Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Investment StashAway Malaysia, Multi-Region ETF at your fingertips!

views
     
MUM
post Mar 19 2023, 09:21 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,867 posts

Joined: Mar 2015

QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Mar 19 2023, 09:05 AM)
Discussion doesn't have to be vitrolic, calm down friends.

Though, my personal two cents is that Stashaway's annualized return infographic can be very misleading to some extent?

Their numbers are very optimistic and not very representative of real use cases, and their methodology is not fully clear, there's plenty of way to fuzz the numbers to make it look a lot better than it is.

For example, in the returns infographic, it does not take into factors such as
1. Stashaway Fees
2. Reoptimization
3. Deposit/Withdrawal timings
4. USD/MYR forex returns

Most of their returns are still from the initial inception bullruns and lucky successful reoptimizations, on the flip side, anyone who's been here from late 2020 onwards would still be looking at a sea of red for god knows when to come, so I wouldn't be surprised if tension runs high.

Ultimately, fund performance within a 2-3 year window are far from a useful judge of a portfolio performance - seeing that the average investor here probably has a horizon of 20-30 years.

My take is always judge Stashaway for everything surrounding it except their performance - is their fees good? Is their investing philosophy sound and aligned to your interest? Would the alternative to Stashaway (to you) is just not investing at all?

When I evaluated it for 2 years, I've found Stashaway incompatible with me - I love how easy it is to set up a reoccuring deposit and forget about it - the truly "Stashaway" nature of investing. It's great that to some people that would have just let their currency rot in their back for 0.25% interest, Stashaway is incredibly straight forward and encourages "set it up and forget".

But, I dislike their reoptimization and stock-pickiness nature, their crazy KWEB sector tilting saga (which was not indicated to me that this is going to be a thing before I started their portfolio), their slow deposit to investing period, the MYR->USD conversion process, their almost misleading fee structure, their app changes and fuzzing of words and numbers during bearish times, the messy MYR/USD return values, and fortunately for myself, I have access to alternative ways to invest in a fashion that's more aligned to what I have in mind.


But above all else, I do not judge them for their returns in a 2 year period out of my next 30 - that's just plain silly, in my opinion.

*
Yes, that is the way and definitely unlike those that started a post saying SA investors are losing money and are "sucker" waiting for a turnaround or "boot-licker like you" to anyone when he does not like to hear anything that question their flawed judgment.

If really want to start a post saying SA investors are "suckers", then better gives a more convincing facts and data to back it up.

Updated:
I just found out, ..... that is how a troll work

This post has been edited by MUM: Mar 19 2023, 09:49 AM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
red streak
post Mar 19 2023, 10:17 AM

Doto 2 Pinoy Slayer
******
Senior Member
1,594 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Mar 19 2023, 09:05 AM)
Discussion doesn't have to be vitrolic, calm down friends.

Though, my personal two cents is that Stashaway's annualized return infographic can be very misleading to some extent?

Their numbers are very optimistic and not very representative of real use cases, and their methodology is not fully clear, there's plenty of way to fuzz the numbers to make it look a lot better than it is.

For example, in the returns infographic, it does not take into factors such as
1. Stashaway Fees
2. Reoptimization
3. Deposit/Withdrawal timings
4. USD/MYR forex returns

Most of their returns are still from the initial inception bullruns and lucky successful reoptimizations, on the flip side, anyone who's been here from late 2020 onwards would still be looking at a sea of red for god knows when to come, so I wouldn't be surprised if tension runs high.

Ultimately, fund performance within a 2-3 year window are far from a useful judge of a portfolio performance - seeing that the average investor here probably has a horizon of 20-30 years.

My take is always judge Stashaway for everything surrounding it except their performance - is their fees good? Is their investing philosophy sound and aligned to your interest? Would the alternative to Stashaway (to you) is just not investing at all?

When I evaluated it for 2 years, I've found Stashaway incompatible with me - I love how easy it is to set up a reoccuring deposit and forget about it - the truly "Stashaway" nature of investing. It's great that to some people that would have just let their currency rot in their back for 0.25% interest, Stashaway is incredibly straight forward and encourages "set it up and forget".

