I'm pretty sure the torque won't be high enough to damage your tyres as the increase will be modest. The max torque will probably be almost the same but should get more torque at low rpm. But it will be good if we can get a stock vs. remapped torque/hp curve.

Here is one example of a remapped Mazda 3 from a U.S. tuner. Not much difference in max torque (red dotted line v. green dotted line) but you can see that it has been boosted at low rpm. If can get something like this I'll be happy.

For those who got this car last year (eg. GL), may I know what was the pricings again?
I see from carlist for those with year 2015, it was around 96k. I read before that Mazda didn't increase the price this year (unlike Toyota and Honda) but why the current price is now 109k? 

i'm going for CannyCool tint http://www.cannycool.com.my/Products.html once i get my car this weekend
96k is not on the road, on the road should be 109k

if you use carlist make sure you sort the price from highest to lowest to see the accurate pricing

The CannyCool website doesn't mention TSER (Total Solar Energy Rejection) which is the most important spec. UVR and IRR are useless as there is no standard so manufacturers can base on a narrow band or just a single wavelength to give impressive figures.

Better go for the established brands, IMO.

wow.. too bad the local one didnt provide any dyno results for b4 and after tuned.. if local malaysia tuner can get similar result like this, i will go for it for sure! so much of torque gained in low end rpm almost 40nm! tats impressive!

wanna ask, if i install 7 mil security tint, will it be a burden for the power window motor? if i wind the window often will the motor burn because the tint too heavy?

For those who got this car last year (eg. GL), may I know what was the pricings again?
I see from carlist for those with year 2015, it was around 96k. I read before that Mazda didn't increase the price this year (unlike Toyota and Honda) but why the current price is now 109k? 

yup price was 109k.. no change b4.. maybe the price is after rebates + not on the road.. u knw they always put lowest possible price to attract buyer to pm them hehe

wow.. too bad the local one didnt provide any dyno results for b4 and after tuned.. if local malaysia tuner can get similar result like this, i will go for it for sure! so much of torque gained in low end rpm almost 40nm! tats impressive!

For those experiencing throttle lag or lack of power, I would advise you to change to Shell 97 or BHP 97. I have almost 30,000km on this car and I can tell you this car is quite picky on the type of fuel you feed it. I am now permanently on Shell 97 and lag for me is minimal, and on colder days(at night) zero lag, press throttle car straight away fly.

Don't bother with the other 97s aside from these two brands, I have tested them multiple tanks over many refuels. If you have to go 95, only BHP 95 is decent. So if your engine is roaring loud but no power, it's most likely your fuel. Crap fuel pulls timing from your engine making it drive like a lorry. If you have the budget I highly recommend going 97 for this car.

Dude any comment on Petron Ron97? been using this actually,
can compare between shell?

but confirm fuel consumption is gg liao 

You have to look into overall bro. It's best if you check your MZD fuel consumption data analyze. Look at the picture which I've took. The avg FC is hard for you to judge.

Basically, you need to know how you want to control your speed on the highway. Well, basically in city, you can hardly control due to the jam. Your speed have to be constant in order m3 system to show you the accurate display. If you 10 mins step 90 kph then the next 110 kph, then next 50kph, and so on, how can m3 system show you an accurate display, if you get what i mean. It's best if you observe the current FC instead of the average. For my guess, m3 system will take 90kph + 110 kph + 50kph + so on / the time running = average FC.
So far, if at constant speed, yes, i find it 80% accurate. The other 20% base on approximity / roughly (example, m3 shows 780km and u can roughly estimate 750km @ 90kph.)

Here are the pictures of the km I've been travelling from Damansara to Penang with just 1 fuel tank.

Above is the full tank before i travel to Penang. Notice that is already running 24.1km.

Above is the M3 system on economy Fuel consumption menu. Driving on 90 kph @ 4.6 ltr/ 100km

Above driving on 90kph after more than an hour @ 4.5 ltr/ 100km

Above driving on 110kph going back to Damansara.

Above driving on 110kph reaching Damansara.

Above is the total km which i m about to refill

Above refilled. The km updated shows 797km which I'm able to drive at 110kph constantly.

Above is the price I've pump. 34.41 liter @ RM67.10 - RM1.95 per liter
Note that M3 is a 51 liter car. That gives me remaining of 16.59 liter.
Hope this give an overall that m3 is a fuel saving car depends on the speed you are going. Above is 90kph and 110kph day trip.

Well, enjoy your ride with M3 guys. =)

Any idea on Caltex fuel?
I got few friend which in car servicing business, they recommended me to use Caltex.

Any idea on Caltex fuel?
I got few friend which in car servicing business, they recommended me to use Caltex.