thanks for explaining, i am wondering how do you know 39ft for legenda. is it written somewhere or someone measure it. for legasi2, you said before that someone saw the drawing, perhaps you get the figure from there.

I think there needs to be hard figures and more info attached for ppl to make their decision. For example, how much would it be per month if we maintain just a legasi 2 guardhse with 3 guards? Vs the savings if any for a shared entrance. I can easily state now I do not want to be subsidising legasi 3 and 4 owners if there is no benefit to me.

Also, i have no basis for how much a nice entrance will cost. Secondly, need to see what guardhse spsetia gives us also. Maybe just a zinc pondok. Maybe its a nice sturdy brick one and we just need to add a cover arch for rain and aesthetics.

Not sharing also got benefit la. Easier to hold a smaller pool of guards accountable for any incident. E.g. got 3 guards just for legasi 2 vs 12 guards across all 4 phases.

And we've not heard anything from other owners also. We could be for a joint entrance between 1&2 or 1-4, but if other phase owners don't see the benefit, its not gonna happen.

Anyone knows how the RA gonna be organised? A shared entrance definitely more likely if the RA is across all Legasi phases.

Tldr: we can discuss here till pigs fly but too many unknowns currently for good informed decision.

Yeah for Lagenda i asked this info from the developer when i visited them.

The guard fee got split by land size? Like that only fair

Anybody going to sign the SPA for Legasi 3 by this Thursday to catch the 2% early bird discount? Booked a unit under Legasi 3 and looking to also catch up with those whom have booked a unit!

icic.......tot you have a high tech drone to fly there and measure ma.....thanks for the info.......

like that no need talk, no need discuss....... wait for VP first.

this usually happened to project with strata title. as it is calculated by the size of the unit and governed by law.

I think its a good start nevertheless to start laying options and we are well aware on the challenges upfront so we can decide and table the options after VP.
Hopefully its a good sturdy brick one like you mentioned and we just add an arch. That would be ideal!
Guess we should have scenarios of combine vs not combine with the pros and cons.
For starter maybe we can list our names below on first page on thread to indicate username and legasi phase to help the RA planning perhaps!

Legasi 1



Legasi 2
Lumdra


Legasi 3

Which unit bro? Go buy already and congrats in advance!

I agree, in case of freehold and landed, its divided per house unit.
Simpler as there is no management involved and to avoid disputes.

Ya, like what lumdra said. Individual title would be per unit. No management office that have every units land or buildup size to calculate. Doubt owners will give that up so readily also even if RA vote to do it that way.

Lol. My post came across wrong. Didn't mean to pour cold water on the discussion. It was intended to list the factors that would influence owners' decision on whether to share or not.

Yeap, i think the options now wld mostly be reliant on location and sturdiness of the guardhse provided by developer. If they provide temporary zinc ones, it'll be much easier to convince owners to relocate it and build a nicer one. If they already provide an acceptable one, my guess is most would just want to incur minimal additional expenses, maintain its location and contribute to just the arch cover as mentioned earlier.

My question about the RA still stands tho. Will developer be helping to arrange a meeting based on phases? Or they leave it up to residents to sendiri find the owners? I think it's usually the first scenario cus the 2nd one like damn mafan.

I've already booked for unit 35 (under the bumi allocation, which makes the no. of bumi units available now down to 5 I suppose) but I've yet to sign the SPA.

Apparently early bird of 2% ends this Thursday, so am not sure if i should rush it but 2% is quite a fair bit!. Also, upon further inspection of the area, noticed that Legasi 3 is the same level as Jalan Impian Indah. Could I check if anyone also has noticed that and if so, would SP be building fences to demarcate the area or is that under the RA?

More than happy to have to allocate funds under the RA to increase guard count and/or fencing.

This post has been edited by z3r0l33t: Nov 24 2020, 10:48 AM

Congrats! Good unit. Was it a loan rejected one?

About the land level, got a portion of legasi 3 that is lower than Jalan Impian Indah. Based on scale model, the land's lower starting from the tnb substation. Yours shld be slightly higher than it.

When u sign the SPA, developer will make u sign a form to allow for construction of the fence around your phase. So, fence isn't under RA.

Guard count should be under RA methinks.

I believe it is a loan rejected unit under the bumi lots waitlist (That's what they told me).

Thanks for the clarification! Would the fence likely be a wall or just a simple fence you reckon? Is Legasi 4 technically going to be lower than in that case?

This post has been edited by z3r0l33t: Nov 24 2020, 11:33 AM

Should be the anticlimb fence that's quite common around BK.

Ya Legasi 4 surely even lower than Jalan. If you drive by recently already can see... Their advantage is bigger intermediate land and buildup size la.

will INP level up the land for legasi 3 before start builing it? land is not prepared yet for legasi 4 too, so probably they may level it first as well before building?

So Legasi 1 and 2 owners have already signed these forms on the day they sign the SPA? Also, i think it's still unclear right if legasi 1,2 and 3 are sharing the main entrance?

2% early bird only? thought is 5% rebate

Don't count on legasi 4, still early stage, the land is not cleared and the land is also too low compare to jalan impian indah, not sure how they can level it