QUOTE(jwrx @ Jul 24 2013, 11:00 PM)
Got. Ford Fiesta sedan, under 85kk, 7 airbags, ESP, ABS, EBD, TCS...apa u mau pun ada, 5 star NCAP as well
Rio has 6 airbags. Less than 80k.Why driving a safe car makes sense
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:02 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
5 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:04 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(darkdevilrey @ Jul 24 2013, 10:38 PM) You earn enuff to buy a safe car, you can choose toa) buy and drive a safe car b) drive a kancil and let God decide You are alive today, you can choose to a) NOT sleep on the PLUS highway b) sleep on the PLUS highway and let God decide See my point? Besides, if you wanna talk religion: If you think God is all-powerful and can control whether you die or not, what makes you think you can control whether you wanna suicide or not against His will? This post has been edited by dares: Jul 24 2013, 11:06 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
114 posts Joined: Aug 2012 |
Sorry, my POV is that there is NO WAY we can ENSURE That the car we are driving is totally SAFE. Simply because all these are assumptions. The crash test only comes out with a procedures, common encounter and put them into test. Once passed, then these cars get certified.
Do you think when (touch wood) someone is meant to get into casualty, because of the brand "Volvo" "Mercs" "BMW", then it makes the differences? Or even it is "VIOS", then the God will say,"It is a God's car, let's spare these INNOCENT lives!"?? No, even the most safety car, tend to fail. It does mean it is fail proof. Statistics have proven that the bigger the vehicle, the higher the chance of survival. If this is the case, why don't we all change our cars to trucks due to the safety issues. I think these truck can easily pass these Euro NCAP easily. It all depends on how vehicles collide, how is the casualty happens and the impact of the casualty. These design can prevent but NOT avoid it some vehicles would get involved into the casualties. QUOTE Good Choices Read more here: http://www.trucktrend.com/features/consume...l#ixzz2ZyZ86V8jCertainly, there are pros and cons to driving a truck or SUV as with any vehicle, but the negatives critics are anxious to point out aren't necessarily a disadvantage. A study by two economics professors at Rutgers University for the Cato Institute, an anti-regulatory think tank, indicates that pickups and SUVs may actually be decreasing fatalities on our nation's roads. The study notes that, despite the doubling of light trucks over the last 20 years, there's been a 33-percent drop in traffic-accident fatalities per capita, per licensed driver, and per registered vehicle. In addition, fatalities per vehicle mile traveled have decreased by 50 percent. The professors say safety advantages, including stiffer chassis and added weight, override the hazards. The pair concludes that a 10-percent increase in light-truck registration would reduce deaths from multiple-vehicle crashes by 4 percent and single-crash fatalities by 15. This post has been edited by gold member: Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(gold member @ Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM) Sorry, my POV is that there is NO WAY we can ENSURE That the car we are driving is totally SAFE. Simply because all these are assumptions. The crash test only comes out with a procedures, common encounter and put them into test. Once passed, then these cars get certified. The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE. Do you think when (touch wood) someone is meant to get into casualty, because of the brand "Volvo" "Mercs" "BMW", then it makes the differences? Or even it is "VIOS", then the God will say,"It is a God's car, let's spare these INNOCENT lives!"?? No, even the most safety car, tend to fail. It does mean it is fail proof. Statistics have proven that the bigger the vehicle, the higher the chance of survival. If this is the case, why don't we all change our cars to trucks due to the safety issues. I think these truck can easily pass these Euro NCAP easily. It all depends on how vehicles collide, how is the casualty happens and the impact of the casualty. These design can prevent but NOT avoid it some vehicles would get involved into the casualties. Read more here: http://www.trucktrend.com/features/consume...l#ixzz2ZyZ86V8j If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva. This post has been edited by dares: Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:17 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
515 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:04 PM) I have checked with the Ford SA already, not auto lock for all Ford models, even the Focus and Mondeo ! Like I said, it's a euro safety feature, even a 300k bmw does not have it, but if something like lack of auto lock is so important that you would ignore the other safety features? |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,704 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:22 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
114 posts Joined: Aug 2012 |
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM) The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE. Exactly what I am trying to say. It all depends on the driver and sometimes probabilities. All these are out of our controls. There are so many parameters on the road. It doesn't mean if we are careful, and driving a very safety branded car, then it is an "immunity" to all casualties! (in other word, it doesn't means once one has shone the brand of incredible "VIOS" = ultimately spare!). If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva. There are many way a casualty can happen. It can happen that a vehicle losses control, some obstacles on road during high speed driving and can be even (the story inspira vs lancer) that a vehicle lost control and flying over from the opposite side of the road! There are just many possibilities. It doesn't mean that if we have a safe car, we drive recklessly = God saves the poor driver. |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
700 posts Joined: Jun 2008 |
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM) The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE. but driving a Viva might avoid that accident in the first place..maybe due to slower acceleration and top speed.If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva. It is all about bad timing. This post has been edited by wh0cares: Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
5 posts Joined: Oct 2012 |
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ?
