps for me
*
then don't watch movies at 1080p because it is too clear like they are talking to you doh.gif
tonYe
post Dec 19 2012, 10:54 PM

Game Designer
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(maranello55 @ Dec 19 2012, 08:46 PM)
u d one said its draggy....and tell one part too long....which one?
*
The first half. All that talking without thorough explanation. Two of the biggest questions I have is... why can't Gandalf get the birds to fetch them all the way to the destination from the beginning? Why does he use Bilbo's house as meeting point without his consent? He also disappears for no reason and predictably appears at the right time. Why doesn't he use his magic as much as he obviously needed to anyway? Also, what is with the rocks that started fighting each other? Seems like this movie is made purely for the fans of the book. Still good to watch, given that I was ignoring these gaps.
memphiz_zero88
post Dec 19 2012, 11:10 PM

My stars has gone. T_T
Group Icon
Staff
2,255 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: meditating at Mt Emei
QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 10:54 PM)
why can't Gandalf get the birds to fetch them all the way to the destination from the beginning?
*
doh.gif doh.gif sweat.gif
axoloke
post Dec 19 2012, 11:14 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pearl Of The Orient


QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 10:54 PM)
The first half. All that talking without thorough explanation. Two of the biggest questions I have is... why can't Gandalf get the birds to fetch them all the way to the destination from the beginning? Why does he use Bilbo's house as meeting point without his consent? He also disappears for no reason and predictably appears at the right time. Why doesn't he use his magic as much as he obviously needed to anyway? Also, what is with the rocks that started fighting each other? Seems like this movie is made purely for the fans of the book. Still good to watch, given that I was ignoring these gaps.
*
The Eagles are not "taxis"...this is one part I wish PJ had elaborated on in LOTR and now in the Hobbit. They are intelligent and even have a king of their own. But they also don't interfere if possible with the goings of the world. I agree that PJ didn't flesh out this aspect properly.

As for the other questions, CNN covers some of it smile.gif

http://us.cnn.com/2012/12/18/showbiz/movie...html?hpt=hp_bn9


Added on December 19, 2012, 11:15 pm
QUOTE(shootkk @ Dec 19 2012, 03:58 PM)
Yes. This movie is made for the fans. Peter Jackson's fans to be precise. Tolkien fans? Not so much.
*
Well...a bit of both I would say tongue.gif

This post has been edited by axoloke: Dec 19 2012, 11:15 PM
tonYe
post Dec 19 2012, 11:52 PM

Game Designer
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(memphiz_zero88 @ Dec 19 2012, 11:10 PM)
doh.gif  doh.gif  sweat.gif
*
sorry for the spoiler.

QUOTE(axoloke @ Dec 19 2012, 11:14 PM)
The Eagles are not "taxis"...this is one part I wish PJ had elaborated on in LOTR and now in the Hobbit. They are intelligent and even have a king of their own. But they also don't interfere if possible with the goings of the world. I agree that PJ didn't flesh out this aspect properly.

As for the other questions, CNN covers some of it smile.gif

http://us.cnn.com/2012/12/18/showbiz/movie...html?hpt=hp_bn9


Added on December 19, 2012, 11:15 pm

Well...a bit of both I would say  tongue.gif
*
They don't interfere until Gandalf asks them to? Then still, why not send them closer to the destination? They did, after all, interfered and save their useless arses from danger. Thanks for clarifying a bit anyway. The non-fan viewers shouldn't have to go looking for answers. A 164-minute film really should explain it all, not to mention making a trilogy out of a single book (which I heard is like less than a hundred pages?).
memphiz_zero88
post Dec 19 2012, 11:59 PM

My stars has gone. T_T
Group Icon
Staff
2,255 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: meditating at Mt Emei
QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 11:52 PM)
sorry for the spoiler.
They don't interfere until Gandalf asks them to? Then still, why not send them closer to the destination? They did, after all, interfered and save their useless arses from danger. Thanks for clarifying a bit anyway. The non-fan viewers shouldn't have to go looking for answers. A 164-minute film really should explain it all, not to mention making a trilogy out of a single book (which I heard is like less than a hundred pages?).
*
not the spoiler.

like axoloke said, the eagles are not "taxis". i dunno how to explain, but the king of eagles owe gandalf about something. in exchange, gandalf can call them for help when needed. need someone to fix this for me sweat.gif

