Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Campro Engine Good or Not?

views
     
TSMingson
post Apr 29 2006, 09:10 AM, updated 20y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
Hello the Proton Campro Engine you feel good or not??
I got a friend always say Campro Engine is very very good.. because he driving Proton Gen2. i got to test he can. i only know the Engine Start Speed very very slow!! but don't know how you feel la. please share with us the good thing and bad things.
cody99
post Apr 29 2006, 09:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Wrong section dude... it should be in Fast & Furious
kcng
post Apr 29 2006, 10:15 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



OMG....

Campro = RWI

Since when ?

doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif
thefryingfox
post Apr 29 2006, 10:17 AM

Lonely Maharajah
*******
Senior Member
5,165 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
haha funny
but i think the engine is so so lah
quite smooth also.

but pickup not really there.

guest18
post Apr 29 2006, 11:25 AM

hisap hisap hisap
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


let compare the only other 1.6 engine that did 110 horsepower , oh wait ...
most 1.6 from are delievering atleast 140 hp , cause they are more efficient

damm , the next closest I can think of is ga16de that is a 100 hp engine but it is more fuel saving cause the power dont kick it only you rev high and it save more fuel than campro and it is proven reliable base for turbocharging

anyway , campro if you are a high revver , it is a ok ok engine
you are sitll better off with 4age or mivec or vtec engine
lower price more power more reliable
magiara
post Apr 29 2006, 12:29 PM

Legend
******
Senior Member
1,599 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Puchong


1.6 with 140bhp?
that's mivec lor! sweat.gif
feralee
post Apr 29 2006, 12:39 PM

Enthusiastic (R)(C)(tm)
*******
Senior Member
4,897 posts

Joined: Aug 2005



campro is using F5M41
means F5M42 (mivec terbalik)

icon_idea.gif
TSMingson
post Apr 29 2006, 12:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
OMG!!! 1.6 got 140 HP?? Nissan QG16DE Engine also lose....
can let me know the engine name?
guest18
post Apr 29 2006, 12:44 PM

hisap hisap hisap
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


what ? for decade japan maker already pushing engine 1.6 to atleast 140 hp lah

vtec got 160 so does 4age so does mivec and countless other , what soo surprising? sweat.gif
-=Axis=-
post Apr 29 2006, 12:52 PM

- SS -
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
before this, proton said gen2 will be fitted with campro, along with CPS and VIM (Cam Profile Switching, something like MIVEC or VTEC and, Variable Inlet Manifold). those technologies were pull out at the last minute and gen2 was rush to the market. so its kinda early to judge the full potential of this engine at the moment.
TSMingson
post Apr 29 2006, 12:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
For Powerful Engine : Nissan SR20

For Save Fuel Engine : Nissan SR16
guest18
post Apr 29 2006, 12:56 PM

hisap hisap hisap
*******
Senior Member
2,236 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


swt ... neovvl are performance engine , it drink fuel alot lah ...
not really that save if you ask me
BuFung
post Apr 29 2006, 01:00 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


wat la.. Campro.. Vtec City give u 110.. Vios give u 109 lah.. both also 1.5 engine.. some more those engine give u better torqe in low rav.. campro... hay..
travis_ckf
post Apr 29 2006, 01:19 PM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


Well a typical 1.6 engine gives 110 HP for most normal road cars, while those 1.6 with 140-160HP are for their sporty lineup, such as the toyota levin/trueno series and the honda civic Si.

For me a 1.6 with 100HP is good enough for normal driving, but that depends to the car design as well. Having a 100HP car with a heavy car chasis like the waja and the new sentra makes the car underpowered as well.

As for the CAMPRO, it gives a decent 110hp but due to its high reviing design where 3-4k RPM is needed to bring the car's power, expect underpower when driving in cities or town driving.

guest18:
u r talking more to the engines for performance sporty car lineup, not to normal cars. I hope u dont confuse the rest sweat.gif

This post has been edited by travis_ckf: Apr 29 2006, 01:22 PM
mockv1per
post Apr 29 2006, 02:02 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
the Campro with CPS should deliver around 130bhp stock.
rcracer
post Apr 29 2006, 02:24 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

I think you kinda asked in the wrong place.

Anyways the campro engine is the smoothest engine i have driven by proton. It has a very conti feel to it. Our club members have dynoed a stock manual car and it registered 100HP on wheel, this is no lie. It's true that low end is slightly lower but it's more than enough for city driving, it's like a VTEC per se, if you push hard you will have a big smile on your face but the engine is also happy puttering around in the city. The engine has been taken to sepang by us numerous times and none have ever reported any failures at all. Visit our forum if you want to know how to push the HP up to 110 on wheel.
tunertoobe
post Apr 29 2006, 03:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


You guys make me wanna buy a Gen2 and twin turbo it. drool.gif
prozac
post Apr 29 2006, 03:10 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


The Waja and Gen2 is very capable for transplanting, nowadays. Apparently it's plug n play with the newer generation MIVEC, GSR and GDI engines.
rcracer
post Apr 29 2006, 03:11 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

Not really plug and play but the engines fit the orientation of right gearbox and the engine on the left.
Futura
post Apr 29 2006, 08:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya



Test driven the Waja Campro just now. Engine is very quiet and smooth. Pick up so so only but not that bad, coz filled with V-Power tongue.gif. Spacious and nice interior, esp the new meter cluster looks so cool with chrome edged. rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by Futura: Apr 30 2006, 12:44 AM
soulfly
post Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



hmm...i thought 4G92 DOHC (1.6 litre) normal one is around 120hp or more... and the torque is quite good also.

because 4G91 DOHC (1.5 litre) is already 110hp.
darthvadersidious
post Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
167 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
BuFung
post Apr 29 2006, 11:34 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
wah.. u sound like come from Proton.. brave man.. please elaborate ur statement.. I believe most of us would like to listen...

are u a campro owner?
SUSceo684
post Apr 29 2006, 11:35 PM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




How come Gen2 doesnt seem to sell well overseas ar?
-=Axis=-
post Apr 29 2006, 11:39 PM

- SS -
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ceo684 @ Apr 29 2006, 11:35 PM)
How come Gen2 doesnt seem to sell well overseas ar?
*
because foreign cars like honda, toyota and most of the european cars aint taxed like mad except for some south east asian country, like us. within the same price range, proton is no comparision to japs and european cars. also due to its unpopularity, spare parts are often more expensive. dont forget about depreciation too coz the used car market out there is full car with better quality.

This post has been edited by -=Axis=-: Apr 29 2006, 11:40 PM
tunertoobe
post Apr 29 2006, 11:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
QUOTE(BuFung @ Apr 29 2006, 11:34 PM)
wah.. u sound like come from Proton..  brave man..  please elaborate ur statement..  I believe most of us would like to listen... 

are u a campro owner?
*
Campro certainly have potential. It can beat VTEC if Proton really tries.
I mean really, VTEC is not impossible to beat.
egiewan
post Apr 29 2006, 11:47 PM

aL-|ncognito
*******
Senior Member
6,777 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur



Civic Type R's 1.6 chunks out 185bhp rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif
shift2
post Apr 30 2006, 12:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Isle of Legend



there is potential..but wil take time for boleh land engineers to R&D..lol
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 30 2006, 12:12 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(soulfly @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
hmm...i thought 4G92 DOHC (1.6 litre) normal one is around 120hp or more... and the torque is quite good also.

because 4G91 DOHC (1.5 litre) is already 110hp.
*
i would like to add something... if i remember correctly... 4G92 SOHC (local 1.6 type) .. produce 112hp... (darn old technology and yet a single cam) ...
but then gen2 .. new tech (of coz without the CPS system rclxms.gif ) .. only gets 110hp yet with a DOHC ... geeez... somemore weak low end torque from wat i heard most... judge urself ..

a 4G92 DOHC should be 120hp ++ .. not to says Mivec.. and of coz no fight with VTECs.. shocking.gif
BuFung
post Apr 30 2006, 12:17 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Apr 29 2006, 11:43 PM)
Campro certainly have potential. It can beat VTEC if Proton really tries.
I mean really, VTEC is not impossible to beat.
*
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Apr 30 2006, 12:12 AM)
i would like to add something... if i remember correctly... 4G92 SOHC (local 1.6 type) .. produce 112hp... (darn old technology and yet a single cam) ...
but then gen2 .. new tech (of coz without the CPS system  rclxms.gif ) .. only gets 110hp yet with a DOHC ... geeez... somemore weak low end torque from wat i heard most... judge urself ..

a 4G92 DOHC should be 120hp ++ ..  not to says Mivec.. and of coz no fight with VTECs.. shocking.gif
*
How come all this statement disagree one to another one.. shocking.gif shocking.gif laugh.gif doh.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif

rcracer
post Apr 30 2006, 12:20 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

mingson : see what i said about asking in the wrong place, if you don't believe the HP figures there are dyno charts in our forum to back them up.Not just hearsay.
travis_ckf
post Apr 30 2006, 12:21 AM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


QUOTE(ceo684 @ Apr 29 2006, 11:35 PM)
How come Gen2 doesnt seem to sell well overseas ar?
*
the foreigners have better choices unlike us. The gen2 has dubious quality for them. Even though its cheaper than the Japanese and other european cars the maintainance and the 2nd hand value is horrible, similiar like European cars over here. That why the gen2 sold poorly in the UK. sweat.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 30 2006, 12:36 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(BuFung @ Apr 30 2006, 12:17 AM)
How come all this statement disagree one to another one..  shocking.gif  shocking.gif  laugh.gif  doh.gif  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
*
read properly, he says IF proton really tries... hehehe rclxms.gif
shinjite
post Apr 30 2006, 01:36 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


4G92 SOHC 1.6 already produces quite good torque and power at low end
To me Campro, high revs only.....if city driving (compare Waja & Waja Campro), I still prefer the old 4G18 engine smile.gif
mockv1per
post Apr 30 2006, 01:45 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
Gen 2 in Japan... ?

user posted image
borneo
post Apr 30 2006, 01:48 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
316 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: KL


nope.. thats in taiwan i think.
wah... nice rear spoiler.




mockv1per
post Apr 30 2006, 02:27 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
its japan plate number if im not mistaken.. not far from my frens place, he used to stay there.
iZuDeeN
post Apr 30 2006, 02:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,466 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ, Malaysia
Hey... dont compare Campro yet lah..

Wait till the engine 'fully finish' i.e Camshaft Profiling fitted in...

then only compare....

