QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Sep 26 2016, 03:28 PM)
I think, it is being rather impractical to just talk (and nothing more than just empty talk) about the merits and cons of any particular investment vehicle as if when it is not suitable for one ownself, then it is not suitable for others.
QUOTE(xuzen @ Sep 26 2016, 04:50 PM)
No, I made a lost of around 8% in 9 mths of holding this fund (CIMB-GTF). I participated starting in Sep 2015 and completely exited the position by Jun 2016.
Xuzen
this is quite surprising to me.. despite having the advantage of algozen ball?.
QUOTE(xuzen @ Sep 26 2016, 04:53 PM)
But but but must talk about it wan, or else,
guy3288 will butthurt complain we only talk about winners and not the losers. We must average it lar, this lar, that lar...
Xuzen
just show winners only to become daddy mana boleh.
QUOTE(xuzen @ Sep 23 2016, 11:47 PM)
Since we on the ASX FP topic, I just google it and check its ROI, and found that they are around 6.XX% never touching 7%. The Bumiputera only is slightly higher by 100 basis pts.
I took the liberty and checked out FSM list and found that there are 10 Balanced UTF that have above 10% CAGR.
Who's your daddy now!
Xuzen
asking this lar that lar, is not me , but this thinker:
QUOTE(dexk @ Sep 24 2016, 03:54 AM)
I have been following this topic actually. 10 > 10% but how many < 7.XX? To compare apple with apple we should use the median or average isn't it?
QUOTE(Vanguard 2015 @ Sep 26 2016, 05:11 PM)
I always believe in the same way we preach DIVERSIFICATION for unit trust investment, unit trust by itself should be an asset class in a basket of investment. The basket of investment could contain EPF, endowment policy, property investment, stocks, PNB funds, etc.
trouble is many are also "allergic" hearing epf, endowment and pnb funds.........
QUOTE(vseries @ Sep 26 2016, 05:41 PM)
Thanks! Yes, I know distribution is meaningless..
dude, dont take that literally.
Distribution is meaningless only if after distribution your UT drops and never pick up again. If it gives 2% ( NAV drops 2%) and never gain back its NAV again, of course no use la the distribution.
However if it gives out 10%, and later on the NAV picks up back that 10% , then the distribution is meaningful.
That is 10% return even if your UT stays stagnant from beginning to end of year.
Talk no use, example is here.
I bought Am Asia Pac Equity Income 3 yrs ago at RM1.10++ and it has gone down and down, and i keep buying and selling down and down , now only RM0.94.
Price keep going down, No distribution sure i lose money already
Guess what? i earned RM8000+, it give me an IRR of 9% .
All because of distributions!
So distributions are not meaningless as you would like to listen.