This post has been edited by memphiz_zero88: Dec 20 2012, 12:01 AM
maranello55
post Dec 20 2012, 12:36 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 10:54 PM)
The first half. All that talking without thorough explanation. Two of the biggest questions I have is... why can't Gandalf get the birds to fetch them all the way to the destination from the beginning? Why does he use Bilbo's house as meeting point without his consent? He also disappears for no reason and predictably appears at the right time. Why doesn't he use his magic as much as he obviously needed to anyway? Also, what is with the rocks that started fighting each other? Seems like this movie is made purely for the fans of the book. Still good to watch, given that I was ignoring these gaps.
*
obviously ure not a fan laugh.gif

u want thorough explaination yet u complain abt drag? laugh.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by maranello55: Dec 20 2012, 12:40 AM
tonYe
post Dec 20 2012, 01:33 AM

Game Designer
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(maranello55 @ Dec 20 2012, 12:36 AM)
obviously ure not a fan  laugh.gif

u want thorough explaination yet u complain abt drag?  laugh.gif  doh.gif
*
It's draggy even without thorough explanation, that's what I'm complaining. If this movie was made for fans like you only, then they should've said so on their poster and trailers so that people like me would understand and try to enjoy the film without knowing the heck is going on. But no, so I'll just take it as it's not done well enough.
khairullz
post Dec 20 2012, 07:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(soitsuagain @ Dec 19 2012, 10:06 PM)
then don't watch movies at 1080p because it is too clear like they are talking to you  doh.gif
*
it is not a normal 1080p, i already suit with 1080p hd, but 48fps is similar to 1080p + 200hz LED tv, too fluid and look cartoonish...

well..it is a good technology, but not for me at least for this time around, not yet... just my humble point of view smile.gif

shinjite
post Dec 20 2012, 08:36 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,320 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Well HFR 48fps, some may love it, some may dislike it

Personally, I haven't experience it yet, will do so soon smile.gif
shootkk
post Dec 20 2012, 09:05 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 11:52 PM)
sorry for the spoiler.
They don't interfere until Gandalf asks them to? Then still, why not send them closer to the destination? They did, after all, interfered and save their useless arses from danger. Thanks for clarifying a bit anyway. The non-fan viewers shouldn't have to go looking for answers. A 164-minute film really should explain it all, not to mention making a trilogy out of a single book (which I heard is like less than a hundred pages?).
*
The real reason for the apparently stupid move done by the giant eagles is because Jackson did not follow Tolkien's version of how it happened in The Hobbit.

In the book, the eagles were NOT summoned. Gandalf did not summon them. They were just flying by when they saw the fire below and investigated. When they saw that goblins are harassing the party, they decided to help because they had no love for goblins. So they swooped down, picked the party up and dropped them just out of the goblin's reaches. It was done more to spite the goblins than anything.

And yes, they were intelligent and could talk in the book but Jackson never told his audience that. It kinda made sense in the book. Although I must say that it was a good idea to have the eagles fly them all the way. Save all the trouble. Haha. And you're not the first one to bring up this question. There were some who asked in LOTR why not just have the eagles fly Frodo to Mt. Doom so he could just chuck the ring in. It would have been a very short story if that had happened.
defaultname365
post Dec 20 2012, 09:16 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
The eagles were summoned by using butterfly/moth. They should have kept some in a jar. tongue.gif Seeing this again on Sunday night, in HFR3D.


shootkk
post Dec 20 2012, 09:57 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Now that someone brought it up... I kinda wondered how fast the moth could fly!!

In LOTR it made some sense as the eagle did not arrive to save Gandalf from Saruman's tower until quite some time had passed.

In The Hobbit, it seemed like the moth could do supersonic speed and alerted the eagles and had them come to the rescue in just a few minutes.

Taking into consideration that it tool some time for the eagles to get to where Gandalf and company were, that moth could have been flying faster than our modern jets could!!
maranello55
post Dec 20 2012, 10:03 AM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 20 2012, 01:33 AM)
It's draggy even without thorough explanation, that's what I'm complaining. If this movie was made for fans like you only, then they should've said so on their poster and trailers so that people like me would understand and try to enjoy the film without knowing the heck is going on. But no, so I'll just take it as it's not done well enough.
*
funny that most of my frens are not fans....but they enjoyed the movie and everything is understood, without 'thorough explaination'. PJ done well there.
defaultname365
post Dec 20 2012, 10:26 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(shootkk @ Dec 20 2012, 09:57 AM)
Now that someone brought it up... I kinda wondered how fast the moth could fly!!

