Anyone on 1gbps package with bridged black Dlink managed to get full upload speed of 500mbps? I tested 2 units of bridged black dlink both also ng.
Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V43, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!
Official TM UniFi High Speed Broadband Thread V43, READ 1ST PAGE FOR RELEVANT WIFI INFO!
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,570 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
Anyone on 1gbps package with bridged black Dlink managed to get full upload speed of 500mbps? I tested 2 units of bridged black dlink both also ng.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:22 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#302
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
811 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Kota Kinabalu <-> Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(hsbb @ May 13 2025, 12:14 PM) If bridged dlink use with other router than mikrotik, can get lan 940Mbps? Me either zte onu or bridge mode dlink white or fiberhome HG6145F3, I can get my 800Mbps with SR120-A. same result with Xiaomi Mi Router AX1800 (using openwrt), fiberhome SR1041F, SR120-A and same dllink black model ( i have 2 ) 1 from free plan upgrade and 1 from converting plan to swu the only time i get get full speed is when pair with old zte onu but using dlink black itself connecting to pc can get full speed This post has been edited by syahpian: May 13 2025, 12:30 PM |
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:29 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Jul 2016 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE(syahpian @ May 13 2025, 12:22 PM) same result with Xiaomi Mi Router AX1800 (using openwrt), fiberhome SR1041F, SR120-A and same dllink black model ( i have 2 ) old zte onu + mikrotik speed?1 from free plan upgrade and 1 from converting plan to swu the only 1 i get get full speed is when pair with old zte onu but using dlink black itself connecting to pc can get full speed old zte onu + SR1041F, SR120-A speed? bridge dlink 1 + dlink 2 speed? bridge dlink 2 + dlink 1 speed? countingcrows liked this post
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#306
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
584 posts Joined: May 2013 |
Anyone that is still using Unifi TV plan that got their TV Pack changed automatically by the system?
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#307
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,399 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: /dev/null |
QUOTE(hsbb @ May 13 2025, 09:42 AM) Are u using unifi biz bro? I am just normal Unifi I little bit curious why ur JB friend dialed to TM Ipoh juniper imse01.tsk_tp.re0 where the pppoe client supposed to dial imse01.jhb_*.re0 .. I never doubt if Cameron Highland users dialed to imse01.tsk_tp.re0 🤔 I shipped my NIJIKA Stick V2 (beta) to his address at JB, I didn't check his PPPoE AC location, assume shipping address as is. Thing is, he can use 1500 bytes MTU, No VRRP or VXLAN crap. Many Websites WAF, Server NGFW, DPI mark packet lower than 1492 bytes consider suspicious: 1. Reduced MTU = VPN = Potential Botnet 2. Tunneled/obfuscated traffic 3. Rate Limiting That's is why some server take little longer to connect because NGFW has triggered MTU < 1492 likely a VPN User or VPNfilter exploit (where customer CPE has been hacked, use as VPN Gateway) TL;DR 1. Yes, a broken MTU path—caused by PPPoE over VXLAN without jumbo frame support—can make your client appear suspicious, and that can lead to degraded performance, slow TLS handshakes, or outright blocks. 2. TM and TIME as now didn't expect VRRP and VXLAN overhead cause PPPoE has broken MTU 3. I have tried contacting TM and MCMC, Vendor say broken MTU cause by PPPoE over VXLAN is normal 4. Ask to bring back imse01.mc_rsh-re0 like in year 2020, TM can't do that because all have upgraded to crappy VRRP VXLAN 5. Ask to increase L2MTU to 2000 bytes to match GPON MTU for their VRRP and VXLAN to support RFC4638 compliance, TM can't do that |
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#308
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
811 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Kota Kinabalu <-> Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(hsbb @ May 13 2025, 12:32 PM) old zte onu + mikrotik speed? old zte onu + mikrotik speed old zte onu + SR1041F, SR120-A speed? bridge dlink 1 + dlink 2 speed? bridge dlink 2 + dlink 1 speed? ![]() SR1041F, SR120-A around simillar speed bridge dlink 1 + dlink 2 speed - simillar speed as my previous speedtest screenshot bridge dlink 2 + dlink 1 speed - this one i didnt try cause i imagine the result will be same now try to kumpul duit to buy anime4000 uno box ![]() This post has been edited by syahpian: May 13 2025, 12:41 PM |
