My LOD is 70 and Greg is 69.

I checked back VRAM, yours is 2300+MB and greg's is 2500MB+, he's actually higher.

if 980 is fine, can someone with titan x provide ss on it? Might be driver bug?

Wait i post high quality SS from NCP.

The last image is 2797 MB VRAm usage.

This is NVP high quality SS

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/661/aMZmMl.png
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/673/cXkCyJ.png

Can see have that at very far distance there's slightly sharper than NCP default

look at the FPS only 1 fps difference.

There are 2 things to be sure

There is a driver a bug on Titan X or the guy is totally faking.

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 02:58 PM

on the side note, Acid_RuleZz can u update the 1st post, already been more than few days.

Here are some SS of Nvidia high quality

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/901/CuIx4F.png

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/673/BkzmM8.png

Try AF=0
Another user managed to reproduced it to looked like the claimed default screenshot before using that.

Yes wait i am doing it.

NCP AF 16X and high quality

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/673/nyZBwC.png

NCP AF 0X (Gerg Image quality)

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1920x1080.../909/MvmOvF.png

NCP default (let the 3D application decide)

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1665x937q90/661/UXV95h.png

Greg Computer has some real problem

Someone plz post this to anandtech because their is lackluster debate going on there.

This post has been edited by Desprado: Jul 4 2015, 04:28 PM

Sry, too lazy and "busy". Hopefully tomorrow afternoon is not hot as F, so i can work on it.

Anyway Unseen83, you can unlock Fury X memory overclock by enabling "Extend official overclock limits" in Msi Afterburner.
Voltage coming soon, Unwinder already got his hand on Fury X.

awh nooo i don't like msi AF... got black screen history with mee... x i'm scare.. to use that.

By way your looking AMD R9 Fury X RM2.4K fellow is from Kelantan.. he buy test/bench for week than sell...
https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=3634633&hl=

hm i just Enable HBM memory OC.. i did not touch GPU core or Tessellation control.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5299741 Gpu Core /Mem 1050 / 520mhz

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5299827 GPU core/Mem 1,050 /540mhz

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5299877 This GPU core/Mem OC 1,100mhz/540mhz

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/5299926 Gpu core / Mem 1,115mhz / 550mhz

must be error or something, why higher clock get lower G.score.. ehh





This post has been edited by Unseen83: Jul 4 2015, 08:25 PM

Go and read this. Mantle is more useful than nvidia fanboys know.

lol...............

Im no fanboys, except for you who troll here. I use both vendor, Intel and AMD, AMD and nvidia. But if you know what vulkan is you shouldnt ask that question in the first place.

i just report him for trolling, taunt and Flaming on the threads.. please be kind do same, you have good evening

I just did, thanks. You have a good evening too. Im quite jelly that you got the Fury X but Im not really looking for an upgrade, 290X are fine for my needs. But the temperature improvement is great. Maybe I should bought those AIO adapter for my card.