But, I dislike their reoptimization and stock-pickiness nature, their crazy KWEB sector tilting saga (which was not indicated to me that this is going to be a thing before I started their portfolio), their slow deposit to investing period, the MYR->USD conversion process, their almost misleading fee structure, their app changes and fuzzing of words and numbers during bearish times, the messy MYR/USD return values, and fortunately for myself, I have access to alternative ways to invest in a fashion that's more aligned to what I have in mind.


But above all else, I do not judge them for their returns in a 2 year period out of my next 30 - that's just plain silly, in my opinion.

*
With their fees you're already losing 30% of your returns within that investment period of 20-30 years, assuming they as a company even survive past the end of this decade let alone the next few years laugh.gif Assuming you even have returns by the end of that judging by their performance because they buy and sell like typical fund managers thinking they know better, which they really don't judging from their past performance. Let's face it, Robos are a fad and not even a good one. None of them have really made money consistently. They absolutely do have their Dollar-denominated performance data. Do you really believe a Silicon-Valley-wannabe startup doesn't track every single thing they can think of? They just don't want to share it because they know it's either pretty close to breakeven or just straight up negative since they started tracking. That's why they stick to misleading you with cherry-picked metrics and heavily-massaged data. The MYR has fallen nearly 10% in past few years alone. That is where the actual gains are coming from.

Let's face it, if you're still here invested in them with their constant reoptimzations you're delusional. Did you miss the bullrun straight out of Covid these past few years as you said? Yeah, everybody but SA made real money because they decided they knew better and got out of the US to pivot to China. You could have picked any random US stock and doubled your returns as the economy recovered. A lot of people joined SA during the Covid era because they had nothing to do at home, falling for the marketing bullshit of SA. Most people woke up and realized it was all bullshit after their next two optimzations which absolutely bombed and destroyed what meagre gains they had. The rest as you can see in this thread stuck around with their sunk costs and Stockholm Syndrome defending SA with their keyboards despite knowing they would have been better off going D.I.Y. as some people did around the middle of this thread.

As for me, SA was a cheap way to invest in US ETFs at the time which was why I was furious when they decided to reoptimize to KWEB and took my money out with a slight gain.
xander2k8
post Mar 19 2023, 08:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,652 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Mar 19 2023, 09:05 AM)
Discussion doesn't have to be vitrolic, calm down friends.

Though, my personal two cents is that Stashaway's annualized return infographic can be very misleading to some extent?

Their numbers are very optimistic and not very representative of real use cases, and their methodology is not fully clear, there's plenty of way to fuzz the numbers to make it look a lot better than it is.

For example, in the returns infographic, it does not take into factors such as
1. Stashaway Fees
2. Reoptimization
3. Deposit/Withdrawal timings
4. USD/MYR forex returns

Most of their returns are still from the initial inception bullruns and lucky successful reoptimizations, on the flip side, anyone who's been here from late 2020 onwards would still be looking at a sea of red for god knows when to come, so I wouldn't be surprised if tension runs high.

Ultimately, fund performance within a 2-3 year window are far from a useful judge of a portfolio performance - seeing that the average investor here probably has a horizon of 20-30 years.

My take is always judge Stashaway for everything surrounding it except their performance - is their fees good? Is their investing philosophy sound and aligned to your interest? Would the alternative to Stashaway (to you) is just not investing at all?

When I evaluated it for 2 years, I've found Stashaway incompatible with me - I love how easy it is to set up a reoccuring deposit and forget about it - the truly "Stashaway" nature of investing. It's great that to some people that would have just let their currency rot in their back for 0.25% interest, Stashaway is incredibly straight forward and encourages "set it up and forget".

But, I dislike their reoptimization and stock-pickiness nature, their crazy KWEB sector tilting saga (which was not indicated to me that this is going to be a thing before I started their portfolio), their slow deposit to investing period, the MYR->USD conversion process, their almost misleading fee structure, their app changes and fuzzing of words and numbers during bearish times, the messy MYR/USD return values, and fortunately for myself, I have access to alternative ways to invest in a fashion that's more aligned to what I have in mind.


But above all else, I do not judge them for their returns in a 2 year period out of my next 30 - that's just plain silly, in my opinion.