If you still wanna compare to other 1.6 engine, I say the current Campro is still sux...


phunkydude
post Apr 30 2006, 02:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Dec 2004



i'm gen2 driver... , just wanna give some opinion...

if you'r a peaceful driver who drive with good habit as in NOT, in rush or always wanna overtake or wanna race with mivec or vtec...
then gen2 is ok for you.., the engine is ok ok lar... but don't expect to race with 4g93 or b16a... larrr... s4ph is just a plain normal engine without cps , vvt ..

while if you'r a driver who likes to accelerates alot... the one who likes from speed 30km/h expect to boost up to 120km/h in a few seconds... or those who likes to overtake front car although they'r on 70km/h ... or those who likes to tiong` others back....
then gen2 is a no no for you... , might as well just get a bmw e30 with 2jz or rb26dett .. race with mivec or vtec turbo ... kao kao...

tongue.gif

This post has been edited by phunkydude: Apr 30 2006, 02:46 AM
-=Axis=-
post Apr 30 2006, 03:04 AM

- SS -
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(mockv1per @ Apr 30 2006, 02:27 AM)
its japan plate number if im not mistaken.. not far from my frens place, he used to stay there.
*
those words are chinese, not japanese. the plate reads GaoXiong, thats a city in taiwan.
kcng
post Apr 30 2006, 09:13 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 10:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
This is very very bold.....
Very....

Just wait till the rest read this...
pizzaboy
post Apr 30 2006, 09:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
VIP
9,495 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(kcng @ Apr 30 2006, 09:13 AM)
This is very very bold.....
Very....

Just wait till the rest read this...
*
Bold? vmad.gif NO!!!
Stupid? icon_rolleyes.gif YEH!!
BuFung
post Apr 30 2006, 10:12 AM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(mockv1per @ Apr 30 2006, 02:27 AM)
its japan plate number if im not mistaken.. not far from my frens place, he used to stay there.
*
that is Taiwan Gao Xiong City number plate la.. my friend..

you are making a mistake la... doh.gif shakehead.gif
Hellsceamer
post Apr 30 2006, 12:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
257 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(shinjite @ Apr 30 2006, 01:36 AM)
4G92 SOHC 1.6 already produces quite good torque and power at low end
To me Campro, high revs only.....if city driving (compare Waja & Waja Campro), I still prefer the old 4G18 engine smile.gif
*
Of course...the car either will be High torgue or revy for DOHC
SOHC probarly high torque because most SOHC LAZY to rev...


Ken
post Apr 30 2006, 12:13 PM

Immigrants @ Jewish
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...


QUOTE(kcng @ Apr 30 2006, 09:13 AM)
This is very very bold.....
Very....

Just wait till the rest read this...
*
i think he(sidius) is insulting campro, and not praising tongue.gif
tunertoobe
post Apr 30 2006, 12:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


You mean he was being sarcastic?
kcng
post Apr 30 2006, 08:22 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(Ken @ Apr 30 2006, 01:13 PM)
i think he(sidius) is insulting campro, and not praising tongue.gif
*
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Apr 30 2006, 01:14 PM)
You mean he was being sarcastic?
*
404 then
funny not found....
sarcasm not found then..
TSMingson
post Apr 30 2006, 10:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
and anyone know Campro engine is make by which company??
i never hear b4 people say about this engine company.
nerd
post Apr 30 2006, 10:14 PM

another brick in the wall.
*******
Senior Member
3,373 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: My House



proton la. sleep.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 1 2006, 12:08 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Mingson @ Apr 30 2006, 10:05 PM)
and anyone know Campro engine is make by which company??
i never hear b4 people say about this engine company.
*
its by proton with lotus help... most lotus car doesnt use their own engines... so judge urself rclxms.gif

did someone says Campro is way better than VTEC??? if this happens, Honda malaysia sure bankrup d... lolz blush.gif
mockv1per
post May 1 2006, 01:21 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
Cam Profile Switching technology by Lotus. Engine developed by Proton.
syyang85
post May 12 2006, 11:58 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
982 posts

Joined: May 2005
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

ENGINE CODE CamPro S4PH
ENGINE CONFIGURATION 1.6 Litre 16V DOHC
NUMBER OF CYLINDER inLine - 4
DISPLACEMENT 1597cc
BORE 76 mmm
STROKE 88 mm
COMPRESSION RATIO 10:1
VALVE TRAIN Hydraulic Direct Acting
EMS Proton EMS700 Drive-By-Wire with detonation
control
ANCILLARY DRIVE Single Belt Auto Tensioner FEAD
CATALYTIC CONVERTER Single Close Couple Catalyst

PEAK PERFORMANCE POWER (Kw)
TORQUE (Nm) 82 @ 6000 rpm
148 @ 4000 rpm

EXHAUST EMISSION Euro Step 2/
Euro Step 3 with EOBD/
Euro Step 4 with EOBD capable


user posted image

user posted image
soggie
post May 12 2006, 12:00 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 1 2006, 01:21 AM)
Cam Profile Switching technology by Lotus. Engine developed by Proton.
*
Cam Profile Switching technology not found. Please restart company. Failed to boot company, please format nation.
K3nnYkl82
post May 12 2006, 12:08 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(soggie @ May 12 2006, 12:00 PM)
Cam Profile Switching technology not found. Please restart company. Failed to boot company, please format nation.
*
muahahahah rclxms.gif ... good one ... real good one!
soggie
post May 12 2006, 12:29 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ May 1 2006, 12:08 AM)
its by proton with lotus help... most lotus car doesnt use their own engines... so judge urself  rclxms.gif

did someone says Campro is way better than VTEC??? if this happens, Honda malaysia sure bankrup d... lolz  blush.gif
*
Actually, soggiepro is much better than any engine in this world. Too bad, just like campro, it doesn't exist in the real world. On paper yes there's such a design, but no such technology on any car.
kcng
post May 12 2006, 03:25 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(soggie @ May 12 2006, 01:00 PM)
Cam Profile Switching technology not found. Please restart company. Failed to boot company, please format nation.
*
wahahahaha...... notworthy.gif
this i got to tabik...
egiewan
post May 12 2006, 05:25 PM

aL-|ncognito
*******
Senior Member
6,777 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
Anybody wanna buy my car? I wanna buy a Waja Campro la rclxm9.gif
usus
post May 12 2006, 05:57 PM

lalala~~
******
Senior Member
1,144 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seri Petaling, KL



QUOTE(soggie @ May 12 2006, 12:29 PM)
Actually, soggiepro is much better than any engine in this world. Too bad, just like campro, it doesn't exist in the real world. On paper yes there's such a design, but no such technology on any car.
*
the idea is correct already... laugh.gif
ulet
post May 12 2006, 06:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ May 1 2006, 12:08 AM)
its by proton with lotus help... most lotus car doesnt use their own engines... so judge urself  rclxms.gif

did someone says Campro is way better than VTEC??? if this happens, Honda malaysia sure bankrup d... lolz  blush.gif
*
yup, lotus dont create engine because they r niche market. they tried once but it is a failure becoz their market is so little and it is not worth it to pay all the r&d.
BUT their technology in engine is being bought by other car company like volvo, porsche and summore tht i dunno.
variocam in porsche is technology from lotus same with cps n vim in latest volvo 3.0 engine. this cps n vim is the same proton wanna put in their campro.
sakaic
post May 13 2006, 07:21 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
936 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
yeah......but then if proton were to put it in, why didn't they ? are malaysian consumers not worth the technology or is malaysian petrol too cheap ? lets face it. if it really is ready to go it should have been in the gen 2.

if it is planned, we will have to wait for a loooong while unless they really do put it into the next generation satria gti.
soggie
post May 13 2006, 07:26 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


So happens that the improvements from the campro is not significant enough to justify the extra cost to implementing them on their cars. Seems like R3 engine mods increases more on the engine compared to Campro.

Disclaimer: The above is what I HEARD, no confirmation on that rumor, but well, people here might be interested anyway.
K3nnYkl82
post May 13 2006, 08:32 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(sakaic @ May 13 2006, 07:21 AM)
yeah......but then if proton were to put it in, why didn't they ? are malaysian consumers not worth the technology or is malaysian petrol too cheap ? lets face it. if it really is ready to go it should have been in the gen 2.

if it is planned, we will have to wait for a loooong while unless they really do put it into the next generation satria gti.
*
some minor correction ... the Campro engine was suppost to build for WAJA first... but then due to the cam profiling problem .. the engine has been delay and replace by the 4G18... after 3 years.. they came out with GEN2 .. using Campro WITHOUT Camprofiling but they call it CAMPRO!... then now after another 2 to 3 years.. they put the so call CAMPRO engine into the WAJA and sell it! .. still without CAMPROfiling...

If im not mistaken .. WAJA surface around 1999 ... where the CAMPRO engine should be release together with its CAmprofiling technology but yet delay .. till now it has been like 7 years.. nothing about the CPS technology has been heard yet... rclxms.gif
CooShyRee
post May 13 2006, 08:53 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



guys, i think we juz have 2 face the truth.. that proton developing any sort of cam profiling system on their engine is juz pure BULLSHIT!!
igor_is300
post May 13 2006, 09:04 AM

Cheesy & Corny
*******
Senior Member
2,728 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muddy Confluence
I have been following the Proton engine development since they announced the SEng ( Small engine ) development which implementing the Cam profiling technology. If I am not mistaken that was somewhere around 6 years ago. After seeing the bullshite that proton produced in Gen 2. I would say it's deceiving. How come you can name it Campro without actual cam profiling technology in it ?

This post has been edited by igor_is300: May 13 2006, 09:05 AM
CooShyRee
post May 13 2006, 09:13 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



thats y i said we actually have 2 face the fact now that all that is pure BS!! dry.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 13 2006, 09:14 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(igor_is300 @ May 13 2006, 09:04 AM)
I have been following the Proton engine development since they announced the SEng ( Small engine ) development which implementing the Cam profiling technology. If I am not mistaken that was somewhere around 6 years ago. After seeing the bullshite that proton produced in Gen 2. I would say it's deceiving. How come you can name it Campro without actual cam profiling technology in it ?
*
i call that .. MARKETING STRATEGY...
u can see nowadays .. those uncle, aunty, kids.. without much knowledge.. they will says .. GEN2 is very good.. bcoz it uses CAMPRO engine!..when u ask them .. what do u know about campro?? .. they will says.. isnt it something like VVTI, VTECH, DVVT.. those kind of stuff??... yea .. SHOULD Be ... but instead .. it is juz a name for it... same as i can name my 4G93P as VTECH .. lolz~ rclxms.gif
CooShyRee
post May 13 2006, 09:20 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ May 13 2006, 09:14 AM)
i call that .. MARKETING STRATEGY...
u can see nowadays .. those uncle, aunty, kids.. without much knowledge.. they will says .. GEN2 is very good.. bcoz it uses CAMPRO engine!..when u ask them .. what do u know about campro?? .. they will says.. isnt it something like VVTI, VTECH, DVVT.. those kind of stuff??... yea .. SHOULD Be ... but instead .. it is juz a name for it... same as i can name my 4G93P as VTECH .. lolz~  rclxms.gif
actually, ure kinda rite there.. quite a number of my friend's dads bought gen2, most of em like it coz of the design.. n when asked bout the engine, they all said that its very good, coz its a malaysian made.. most of em doesnt know wat the heck cam profiling is..
navigator
post May 13 2006, 10:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


one thing to clear it off, the engine maned as CAMPRO is because the cam profile they used is different from the normal engine (and i don't mean performance engine over here).

