QUOTE(ayamxxx @ Apr 16 2021, 10:00 AM)
the pro vs prefe cfe were:
1. FC. Campro cfe fuel is on the high side while Civic being 1.8NA + CVT give better FC, easily 14-15km/l
2. Better CVT being a torque converter CVT, more direct as opposed clutch-based cvt as preve. The jerkiness is almost none as Preve.
The no 2 makes u feel the car is easy to move, no need to push more.
Or... go for Honda City (which variants doesn't matter)1. FC. Campro cfe fuel is on the high side while Civic being 1.8NA + CVT give better FC, easily 14-15km/l
2. Better CVT being a torque converter CVT, more direct as opposed clutch-based cvt as preve. The jerkiness is almost none as Preve.
The no 2 makes u feel the car is easy to move, no need to push more.
I just notice the size is almost the same as Preve. Damn. Except it's more lighter and no rear torsion beam and no rear brake disc.
B segment sedan is getting bigger.
But to me it's hard to sell my NA Preve. It got complete passive safety features for the price less than 60k.
Maybe my next car will be an SUV or a hatchback to replace my 2nd car (a hatchback too)