*
The infographic did cover the fees on the bottom 🤦‍♀️ while using yearly additional sum of 10k with projected 5.5% yearly gain
Raddus
post Mar 19 2023, 09:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
239 posts

Joined: Mar 2018

QUOTE(James.L1M @ Mar 15 2023, 02:03 PM)
On average, real inflation eats FD rates for breakfast. Currently interest rates are relatively high while The Fed continues to raise interest rates, negatively affecting equity markets overall. 2023 still looks rather choppy and will certainly affect StashAway's performance across the board.
*
so whats the point of putting my current 10k in savings in stash away


Hoshiyuu
post Mar 19 2023, 09:26 PM

wow i unlocked this
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
QUOTE(Raddus @ Mar 19 2023, 09:10 PM)
so whats the point of putting my current 10k  in savings in stash away
*
The optimistic answer is "So I don't miss the ride when it goes up - time in the market beats timing the market".

The pessimistic answer is "I have too much money, let's pay a portion of it to a fund manager regularly while I eat losses for the upcoming decade"

This post has been edited by Hoshiyuu: Mar 19 2023, 09:26 PM
red streak
post Mar 19 2023, 11:09 PM

Doto 2 Pinoy Slayer
******
Senior Member
1,594 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(Hoshiyuu @ Mar 19 2023, 09:26 PM)
The optimistic answer is "So I don't miss the ride when it goes up - time in the market beats timing the market".

The pessimistic answer is "I have too much money, let's pay a portion of it to a fund manager regularly while I eat losses for the upcoming decade"
*
The thing is time in the market is something that people keep repeating without understanding anything about it. It means buy and hold. Which is not what SA is doing at all. They tikam buy random shit based on the overpaid fund managers they hired and then sell everything, only to repeat the process every year or so. Now what they're doing is called timing the market. Which is the exact opposite of what you want to be doing when investing long term. The reason why they're doing so is as you said in the second part, they're overpaid fund managers and they want to be seen doing something so they can justify their ripoff fees. In doing so, they lock in their bad bets and losses so you can never recover in the long term even if the market averages 10% returns per year over the coming decades. Do they really care? Not at all since their almost 1% fee keeps chugging along regardless of how poorly they perform.

Also time in the market almost always refers to investing passively and consistently in ETFs/mutual funds that track the S&P500 or the market as a whole. It doesn't mean randomly buying shit and expecting it to return money consistently, though those bets could pay off if you're Warren Buffett.
xander2k8
post Mar 20 2023, 03:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,652 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(red streak @ Mar 19 2023, 11:09 PM)
The thing is time in the market is something that people keep repeating without understanding anything about it. It means buy and hold. Which is not what SA is doing at all. They tikam buy random shit based on the overpaid fund managers they hired and then sell everything, only to repeat the process every year or so. Now what they're doing is called timing the market. Which is the exact opposite of what you want to be doing when investing long term. The reason why they're doing so is as you said in the second part, they're overpaid fund managers and they want to be seen doing something so they can justify their ripoff fees. In doing so, they lock in their bad bets and losses so you can never recover in the long term even if the market averages 10% returns per year over the coming decades. Do they really care? Not at all since their almost 1% fee keeps chugging along regardless of how poorly they perform.

Also time in the market almost always refers to investing passively and consistently in ETFs/mutual funds that track the S&P500 or the market as a whole. It doesn't mean randomly buying shit and expecting it to return money consistently, though those bets could pay off if you're Warren Buffett.
*
1stly there is no overpaid fund managers in SA 🤦‍♀️

The decision of asset allocation of SA it is based upon an investment committee in SA and headed by CIO

The only thing that is SA incurred is the platform management iinm it is run on AWS, the brokerage Saxo, local banks account with trustee which Pacific Trustee in Malaysia and other expenses like staff and rents

Which is why SA is able to take 50bps out of the minimum fees as their profit but yet still having losses even though running a billion dollar fund 🤦‍♀️ likely not now after the drawdown from KWEB
red streak
post Mar 20 2023, 10:42 PM

Doto 2 Pinoy Slayer
******
Senior Member
1,594 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(xander2k8 @ Mar 20 2023, 03:23 AM)
1stly there is no overpaid fund managers in SA 🤦‍♀️

The decision of asset allocation of SA it is based upon an investment committee in SA and headed by CIO

The only thing that is SA incurred is the platform management iinm it is run on AWS, the brokerage Saxo, local banks account with trustee which Pacific Trustee in Malaysia and other expenses like staff and rents

Which is why SA is able to take 50bps out of the minimum fees as their profit but yet still having losses even though running a billion dollar fund 🤦‍♀️ likely not now after the drawdown from KWEB
*
>No overpaid fund managers
>Investment committee that determines what investments to tikam next and lose your money on while charging almost 1% regardless of performance

Wait a fucking minute. That's the exact same thing. Who do you think they are, Joe Randoms from off the street? rolleyes.gif Let's call a spade a spade and call them what they are without any bullshit.