The engine did some very impressive figure on prototype GEN2, which is 165BHP stock and without CPS. but same as the production, the engine do equipped with VIM system. and thisfigure achieved without violating Euro 4 emmission standard.

but due to the cost problem (plotong alwaysliked to cut cost for profit...) the engine used some rather cheaper material and the horsepower is reduced to the figure shown today......

and to fully boost the ability of the campro, you need some very skilled engineer to tune the ECU up. which none exist in any Klang valley service centers.... but there's one at batu pahat.

for my Gen2, i can have my 0 to 100 kph with near to 9 sec. and this is achieved without the need to fully depress the acceletor.

CAMPRO is a good anddecent engine. for mine, the torque is maintained from range of 2000rpm to 5500rpm. I don't think any of the "normal" japanese car seen in malaysian market have the same capability.

This statement is valid for my 2005 DEC Lennox black HL manual GEN2. i do not sure the previous batch, but I have a friend with 1st batch GEN2 mentioned the same thing.
tunertoobe
post May 13 2006, 10:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


The 165 HP, was that only an experiment by the company?
Pretty impressive. thumbup.gif

With CPS, expect 170-175?
navigator
post May 13 2006, 11:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 13 2006, 10:58 AM)
The 165 HP, was that only an experiment by the company?
Pretty impressive.  thumbup.gif

With CPS, expect 170-175?
*
The car still exist. if I'm not mistaken, one in Lotus UK, one in Tg Malim & one in shah alam. built cost is more than RM100k if i'm not mistaken. however, the condition of the car is unknown, rumour says that the car is now used solely on technical training purposes. so i presume that they're dismantled.....

i do not know figures with CPS, but according to enginnering, the gain is 30% with CPS, you do the math.....
tunertoobe
post May 13 2006, 11:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Whoa!!!
214.5HP!!! shocking.gif
EpsilonStar
post May 13 2006, 12:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Selangor


it's using cheap material, so the hp is reduced... So will it reduce the engine durability if u go tune it up again?
tunertoobe
post May 13 2006, 12:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


What if they make a 2 litre and put it in that sportscar that Proton's been bragging about many years ago? drool.gif

It'll have 270HP!!! NA engine somemore!!! Proton could beat Hondas!!!! rclxm9.gif

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: May 13 2006, 12:40 PM
igor_is300
post May 13 2006, 04:55 PM

Cheesy & Corny
*******
Senior Member
2,728 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Muddy Confluence
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 13 2006, 12:40 PM)
What if they make a 2 litre and put it in that sportscar that Proton's been bragging about many years ago?  drool.gif

It'll have 270HP!!!  NA engine somemore!!!  Proton could beat Hondas!!!!  rclxm9.gif
*
LOL'ed

They could beat Honda but still stuck with power window problems. laugh.gif
tunertoobe
post May 13 2006, 04:59 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


laugh.gif kahkahkah laugh.gif
sonic_cd
post May 13 2006, 05:06 PM

Friendship Is Magic
********
All Stars
19,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Soleanna

QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 13 2006, 12:40 PM)
What if they make a 2 litre and put it in that sportscar that Proton's been bragging about many years ago?  drool.gif

It'll have 270HP!!!  NA engine somemore!!!  Proton could beat Hondas!!!!  rclxm9.gif
*
that will never happen ...lol rclxm9.gif
rcracer
post May 13 2006, 05:07 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(navigator @ May 13 2006, 10:50 AM)
one thing to clear it off, the engine maned as CAMPRO is because the cam profile they used is different from the normal engine (and i don't mean performance engine over here).

The engine did some very impressive figure on prototype GEN2, which is 165BHP stock and without CPS. but same as the production, the engine do equipped with VIM system. and thisfigure achieved without violating Euro 4 emmission standard.

but due to the cost problem (plotong alwaysliked to cut cost for profit...) the engine used some rather cheaper material and the horsepower is reduced to the figure shown today......

and to fully boost the ability of the campro, you need some very skilled engineer to tune the ECU up. which none exist in any Klang valley service centers.... but there's one at batu pahat.

for my Gen2, i can have my 0 to 100 kph with near to 9 sec. and this is achieved without the need to fully depress the acceletor.

CAMPRO is a good anddecent engine. for mine, the torque is maintained from range of 2000rpm to 5500rpm. I don't think any of the "normal" japanese car seen in malaysian market have the same capability.

This statement is valid for my 2005 DEC Lennox black HL manual GEN2. i do not sure the previous batch, but I have a friend with 1st batch GEN2 mentioned the same thing.
*
You mena torque is maintained from 2000 to 6500 rpm.
K3nnYkl82
post May 13 2006, 06:10 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
any one wants my putra?? .. i wanna sell it d lar.. since Gen2 can outperform my car... somemore Gen2 only pay 1.6 road tax... 1/2 price somemore!!!>.. hehahahhaha
my_lov3ly_d3ar_d3ar
post May 13 2006, 08:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
231 posts

Joined: Feb 2006



LOL... Ur putra car how many years jor?
Gen 2 interior very nice.. sporty...
Campro engine ok lar...

ulet
post May 13 2006, 09:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


the reason of not applying CPS n VIM in campro it simple. proton just cannot produce enough engine to cover up the cost back ! if they put the CPS n VIM in campro, they will be losing money every single campro engine they produce with the tech.
example,at the moment only gen 2 n waja using campro engine.
based on february report waja 1.6 is 2258 and gen2 1.6 is 1064.
roughly we take combine of waja n gen2 is 4000 unit a month.
4000 X 12 months is only 48 000 units a year.
tht simply not enough and at the moment, proton will take a long time just to recover the campro R&D money.
so do u think they will put CPS n VIM n lose more money ? unless they can put all the cars with campro. then i guess enough to recover the money back.
K3nnYkl82
post May 14 2006, 01:03 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ulet @ May 13 2006, 09:52 PM)
the reason of not applying CPS n VIM in campro it simple. proton just cannot produce enough engine to cover up the cost back ! if they put the CPS n VIM in campro, they will be losing money every single campro engine they produce with the tech.
example,at the moment only gen 2 n waja using campro engine.
based on february report waja 1.6 is 2258 and gen2 1.6 is 1064.
roughly we take combine of waja n gen2 is 4000 unit a month.
4000 X 12 months is only 48 000 units a year.
tht simply not enough and at the moment, proton will take a long time just to recover the campro R&D money.
so do u think they will put CPS n VIM n lose more money ? unless they can put all the cars with campro. then i guess enough to recover the money back.
*
if that is so ... please dont name the ENGINE as CAMPRO .. as it does NOT have anything to do with CAM PRofiling.. laugh.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 14 2006, 01:40 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ulet @ May 13 2006, 09:52 PM)
the reason of not applying CPS n VIM in campro it simple. proton just cannot produce enough engine to cover up the cost back ! if they put the CPS n VIM in campro, they will be losing money every single campro engine they produce with the tech.
example,at the moment only gen 2 n waja using campro engine.
based on february report waja 1.6 is 2258 and gen2 1.6 is 1064.
roughly we take combine of waja n gen2 is 4000 unit a month.
4000 X 12 months is only 48 000 units a year.
tht simply not enough and at the moment, proton will take a long time just to recover the campro R&D money.
so do u think they will put CPS n VIM n lose more money ? unless they can put all the cars with campro. then i guess enough to recover the money back.
*
something to add-on ..

Since they already spend the money to R&D the Cam Profiling system... means the product actually exist ... then why not included it ?? if the not include .. their R&D is totally wasted... better still dont do R&D..???

Take Honda as an Example... honda sell both with VTec and without VTeC ... those without V-TEc is cheaper than those with VTEC. WHy not Gen2 comes with this OPTION?? since as u said .. the CPS is already working juz not implemented into the CAR only.. i believe .. if add thousand to get a Camprofiling system .. sure still got ppl buy one.. summore they dun sell it .. they totally EARN nothing at all!

get wat i mean whistling.gif

btw, do remember.. the Campro engine was suppost to fit in the WAJA first.. b4 the Gen2... its because of Camprofiling .. it has been delay.. and yet . fit to a GEN2 without Profiling and sell it .. and now fit to WAJA .. still without profiling..

how much was a gen2?? around 55k rite?? .. i believe.. if they add CAMPRO (as stated by u that its already working .. juz my 2 cent) ... and they sell it for RM60k .. there will still plenty of ppl buy it ... true or not?

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: May 14 2006, 01:43 AM
ulet
post May 14 2006, 08:39 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ May 14 2006, 01:40 AM)
something to add-on ..

Since they already spend the money to R&D the Cam Profiling system... means the product actually exist ... then why not included it ?? if the not include .. their R&D is totally wasted... better still dont do R&D..???

