Too technical to explain....n the long version that i have explain thing before is gone

Simplify to say, which can be practice in all kind of knowledge

Hypothesis = assumption , it is the result of one observation. It will remain as an assumption until it is proven by a verified tool. This tool can be form of establish method, like math, history, science, statistic. Tool also can be equate as knowledge

Fact = something that has been verified and supported by established methodology. If we want to challenge this fact, therefore we need to argue on the tool, what method they use, is there a faulty in the data collection, analysis

Tool or knowledge = it is establish form of method, statement that can be use to draw a line n to decide which is truth n which is false

Example A given

Assumption / hypothesis
I believe that the earth is flat, because the ship that travel in front of me, has been missing.

Any tool that can help verified this or support this? none. It remains as hypothesis / assumptioon

Example B given

Assumption / hypothesis
I believe that the earth is round

Tool used
Mathematic, geographic knowledge

So, it is already verified, therefore earth is round is a fact
Going back to kencing unta arguement
"Some Bedouin from 'Uraynah came to the Prophet of Allah [SAW] and accepted Islam, but the climate of Al-Madinah did not suit them; their skin turned yellow and their bellies became swollen. The Prophet of Allah sent them to some milk camels of his and told them to drink their milk and urine until they recovered.”

Sunan al-Nasa’i (4035)

Hypothesis
Prophet encouraged muslim to drink camel urine

Tool use, what to support or verified this?
Any additional hadith support this - NO, this is the only hadith mention about drinking urine
What history of medicine told about this - urine therapy has been established way far beyond in human history
What science tell us benefit of urine - none

So , because there are history to show that urine has been used so far as therapy in human history even before prophet time, it is wrongly to assume that the prophet has recommended the practice of urine drinking

A wise man say, a smart and intelligent people are people who is able to think based on the context

Clearly we can see that the prophet is simply a normal man. He is simply practice it because that was what medicine being practide during that time. That practice is not something new, it is even long long time ago. Even if u look at the narration, it is simply a witness account of what happen. the prophet never say oo muslim, or muslim must etc..etc..

If the prophet do really mean it to be recommended or practice, based on obse5rvation , the prophet will stress the matter many many time. Therefore there will be more hadith to support it. Meanwhile, only 1 hadith exist, means it is simply a witness account of an event, nothing more

SO WHAT HAPPEN, why some scholar stick that urine is recommending
Because they simply refuse to think.
Because as u can see....nothing actually can verified or support that prophet recommending drinking urine. As mentioned early, if a statement cant be verfiried, or supported by any means, it will remains as assumption. Even current knowledge has been totally agaisnt it. But unfortunately, muslim nowaday dont trust science, whcih is unfortunate

This is how i decide what truth or false. It is an universal concept. Fact or truth is something that able to verified abd support. Therefore, if u want to challenge any fact, u must go through the tool / method used to draw up that facts