Look in www.tftcentral.co.uk, www.behardware.com, www.hardforum.com for answers. Those and many others are raving about the 241WZ, even more so than the Dell 2407
Reasons I chose this monitor: 1) The 241WZ's AU-Optronics P-MVA panel is much better than most TN film technology for color repro (cos I need accurate color management since I am a professional photographer), although arguably not as good as S-IPS but I couldn't find any 24" S-IPS panels available in the local market.
2) 241WZ also has HDMI input that fully supports 1080p, HDCP compliant, 1:1 pixel mapping, Picture-in-Picture (PIP), AMA-Z (a.k.a. BFI), 1000:1 contrast ratio, 500cd/m2.
3) Monitor can be used vertically or horizontally thanks to the sturdy but flexible stand, way better than that of the Acer 2423W's (which I considered also cos of the excellent panel and cheap price, about RM1,700 or less). But the stand on the Acer left a lot to be desired.
4) I was about to spring for the Dell 2407 HC, but after hearing so much about the panel lottery issue of the non-HC model and not wanting to have to worry about getting a unit with dead pixels which means the hassle of returning it and not sure if the next is any better, I went ahead and got the 241WZ which costs quite a bit more (enough to buy a mid-end C2D chip). But I could inspect the unit in person, checked for dead pixels etc before handing over the cash. And I am personally p*ssed at companies like Dell and Samsung that sell different panels to different people hoping they won't know the difference. That sucks, unless they actually offer big discounts for the lesser product which is not the case. Anyway.
5) Also heard about input lag (mouse) on the Dell, while this Benq is fine. Maybe I don't know how to discern what input lag really means.
Got it for RM2,300 from LYP 2nd flr, Viewnet Computer System SB. Cheapest I could find at the moment.
Probs so far? 1) The backlight is damn freaking bright! But thankfully quite uniform. Although the viewing angles are far superior to a TN, it is not perfect. However this P-MVA I hear is as close as I can get to S-IPS or AS-IPS. The next techs to look out for would be LED backlight, SED and OLED but those are future products. As for now I am a happy camper!
2) Colors a bit hard to calibrate without 3rd party software. My previous Acer 2216W was way easier. Ended up buying a Colorvision Spyder2 Express to help me out. After calibration I could make out all the colours and black/white shades presented on a color chart, with great neutral grays.
3) OSD buttons on the side are not clearly marked, they all look the same so you have to memorise their locations if you wanted to press them. But then again, after calibration there's not much you need to do there anyway. However if there was a need they can be easily accessed by simply turning the screen to the left cos the stand supports swivel movements.
4) Other than Standard mode, the Movie, Dynamics and Photo modes are way too saturated and really fuzzies up the text. But use Dynamics if you want excellent blacks in movies. But for anything else you'll be better off in Standard mode.
5) Not as fast as TN film so harcore gamers might have to look elsewhere.
6) Got to eat bread and drink plain water for a while.....
Cheers.
QUOTE(alextee1881 @ Jul 19 2007, 01:16 AM)
User are giving a good comments for Samsung, Asus & LG 22" LCD...Anyone has the experience in using BenQ? This would be ideal for normal usage same like Acer...
This post has been edited by gregy: Jul 19 2007, 02:10 AM