Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 noob question in overclocking, after overclock not much different

views
     
TSamduser
post Dec 29 2006, 08:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


when things turns into memory timing, i'm the most noob in timingand i still dont understand wat u all say the 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.0 timing >.<
J-Slade
post Dec 29 2006, 08:40 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia


QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 29 2006, 08:37 PM)
when things turns into memory timing, i'm the most noob in timingand i still dont understand wat u all say the 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.0 timing >.<
*
Have you read our forum's RAM Handbook yet?
TSamduser
post Dec 29 2006, 09:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


it's long man!! until now i'm still reading the timing only!! @@

i still dont know anout the RAM timing even though i hv already read the thread that u gv me, when the international links r up again, i will send u my cpu-z screenshot
LuVjunz
post Dec 29 2006, 11:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
115 posts

Joined: Jul 2006



last time i OC my rig and one thing i found out.

i OC from 2.4GHz to 2.8GHz. it ran fast but can't really feel it.

but when i OC my GC from 450MHz to 550MHz the output from the 3DMark hit from 7000+ for 05 to 9000+ for 05... that is a bloody big difference. haha.. ^^

This post has been edited by LuVjunz: Dec 29 2006, 11:52 PM
syarat
post Dec 30 2006, 01:09 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
325 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Gombak



QUOTE(LuVjunz @ Dec 29 2006, 11:51 PM)
i OC from 2.4GHz to 2.8GHz. it ran fast but can't really feel it.


*
to really enjoy the speed diff, i suggest u familiarize with the speed for a period of time.. run high-processing application,then u revert back to default speed.

next time u run the same application, u will hate the default speed.
laugh.gif

goldfries
post Dec 30 2006, 01:16 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(bobtiang @ Dec 29 2006, 07:52 PM)
gosh.. what diskette it need??
normally for CMOS reset, after pulling the pin out. what's the next step?
*
normally a CMOS reset jumper has 3 pins
[1][2][3]

so normal usage would have the jumper set on pins [1][2] while to reset CMOS just change it to [2][3] for a while then back to [1][2]

however another way to do so would be by removing that battery the mobo. smile.gif

QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 29 2006, 08:37 PM)
when things turns into memory timing, i'm the most noob in timingand i still dont understand wat u all say the 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.0 timing >.<
*
my timings are 3-4-4-11 and i couldn't be bothered to reach 2-2-2-5 either. why? i don't other to spend my time on timings as i don't see the purpose of spending so much time there just to speed up by some nano pico or whatever seconds that i couldn't even notice.
bobtiang
post Dec 30 2006, 10:58 AM

I live in a 6 STARS Hotel
******
Senior Member
1,788 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 冰城

QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 30 2006, 01:16 AM)
normally a CMOS reset jumper has 3 pins
[1][2][3]

so normal usage would have the jumper set on pins [1][2] while to reset CMOS just change it to [2][3] for a while then back to [1][2]
I pull out the pin from [1][2], then leave it there for like 15 mins.
then i plug in the pin back to [1][2].

it can boot till the POST, but it did find out that my RAM timing is not good, hence it set back to default.
so, i am not sure if I did clear the CMOS, cause some other setting like Disable onboard sound, disable Floppy still there. smile.gif

TSamduser
post Dec 30 2006, 11:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 30 2006, 01:16 AM)
my timings are 3-4-4-11 and i couldn't be bothered to reach 2-2-2-5 either. why? i don't other to spend my time on timings as i don't see the purpose of spending so much time there just to speed up by some nano pico or whatever seconds that i couldn't even notice.
*
when u want to make ur timing as less as possible, u must know that is ur RAM can support the timing u want? the lesser the timing the faster the performance, but u must gv out the stability of ur RAM, ur data may corrupt or PC hang, but if u make the timing longer or larger the number, u'll gain stability but ur RAM will suffer lose in performance, even a nano or pico second can make ur data corrupt or PC hang, maybe also can improve much stability.
goldfries
post Dec 30 2006, 07:23 PM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 30 2006, 11:59 AM)
when u want to make ur timing as less as possible, u must know that is ur RAM can support the timing u want? the lesser the timing the faster the performance, but u must gv out the stability of ur RAM, ur data may corrupt or PC hang, but if u make the timing longer or larger the number, u'll gain stability but ur RAM will suffer lose in performance, even a nano or pico second can make ur data corrupt or PC hang, maybe also can improve much stability.
*
which is why i don't spend on performance RAMs. smile.gif btw having shorter timing doesn't mean less stable, having longer timings doesn't mean more stable.

