Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 noob question in overclocking, after overclock not much different

views
     
jchou87
post Dec 28 2006, 10:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
213 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Ampang


QUOTE(zeroglyph @ Dec 28 2006, 10:36 PM)
overclocking should be done little by little over a period of time TS. and you better know what you're doing. AMDs are not as safe as intel with overclocking. better check some of the overclocking guide here and try to understand as much as you can. overclocking blindly is a good way to waste money. 0.2Ghz increment is not that significant is most cases.

about the prime and benchmark thing:
it is to show stability. your system will rarely be pushed as much as with these benchmarking softwares. so if you're system is considered stable doing you daily task, there are still instability in your system that just haven't been discovered. so if your system is not stable with prime or any other benchmark software, your system is not 100% stable. it is only stable for your daily task.
*
thx man i 'll sure will test my rig....
TSamduser
post Dec 28 2006, 11:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


becareful that, boost too much will result in hang, treat ur PC's fever first lar, dont put it in cold place until u also need to wear jacket to go inside, haha
goldfries
post Dec 28 2006, 11:02 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(zeroglyph @ Dec 28 2006, 10:36 PM)
AMDs are not as safe as intel with overclocking.


kindly explain.

i have been OCing AMD processors for since sub 1ghz days. so i'd like to know what you've discovered that i've not.
TSamduser
post Dec 28 2006, 11:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


i also think like that, coz AMd is build for gamers it should be safer than intel, intel only good in cooling, but it's 2.6GHz stock speed lose to my 2.21GHz stock speed ^^
WaCKy-Angel
post Dec 28 2006, 11:16 PM

PeACe~~
*********
All Stars
21,962 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: KL



QUOTE(J-Slade @ Dec 28 2006, 08:15 PM)
Somehow stability isnt a big issue for me. I dun get whats so big deal abt Prime stable and yada yada yada... people just wanna show others that their rig is very good in overclocking but truly, sometimes these benchmark stabilities don't reflect much. I mean, as long as it works, it doesnt hang... it can go load @ 100% without any problems... things shld be okay.

-Out of Topic-
Yo WaCKy-Angel, you sold your Advance Modules already ah? That teddy fella a bit irritating right? lol  laugh.gif
*
Not yet sold le....
Yeah that teddy guy is irritating....he's been posting everywhere to buy ram and ask for screenshot of 250mhz ocing eventhough seller didnt mention about that..
And i found somebody complaining him for aeroplane after reserve to him.

QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 28 2006, 08:21 PM)
if i manually overclock it, i would prefer all go max, but i know that it will burn my processor and motherboard, and i hv no moeny to fixed it, and i dont know much about the voltage adjusting, i only gt a 450W power supply, and i'm not using ASUS or ABIT motherboard, i'm using the GIGABYTE.

is it 3500+ really suitable for overclocking?
*
I doubt OCing could burn ur stuffs....
mobo usually has its own detection and it wont bootup setting is wrong, then it will auto reset back worst case have to manually reset.

QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 28 2006, 10:32 PM)
ok firstly when you overclock, 100mhz gain won't give you noticable difference. neither does 200mhz.

however from 1.8ghz to 2.5ghz like mine, it's really not that noticable either unless the application requires some processing. smile.gif
*
Damm 1.8 to 2.5
goldfries
post Dec 28 2006, 11:25 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 28 2006, 11:08 PM)
i also think like that, coz AMd is build for gamers it should be safer than intel, intel only good in cooling, but it's 2.6GHz stock speed lose to my 2.21GHz stock speed ^^
*
explain that too........... please.

i powered an Intel 2.4ghz without putting on heatsink. no problem. shutdown itself. smile.gif spoil? no. safe? yes. what else?

i'd like to know why you guys are thinking one is safer than another.

intel good in cooling? maybe for the C2D yes........ but have you considered that for the past years, AMD has the cooler processor?

QUOTE(WaCKy-Angel @ Dec 28 2006, 11:16 PM)
Damm 1.8 to 2.5
*
WaCKy, my Sempron 2800+ was 1.6ghz and it did 2.5ghz on 1.5vcore and stock heatsink. smile.gif

don't believe? check it out.......
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/242325

This post has been edited by goldfries: Dec 28 2006, 11:27 PM
zeroglyph
post Dec 28 2006, 11:51 PM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 28 2006, 11:02 PM)
kindly explain.

i have been OCing AMD processors for since sub 1ghz days. so i'd like to know what you've discovered that i've not.
*
QUOTE(goldfries)
i powered an Intel 2.4ghz without putting on heatsink. no problem. shutdown itself. smile.gif spoil? no. safe? yes. what else?


well, that's what i'm basing it on. i'm not too updated with AMD technology, but i'm pretty sure Intel can still run safe without heatsink biggrin.gif. i know that AMD can be overclock, but i've seen for a fact(forgot which website) an overheated athlon got fried and an Intel will only throttle down and reboot. so let me rephrase that abit:

"AMD is overclockable as much as Intel(if not better), but it may not be as failsafe as intel "
syarat
post Dec 29 2006, 12:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
325 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Gombak



@zeroglyph
well, if u are not too updated, i guess u may have to rephrase a lot of time. stop doing it, until u update ur info on AMD.
u might be causing a havoc here.

