QUOTE(SSJBen @ Jun 20 2018, 02:50 PM)
According to this pretty in-depth Polish
review, difference between the B8 and C8 is almost inconceivable. Not surprising because the B8 is basically a rebadged C7.
Now the issue is, in the west the B8 is only $200 MSRP less than the a C8. Street prices would be even lower than that, so I don't see the point of the B8 at all either considering the price difference would be no more than RM1k here.
Agreed
From what I gathered , these are pretty much the only difference
1) Image processing - the B8 is only restricted to dual steps when it comes to the picture enhancing and noise reduction , instead of the highly advertised Quad step from C8 , not like most video purist use this feature anyway . On theory , the C8 should have a slightly more accurate picture enhancement due to having increased color points reference. As you said this may not be visible to the bare eyes
2) the a9 CPU uses a 33x33x33 for their internal 3D L.U.T cube ( 35937 color data points reference) , the a7 (B8) can only do 17x17x17 (4913 color data points) , fewer color interpolation runs are needed for more accurate colors on the C8 ++ models , less room for mistakes . Another not so impactful feature to the consumers , more useful to the calibrators.
3) Both processor can technically decode and run 4k + 120 fps (HFR) videos via USB / internal apps , but the C8 can do HDR + HFR simultaneously , a7 (B8) is restricted to only one task at one time . More of a future proof measurement since there are hardly any HFR consumer content around. Some reviewers also speculate the a9 processor may be able to decode 8k at 60 fps via firmware updates in the future.
These new features aren't crucial or groundbreaking in any ways (at least for now) , I would still spend a little bit more on the C8 ++ series for the peace of mind .
This post has been edited by Convael: Jun 21 2018, 08:38 PM