My E6750 can go up to 3.28Ghz at stock vcore.

You're using crucial ballistix? See my sig on how high I can OC the ballistix....

hmm yes my E6750 can also go up to 410*8 at stock Vcore but it doesnt pass the OCCT test. So i notched the Vcore one higher. Also to note that my motherboard has a Vdroop of 0.02V, take that to count too.

My second run on my newly bought Retail E8400.

4ghz at 1.37vcore (I believe can go lower than this). Using Gigabyte P35-DS3L. Stable at least while posting this. Haha.. Temp: 33'C Full load on WC.







This post has been edited by irangan: Jan 7 2008, 01:26 AM

The screenshot is a bit small

Cool! So the penryn has no problems running on the P35?

What's the stock vcore for the 8400?

there's rumour saying that penryn quadcore got issue with current p35 board.
should be q9xxx series.

ouchh.. damn nice clock there
make me jeles leh..

wth.. 1.375vcore @ 4ghz ...

Does anyone knows between E8400 and E8500, which is a better overclocker?

E8400 3.0GHZ E8500 3.1GHZ....Both are same le....just more 100mhz...Both also can clock to 4GHZ

It's not the same sometimes and one can be a lot better than the other, even the default clock speed is only 100Mhz difference.

multiplier same ah?... maybe its like e6600 and e6750...

Should be no problem... Most P35 board can support penryn provided the manufacturer released a new bios for it.

Not too sure for the stock vcore. The proc spec is not available at intel website yet. But it is written on the box. 1.225vcore.

My stock vcore is lower.

It is a false claim by some AMD fanboys.. When P35 can support QX9650, I cant see the point why its cannot support those normal Quad.

Tunggu apa lagi~! Beli la~! Kan bonus sudah keluar

I think most wolfdale can do that. With proper board and ram, close one eye can reach 4.5ghz on Air.. See coolice testing.

My result is considered lousy.

I think noone can answer that since E8500 is not available in the market yet. But since E8500 have a higher multipler, the chances of better clock is greatly increased.

No... E8500 have a higher multipler.

by the way bro irangan, the wolfsdale E8*** which has the same clock as the E6750 but a higher cache, is it better than E6750, without taking count to the 45-65nm difference in architecture. Would it be alright to run the e6750.. ? Do u find any difference whatsoever?

depend on ur luck too some proc have a 'wall' which its ocable limited to certain speed....and maybe factor of batch and stepping.

wee great clock~

like many said, penryn retail shud be a lil bit better than the ES one.. so how jeff.. any dry ice on ur new proc?

I think the wall mostly exists on older processors. If we see the current/newer ones, many tend to get a good OC out of it. I believe getting a wolfdale would be the right choice

alo sape2 dapat potong hoodlum tu kabo kat aku

so bro claw claw, lets challenge e6750 and wolfsdale lor.. see who win the only difference is architecture and cache size.. by 2MB..

Actually, E8400 is sharing the clock as E6850 and not E6750. Basically, you wont feel the difference in daily usage between E6850 and E8400 unless during benchmark. But the thing that you will notice is the lower idle/load temp and its can clock much much better.

Not to mention, the freaking cheap price compare to E6850.


A lousy clock if u ask me... Serious limitation from my board. But cant whine much since it is a retirement rig .. Fast fast go and get one and show me the true potential.

About that, we cant say my retail one is better than coolice's ES cuz his proc can go at least 4.7ghz on air cooling. I dont think so... coolice will get one himself soon. hahaha