Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LOTR & Hobbit Movies Thread, NOW: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

views
     
khairullz
post Dec 19 2012, 09:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

hi, i see u guys talking about the awesomeness of HFR 48fps the hobbit, but how about the sound?

i'm not sure which one to go, HFR 48fps, imax 3d or thx summit usj,

of coz i prefer superb sound quality with good viewing.

plz help me guys


Added on December 19, 2012, 9:53 amby the way, what is HFR mean? sorry noob

This post has been edited by khairullz: Dec 19 2012, 09:53 AM
khairullz
post Dec 19 2012, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(pkh @ Dec 17 2012, 07:19 PM)
For me, the 48p in Gardens was worth it. For RM32, you get physically excellent seats, no queue, 48p and the best of all, THX. But I do admit the hot dog was abit expensive. RM7 is like a KFC meal.

48p works fantastic during the action sequence. But it kind of dulls down during dialogue session. Maybe it was the camera angle, maybe it was the characters. Not as 'memorable' as the Fellowship. Heck, I can't even name a single dwarf. Ok, ok, The Hobbit was originally meant as a children's book.
*
wow, 48p + THX ??

u serious?

if this true, this gonna be my really awesome
khairullz
post Dec 19 2012, 07:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

just got back from gsc garden

yes, THX + 48fps,

sound quality is superb, can hear everything with good clarity and punchy bass

but the fluidity 48fps made the movie less enjoyment, like watching cartoon, and it made the movie not as serious as the scene should be.

and the storyline maybe is not my type, didnt like it, fall asleep few times.

great movie, but feeling i waste my money for this

no more 48fps for me

This post has been edited by khairullz: Dec 19 2012, 07:13 PM
khairullz
post Dec 20 2012, 07:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(soitsuagain @ Dec 19 2012, 10:06 PM)
then don't watch movies at 1080p because it is too clear like they are talking to you  doh.gif
*
it is not a normal 1080p, i already suit with 1080p hd, but 48fps is similar to 1080p + 200hz LED tv, too fluid and look cartoonish...

well..it is a good technology, but not for me at least for this time around, not yet... just my humble point of view smile.gif

khairullz
post Dec 20 2012, 10:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

guys, now we have HFR 48fps 3D, will we have a HFR 48fps 2D?
khairullz
post Dec 21 2012, 05:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(lyn_grayskale @ Dec 21 2012, 11:31 AM)
I'm sure there will be.. but not looking forward to it.

My 48fps experience at tgv 1u - clear, sharp details, achieves a documentary style look which, for me, badly represents middle-earth - after being so accustomed to the previous trilogy at 24fps.

It was a struggle througout trying to enjoy 'the Hobbit' in HFR... i could tolerate static dialogue close-up scenes - but, as soon as the camera moves - OMG.. giant LED TV screen with motion-flow turned on.. even in 3d, its horrifying.

So, i walked out of halfway, when the dwarves arrive at rivendell - and going to good old imax3d at 24fps tomorrow.
http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2012/12/19/...cinema-magical/
*
respect notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0163sec    0.35    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 06:35 PM