In LOTR it made some sense as the eagle did not arrive to save Gandalf from Saruman's tower until quite some time had passed.

In The Hobbit, it seemed like the moth could do supersonic speed and alerted the eagles and had them come to the rescue in just a few minutes.

Taking into consideration that it tool some time for the eagles to get to where Gandalf and company were, that moth could have been flying faster than our modern jets could!!
*
Science/logic in a fantasy film with wizard, elves and dwarfs? Ok then, an interesting fact is that a male emperor moth can detect a female about 6 miles (11 km) away. Moths have an extraordinary sensory detection so yeah, word could travel fast I suppose in Middle-Earth, no idea if it can work both ways but just an interesting fact. Zzzz...
shootkk
post Dec 20 2012, 10:45 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Dec 20 2012, 10:26 AM)
Science/logic in a fantasy film with wizard, elves and dwarfs? Ok then, an interesting fact is that a male emperor moth can detect a female about 6 miles (11 km) away. Moths have an extraordinary sensory detection so yeah, word could travel fast I suppose in Middle-Earth, no idea if it can work both ways but just an interesting fact. Zzzz...
*
Well, I was just wondering. Any kind of story on any kind of media does need some degree of suspension of disbelief on the reader's/viewer's to work but if you go too far, people start complaining. biggrin.gif

Wizards, elves and what-not can exist but the imaginary world still need to abide by some form of logic and that logic needs to be consistent. We can see that Gandalf is a wizard adept at fire and light magic but if he starts to spew laser bolts out from his fingers, people will start to complain.

The moth case is just inconsistent. Not a biggie.
Mov_freak
post Dec 20 2012, 01:29 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Dec 18 2012, 09:05 PM)
Really liked the 48fps, made the 3D a lot better, though I do think it makes your eyes strain more, having to process fake 3D at twice the frequency.
*
Well. Will WONDERS never cease. You and I are agreeing on the same thing!!! biggrin.gif THE WORLD WILL END TOMORROW!! biggrin.gif

I just rewatch The Hobbit yesterday in 48fps 3D and it is a TOTALLY different movie.

The images JUST POPS OUT AT YOU!!

This is the WAY the movie should really be seen.

My Addendum's addendum!! smile.gif
vivienne85
post Dec 20 2012, 01:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
360 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: land of Starlight


QUOTE(tonYe @ Dec 19 2012, 10:54 PM)
The first half. All that talking without thorough explanation. Two of the biggest questions I have is... why can't Gandalf get the birds to fetch them all the way to the destination from the beginning? Why does he use Bilbo's house as meeting point without his consent? He also disappears for no reason and predictably appears at the right time. Why doesn't he use his magic as much as he obviously needed to anyway? Also, what is with the rocks that started fighting each other? Seems like this movie is made purely for the fans of the book. Still good to watch, given that I was ignoring these gaps.
*
the stone giants were in the book and it was not explained in the book why were they fighting rolleyes.gif
axoloke
post Dec 20 2012, 02:06 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pearl Of The Orient


QUOTE(shootkk @ Dec 20 2012, 09:57 AM)
Now that someone brought it up... I kinda wondered how fast the moth could fly!!

In LOTR it made some sense as the eagle did not arrive to save Gandalf from Saruman's tower until quite some time had passed.

In The Hobbit, it seemed like the moth could do supersonic speed and alerted the eagles and had them come to the rescue in just a few minutes.

Taking into consideration that it tool some time for the eagles to get to where Gandalf and company were, that moth could have been flying faster than our modern jets could!!
*
Even the scene in LOTR was not following the book if i remember correctly. Radagast was passing along a message to this particular eagle for Gandalf, and he arrived at Saruman's tower and Gandalf asked him for help. I could be remembering it wrong though, need to consult the books tongue.gif

Meaning again, Gandalf doesn't go around summoning the eagles on a whim rolleyes.gif

43 Pages « < 18 19 20 21 22 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0261sec    0.72    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 02:05 PM