OCers know what they are doing. failsafe or not or watsoever prob, they did it on their own risk.
i fried my athlon few years back, just because i am a noob at that time.. those who know how to handle things, i bet their Athlon is still doing a decent job.
zeroglyph
post Dec 29 2006, 12:21 AM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(syarat @ Dec 29 2006, 12:02 AM)
@zeroglyph
well, if u are not too updated, i guess u may have to rephrase a lot of time. stop doing it, until u update ur info on AMD.
u might be causing a havoc here.

OCers know what they are doing. failsafe or not or watsoever prob, they did it on their own risk.
i fried my athlon few years back, just because i am a noob at that time.. those who know how to handle things, i bet their Athlon is still doing a decent job.
*
exactly what i mean. intel will not fry itself due to its throttle down and reboot feature. by not updated, i mean i know that athlon does not have this feature, i just don't know whether the newer AMD model has it. so it is my bad for basing on old tech.

by failsafe, i mean a p4 can be overclocked without worries on stock, but an athlon will fry if clocked too much on stock. with proper cooling, it's a different story already.

by "knowing how to handle things" means, it is no longer in failsafe territory because they already know how to do things.

i'm not trying to mislead or "wreck havoc", just a precaution based on experience. if that's wrong, then.....whatever.
syarat
post Dec 29 2006, 12:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
325 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Gombak



i'd say that is a better explanation.
i am never in a position to say u are misleading.. my bad if i have the tone..i got what u mean in the first place, but afraid newbies tend to get the wrong idea, simply conclude AMD is not safe for OC.


goldfries
post Dec 29 2006, 12:30 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(zeroglyph @ Dec 29 2006, 12:21 AM)
exactly what i mean. intel will not fry itself due to its throttle down and reboot feature. by not updated, i mean i know that athlon does not have this feature, i just don't know whether the newer AMD model has it. so it is my bad for basing on old tech.


ok. smile.gif never answer based on old tech. for the past few years, AMD has the cooler processor compared to Intel.

AMD boards comes with shutdown temperature setting BIOS too. smile.gif

in fact those hot processors were the past, i once fried till crack a Duron just because i forgot to put on the heatsink (used to Intel processors tongue.gif that time the Intels were fine without sink for a while)

anyway have a read at this article http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=346&pgno=4


QUOTE(zeroglyph @ Dec 29 2006, 12:21 AM)
by failsafe, i mean a p4 can be overclocked without worries on stock, but an athlon will fry if clocked too much on stock. with proper cooling, it's a different story already.


i assume your Athlon in the above statement refers to AMD processors in general

here's my Sempron 2800+ overclock to prove the above being false.
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...1&#entry5833191

CPU: AMD Sempron 2800+
SPEED: 2500MHz (312MHz x 8) <=-- original speed. 1600mhz. that's 56% overclock
VOLTAGE APPLIED: 1.500V
COOLING: AIR
CPU COOLER: stock HSF <=-- yup, stock heatsink.

btw even now i'm typing to you on my Athlon64 2800+ from 1.8ghz to 2.4ghz (was 2.5ghz but i changed board. will try to push to 2.5ghz again on Scythe Ninja running fanless.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Dec 29 2006, 12:34 AM
zeroglyph
post Dec 29 2006, 12:50 AM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
by athlon i mean athlon XP. the research papers i read was a comparison between p4 and athlon XP.
goldfries
post Dec 29 2006, 01:06 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(zeroglyph @ Dec 29 2006, 12:50 AM)
by athlon i mean athlon XP. the research papers i read was a comparison between p4 and athlon XP.
*
ok. then you had better mention Athlon XP specifically.

because since even AFTER Athlon XP, there's still other Athlons. like Athlon 64, Athlon FX and even Athlon X2 - covering from S754 to S940. smile.gif

so by saying Athlon alone would generalize and mislead.