Take Honda as an Example... honda sell both with VTec and without VTeC ... those without V-TEc is cheaper than those with VTEC. WHy not Gen2 comes with this OPTION?? since as u said .. the CPS is already working juz not implemented into the CAR only.. i believe .. if add thousand to get a Camprofiling system .. sure still got ppl buy one.. summore they dun sell it .. they totally EARN nothing at all!

get wat i mean  whistling.gif

btw, do remember.. the Campro engine was suppost to fit in the WAJA first.. b4 the Gen2... its because of Camprofiling .. it has been delay.. and yet . fit to a GEN2 without Profiling and sell it .. and now fit to WAJA .. still without profiling..

how much was a gen2?? around 55k rite?? .. i believe.. if they add CAMPRO (as stated by u that its already working .. juz my 2 cent) ... and they sell it for RM60k .. there will still plenty of ppl buy it ... true or not?
*
options... it something that proton wont do in the future for us.
they dont give us options to put airbags in the car even though oversea like UK got the options to install side airbags.
UK proton cars also got abs, ebd, traction controls. here in msia, for it to be options is also dont have. from all the talk i get from the engineers, it is all becoz of the stupid proton marketing department. they the 1 decide it.

btw, for CPS n VIM to be an options, is not a choice.
becoz in manufacturing world, there is no such thing as options coz to do some n not to do is actually losing money bigger than implement it to all the engines. and summore u must guarantee the order constant all the times.
thts y, even though proton is not selling very good, the factory still produce the car like normal becoz they will keep receiving supply. it is in the contract.

ok, for campro to be implement 1st in WAJA, im not sure about the truthfulness of this news coz there is no black n white news about it. to implement in the waja, they have to do R&D all over again.
btw, do u know why waja campro dont have airbags ? is becoz they need to do crash test again becoz the characteristic of the impact already change. n to do it need money.

ur last statement, even though if they add campro in gen2 n selling for 60k they will still lose money coz the figures of gen2 + waja campro is just not enough in the manufacturing world !!! i forgot aedi where i read but they need to sell around 200,000 cars a year with the same engine for how many years(forgot) just to recover the R&D for the engine !(i totally forgot where i got the figures but this topic hot during 1st proton implement the campro)
thats y u see the same engine is being used for a few generation of cars.
sakaic
post May 14 2006, 08:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
936 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
worse still, some of the options that we are given here are suppossed to be standard so you cannot don't want it.

take the lines on the early perdanas ( the lines down the side of the car) they told my dad that although its an optional item, the car must come with it.

but anyway, back to the topic.

theoretically the engine is good. it is suppossed to be a promising design with its futuristic enhancements and features which promises flexible power with minimal effect on fuel economy.

the fact is when compared with their japanese equivalent, they are NOT as good. and don't start telling me about proton is new and don't expect hem to get it right the first time, go and read up hondas history and see what real determination and competitiveness is.

This post has been edited by sakaic: May 14 2006, 08:57 AM
navigator
post May 15 2006, 09:54 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(rcracer @ May 13 2006, 05:07 PM)
You mena torque is maintained from 2000 to 6500 rpm.
*
it's maintained "in a 80~100% margin" and it's proven on dyno.

and dear all, Campro do have the VIM.

and one more, the campro maned as campro becaouse the cam profile is different from conventional "normal" engine. although there's no CPS in there.

the same campro system is used to build lotus APX. but in 3.2 litre turbocharged. just for your info

This post has been edited by navigator: May 15 2006, 09:57 AM
rcracer
post May 15 2006, 12:36 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(navigator @ May 15 2006, 09:54 AM)
it's maintained "in a 80~100% margin" and it's proven on dyno.

and dear all, Campro do have the VIM.

and one more, the campro maned as campro becaouse the cam profile is different from conventional "normal" engine. although there's no CPS in there.

the same campro system is used to build lotus APX. but in 3.2 litre turbocharged. just for your info
*
Haha bro i mean try revving all the way until 6500rpm, it pulls all the way there..
rclxm9.gif
soggie
post May 15 2006, 12:44 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 13 2006, 10:50 AM)
one thing to clear it off, the engine maned as CAMPRO is because the cam profile they used is different from the normal engine (and i don't mean performance engine over here).

The engine did some very impressive figure on prototype GEN2, which is 165BHP stock and without CPS. but same as the production, the engine do equipped with VIM system. and thisfigure achieved without violating Euro 4 emmission standard.

but due to the cost problem (plotong alwaysliked to cut cost for profit...) the engine used some rather cheaper material and the horsepower is reduced to the figure shown today......

and to fully boost the ability of the campro, you need some very skilled engineer to tune the ECU up. which none exist in any Klang valley service centers.... but there's one at batu pahat.

for my Gen2, i can have my 0 to 100 kph with near to 9 sec. and this is achieved without the need to fully depress the acceletor.

CAMPRO is a good anddecent engine. for mine, the torque is maintained from range of 2000rpm to 5500rpm. I don't think any of the "normal" japanese car seen in malaysian market have the same capability.

This statement is valid for my 2005 DEC Lennox black HL manual GEN2. i do not sure the previous batch, but I have a friend with 1st batch GEN2 mentioned the same thing.
*
Don't be so naive. ANY engine, can make 100 horses per litre if its a prototype version. This is because only one engine is made, and it follows all the blueprint of the original sketch. And high quality materials are used. When going down to the mass production pipe, materials are switched to more mass production materials and the engine's tolerances, shape, dimensions and eerything viaries from the original prototype. THat's why in the final product, expect to lose 40-50% of the horse power in the prototype.

Campro is just a normal engine. Nothing to be proud of.
soggie
post May 15 2006, 12:48 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 15 2006, 09:54 AM)
it's maintained "in a 80~100% margin" and it's proven on dyno.

and dear all, Campro do have the VIM.

and one more, the campro maned as campro becaouse the cam profile is different from conventional "normal" engine. although there's no CPS in there.

the same campro system is used to build lotus APX. but in 3.2 litre turbocharged. just for your info
*
My arse. Tell me what's the "normal" cam profile, and what's the difference between it and the campro's profile. Its just a more aggressive profile, which shows because power is pathetic on the lower ranges and acceptable on the higher ranges. While everybody is targeting more torque for the normal drivers, Proton decides to go for high range powers with not many people will ever use. That's the only "genious" in the campro design. As for VIM, that's for variable intake manifold. I beg you to open the engine hood and point out where the mechanism lie. So far I only see one tube from the air intake to the intake manifold. Show me the second, shorter tube please.

And so what if the campro system is in the APX? We'll probably never see that car in malaysia due to its braindead aluminium chassis which Proton does not have the capability to build yet. Building a huge engine is easy. Building an engine that has 100 horses/litre is not. And proton is good at NOT being able to do the second one.
JasonKing
post May 15 2006, 01:32 PM

G-Unit
******
Senior Member
1,642 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


your arse got campro???hahahahaa...
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 02:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Seen Waja Campro yesterday. Quite good looking inside. thumbup.gif

Didn't get to inspect the inside a little further though, can't tell the quality.
karhoe
post May 15 2006, 02:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,238 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


If you have read the star RM50 winner column recently, you will remmember that a Gen2 was burned
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 03:43 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(karhoe @ May 15 2006, 02:46 PM)
If you have read the star RM50 winner column recently, you will remmember that a Gen2 was burned
*
dun bring up this topic .. it will causes flaming!..

btw, the gen2 burn because had an accident... hit another car..
1133
post May 15 2006, 05:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
736 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 槟岛之东
QUOTE(ulet @ May 14 2006, 08:39 AM)
options... it something that proton wont do in the future for us.
they dont give us options to put airbags in the car even though oversea like UK got the options to install side airbags.
UK proton cars also got abs, ebd, traction controls. here in msia, for it to be options is also dont have. from all the talk i get from the engineers, it is all becoz of the stupid proton marketing department. they the 1 decide it.

btw, for CPS n VIM to be an options, is not a choice.
becoz in manufacturing world, there is no such thing as options coz to do some n not to do is actually losing money bigger than implement it to all the engines. and summore u must guarantee the order constant all the times.
thts y, even though proton is not selling very good, the factory still produce the car like normal becoz they will keep receiving supply. it is in the contract.

ok, for campro to be implement 1st in WAJA, im not sure about the truthfulness of this news coz there is no black n white news about it. to implement in the waja, they have to do R&D all over again.
btw, do u know why waja campro dont have airbags ? is becoz they need to do crash test again becoz the characteristic of the impact already change. n to do it need money.

ur last statement, even though if they add campro in gen2 n selling for 60k they will still lose money coz the figures of gen2 + waja campro is just not enough in the manufacturing world !!! i forgot aedi where i read but they need to sell around 200,000 cars a year with the same engine for how many years(forgot) just to recover the R&D for the engine !(i totally forgot where i got the figures but this topic hot during 1st proton implement the campro)
thats y u see the same engine is being used for a few generation of cars.
*
OK, then we wait till year 2020 and see how things going on..... rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif
CAMPRO... Coning Anticipative Malaysian PROgram

shinjite
post May 15 2006, 05:50 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Waja Campro is very nice the interior, way better than the Saga Special Edition
vincentl
post May 15 2006, 05:56 PM

LIM
******
Senior Member
1,240 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Batu Caves


Campro or Campor ?

btw anyone turbocharge this engine or not ?
maybe can produce 200HP leh .... whistling.gif
then someone would really sell his/her civic @180HP tongue.gif

SUSceo684
post May 15 2006, 06:04 PM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




QUOTE(shinjite @ May 15 2006, 05:50 PM)
Waja Campro is very nice the interior, way better than the Saga Special Edition
*
4G13 in Mit Lancer F
79.1 PS (78.0 bhp) (58.2 kW)
@6000 rpm

4G13 in Proton Saga current edition
MAXIMUM OUTPUT
62 kW (83hp) @ 6000 rpm

I think must've been dynoed in the middle of the night.

Saga LMST interior really sucks lah..the LMSS was much better.

Difference between a normal engine (aka Camtakpro) vs VTEC is that the VTEC still can putter around town nicely + whack fast.. instead of whacking high rpm all the time
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 06:36 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(soggie @ May 15 2006, 12:48 PM)
My arse. Tell me what's the "normal" cam profile, and what's the difference between it and the campro's profile. Its just a more aggressive profile, which shows because power is pathetic on the lower ranges and acceptable on the higher ranges. While everybody is targeting more torque for the normal drivers, Proton decides to go for high range powers with not many people will ever use. That's the only "genious" in the campro design. As for VIM, that's for variable intake manifold. I beg you to open the engine hood and point out where the mechanism lie. So far I only see one tube from the air intake to the intake manifold. Show me the second, shorter tube please.

And so what if the campro system is in the APX? We'll probably never see that car in malaysia due to its braindead aluminium chassis which Proton does not have the capability to build yet. Building a huge engine is easy. Building an engine that has 100 horses/litre is not. And proton is good at NOT being able to do the second one.
*
may be the rubber tube connected to the air filter is full of tiny holes so that it can have lots of intake leh tongue.gif
eric84cool
post May 15 2006, 06:41 PM

I'm BACK!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,540 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sing-a-poor / Kayell / Jay-Bee



Ohhh...I met a lotsa of GEN2 caught on fire in newspaper recently leh........dare not to purchase the car....
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 06:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


CamPro engine got potential, I really do think so.
The only problem is Proton advertised the technology too early.
If they say earier that the engine was still in R&D, we wouldn't be bashing them like hell now.
CooShyRee
post May 15 2006, 07:01 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 15 2006, 06:58 PM)
CamPro engine got potential, I really do think so.
The only problem is Proton advertised the technology too early.
If they say earier that the engine was still in R&D, we wouldn't be bashing them like hell now.
proton juz wanna show off.. they wanna tell us that they can make stuff like that.. but the prob is, y dont they, rite???
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 07:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 15 2006, 07:01 PM)
proton juz wanna show off.. they wanna tell us that they can make stuff like that.. but the prob is, y dont they, rite???
*
They are not patient enough.
But I can wait for the real one to come, biggrin.gif if it does come. dry.gif
jinyee80
post May 15 2006, 07:11 PM

Jinyee? Me lor =)
*****
Senior Member
868 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


Anyone, what is the meaning of KONG ?
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 07:18 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 15 2006, 06:58 PM)
CamPro engine got potential, I really do think so.
The only problem is Proton advertised the technology too early.
If they say earier that the engine was still in R&D, we wouldn't be bashing them like hell now.
*
potential is 1 story .. the ability to build it is another story..
for me.. any 1.6 Twin cam .. engine will have a very good potential for modding .. juz that is the modded able to mod it!.. for instance... the infamous old 4AGE.. its producing 130bhp without any cam profiling or wat so ever...
but for CAMpro.. the engine has been repeatedly discuss and discuss for the pass 7 years.. and yes .. we dont see any Cam profiling ability in it .. and we dont see any VIM technology in it.. notworthy.gif
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 07:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


I really do want Proton to use Lotus very intelligently, now is the time!
They made 190 HP easily from a 1.8 Toyota unit.

