Yes, according to TTL, he saw some mockups/prototypes of the Fury in all its custom glory.

Pricing doesn't sound right, considering a custom 980Ti costs about the same...

typically, euro prices are bit higher

Forgot about the Euro part

I read it as 700USD...

This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jul 5 2015, 12:52 PM

Asus strix certainly will cool down this beast well, hand itchy to buy r9 fury but my CPU is still FX8350 scared will bottleneck this beast. Hopefully dx12 will improve fx cpu performance hopefully hahahahaha.....

I'm waiting to see how Sapphire 'remix' the Fury...

Imagine Fury with Vapor-X cooler?

yeah vapor x will certainly improve cooling to the max on air, damn fury x so tempting . Id say air cooled fury will certainly give the 980ti a run for its money

I doubt that..the 980Ti is way faster..with all we have seen air id say cooled fury would still be ahead of GTx 980 and 390x. Maybe it might be better on price/perf ratio

most benchmarks i saw its like slight margin of difference its not that far from the 980ti, yeah ur right price/performance will be spot on on air cooled

Fury non X is a cut die on some stream processor, and run on air cooling.

If Fury X can't get a clear win on 980TI, I seriously doubt Fury Vanilla can do so, just saying.

i dont think 8350 will bottleneck a single fury x.. last time i used it with 290s no issue at all. but for sure 8350 need to be overclock.

you guys saw the design ASUS STRIX III with triple Fan ... maybe that's for AMD Fury (non X) yes i saw it for 980 Ti too..



Fiji Pro with only 3584 Stream Process /56 Compute hm but price 550USD i could really see it on Vapor X..

http://wccftech.com/wip-amd-r9-fury-3584-g...eam-processors/

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Jul 5 2015, 05:47 PM

MSI AF activate it... reason it lock 1)beta driver 2) New TEch HBM

bro: i post some 3dmark.. bench on it eh... not alot and i see it hit limit on mem i can clock.. +60Mhz on Mem and +75Mhz Core any higher Benchmark crash..

MSI AF activate it.. i have unlock it but.. is average clock.. i manage to get 560Mhz mem without crashing the benchmark.. this with Core clock to 1125Mhz.. x

But there Gentleman name of # royfrosty on overclock net up load his benchmark score for game...

whats holding back the core clock bro ? Cannot up the voltage ya

I heard this card got dual bios , have you tried custom bios if there is one ?

hm FEAR... when boost Core/Mem 1,130Mhz/600Mhz Volt 40% it got artifact so i default it Find safest (without Crash Benchmark/Artifact) is Core/Mem1124mhz/560Mhz. so weird temp under 55C during load..

yeah got dual bios.. able to reset incase i screw up bios it auto restore.. but not gone to that blue/black screen yet.. eh scare la.. i think i wait when time fury X is more available market so i can RMA just in case i over do it.. but at moment is solid.. but wish i could break 19K Graphic score on 3dmark

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Jul 5 2015, 11:12 PM

Currently getting ready for games like FO4 end of this year. 380/380x/390 worth getting over their predecessors? 280x/290x? Got big diff worth the price between them?

hello, saw signature your using Nvidia.. hm why don't you go for GTX 970 if your gaming on 1080P it should serve you well..

hurm..8gb vs 4gb..even though the difference is quite large..but framerate for 1080p game is not to much difference around 2-5fps..if u got money buy r9 390x(RM1650++)..if ur budget is tight get a r9 290x(RM1300++)

This post has been edited by crash123: Jul 6 2015, 12:32 AM

Memory size don't affect frame-rate when games don't eat over the memory limit.

8GB is a little overkill for 1080p but again, the general rule is the more the better, who knows one day you might consider a multi cards setup or interested with some heavy mods/textures in game, those are time where huge VRAM cards will shine over the default cards.

This post has been edited by Human10: Jul 6 2015, 01:09 AM

im not very up to date with nvidia stuff I dont know what I should get for nvidia been following amd since forever. Im also on tight budgets so unless nvidia has better options at same price as 280x I'll have to stick to AMD.

mm icic, I think i'll just go for the old gen, not much worth the difference.