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
139 posts Joined: May 2009 |
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM) I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ? not some, is many, at least typical malaysians |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
QUOTE(gold member @ Jul 24 2013, 11:22 PM) Exactly what I am trying to say. It all depends on the driver and sometimes probabilities. All these are out of our controls. There are so many parameters on the road. It doesn't mean if we are careful, and driving a very safety branded car, then it is an "immunity" to all casualties! (in other word, it doesn't means once one has shone the brand of incredible "VIOS" = ultimately spare!). Fair point. You can only do your best to increase the chance of survival for yourself and your passengers, that's all.There are many way a casualty can happen. It can happen that a vehicle losses control, some obstacles on road during high speed driving and can be even (the story inspira vs lancer) that a vehicle lost control and flying over from the opposite side of the road! There are just many possibilities. It doesn't mean that if we have a safe car, we drive recklessly = God saves the poor driver. |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:44 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(jwrx @ Jul 24 2013, 11:19 PM) Like I said, it's a euro safety feature, even a 300k bmw does not have it, but if something like lack of auto lock is so important that you would ignore the other safety features? No, I will not overlook the important safety features such as side & curtain airbags, ABS, ESP etc. But I will also NOT consider a car that does not has auto lock feature, with the rampant robberies, road bullies and snatch thieves in Malaysia nowadays ! Looks like I have to change my next nickname to kiahyundai, no more f10f30 loh ! This post has been edited by E34E36E46: Jul 24 2013, 11:48 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 11:53 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(kailord @ Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM) I can confirm that, one day I was driving happily at 120kp on the NS highway, but was overtaken by 2 kancil/viva (can't differentiate because they were passing too fast lah) This post has been edited by E34E36E46: Jul 25 2013, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
495 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Renggam |
im driving viva . thinking of upgrade with 70k budget make taken service charge into consideration.
so alza, almera, preve which one is safer ? |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:18 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
876 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM) I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ? Many factors:1. Money. They are not going to use their car for long, hence RV is important. Since they know they are going to sell their car in a few years, it is a CONFIRMED big 'savings'. 2. Cars tend to breaks down in Malaysia shitty road. Drive a skyline in Japan, absorbers good for many years. Take the skyline back to Malaysia, all 4 absorbers need to chance in less than 2 years (4k satu batang). Nobody keeps the absorber as stock in Malaysia, need wait 1 week for stock. This is about money + convenience. 3. Chances of fatal accident is very very low. Whereas chances for minor accident (scratch, bump other cars during parking, scratch door) is very common especially among young drivers. Hence buying a car with cheap spare parts almost guaranteed some 'savings' as all these minor accidents might required you to change some parts. Why pay more for something that has the probability of >1% (fatal accident) to happen when you can SAVE for something that will happen at the probability of say...50%? (minor accident) 4. Malaysians usually prepare for something they foresee. Since fatal accident is very rare and "die" is a almost a taboo word, they would sometimes place more importance on other factor. As long as the car have some safety features, then it is fine. Don't need to have 6 airbags. 2 airbags are enough. *All those numbers are just my imaginary guess works to show my point. It's not a statistic but it makes my point clearer. |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:37 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
QUOTE(Balanced @ Jul 25 2013, 12:18 AM) Many factors: Then why buy life insurance or personal accident insurance. The probability of dying at a young age also very low what, or else the life insurance companies all kaput ! I look at those safety features as insurance, hope I will never use them, but will have peace of mind to have them ever ready to serve. 1. Money. They are not going to use their car for long, hence RV is important. Since they know they are going to sell their car in a few years, it is a CONFIRMED big 'savings'. 2. Cars tend to breaks down in Malaysia shitty road. Drive a skyline in Japan, absorbers good for many years. Take the skyline back to Malaysia, all 4 absorbers need to chance in less than 2 years (4k satu batang). Nobody keeps the absorber as stock in Malaysia, need wait 1 week for stock. This is about money + convenience. 3. Chances of fatal accident is very very low. Whereas chances for minor accident (scratch, bump other cars during parking, scratch door) is very common especially among young drivers. Hence buying a car with cheap spare parts almost guaranteed some 'savings' as all these minor accidents might required you to change some parts. Why pay more for something that has the probability of >1% (fatal accident) to happen when you can SAVE for something that will happen at the probability of say...50%? (minor accident) 4. Malaysians usually prepare for something they foresee. Since fatal accident is very rare and "die" is a almost a taboo word, they would sometimes place more importance on other factor. As long as the car have some safety features, then it is fine. Don't need to have 6 airbags. 2 airbags are enough. *All those numbers are just my imaginary guess works to show my point. It's not a statistic but it makes my point clearer. |
|
|
Jul 25 2013, 12:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
876 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 25 2013, 12:37 AM) Then why buy life insurance or personal accident insurance. The probability of dying at a young age also very low what, or else the life insurance companies all kaput ! I look at those safety features as insurance, hope I will never use them, but will have peace of mind to have them ever ready to serve. Life insurance = covered many things ma, not only accident fatal accident on the road. Personal accident insurance = it is aim for coverage during accident. But is not only covered for fatal accident ma. Normal minor accidents also covered |
| Change to: | 0.0173sec
0.67
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:01 AM |