What if Campro have 5 valves per cylinder? drool.gif

When I grow up, I want to beat Proton in their game, tune the CamPro according to my taste. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: May 15 2006, 07:30 PM
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 07:30 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 15 2006, 07:27 PM)
I really do want Proton to use Lotus very intelligently, now is the time!
They made 190 HP easily from a 1.8 Toyota unit.

What if Campro have 5 valves per cylinder?  drool.gif
*
wait till their CAMPRO really have CAm profilling then only says others ...
btw, 5 valves per cylinder was develop by toyota!. hehe ..nothing to do with the lotus... lotus use toyota engine to tune and do other stuff only.
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 07:32 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ May 15 2006, 07:30 PM)
wait till their CAMPRO really have CAm profilling then only says others ...
btw, 5 valves per cylinder was develop by toyota!. hehe ..nothing to do with the lotus... lotus use toyota engine to tune and do other stuff only.
*
Ya I know but it is possbile, if not expensive. tongue.gif
Imagine the free flowing air, imagine the fuel savings, imagine, the POWER!! drool.gif

Cam profiling initiate! flex.gif
CooShyRee
post May 15 2006, 09:47 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



2 be honest, i really wanna see proton do it.. i really really wanna see proton making this engine, n i really really wanna see that it'll turn out a good engine.. despite me being not a supporter of malaysian cars, i am still a malaysian.. as a malaysian, i wanna see a malaysian car maker succeed at building cars.. i dont expect them 2 rival the germans or japans 4 that matter, i juz wanna see that we can make good cars.. its really sad actually being a car enthusiast whos a malaysian.. coz truth be told, we havent contributed anything significant in the world of motoring, apart from rebadging n coming out wit stupid stuff..

This post has been edited by CooShyRee: May 15 2006, 09:58 PM
tunertoobe
post May 15 2006, 10:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Right on.
So stop bashing and give support! flex.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 10:09 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 15 2006, 09:47 PM)
2 be honest, i really wanna see proton do it.. i really really wanna see proton making this engine, n i really really wanna see that it'll turn out a good engine.. despite me being not a supporter of malaysian cars, i am still a malaysian.. as a malaysian, i wanna see a malaysian car maker succeed at building cars.. i dont expect them 2 rival the germans or japans 4 that matter, i juz wanna see that we can make good cars.. its really sad actually being a car enthusiast whos a malaysian.. coz truth be told, we havent contributed anything significant in the world of motoring, apart from rebadging n coming out wit stupid stuff..
*
not that we wanna bash the protons... i myself driving 1 .. not much complaint.. its juz tat.. its okie if u admit that u can't make the camprofiling system.. and stop cheating our citizen with ur marketing strategy (i mean proton) ...

well, for proton 1st ever build engine.. if they didnt name it CAMPRO.. they didnt says it will be implemented with VIM system.. if they juz name it .. proton first ever build engine.. with a 110bhp, a DOHC .. i think many ppl will appreaciate it..

the point im trying to pointout here is that.. dun think of flying when u still can't walk .. get wat i mean.. Honda didnt come out with a VTEC engine for its first engine.. so as toyota or wat so ever company...

To me, proton is aiming to high .. yet .. they wanna keep their FACEs.. so they name the engine CAMPRO .. instead of the technology .. so consumer are tricked.. its a marketing strategy .. more like dishonest..
ntlc87
post May 15 2006, 10:22 PM

♥ Grammatically Impaired ♥
******
Senior Member
1,286 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: Damansara Heights



hmm..at first i really dont know what is campro and vim system at all...after doing some research then i realise that this tech is indeed very good and very high potential..

seeing that proton came up with this campro engine definitly give me some kind of felling that proton has hope and chances to compete globally..

without my expectation, recently about last week i only know that there were no camshaft profiling system or VIM system in the campro engine...i felt that i was trick and i bet most people doesnt even know about this campro thingy, even some gen2 owners..

when i ask them "gen 2 engine good?" they replied "of coz la, got campro technology from lotus one what" ....

seems that proton really done a good job marketing this campro..thumbs up!! thumbup.gif
CooShyRee
post May 15 2006, 10:24 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 15 2006, 10:01 PM)
Right on.
So stop bashing and give support!  flex.gif
nope.. ill stop bashing only after its certain that they come up wit sumthin good..

QUOTE(ntlc87 @ May 15 2006, 10:22 PM)
seems that proton really done a good job marketing this campro..thumbs up!!  thumbup.gif
hahahahaha.. nicely said dude, n i agree wit u totally..

it seems that the only good thing they have done wit the campro is marketing it.. thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by CooShyRee: May 15 2006, 10:28 PM
soggie
post May 15 2006, 11:31 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(ntlc87 @ May 15 2006, 10:22 PM)
hmm..at first i really dont know what is campro and vim system at all...after doing some research then i realise that this tech is indeed very good and very high potential..

seeing that proton came up with this campro engine definitly give me some kind of felling that proton has hope and chances to compete globally..

without my expectation, recently about last week i only know that there were no camshaft profiling system or VIM system in the campro engine...i felt that i was trick and i bet most people doesnt even know about this campro thingy, even some gen2 owners..

when i ask them "gen 2 engine good?" they replied "of coz la, got campro technology from lotus one what" ....

seems that proton really done a good job marketing this campro..thumbs up!!  thumbup.gif
*
You'll be surprised that even the salesperson also didn't know that campro is nothing more than just a name.
K3nnYkl82
post May 15 2006, 11:48 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ntlc87 @ May 15 2006, 10:22 PM)
hmm..at first i really dont know what is campro and vim system at all...after doing some research then i realise that this tech is indeed very good and very high potential..

seeing that proton came up with this campro engine definitly give me some kind of felling that proton has hope and chances to compete globally..

without my expectation, recently about last week i only know that there were no camshaft profiling system or VIM system in the campro engine...i felt that i was trick and i bet most people doesnt even know about this campro thingy, even some gen2 owners..

when i ask them "gen 2 engine good?" they replied "of coz la, got campro technology from lotus one what" ....

seems that proton really done a good job marketing this campro..thumbs up!!  thumbup.gif
*
another consumer whom felt cheated by proton's so called CAMPRO engine rclxms.gif
travis_ckf
post May 15 2006, 11:56 PM

ambitious but rubbish......
*******
Senior Member
6,413 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong Not For Human Live One....


QUOTE(CooShyRee @ May 15 2006, 09:47 PM)
2 be honest, i really wanna see proton do it.. i really really wanna see proton making this engine, n i really really wanna see that it'll turn out a good engine.. despite me being not a supporter of malaysian cars, i am still a malaysian.. as a malaysian, i wanna see a malaysian car maker succeed at building cars.. i dont expect them 2 rival the germans or japans 4 that matter, i juz wanna see that we can make good cars.. its really sad actually being a car enthusiast whos a malaysian.. coz truth be told, we havent contributed anything significant in the world of motoring, apart from rebadging n coming out wit stupid stuff..
*
Believe me, let the current CEO Syed Zainal to do the job. I have a feeling he will deliver and not only saves proton but bringing it into a new correct direction. It's hard to reduce and repair the damage done by the ex CEO TM but, from what i see on recent Proton developments, things like looking positive. Just let Syed Zainal do his job, and we will be the judge in moments to come. smile.gif
soggie
post May 16 2006, 12:51 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(travis_ckf @ May 15 2006, 11:56 PM)
Believe me, let the current CEO Syed Zainal to do the job. I have a feeling he will deliver and not only saves proton but bringing it into a new correct direction. It's hard to  reduce and repair the damage done by the ex CEO TM but, from what i see on recent Proton developments, things like looking positive. Just let Syed Zainal do his job, and we will be the judge in moments to come. smile.gif
*
Same here. The new CEO really looks promising. Hope he doesn't let Proton down.
nx7010
post May 16 2006, 03:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
uhmmm if not mistaken the 5 valve per cylinder head design is also not entirely developed by toyota.

design is by yamaha... that's why u see the yamaha R1 and all also using 5 valve per cylinder in their bikes...

smile.gif

ulet
post May 16 2006, 07:12 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(nx7010 @ May 16 2006, 03:22 AM)
uhmmm if not mistaken the 5 valve per cylinder head design is also not entirely developed by toyota.

design is by yamaha... that's why u see the yamaha R1 and all also using 5 valve per cylinder in their bikes...

smile.gif
*
huh ????? sweat.gif
btw, the 5 valves per cylinder design is pioneer by bugatti.
then followed by others.
dstl1128
post May 16 2006, 01:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
btw, 5 valves per cylinder was develop by toyota!. hehe ..nothing to do with the lotus... lotus use toyota engine to tune and do other stuff only.

5-valve per cylinder isn't from Toyota, it was joint develop mainly with Yamaha.

Btw, 5-valve per cylinder already in racing engine some time ago before 4AGE using it. But the pros for 5-valve cylinder doesn't give much advantage over 4-valve relative to the complexity introduced to the engine. That's why most racing engine now still settle for 4-valve cylinder.
navigator
post May 16 2006, 01:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(rcracer @ May 15 2006, 12:36 PM)
Haha bro i mean try revving all the way until 6500rpm, it pulls all the way there..
rclxm9.gif
*
yes, it revs all the way to 7200rpm. and i did it often. so?
navigator
post May 16 2006, 01:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ May 15 2006, 12:48 PM)
My arse. Tell me what's the "normal" cam profile, and what's the difference between it and the campro's profile. Its just a more aggressive profile, which shows because power is pathetic on the lower ranges and acceptable on the higher ranges. While everybody is targeting more torque for the normal drivers, Proton decides to go for high range powers with not many people will ever use. That's the only "genious" in the campro design. As for VIM, that's for variable intake manifold. I beg you to open the engine hood and point out where the mechanism lie. So far I only see one tube from the air intake to the intake manifold. Show me the second, shorter tube please.

