Frame times... does it ring a bell to you?



This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Jul 6 2015, 10:18 PM

Sos cili: http://www.techpowerup.com/214085/amd-rade...ons-leaked.html

This post has been edited by Minecrafter: Jul 6 2015, 10:24 PM

can rediuce screen tearing bro on certain games

stuttering fest for cfx configurations

Old crossfire yes, new crossfire no.

oh now i remember why i don't care Ft...

We got a fight in our hands

An article at Anandtech expects the Nano to be retailed higher than Fury X

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd...fury-x-review/9

i say AMD R9 NAno be same price or tad a bit lower..

1)why higher price? no AIO Wc.. so extra cost producing or involve, no paying 3rd party AIO e.g. CoolerMaster

2) still base on Fiji same Stream just Lower Clock/Mem HBM, TDP lower so OC must be lock or worst than (limited) Fury X..

3) base this .. http://www.anandtech.com/show/9390/the-amd...fury-x-review/9 does it say about price R9 Nano be Higher ?

Haha, dude, read the article la

wow 2 titans kaw2 kena , the temps on full load is so awesome

i wait for r9 nano out

He's just predicting with the reasons being having no competition for that form factor.

Ah wells. I thought the nano would be a slightly more affordable Fiji.

It'll be no suprise if the nano is more expensive than Fury X. It is essentially a Fury x, with just a lower clockspeed. Everything else is equal. You can dump a fury bios, and run it with custom wc. The R9 nano will be the better binned of the Fiji chip.

yes predicting.. Small form factor i saw GTX 970 but R9 Nano come with new HBM.. high bandwidth memory not even their competitor have that tech.. so i am sure there no competitor could really match if compare board to board tech.. +4ooo Stream processor and 8.9billion transistor.. hm hard to get competitor for it indeed, i did not heard R9 Nano be price as lower than Flagship but been advertise as a First small form GPU running new HBM with all Fiji chip have to offer but running lower core/mem clock.. but let's just wait..

Nobody going to buy that if they price it higher than the Fury X.
Based on AMD 2x Performance/Watt and 175watt TDP claim, i expect the R9 Nano will perform similar or slightly better than the R9-290x.
Green camp have mini GTX 970 at that form factor and performance range.

But nano is still shorter than 970ITX, also 970 ITX's performance is a little limited compared to full size 970.

A price above 290x is still sensible, price it above Fury (or even Fury X) without justification in performance simply wouldn't work.

GTX970 times up, only advantage it had is the lower power consumption.

this denied jayz bias/lean towards nvidia like someone said before.

is the pricing same to compare to malaysia?.
im not up to date with msia prices.

This post has been edited by TheHitman47: Jul 7 2015, 09:01 PM

Marginally shorter. Indeed the performance is slightly lower but it still 290x tier.

I think will price it similar or slightly lower than GTX 980.

Damn, that card is faster than my 290x.