that's why some people take a lot of time and hassle to find out what's that lowest timing they can get before the RAM goes unstable. of course you can pump the vdimm for to help stabilize.
TSamduser
post Dec 30 2006, 07:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


y dont buy high performance RAM? more speed and stable u will gain isn't it?
goldfries
post Dec 31 2006, 01:54 AM

40K Club
Group Icon
Forum Admin
44,415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 30 2006, 07:43 PM)
y dont buy high performance RAM? more speed and stable u will gain isn't it?
*
i already explained earlier why i didn't get performance RAMs.

sure, you can say it's faster by having tighter timings and FSB - my question will be : how much faster? if you have the moolah and willing to pay for the boost (whether significant or not) then go ahead.

and value ram doesn't mean it's unstabled. neither does it mean it can't be OCed and still be stable. of course, this really depends on what Value Rams we're talking about. my KVR BT-D43s can OC fine but i tried other KVRs with Nanya chips and others, no such luck on OCing. smile.gif

all in all it really depends on what you have, and your knowledge on how to use it. for my case, my KVR works great so i don't see a purpose of buying performance RAMs unless my goal is to OC really well and get benchmarking results that i can brag about.
J-Slade
post Dec 31 2006, 12:33 PM

|[ Phenom II ]|
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: West Malaysia


QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 31 2006, 01:54 AM)
i already explained earlier why i didn't get performance RAMs.

sure, you can say it's faster by having tighter timings and FSB - my question will be : how much faster? if you have the moolah and willing to pay for the boost (whether significant or not) then go ahead.

and value ram doesn't mean it's unstabled. neither does it mean it can't be OCed and still be stable. of course, this really depends on what Value Rams we're talking about. my KVR BT-D43s can OC fine but i tried other KVRs with Nanya chips and others, no such luck on OCing. smile.gif

all in all it really depends on what you have, and your knowledge on how to use it. for my case, my KVR works great so i don't see a purpose of buying performance RAMs unless my goal is to OC really well and get benchmarking results that i can brag about.
*
Agreed... I have pushed my RAMs to tighter timings. But somehow... can't feel any difference. All I get is just the satisfaction of benchmarked results... haha.. kinda like syiok sendiri. No actual feel of the performance sweat.gif
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Jan 8 2007, 07:48 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


QUOTE(J-Slade @ Dec 31 2006, 01:33 PM)
Agreed... I have pushed my RAMs to tighter timings. But somehow... can't feel any difference. All I get is just the satisfaction of benchmarked results... haha.. kinda like syiok sendiri. No actual feel of the performance  sweat.gif
*
it depends on wat u do... not all OC get higher benchies... the reason i don get my CPU to 3GHz cuz it's more jumpy at 3GHz than my current 2.5GHz... i've tried tightenning my timings but will be unstable... If u do light OC it memang won show any diff... if u do better OC than diff story... example: wif my rig i can play Fear wif majority medium and some high wif no AA... after OC can put 2x AA... therefore in this case i achieved better speed & quality... so it really depend on wat u do... hmm.gif

This post has been edited by t3chn0m4nc3r: Jan 8 2007, 07:50 PM
TSamduser
post Jan 8 2007, 08:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


my memory timing is 4-3-3-5-13 1T i think i havent reach the most stable and tightest timing, but is my timing really that tights? i'm using DDR2 PC4300

4 Pages « < 2 3 4Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0166sec    0.54    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 02:06 AM