And so what if the campro system is in the APX? We'll probably never see that car in malaysia due to its braindead aluminium chassis which Proton does not have the capability to build yet. Building a huge engine is easy. Building an engine that has 100 horses/litre is not. And proton is good at NOT being able to do the second one.
*
so dude, explain to me why i got a near flat power curve on the latest batch of Gen2????

you don't see the mechanical there, you can only get it when you turn a PDT 2000 on. or a overhaul, dude.

Too much bashers and these ppl filtered out all the necessary infos for the new comer. can't you all just answer the question? why da hell must all the bashers add all the unnecessary statement? this is unethical!

This post has been edited by navigator: May 16 2006, 01:40 PM
Ken
post May 16 2006, 01:42 PM

Immigrants @ Jewish
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 15 2006, 10:01 PM)
Right on.
So stop bashing and give support!  flex.gif
*
mind to explain how to support?
navigator
post May 16 2006, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(Ken @ May 16 2006, 01:42 PM)
mind to explain how to support?
*
by only reply with the necessary and neutral answer. that's the best support you can provide. not idiotic bashing to the sky.

This post has been edited by navigator: May 16 2006, 01:50 PM
Ken
post May 16 2006, 01:50 PM

Immigrants @ Jewish
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(navigator @ May 16 2006, 01:48 PM)
by only reply with the necessary and neutral answer. that's the best support you can provide. not idiotic bashing till the sky.
*
oh, i thought the one and only way to support proton is buy their cars
tunertoobe
post May 16 2006, 01:53 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


You can do that.....if you DARE! brows.gif
When CamPro is done, by the time Proton's alliance with Mitsubishi is over, other versions of CamPro will emerge like a 1.8, 1.5, 2.0, turbos and so on. So we won't have to rely much on others anymore to power our vehicles!

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: May 16 2006, 01:56 PM
dstl1128
post May 16 2006, 02:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
oh, i thought the one and only way to support proton is buy their cars

Not really. You buy foreign cars which already imposed some hefty amount of taxes to the Government. And the government supported Proton do get benefits from it. But no one in public knows how much help do they received from the Government.


QUOTE
so dude, explain to me why i got a near flat power curve on the latest batch of Gen2????

Did you dyno it? Or just simply said it out just like the Proton brochures shown to us. Scan your dyno page and show to all of us if you dare and prove us dead wrong. Otherwise it is just another baseless assumption.

This post has been edited by dstl1128: May 16 2006, 02:16 PM
K3nnYkl82
post May 16 2006, 02:28 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(navigator @ May 16 2006, 01:34 PM)
so dude, explain to me why i got a near flat power curve on the latest batch of Gen2????

you don't see the mechanical there, you can only get it when you turn a PDT 2000 on. or a overhaul, dude.

Too much bashers and these ppl filtered out all the necessary infos for the new comer. can't you all just answer the question? why da hell must all the bashers add all the unnecessary statement? this is unethical!
*
ya rite... prove to us with the dyno chart ... a picture explains a million... rclxms.gif
ulet
post May 16 2006, 03:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ May 16 2006, 01:34 PM)
so dude, explain to me why i got a near flat power curve on the latest batch of Gen2????

you don't see the mechanical there, you can only get it when you turn a PDT 2000 on. or a overhaul, dude.

Too much bashers and these ppl filtered out all the necessary infos for the new comer. can't you all just answer the question? why da hell must all the bashers add all the unnecessary statement? this is unethical!
*
im not a basher. i can says im a proud supporter of proton but for u to says u get a flat power curve in latest gen2 engine.... is either ur engine is special made from proton or the dyno machine got something wrong.

our current campro engine doesnt come with CPS or VIM. is just a normal 4-valves DOHC engine with aggrasive camshaft. u can email proton n ask about it but if ur engine really can get flat power curve across the RPM.... u better sell back ur engine to proton with much much higher price so they can dissect it back n learn how the hell it can get flat power curve across the RPM without sumthing like CPS, VIM, VVTI, I-VTEC, Vario-Cam, Double vanos.. etc etc.
navigator
post May 17 2006, 08:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(dstl1128 @ May 16 2006, 02:05 PM)
Not really. You buy foreign cars which already imposed some hefty amount of taxes to the Government. And the government supported Proton do get benefits from it. But no one in public knows how much help do they received from the Government.
Did you dyno it?  Or just simply said it out just like the Proton brochures shown to us. Scan your dyno page and show to all of us if you dare and prove us dead wrong. Otherwise it is just another baseless assumption.
*
oh, i do wish to, but currently i got limited access to internet since i'm at my new home and I cannot upload the chart yet. once my internet connection is restored, I'm more than willing to post it up.

so it might be a while for me to get my streamyx....
navigator
post May 17 2006, 08:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(ulet @ May 16 2006, 03:24 PM)
im not a basher. i can says im a proud supporter of proton but for u to says u get a flat power curve in latest gen2 engine.... is either ur engine is special made from proton or the dyno machine got something wrong.

our current campro engine doesnt come with CPS or VIM. is just a normal 4-valves DOHC engine with aggrasive camshaft. u can email proton n ask about it but if ur engine really can get flat power curve across the RPM.... u better sell back ur engine to proton with much much higher price so they can dissect it back n learn how the hell it can get flat power curve across the RPM without sumthing like CPS, VIM, VVTI, I-VTEC, Vario-Cam, Double vanos.. etc etc.
*
Oh, the flat curve is after a proper tuning somewhere outside the Klang valley, and I do sure I seen something on PDT2000 which resembles the VIM setting. prove me wrong my explain all the content in PDT.

Will post the chart in near future. but not now.

Why should I trade my engine out? I can't keep it myself? Your statement doesn't make any sense to me.
ulet
post May 17 2006, 11:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ May 17 2006, 08:33 AM)
Oh, the flat curve is after a proper tuning somewhere outside the Klang valley, and I do sure I seen something on PDT2000 which resembles the VIM setting. prove me wrong my explain all the content in PDT.

Will post the chart in near future. but not now.

Why should I trade my engine out? I can't keep it myself? Your statement doesn't make any sense to me.
*
sorry if the sentence sell it back to proton at much much higher price doesnt make sense to u. let me make it simple.

to develop a technology like CPS, VIM, VVTI, I-VTEC, Double Vanos n etc etc... u need millions of RM/dollars/EURO/(billions of YEN).

so basically if u really can get flat power curve across the rpm without those technology, u have a goldmine... diamond mine more correct in ur engine !

so meaning u can sell back to proton n show the flat power curve without the techs n they willing to buy for millions also coz they can skip the R&D time and no need to add manufacturing cost.

does it make common sense now ?
dstl1128
post May 17 2006, 12:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(navigator @ May 17 2006, 08:30 AM)
oh, i do wish to, but currently i got limited access to internet since i'm at my new home and I cannot upload the chart yet. once my internet connection is restored, I'm more than willing to post it up.

so it might be a while for me to get my streamyx....
*
That good. I'm eager on that chart. I found it weird since that engine were able to tune towards near flat torque curve (an advantage), I wonder why Proton not doing that as factory default, instead of the less practicle setting (or is it they already did that on newer batches?)

Without the graph, from the time being, the flat torque curve remains a myth. And I think it shouldn't be used as fact for the moment.

Regardlessly, should Proton slap on a supercharger on Gen2, I think it might reach some sweet spot and bring in some more enthusiasts, an interesting scenario (Gen2 vs GTi) in our local motorsport.
sranua
post May 17 2006, 01:02 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
784 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Selangor


Whatever it is, Proton still in the process of perfecting the Campro and Proton wants to instill confident for Proton's buyer as the engine is reliable as Mitsu, nissan, toyota and honda engines.
Hopefully next batch of Campro have the CPS and VIMS technology as it will enhance the capability of Campro engines. With Lotus back up, I believe they can do it. biggrin.gif
mockv1per
post May 17 2006, 01:15 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
yeah, me too... waiting for the *130bhp 1.6L campro.. and *155bhp R3 tuned campro..
*with CPS and VIM. (heard somewhere)
WANRAHMAT
post May 17 2006, 02:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
49 posts

Joined: May 2005


currently i'm using kenari already 2 years... now decide to change to a bigger car. I think wanna get gen2 or honday city.. so can anybody tell me the benefit between this 2 car especially the FC?


thanx rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
soggie
post May 17 2006, 04:06 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


If you can afford a honda city, then buy a honda city. Build quality is eons ahead of proton. Its a no-brainer, really.
soggie
post May 17 2006, 04:11 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 16 2006, 01:34 PM)
so dude, explain to me why i got a near flat power curve on the latest batch of Gen2????

you don't see the mechanical there, you can only get it when you turn a PDT 2000 on. or a overhaul, dude.

Too much bashers and these ppl filtered out all the necessary infos for the new comer. can't you all just answer the question? why da hell must all the bashers add all the unnecessary statement? this is unethical!
*
Stop talking bullcrap and give me a dyno chart to proof it. I am basing my argument on the dyno chart released by Proton, so if you wish to call my argument a baseless argument then it is only fair that you provide one with your own definition of a "sound argument". If you fail to do that, then I believe your own words apply to yourself more than it does to me.

And you replied:

QUOTE
Oh, the flat curve is after a proper tuning somewhere outside the Klang valley, and I do sure I seen something on PDT2000 which resembles the VIM setting. prove me wrong my explain all the content in PDT.

Will post the chart in near future. but not now.

Why should I trade my engine out? I can't keep it myself? Your statement doesn't make any sense to me.


I wonder, proper tuning to gain back your flat torque curve. Why isn't that factory tuned? How many average buyers would go for such a tuning or even have the extra cash for that? If you want to talk about tuning, I'd say the VTEC 1.6 engine could ravage its ass with that kind of tuning. Flatter and wider torque band, higher horsepower.

And mind to explain what PDT is?
sranua
post May 17 2006, 04:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
784 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Selangor


QUOTE(WANRAHMAT @ May 17 2006, 02:04 PM)
currently i'm using kenari already 2 years... now decide to change to a bigger car. I think wanna get gen2 or honday city.. so can anybody tell me the benefit between this 2 car especially the FC?
thanx rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
FC of course Honda City IDSi win, and ultra seat, build quality, everything is far ahead of Proton. One of my friend patiently save his salary for two years riding a kapchai go and back to work. He manage to put a RM12,000 as d/payment and now he is the proud owner of City IDSi. FC for him to 'balik kg' to Kelantan quite impressive.

