QUOTE(JasonTheGreat @ Nov 23 2020, 02:37 PM)
The guard fee got split by land size? Like that only fair
Ya, like what lumdra said. Individual title would be per unit. No management office that have every units land or buildup size to calculate. Doubt owners will give that up so readily also even if RA vote to do it that way.
QUOTE(keane04 @ Nov 23 2020, 05:39 PM)
like that no need talk, no need discuss....... wait for VP first.
QUOTE(lumdra @ Nov 24 2020, 08:32 AM)
I think its a good start nevertheless to start laying options and we are well aware on the challenges upfront so we can decide and table the options after VP.
Hopefully its a good sturdy brick one like you mentioned and we just add an arch. That would be ideal!
Guess we should have scenarios of combine vs not combine with the pros and cons.
For starter maybe we can list our names below on first page on thread to indicate username and legasi phase to help the RA planning perhaps!
Legasi 1Legasi 2Lumdra
Legasi 3Lol. My post came across wrong. Didn't mean to pour cold water on the discussion. It was intended to list the factors that would influence owners' decision on whether to share or not.
Yeap, i think the options now wld mostly be reliant on location and sturdiness of the guardhse provided by developer. If they provide temporary zinc ones, it'll be much easier to convince owners to relocate it and build a nicer one. If they already provide an acceptable one, my guess is most would just want to incur minimal additional expenses, maintain its location and contribute to just the arch cover as mentioned earlier.
My question about the RA still stands tho. Will developer be helping to arrange a meeting based on phases? Or they leave it up to residents to sendiri find the owners? I think it's usually the first scenario cus the 2nd one like damn mafan.