Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 noob question in overclocking, after overclock not much different

views
     
zeroglyph
post Dec 28 2006, 10:36 PM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
overclocking should be done little by little over a period of time TS. and you better know what you're doing. AMDs are not as safe as intel with overclocking. better check some of the overclocking guide here and try to understand as much as you can. overclocking blindly is a good way to waste money. 0.2Ghz increment is not that significant is most cases.

about the prime and benchmark thing:
it is to show stability. your system will rarely be pushed as much as with these benchmarking softwares. so if you're system is considered stable doing you daily task, there are still instability in your system that just haven't been discovered. so if your system is not stable with prime or any other benchmark software, your system is not 100% stable. it is only stable for your daily task.

This post has been edited by zeroglyph: Dec 28 2006, 10:37 PM
zeroglyph
post Dec 28 2006, 11:51 PM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 28 2006, 11:02 PM)
kindly explain.

i have been OCing AMD processors for since sub 1ghz days. so i'd like to know what you've discovered that i've not.
*
QUOTE(goldfries)
i powered an Intel 2.4ghz without putting on heatsink. no problem. shutdown itself. smile.gif spoil? no. safe? yes. what else?


well, that's what i'm basing it on. i'm not too updated with AMD technology, but i'm pretty sure Intel can still run safe without heatsink biggrin.gif. i know that AMD can be overclock, but i've seen for a fact(forgot which website) an overheated athlon got fried and an Intel will only throttle down and reboot. so let me rephrase that abit:

"AMD is overclockable as much as Intel(if not better), but it may not be as failsafe as intel "
zeroglyph
post Dec 29 2006, 12:21 AM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(syarat @ Dec 29 2006, 12:02 AM)
@zeroglyph
well, if u are not too updated, i guess u may have to rephrase a lot of time. stop doing it, until u update ur info on AMD.
u might be causing a havoc here.

OCers know what they are doing. failsafe or not or watsoever prob, they did it on their own risk.
i fried my athlon few years back, just because i am a noob at that time.. those who know how to handle things, i bet their Athlon is still doing a decent job.
*
exactly what i mean. intel will not fry itself due to its throttle down and reboot feature. by not updated, i mean i know that athlon does not have this feature, i just don't know whether the newer AMD model has it. so it is my bad for basing on old tech.

by failsafe, i mean a p4 can be overclocked without worries on stock, but an athlon will fry if clocked too much on stock. with proper cooling, it's a different story already.

by "knowing how to handle things" means, it is no longer in failsafe territory because they already know how to do things.

i'm not trying to mislead or "wreck havoc", just a precaution based on experience. if that's wrong, then.....whatever.
zeroglyph
post Dec 29 2006, 12:50 AM

woot!!! senior member now?
******
Senior Member
1,255 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
by athlon i mean athlon XP. the research papers i read was a comparison between p4 and athlon XP.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0143sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 10:47 AM