Xefron
post May 17 2006, 06:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,507 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


anyway what do you mean by flat power curve? if i am not mistaken any engine after it passed it peak power point,the curve will go down.anyway what is PDT2000.i tried google it but can't find any relavant answer.anyway these are some dyno for GEN 2 that i found on the net.

user posted image

inertial load

user posted image

variable load
navigator
post May 19 2006, 12:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ May 17 2006, 04:11 PM)
Stop talking bullcrap and give me a dyno chart to proof it. I am basing my argument on the dyno chart released by Proton, so if you wish to call my argument a baseless argument then it is only fair that you provide one with your own definition of a "sound argument". If you fail to do that, then I believe your own words apply to yourself more than it does to me.

And you replied:
I wonder, proper tuning to gain back your flat torque curve. Why isn't that factory tuned? How many average buyers would go for such a tuning or even have the extra cash for that? If you want to talk about tuning, I'd say the VTEC 1.6 engine could ravage its ass with that kind of tuning. Flatter and wider torque band, higher horsepower.

And mind to explain what PDT is?
*
Oh dude, if u don't even know what PDT is, you don't even have any right to comment on the Campro. doh.gif

PDT stands for Proton Diagnostic Tool which is used to check all the error logged in the ECU (and yes, Gen2 logged all the error to the ECU, including the Door Ajar sensor)

Until I have a proper conenction to internet from my house, I can hardly have any access to internet. My access to internet is very restricted and it's impossible for me to upload any attachment currently.

VTEC? oh pal, B16x series engine is designed as a performance engine in mind, while campro S4PH found in GEN2 & WAJA is designed to be a Thermal efficient, cost efficient and Green engine which exceed Euro 4 emmission standard in mind. I won't mind to tell you that Campro series design can be modified to a more powerful engine without deploying any CPS technology.

The near flat torque curve i mentioned is between 2500 to 5500rpm before the torque started to drop below 80% peak. From what I understand from proton, The result is achieved by deploying VIM and electronic throttle body control which work similar way in the Civic 2006.

I'm not bashing City, but after tried most of the cars in similar price range from 50k to 100k (as those car actually same class in terms of engine capacity and type) for nearly 2 weeks, the Gen2 wins for me for superb handing and good power on wider rpm range. the City VTEC maybe better, but the i-DSi cannot even match with the Gen2 on all these. the only thing that City surpass the Gen2 for both i-DSi and VTEC is the smooth gearbox (but again, I liked manual transmission more...) and the great turning raduis. the cabin? for me Gen2 better, as mine is dual tone colored (black & beige) quality is almost the same.

Vios? Aveo? they're all not satisfactory to me. at least the test drive unit they provide is poorly built. and I have had enough with the Toyota Fiasco previously.
navigator
post May 19 2006, 12:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(sranua @ May 17 2006, 04:40 PM)
FC of course Honda City IDSi win, and ultra seat, build quality, everything is far ahead of Proton. One of my friend patiently save his salary for two years riding a kapchai go and back to work. He manage to put a RM12,000 as d/payment and now he is the proud owner of City IDSi. FC for him to 'balik kg' to Kelantan quite impressive.
*
yeah, FC definately i-DSi win. but.....there's better one from honda..... I've heard honda brought in Civic Hybrid which the FC is almost a kapchai's standard.

if u want good FC, Gen2 is not your choice. as the FC is not impressive enough. at least for me. But City cannot provide you a joy-of-ride like Gen2 icon_rolleyes.gif
cockerish
post May 19 2006, 12:12 PM

12k SP@M Club
********
All Stars
13,619 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: between your legs


QUOTE(navigator @ May 19 2006, 12:07 PM)
Oh dude, if u don't even know what PDT is, you don't even have any right to comment on the Campro. doh.gif

PDT stands for Proton Diagnostic Tool which is used to check all the error logged in the ECU (and yes, Gen2 logged all the error to the ECU, including the Door Ajar sensor)

Until I have a proper conenction to internet from my house, I can hardly have any access to internet. My access to internet is very restricted and it's impossible for me to upload any attachment currently.

VTEC? oh pal, B16x series engine is designed as a performance engine in mind, while campro S4PH found in GEN2 & WAJA is designed to be a Thermal efficient, cost efficient and Green engine which exceed Euro 4 emmission standard in mind. I won't mind to tell you that Campro series design can be modified to a more powerful engine without deploying any CPS technology.

The near flat torque curve i mentioned is between 2500 to 5500rpm before the torque started to drop below 80% peak. From what I understand from proton, The result is achieved by deploying VIM and electronic throttle body control which work similar way in the Civic 2006.

I'm not bashing City, but after tried most of the cars in similar price range from 50k to 100k (as those car actually same class in terms of engine capacity and type) for nearly 2 weeks, the Gen2 wins for me for superb handing and good power on wider rpm range. the City VTEC maybe better, but the i-DSi cannot even match with the Gen2 on all these. the only thing that City surpass the Gen2 for both i-DSi and VTEC is the smooth gearbox (but again, I liked manual transmission more...) and the great turning raduis. the cabin? for me Gen2 better, as mine is dual tone colored (black & beige) quality is almost the same.

Vios? Aveo? they're all not satisfactory to me. at least the test drive unit they provide is poorly built. and I have had enough with the Toyota Fiasco previously.
*
i've sat inside gen2 and inside city 2006 model.
the gen 2 is definitely crap if u wanan compare to city interiors.
city alto look small..but its freaking comfortable. the gen2, well the seats are too hard for my ass...and the dashboard plastic's is a sight that i cant stand.....even the steering feels plasticky.


honestly, city beats teh gen2 in every single position apart from price point

navigator
post May 19 2006, 12:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(mockv1per @ May 17 2006, 01:15 PM)
yeah, me too... waiting for the *130bhp 1.6L campro.. and *155bhp R3 tuned campro..
*with CPS and VIM. (heard somewhere)
*
R3 does not have the CPS ver. Campro YET. and this statement valid by the time is posted.

but 130bhp Campro with VVT might be installed on SRM. and they're planning a 1.8 Campro Turbo for SRM.
navigator
post May 19 2006, 12:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(cockerish @ May 19 2006, 12:12 PM)
i've sat inside gen2 and inside city 2006 model.
the gen 2 is definitely crap if u wanan compare to city interiors.
city alto look small..but its freaking comfortable. the gen2, well the seats are too hard for my ass...and the dashboard plastic's is a sight that i cant stand.....even the steering feels plasticky.
honestly, city beats teh gen2 in every single position apart from price point
*
it's weird then. you're commenting on normal Ver? and um....i would have to agree that the steering feels fragile..... but the wholedashboard, door trim are well decorated. and it feels better and mode solid that the City. The city, got once i seen the panel moving when the window is winding up........ doh.gif

Mine is HL, using leather seat and so far anyone hoped into my ride on it also commenting the improvement made by proton.

maybe normal very is still bad?>????

This post has been edited by navigator: May 19 2006, 12:22 PM
soggie
post May 19 2006, 12:50 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 19 2006, 12:07 PM)
Oh dude, if u don't even know what PDT is, you don't even have any right to comment on the Campro. doh.gif

PDT stands for Proton Diagnostic Tool which is used to check all the error logged in the ECU (and yes, Gen2 logged all the error to the ECU, including the Door Ajar sensor)

Until I have a proper conenction to internet from my house, I can hardly have any access to internet. My access to internet is very restricted and it's impossible for me to upload any attachment currently.

VTEC? oh pal, B16x series engine is designed as a performance engine in mind, while campro S4PH found in GEN2 & WAJA is designed to be a Thermal efficient, cost efficient and Green engine which exceed Euro 4 emmission standard in mind. I won't mind to tell you that Campro series design can be modified to a more powerful engine without deploying any CPS technology.

The near flat torque curve i mentioned is between 2500 to 5500rpm before the torque started to drop below 80% peak. From what I understand from proton, The result is achieved by deploying VIM and electronic throttle body control which work similar way in the Civic 2006.

I'm not bashing City, but after tried most of the cars in similar price range from 50k to 100k (as those car actually same class in terms of engine capacity and type) for nearly 2 weeks, the Gen2 wins for me for superb handing and good power on wider rpm range. the City VTEC maybe better, but the i-DSi cannot even match with the Gen2 on all these. the only thing that City surpass the Gen2 for both i-DSi and VTEC is the smooth gearbox (but again, I liked manual transmission more...) and the great turning raduis. the cabin? for me Gen2 better, as mine is dual tone colored (black & beige) quality is almost the same.

Vios? Aveo? they're all not satisfactory to me. at least the test drive unit they provide is poorly built. and I have had enough with the Toyota Fiasco previously.
*
Why do I not have the right to comment on Proton if I do not know what PDT is? Do you know what is a BDT? Or HTAS? Do you need to know those acronyms to be able to understand what things are? You said your PDT shows something that resembles a VIM. Do you need a PDT to actually know if there's a VIM inside the car? I believe that's a simple enough question, any idiot with the barest understanding of the intake manifold can point out a VIM if he sees one. So tell me, where is the VIM on the Gen2?

Seriously, do proof your point on the campro having VIM. I would love to be proven wrong. And btw, a flat torque curve is what makes daily driving sustainable. The dyno chart of the Gen2 clearly shows that it requires high revs to make the most of its power. Not to mention the power dip after 2500 rpm. So how is this "designed with fuel economy and daily driving in mind"?

Again I have to reiterate, maybe you got a nice engine, one of the few that happens to have been better built than the others. But the official charts, and countless driver reviews, seems to go against your solo (minority) claim as to campro having a flat torque curve. Seems that was more of luck than any credible engineering.
soggie
post May 19 2006, 12:53 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 19 2006, 12:17 PM)
it's weird then. you're commenting on normal Ver? and um....i would have to agree that the steering feels fragile..... but the wholedashboard, door trim are well decorated. and it feels better and mode solid that the City. The city, got once i seen the panel moving when the window is winding up........ doh.gif

Mine is HL, using leather seat and so far anyone hoped into my ride on it also commenting the improvement made by proton.

maybe normal very is still bad?>????
*
I have to second on cockerish's comments on Gen2 having a bad interior. Compared relatively to the cars in the same class, Gen2's interior is not up to the standard. I've sat in a Gen2 several times, and I do not fancy its panels. My credit goes to city if you want to talk about interior terms.
soggie
post May 19 2006, 12:56 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ May 19 2006, 12:14 PM)
R3 does not have the CPS ver. Campro YET. and this statement valid by the time is posted.

but 130bhp Campro with VVT might be installed on SRM. and they're planning a 1.8 Campro Turbo for SRM.
*
Err if my sources are correct its a kleeman compressor (supercharger), not a turbo on the SRM GTi.
tunertoobe
post May 19 2006, 01:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


130HP ay? sleep.gif
Should be enough. But the torque is what I'm worried about.

