1990 Honda Accord:

2012 Tesla Model S:
Clearly the Honda driver was the most innocent one in the whole crash, but since he drove the worst car he was the one to die. Would passive, careful driving have helped him? Nah. There's probably nothing he could have done. Life is unfair.
So when you buy your next car, don't just consider resale value. Stuff like this happens all the time, and there are huge differences between cars, even new ones. Consider if a bit of convenience and a few RM are worth your life (and consider the huge medical bills that come up when you are heavily injured as opposed to minor injuries). A Preve CFE or a Kia Rio will do a decent job at protecting you and your family, and they won't break the bank. There are other cars that aren't as safe as these cars that cost twice as much.
The way I see it there are 2 classes: Contis and Koreans on one side and local and Japanese on the other (Preve CFE sits in between, new Mazdas are mostly conti, Prius C and Prius too, Fiesta S is Japanese (all other Fiesta versions aren't)).
Btw.: The Tesla clearly shows the importance of a crumple zone. The whole front end is a crumple zone, there is no engine that can be pushed into the interior of the car. So they could design it in a way that all the crash energy can be absorbed in that area. Apparently it worked.
This post has been edited by kadajawi: Jul 24 2013, 04:10 PM
Jul 24 2013, 04:05 PM, updated 9y ago
Quote






0.0278sec
0.77
6 queries
GZIP Disabled