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE(hunt3r87 @ May 13 2025, 12:29 PM) https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...ost&p=111576374 |
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE(syahpian @ May 13 2025, 12:38 PM) old zte onu + mikrotik speed forget 1 item.![]() SR1041F, SR120-A around simillar speed bridge dlink 1 + dlink 2 speed - simillar speed as my previous speedtest screenshot bridge dlink 2 + dlink 1 speed - this one i didnt try cause i imagine the result will be same now try to kumpul duit to buy anime4000 uno box ![]() old zte onu + dlink can get 940Mbps? |
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:46 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
603 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 12:49 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#312
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
811 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Kota Kinabalu <-> Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,570 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
QUOTE(Anime4000 @ May 13 2025, 12:36 PM) I am just normal Unifi Seem physical imse01.mc_rsh-re0 now upgraded to virual ibse03.rsh .. u dialed to malacca before. As for ur friend, actuality somewhere at perak.I shipped my NIJIKA Stick V2 (beta) to his address at JB, I didn't check his PPPoE AC location, assume shipping address as is. Thing is, he can use 1500 bytes MTU, No VRRP or VXLAN crap. Many Websites WAF, Server NGFW, DPI mark packet lower than 1492 bytes consider suspicious: 1. Reduced MTU = VPN = Potential Botnet 2. Tunneled/obfuscated traffic 3. Rate Limiting That's is why some server take little longer to connect because NGFW has triggered MTU < 1492 likely a VPN User or VPNfilter exploit (where customer CPE has been hacked, use as VPN Gateway) TL;DR 1. Yes, a broken MTU path—caused by PPPoE over VXLAN without jumbo frame support—can make your client appear suspicious, and that can lead to degraded performance, slow TLS handshakes, or outright blocks. 2. TM and TIME as now didn't expect VRRP and VXLAN overhead cause PPPoE has broken MTU 3. I have tried contacting TM and MCMC, Vendor say broken MTU cause by PPPoE over VXLAN is normal 4. Ask to bring back imse01.mc_rsh-re0 like in year 2020, TM can't do that because all have upgraded to crappy VRRP VXLAN 5. Ask to increase L2MTU to 2000 bytes to match GPON MTU for their VRRP and VXLAN to support RFC4638 compliance, TM can't do that tsk_tg = tasek_taiping mc_rsh = malacca_rasah |
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,570 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
445 posts Joined: Aug 2009 |
|
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:33 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#318
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,399 posts Joined: Jul 2009 From: /dev/null |
QUOTE(hsbb @ May 13 2025, 01:06 PM) Seem physical imse01.mc_rsh-re0 now upgraded to virual ibse03.rsh .. u dialed to malacca before. As for ur friend, actuality somewhere at perak. i asked my friend that time he balik kampung, lol, no wonder I had to ship there,tsk_tg = tasek_taiping mc_rsh = malacca_rasah well good for him not under VRRP crap, I ask to enjoy 1500 bytes MTU while he can. so, do you have connections to TM higher staff? possible they fix this MTU issue? and reinstated RFC4638 why I ask RFC4638? Because I have setup PON Stick with Unifi Biz with /30 and /29 customer, giving Server real Unifi IP Address, need configure OS Ethernet MTU tu 1488. if PPPoE with 1500 bytes MTU, no more fragmented packet and performance dropped. default L2MTU 1600 MTU no longer enough, as VRRP and VXLAN take a lot of overhead |
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,570 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
QUOTE(hsbb @ May 13 2025, 01:31 PM) U can buy own router later if can get upload 500Mbps using stock/old router. Told u already about T-CONT. Told Telekom also about it. But that they are not responding on that. The case keeps escalate to technician to go on site instead of checking at their back end. |
|
|
May 13 2025, 01:43 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#320
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
811 posts Joined: Jul 2008 From: Kota Kinabalu <-> Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(neekun @ May 13 2025, 01:39 PM) Told Telekom also about it. But that they are not responding on that. The case keeps escalate to technician to go on site instead of checking at their back end. try asking them to escalated the ticket to higher level, i think that is most suitable next step since onsite cannot resolve the issue also, mention the possible T-CONT issue as hsbb say This post has been edited by syahpian: May 13 2025, 01:46 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0152sec
0.51
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 03:51 AM |