Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

17 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why driving a safe car makes sense

views
     
kailord
post Jul 24 2013, 11:02 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(jwrx @ Jul 24 2013, 11:00 PM)
Got. Ford Fiesta sedan, under 85kk, 7 airbags, ESP, ABS, EBD, TCS...apa u mau pun ada, 5 star NCAP as well
*
Rio has 6 airbags. Less than 80k.
E34E36E46
post Jul 24 2013, 11:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(jwrx @ Jul 24 2013, 11:00 PM)
Got. Ford Fiesta sedan, under 85kk, 7 airbags, ESP, ABS, EBD, TCS...apa u mau pun ada, 5 star NCAP as well
*
I have checked with the Ford SA already, not auto lock for all Ford models, even the Focus and Mondeo ! doh.gif
dares
post Jul 24 2013, 11:06 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(darkdevilrey @ Jul 24 2013, 10:38 PM)
you are plain stupid.

you cant even differentiate suicide and God's Will.
*
You earn enuff to buy a safe car, you can choose to
a) buy and drive a safe car
b) drive a kancil and let God decide

You are alive today, you can choose to
a) NOT sleep on the PLUS highway
b) sleep on the PLUS highway and let God decide

See my point?

Besides, if you wanna talk religion: If you think God is all-powerful and can control whether you die or not, what makes you think you can control whether you wanna suicide or not against His will?

This post has been edited by dares: Jul 24 2013, 11:06 PM
gold member
post Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
Sorry, my POV is that there is NO WAY we can ENSURE That the car we are driving is totally SAFE. Simply because all these are assumptions. The crash test only comes out with a procedures, common encounter and put them into test. Once passed, then these cars get certified.

Do you think when (touch wood) someone is meant to get into casualty, because of the brand "Volvo" "Mercs" "BMW", then it makes the differences? Or even it is "VIOS", then the God will say,"It is a God's car, let's spare these INNOCENT lives!"??

No, even the most safety car, tend to fail. It does mean it is fail proof. Statistics have proven that the bigger the vehicle, the higher the chance of survival. If this is the case, why don't we all change our cars to trucks due to the safety issues. I think these truck can easily pass these Euro NCAP easily.

It all depends on how vehicles collide, how is the casualty happens and the impact of the casualty. These design can prevent but NOT avoid it some vehicles would get involved into the casualties.



QUOTE
Good Choices
Certainly, there are pros and cons to driving a truck or SUV as with any vehicle, but the negatives critics are anxious to point out aren't necessarily a disadvantage. A study by two economics professors at Rutgers University for the Cato Institute, an anti-regulatory think tank, indicates that pickups and SUVs may actually be decreasing fatalities on our nation's roads. The study notes that, despite the doubling of light trucks over the last 20 years, there's been a 33-percent drop in traffic-accident fatalities per capita, per licensed driver, and per registered vehicle. In addition, fatalities per vehicle mile traveled have decreased by 50 percent. The professors say safety advantages, including stiffer chassis and added weight, override the hazards. The pair concludes that a 10-percent increase in light-truck registration would reduce deaths from multiple-vehicle crashes by 4 percent and single-crash fatalities by 15.
Read more here: http://www.trucktrend.com/features/consume...l#ixzz2ZyZ86V8j

This post has been edited by gold member: Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM
dares
post Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(gold member @ Jul 24 2013, 11:08 PM)
Sorry, my POV is that there is NO WAY we can ENSURE That the car we are driving is totally SAFE. Simply because all these are assumptions. The crash test only comes out with a procedures, common encounter and put them into test. Once passed, then these cars get certified.

Do you think when (touch wood) someone is meant to get into casualty, because of the brand "Volvo" "Mercs" "BMW", then it makes the differences? Or even it is "VIOS", then the God will say,"It is a God's car, let's spare these INNOCENT lives!"??

No, even the most safety car, tend to fail. It does mean it is fail proof. Statistics have proven that the bigger the vehicle, the higher the chance of survival. If this is the case, why don't we all change our cars to trucks due to the safety issues. I think these truck can easily pass these Euro NCAP easily.

It all depends on how vehicles collide, how is the casualty happens and the impact of the casualty. These design can prevent but NOT avoid it some vehicles would get involved into the casualties.
Read more here: http://www.trucktrend.com/features/consume...l#ixzz2ZyZ86V8j
*
The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE.