As for the billion dollar fund, I already commented years ago and an admin agreed with me. There's is no bloody way in hell SA has much lifespan left considering their cash burn rate. They cannot make money with their AUM even with their high fees, simply because they cannot attract enough suckers to invest with them. A billion is nothing. A significant chunk of that is just people who lost money and are still hoping to reduce or breakeven to pull out their money. Robos are a fad that is slowly going away as more people realize they're not really anything new and add nothing to the investment table. They had to fire 14% of their workforce last year because they realized they couldn't keep up. All they do is lose money and permanently lock in your losses when they reoptimize every year, all while charging 20-30x the fees of doing it yourself by investing in an S&P 500 ETF like VOO (which by the way, returned an average of 12.13% per annum in the past 3 years and 9.77% in the past 5 years and 12.21% in the past 10 years, while charging only 0.03%).
Drian
post Mar 21 2023, 09:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


To me stashaway oversold on their capabilities and did not deliver.
They were also wrong in their bets.


Example of their marketing and how it differs to reality.


QUOTE
“The system continuously monitors the markets’ behaviors, and is built to REACT IMMEDIATELY TO ANY UNEXPECTED SHOCK. Through the use of a few technical analysis techniques such as death crosses, ERAA®’s framework is able to acknowledge if the markets cease to follow economic data and is able to REACT PROMPTLY BEFORE A SIGNIFICANT CRASH HAPPENS.”
Also they tend to inflate the returns

I don't know how they manage to make the gains positive in the app despite it losing money.



This post has been edited by Drian: Mar 21 2023, 09:44 AM
xander2k8
post Mar 21 2023, 10:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,652 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Drian @ Mar 21 2023, 09:29 AM)
To me stashaway oversold on their capabilities and did not deliver.
They were also wrong in their bets.
Example of their marketing and how it differs to reality.
Also they tend to inflate the returns

I don't know how they manage to make the gains positive in the app despite it losing money.
*
Even the Fed can’t read the economic data and react promptly what makes SA better than them 🤦‍♀️

So when the hyped up their AUM at 1billion since then they been humbled by their markets and yet still losing from the reopt as always
James.L1M
post Mar 22 2023, 02:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Feb 2023


QUOTE(Raddus @ Mar 19 2023, 09:10 PM)
so whats the point of putting my current 10k  in savings in stash away
*
In hopes of beating inflation over the long term.
xander2k8
post Mar 22 2023, 03:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,652 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(James.L1M @ Mar 22 2023, 02:11 PM)
In hopes of beating inflation over the long term.
*
While paying fees to SA will erode more than inflation 🤦‍♀️

If want to beat inflation buy Gold and stash it away for the long run
godhpf
post Mar 23 2023, 05:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
605 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 19 2023, 01:34 AM)
Depreciation of Currency is SA Fault??
you invest with MYR,..you calculates your returns in MYR.

did SA portfolio loses your money if you follow what was in that image??
*
While I don't judge SA using short time period's performance, I disagree with using MYR to judge SA's performance.
SA converts your fund to USD before investing (except for Simple), so it only make sense to judge SA's performance using USD.

Otherwise, the performance is masked by currency fluctuations.

You can use MYR to see how much you will have at the end of the day, but to judge the performance, it should be in USD.

MUM
post Mar 23 2023, 05:18 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,867 posts

Joined: Mar 2015

QUOTE(godhpf @ Mar 23 2023, 05:02 PM)
While I don't judge SA using short time period's performance, I disagree with using MYR to judge SA's performance.
SA converts your fund to USD before investing (except for Simple), so it only make sense to judge SA's performance using USD.

Otherwise, the performance is masked by currency fluctuations.