have a look
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=337&pgno=1

This post has been edited by goldfries: Dec 29 2006, 01:07 AM
warrior
post Dec 29 2006, 05:53 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
502 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 29 2006, 01:06 AM)
ok. then you had better mention Athlon XP specifically.

because since even AFTER Athlon XP, there's still other Athlons. like Athlon 64, Athlon FX and even Athlon X2 - covering from S754 to S940. smile.gif

so by saying Athlon alone would generalize and mislead.

have a look
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=337&pgno=1
*
first of all i'm not pin pointing to anyone, but i feel that many ppl in this forum like to give their "maybe" opinion instead they're not sure about it. so as mod say answer it if you are sure or put a ? if you're not sure...
or you may say what's wrong if i simply answer? well when ppl google up they'll see the thread and this lead them to think "ppl in this forum/country are just so so"

my 2 cents
davidletterboyz
post Dec 29 2006, 08:05 AM

Der Kaiser
*******
Senior Member
4,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 28 2006, 07:50 PM)
i want to ask u all, i hv tune my GPU and motherboard settings using the nTune download from the nvidia.com, i just let it to help me to tune my setting in my graphic card and motherboard, after i wait for 3 hours, ntg change also, i go for my game, and still the same experience >.<

i use the nvidia monitor(software from nvidia) to detect my CPU core and PCI-E bus speed

original MHz of CPU core: 2210.xxxMHz
after overclock: 2321.277MHz

original PCI-E bus speed: 2500MHz
after overclock: 2925MHz

i'm using AMD 3500+ 2.2GHz and run on 7300GS 512MB DDR2 and 1GB RAM

should i considered the changes of bus speed of CPU and PCI-E as overclock?
*
What's motherboard r u using?!
That PCI-E bus speed is wrong. No way it can get that high...
TSamduser
post Dec 29 2006, 09:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


i use nvidia nTune software and i use GIGABYTE M61PM-S2, i didnt adjust the PCI-E bus speed itself, i just let the nvidia nTune to tune itself, at first it boost my processor to 2.5 then hang, and then it take it down to 2.3GHz, and yesterday be4 i sleep, i take it up to 2.4GHz, and now still works fine for me, the PCI-E bus speed seem not to be so useful.

EDIT: y after i overclock my PC, when i go to the control panel > system there, it still show me 2.21GHz although i already adjust to 2.4GHz, and one more things, is 589.980MHz very high for my kingston PC4200 DDRs 1GB RAM?

This post has been edited by amduser: Dec 29 2006, 10:24 AM
TSamduser
post Dec 29 2006, 01:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


my comp restart while i playing games or watching movies after some time, system overheating? or overclock the limit? i using 3500+ 2.21GHz and 7300GS 512MB
goldfries
post Dec 29 2006, 01:23 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




- delete -

This post has been edited by goldfries: Dec 29 2006, 02:20 PM
goldfries
post Dec 29 2006, 01:53 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 29 2006, 09:57 AM)
EDIT: y after i overclock my PC, when i go to the control panel > system there, it still show me 2.21GHz although i already adjust to 2.4GHz, and one more things, is 589.980MHz very high for my kingston PC4200 DDRs 1GB RAM?
*
better you use CPU-Z to view your system.

sometimes it's more about instability rather than heat.

so to make it more stable, you might have to up the vcore or vdimm or both.

after upping those stuff you'll generate more heat. smile.gif of course, i would that you understand vcore / vdimm and pushing it too high MAY cause damage to your system.

as for me, I OCed my rig from 1.8ghz to 2.5ghz with 1.6vcore. however i decided to drop it back to 2.3ghz and running 1.5vcore instead. lesser heat, and only a bit slower than 2.5ghz but still much faster than 1.8ghz. smile.gif

This post has been edited by goldfries: Dec 29 2006, 02:21 PM
WaCKy-Angel
post Dec 29 2006, 02:16 PM

PeACe~~
*********
All Stars
21,962 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: KL



QUOTE(warrior @ Dec 29 2006, 05:53 AM)
first of all i'm not pin pointing to anyone, but i feel that many ppl in this forum like to give their "maybe" opinion instead they're not sure about it. so as mod say answer it if you are sure or put a ? if you're not sure...
or you may say what's wrong if i simply answer? well when ppl google up they'll see the thread and this lead them to think "ppl in this forum/country are just so so"

my 2 cents
*
ppl learn from mistakes, and other brighter ppl learn from other ppl's mistakes...
Ok so we're abit dumb, whats wrong about that?
Your gonna take your C2D, quad core, etc etc to compare with US?
They have the tech more earlier than u...

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0192sec    0.37    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 09:59 AM