If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva.

This post has been edited by dares: Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM
E34E36E46
post Jul 24 2013, 11:17 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(6UE5T @ Jul 24 2013, 10:30 PM)
You can see from his nick that BMW is his car of choice, so none below rm100k when new. smile.gif
*
Hey Bro, haven't you notice all the models are above 10 years old ? brows.gif
jwrx
post Jul 24 2013, 11:19 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
515 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:04 PM)
I have checked with the Ford SA already, not auto lock for all Ford models, even the Focus and Mondeo ! doh.gif
*
Like I said, it's a euro safety feature, even a 300k bmw does not have it, but if something like lack of auto lock is so important that you would ignore the other safety features?
6UE5T
post Jul 24 2013, 11:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,704 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:17 PM)
Hey Bro, haven't you notice all the models are above 10 years old ?  brows.gif
*
I know, but when new they're all expensive cars, right? smile.gif
gold member
post Jul 24 2013, 11:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Aug 2012
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM)
The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE.

If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva.
*
Exactly what I am trying to say. It all depends on the driver and sometimes probabilities. All these are out of our controls. There are so many parameters on the road. It doesn't mean if we are careful, and driving a very safety branded car, then it is an "immunity" to all casualties! (in other word, it doesn't means once one has shone the brand of incredible "VIOS" = ultimately spare!).

There are many way a casualty can happen. It can happen that a vehicle losses control, some obstacles on road during high speed driving and can be even (the story inspira vs lancer) that a vehicle lost control and flying over from the opposite side of the road! There are just many possibilities. It doesn't mean that if we have a safe car, we drive recklessly = God saves the poor driver. wink.gif
wh0cares
post Jul 24 2013, 11:24 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
700 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 24 2013, 11:15 PM)
The whole point for safer cars is about the INCREASING THE POSSIBILITY of surviving an accident, not a GUARANTEE.

If someone gets killed in a Viva after ramming a tree, perhaps that person would've survived in a Vios? But would a Vios survive a collision with a 10 tonne truck? probably not, but it is even less likely for a Viva.
*
but driving a Viva might avoid that accident in the first place..maybe due to slower acceleration and top speed.
It is all about bad timing.

This post has been edited by wh0cares: Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM
kailord
post Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2012


QUOTE(wh0cares @ Jul 24 2013, 11:24 PM)
but driving a Viva might avoid that accident in the first place..maybe due to slower acceleration and top speed.
*
Viva can be fast. Enough to cause a fatal accident.
E34E36E46
post Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ? hmm.gif
**no-name**
post Jul 24 2013, 11:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
139 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM)
I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ?  hmm.gif
*
not some, is many, at least typical malaysians
dares
post Jul 24 2013, 11:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(gold member @ Jul 24 2013, 11:22 PM)
Exactly what I am trying to say. It all depends on the driver and sometimes probabilities. All these are out of our controls. There are so many parameters on the road. It doesn't mean if we are careful, and driving a very safety branded car, then it is an "immunity" to all casualties! (in other word, it doesn't means once one has shone the brand of incredible "VIOS" = ultimately spare!).

There are many way a casualty can happen. It can happen that a vehicle losses control, some obstacles on road during high speed driving and can be even (the story inspira vs lancer) that a vehicle lost control and flying over from the opposite side of the road! There are just many possibilities. It doesn't mean that if we have a safe car, we drive recklessly = God saves the poor driver.  wink.gif
*
Fair point. You can only do your best to increase the chance of survival for yourself and your passengers, that's all.
E34E36E46
post Jul 24 2013, 11:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(jwrx @ Jul 24 2013, 11:19 PM)
Like I said, it's a euro safety feature, even a 300k bmw does not have it, but if something like lack of auto lock is so important that you would ignore the other safety features?
*
No, I will not overlook the important safety features such as side & curtain airbags, ABS, ESP etc. But I will also NOT consider a car that does not has auto lock feature, with the rampant robberies, road bullies and snatch thieves in Malaysia nowadays ! shakehead.gif

Looks like I have to change my next nickname to kiahyundai, no more f10f30 loh !