You can use MYR to see how much you will have at the end of the day, but to judge the performance, it should be in USD.
*
i have money in EPF,...
EPF has overseas investment
EPF gives out 5.35% ROI
i judge EPF returns in % it gives me

i have money in UT that invested in overseas markets with MYR
these UT returns is in %
i judge the UT returns in % it gives me

i have money in SA with MYR
SA invest in overseas
SA gives me returns in %
i judge SA returns in % it gives me.


xander2k8
post Mar 23 2023, 05:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,652 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(godhpf @ Mar 23 2023, 05:02 PM)
While I don't judge SA using short time period's performance, I disagree with using MYR to judge SA's performance.
SA converts your fund to USD before investing (except for Simple), so it only make sense to judge SA's performance using USD.

Otherwise, the performance is masked by currency fluctuations.

You can use MYR to see how much you will have at the end of the day, but to judge the performance, it should be in USD.
*
That is what SA supposed to be in the 1st place while to use this to their advantage

Performance is by judging USD holdings while return is on RM performance

But the way script their returns no doubt will leave a bitter to taste to many 🤦‍♀️
godhpf
post Mar 23 2023, 05:27 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
605 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(MUM @ Mar 23 2023, 05:18 PM)
i have money in EPF,...
EPF has overseas investment
EPF gives out 5.35% ROI
i judge EPF returns in % it gives me

i have money in UT that invested in overseas markets with MYR
these UT returns is in %
i judge the UT returns in % it gives me

i have money in SA with MYR
SA invest in overseas
SA gives me returns in %
i judge SA returns in % it gives me.
*
Well, let's agree to disagree.
For me, if SA converts it to USD, and USD is the currency of the investments, to judge the investments' performance, we have to use the currency that those uses.

Your example of EPF & UT is not exactly equivalent.
EPF can invest in many different currencies. To judge the performance of those individual investment, you use the currency that those investments are using.
However, we don't get such visibility. We only see the MYR value. Thus we HAVE to judge EPF using the MYR value.

Same goes to UT.


MUM
post Mar 23 2023, 05:42 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,867 posts

Joined: Mar 2015

QUOTE(godhpf @ Mar 23 2023, 05:27 PM)
Well, let's agree to disagree.
For me, if SA converts it to USD, and USD is the currency of the investments, to judge the investments' performance, we have to use the currency that those uses.

Your example of EPF & UT is not exactly equivalent.
EPF can invest in many different currencies. To judge the performance of those individual investment, you use the currency that those investments are using.
However, we don't get such visibility. We only see the MYR value. Thus we HAVE to judge EPF using the MYR value.

Same goes to UT.
*
thumbup.gif

judge based on not just the currency used too.
judge also on the content of the portfolio, is it single ETF or multi diversified portfolio that has multiple ETFs.
it is also not judgeable to say FM of SA is BAD while (example) VOO is GOOD as they are not the same.

same as my example about UT,... i cannot just judge based on the ROI % of that single UT....i have to judge and compare it against it peers of similar mandate to try to see it performance

i also cannot judge EPF returns is good or bad compared to my other investment,....as they are not of similar mandate.

at the end of the day,....i still will judge and see how much money i made from my investment in MYR. did i made + or - returns from my investment last year?



Hoshiyuu
post Mar 23 2023, 09:13 PM

wow i unlocked this
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Nov 2011
Hmm, now that makes me wonder if in Stashaway's marketing material, their benchmark index performance doesn't include forex gains, but SA's portfolio performance include forex gains...
TS[Ancient]-XinG-
post Mar 24 2023, 09:36 AM

20k VIP club
*******
Senior Member
5,752 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
I duno man….
My SA, syfe, ibkr, fsm all into sea water.

Want to blame SA… but generally market bad… but if dun scold SA, cannot also coz their perf is not what they preech…

Only thing doing good is my epf and ansb… but those number can be fake…. Or beutify…. Or just reserved drying up…. So yea…

I think the crisis is imminent. We just wait and see.

Cash is king for now
Pewufod
post Mar 24 2023, 10:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,537 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Mar 24 2023, 09:36 AM)
I duno man….
My SA, syfe, ibkr, fsm all into sea water.

Want to blame SA… but generally market bad… but if dun scold SA, cannot also coz their perf is not what they preech…

Only thing doing good is my epf and ansb… but those number can be fake…. Or beutify…. Or just reserved drying up…. So yea…

I think the crisis is imminent. We just wait and see.

Cash is king for now
*
what are you talking about
now is the best time to plough cash in biggrin.gif

1032 Pages « < 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0432sec    0.39    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:27 AM