This post has been edited by E34E36E46: Jul 24 2013, 11:48 PM
E34E36E46
post Jul 24 2013, 11:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(kailord @ Jul 24 2013, 11:25 PM)
Viva can be fast. Enough to cause a fatal accident.
*
I can confirm that, one day I was driving happily at 120kp on the NS highway, but was overtaken by 2 kancil/viva (can't differentiate because they were passing too fast lah) blush.gif

This post has been edited by E34E36E46: Jul 25 2013, 12:08 AM
lunacy
post Jul 25 2013, 12:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
495 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Renggam


im driving viva . thinking of upgrade with 70k budget make taken service charge into consideration.

so alza, almera, preve which one is safer ?
Balanced
post Jul 25 2013, 12:18 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
876 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 24 2013, 11:38 PM)
I really cannot comprehend how come some people would choose RV/cheap spare parts/low maintenance over 6 Airbags and stability control, when these safety features will greatly improve their chances of survival in an accident or minimize the injuries ?  hmm.gif
*
Many factors:

1. Money. They are not going to use their car for long, hence RV is important. Since they know they are going to sell their car in a few years, it is a CONFIRMED big 'savings'.

2. Cars tend to breaks down in Malaysia shitty road. Drive a skyline in Japan, absorbers good for many years. Take the skyline back to Malaysia, all 4 absorbers need to chance in less than 2 years (4k satu batang). Nobody keeps the absorber as stock in Malaysia, need wait 1 week for stock. This is about money + convenience.

3. Chances of fatal accident is very very low. Whereas chances for minor accident (scratch, bump other cars during parking, scratch door) is very common especially among young drivers. Hence buying a car with cheap spare parts almost guaranteed some 'savings' as all these minor accidents might required you to change some parts. Why pay more for something that has the probability of >1% (fatal accident) to happen when you can SAVE for something that will happen at the probability of say...50%? (minor accident)

4. Malaysians usually prepare for something they foresee. Since fatal accident is very rare and "die" is a almost a taboo word, they would sometimes place more importance on other factor. As long as the car have some safety features, then it is fine. Don't need to have 6 airbags. 2 airbags are enough.

*All those numbers are just my imaginary guess works to show my point. It's not a statistic but it makes my point clearer. icon_rolleyes.gif



E34E36E46
post Jul 25 2013, 12:37 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jul 2013
QUOTE(Balanced @ Jul 25 2013, 12:18 AM)
Many factors:

1. Money. They are not going to use their car for long, hence RV is important. Since they know they are going to sell their car in a few years, it is a CONFIRMED big 'savings'.

2. Cars tend to breaks down in Malaysia shitty road. Drive a skyline in Japan, absorbers good for many years. Take the skyline back to Malaysia, all 4 absorbers need to chance in less than 2 years (4k satu batang). Nobody keeps the absorber as stock in Malaysia, need wait 1 week for stock. This is about money + convenience.

3. Chances of fatal accident is very very low. Whereas chances for minor accident (scratch, bump other cars during parking, scratch door) is very common especially among young drivers. Hence buying a car with cheap spare parts almost guaranteed some 'savings' as all these minor accidents might required you to change some parts. Why pay more for something that has the probability of >1% (fatal accident) to happen when you can SAVE for something that will happen at the probability of say...50%? (minor accident)

4. Malaysians usually prepare for something they foresee.  Since fatal accident is very rare and "die" is a almost a taboo word, they would sometimes place more importance on other factor. As long as the car have some safety features, then it is fine. Don't need to have 6 airbags. 2 airbags are enough.

*All those numbers are just my imaginary guess works to show my point. It's not a statistic but it makes my point clearer.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Then why buy life insurance or personal accident insurance. The probability of dying at a young age also very low what, or else the life insurance companies all kaput ! I look at those safety features as insurance, hope I will never use them, but will have peace of mind to have them ever ready to serve. whistling.gif
Balanced
post Jul 25 2013, 12:47 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
876 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(E34E36E46 @ Jul 25 2013, 12:37 AM)
Then why buy life insurance or personal accident insurance. The probability of dying at a young age also very low what, or else the life insurance companies all kaput ! I look at those safety features as insurance, hope I will never use them, but will have peace of mind to have them ever ready to serve. whistling.gif
*
Life insurance = covered many things ma, not only accident fatal accident on the road. blush.gif
Personal accident insurance = it is aim for coverage during accident. But is not only covered for fatal accident ma. Normal minor accidents also covered tongue.gif




17 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0173sec    0.67    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 02:01 AM