Turbos won't be reliable. Superchargers are easier to control, plus a chance of getting a better FC. biggrin.gif
ulet
post May 19 2006, 01:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


fight until dunnow hen also not finish.
wait ar, i send email to proton today n they should reply to me by monday.
monday i will post the email here.
then we can know whether latest gen2 engine got VIM or CPS or got BOTH.
but highly doubt they have VIM or CPS.
dstl1128
post May 19 2006, 01:09 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Here's the torque/power graph from Gen2. Source: http://www.geocities.com/robyndigital/charts.htm

Attached Image

Attached Image


The red line is claimed to be the stock before modding.
The green line is after modded to have better performance and wider torque curve.



From the chart, the stock Gen2 torque curve is terribly in the wrong range.

This post has been edited by dstl1128: May 19 2006, 01:12 PM
soulfly
post May 19 2006, 01:41 PM

revving towards 10,000 rpm
Group Icon
VIP
15,903 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Miri



QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 19 2006, 01:07 PM)
130HP ay?  sleep.gif
Should be enough. But the torque is what I'm worried about.

Turbos won't be reliable. Superchargers are easier to control, plus a chance of getting a better FC.  biggrin.gif
turbo or supercharge, the fuel consumption depends on the boost
JasonKing
post May 19 2006, 01:52 PM

G-Unit
******
Senior Member
1,642 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


wah this thread still very active... thanks for the charts 1128
CooShyRee
post May 19 2006, 02:09 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(soggie @ May 19 2006, 12:53 PM)
I have to second on cockerish's comments on Gen2 having a bad interior. Compared relatively to the cars in the same class, Gen2's interior is not up to the standard. I've sat in a Gen2 several times, and I do not fancy its panels. My credit goes to city if you want to talk about interior terms.
me too.. recently, ive sat in a couple of quite brand new gen2's, both 1.3 n 1.6 model.. quite brand new meaning in theyre only bout few moths old.. no offense gen2 owners, but the interior is crap!! u can feel that everything that is used 2 make the interior is cheap.. n i dont think its pretty either.. it may be different from we're used 2 get in other protons, but i dont think its an achievement we should be proud off.. i especially hate the clock in the middle wit sort of a roof shading it.. the so called sporty seats r not comfortable n not sporty at all.. n at the back, i dont feel comfortable at all sitting at the back, suffering from a serious lack of head room.. gotta be honest, im not gonna be looking 4ward doing a long journey sitting at the back of that car..

im really sorry if i sound harsh gen2 owners n supporters, but this is facts..
Futura
post May 19 2006, 02:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(dstl1128 @ May 19 2006, 01:09 PM)
Here's the torque/power graph from Gen2. Source: http://www.geocities.com/robyndigital/charts.htm

Attached Image

Attached Image
The red line is claimed to be the stock before modding.
The green line is after modded to have better performance and wider torque curve.
From the chart, the stock Gen2 torque curve is terribly in the wrong range.
*
Thanks for the charts. I assumed that campro waja is using same engine as gen2, once I get it I might want to tune it as to achieve this green line curve(although I have no idea how is it gonna improve daily driving purpose)...Where you tuned ur gen2? How much? notworthy.gif
tunertoobe
post May 19 2006, 02:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Engineering a supercharger to allow a decent boost at low rpm is easier though.
Futura
post May 19 2006, 02:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(tunertoobe @ May 19 2006, 02:16 PM)
Engineering a supercharger to allow a decent boost at low rpm is easier though.
*
Any car also can do it? unsure.gif
dstl1128
post May 19 2006, 03:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
Where you tuned ur gen2? How much?

Please refer to the source. I'm not the owner of the charts and car. tongue.gif

I won't be owning any Proton unless there won't be any more comment on cheap plastic, power window, door knob and its overal quality as a comfortable reliable practical car. And I don't need any high-revving engine or racing kind of turning corner.

Ken
post May 19 2006, 03:40 PM

Immigrants @ Jewish
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(navigator @ May 19 2006, 12:17 PM)


Mine is HL, using leather seat and so far anyone hoped into my ride on it also commenting the improvement made by proton.

maybe normal very is still bad?>????
*
well, i hope to take a ride on ur gen 2...since u praise gen 2 till sky high...

btw, u say gen 2 1.6 is better than city idsi..actually on paper, gen 2 must be better because is 1.6 compare with 1.5 doh.gif
tunertoobe
post May 19 2006, 06:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(Futura @ May 19 2006, 02:27 PM)
Any car also can do it? unsure.gif
*
What do you mean? huh.gif
ulet
post May 22 2006, 07:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i've been waiting for navigator to post his dyno chart.
where r u navigator ?
Austin123
post May 28 2006, 07:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,336 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


anyone wan to borrow me his gen2 for a ride?? rclxm9.gif rclxm9.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 28 2006, 08:09 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Austin123 @ May 28 2006, 07:29 PM)
anyone wan to borrow me his gen2 for a ride??  rclxm9.gif  rclxm9.gif
*
why not go proton edar and have a TEST drive .. rclxms.gif
ulet
post May 28 2006, 08:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


navigator been missing
hmm..... laugh.gif
shinjite
post May 28 2006, 10:14 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Yup go Proton Edar hentam the Waja CAMPRO AND gEN2 XD
One day I must go and test drive it

wufei
post May 28 2006, 10:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,039 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Laputa


test drive it.....bring it to 4K-5K RPM to feel the sensation of sports car
K3nnYkl82
post May 28 2006, 11:04 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(wufei @ May 28 2006, 10:21 PM)
test drive it.....bring it to 4K-5K RPM to feel the sensation of sports car
*
4 to 5k only ?? tongue.gif
can i do 7k on test drive??

i trash my car sometimes up to 7.5k rpm!
hehe biggrin.gif
shinjite
post May 28 2006, 11:30 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Yours manual mah sure can go high ler~~~
Mine auto got rev cut because auto tongue.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 28 2006, 11:31 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(shinjite @ May 28 2006, 11:30 PM)
Yours manual mah sure can go high ler~~~
Mine auto got rev cut because auto tongue.gif
*
test drive cannot chose MANUAL??
i dun like auto cars... at least for now ... still young!.. hehe tongue.gif
shinjite
post May 28 2006, 11:54 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


If I use manual, i also tiong till redline ler tongue.gif
Auto cars also ok ler, just pick up sucks >.>"
I planning to change manual

You selling ur putra I heard? Good condition? tongue.gif
K3nnYkl82
post May 28 2006, 11:56 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(shinjite @ May 28 2006, 11:54 PM)
If I use manual, i also tiong till redline ler tongue.gif
Auto cars also ok ler, just pick up sucks >.>"
I planning to change manual

You selling ur putra I heard? Good condition? tongue.gif
*
since when im selling .. hahahaha..
manual Gearbox for 4G92 or 4G93 .. quite hard to get ler.. (i think)
4G92 and 4G93 (proton) uses the same gear box i believe..
shinjite
post May 28 2006, 11:58 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


I dunno loh, if can I get a good ratioed manual GB and add in but need to fuse nicely with engine, if get wrong 1 die also, lose power instead XD
@meno
post May 29 2006, 12:02 AM

It's "A Meh Noh" not Meno!!!
*******
Senior Member
2,386 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Many calls it "Hell"


current Campro engine is not really tat good, when Proton release the Campro with camshaft profiling(which is where the name Campro come from), then we might get a nice engine there...
ApeKG
post May 29 2006, 12:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
538 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Jln Kuching



1.3 daihatsu yrv delivering 140 hp
but its turbo..k3-vet
K3nnYkl82
post May 29 2006, 12:03 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
i heard perdana SE's manual GB is suitable .. it even have better final drive.. means u cruse at lower RPM .. provided ur car is powerfull enuf .. hehe

i always tot that 4G93's manual GB is a bit too short ler.. if only they could make it cruise at lower RPM .. it will save a bit of petrol.. but then of coz the counterpart .. lose pickup a bit lor
shinjite
post May 30 2006, 04:24 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(ApeKG @ May 29 2006, 12:03 AM)
1.3 daihatsu yrv delivering 140 hp
but its turbo..k3-vet
*
This 1 totally different already....its a turbo engine >.>"


K3nnYkl82
post May 30 2006, 04:28 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ApeKG @ May 29 2006, 12:03 AM)
1.3 daihatsu yrv delivering 140 hp
but its turbo..k3-vet
*
so dues 4G93P deliver 138bhp ! and its NA.
4G93T deliver 190bhp~ 210bhp ...

tongue.gif
shinjite
post May 30 2006, 05:25 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


I heard 1 fella from chop shop say 4G93T got 195BHP and 205BHP
Lower 1 is with small intercooler and the bigger 1 is with big intercooler >.>"

I forgot to ask the price of it XD

K3nnykl82 : But the K3-vet is 1.3, GSR 4G93T is 1.8, a lot of difference XD Take Mazda's 13B turbo and compete ler, 1.3 with 280BHP thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by shinjite: May 30 2006, 05:26 PM
K3nnYkl82
post May 30 2006, 05:42 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(shinjite @ May 30 2006, 05:25 PM)
I heard 1 fella from chop shop say 4G93T got 195BHP and 205BHP
Lower 1 is with small intercooler and the bigger 1 is with big intercooler >.>"

I forgot to ask the price of it XD

K3nnykl82 : But the K3-vet is 1.3, GSR 4G93T is 1.8, a lot of difference XD Take Mazda's 13B turbo and compete ler, 1.3 with 280BHP thumbup.gif
*
one is 4G93T and another is 4G93T RS.

i know .. its a 1.8 .. since the topic is about campro , that would be 1.6, but someone came up with the 1.3 Turbo .. might as well promote the 1.8 one .. hehe
tottally off topic! .. muahahaha

yea.. Twin rotor .. my dream engine.
shinjite
post May 30 2006, 05:59 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Campro 1.6 mah, so promote MIVEC loh, same mah 1.6 but 175BHP on crank smile.gif

If add turbo its better, like Evo IX engine, MIVEC Turbo!! smile.gif
soggie
post May 30 2006, 07:40 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


And you'll have a hard time tuning the ECU just to get MIVEC and turbo running together.
ulet
post May 30 2006, 07:45 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


ok guys, honest here.
i want to know who kidnap navigator ? he been missing since 19th may.
who kidnap him for the purpose of getting his Gen2 Flat Power Curve Equip With VIM ??
i know u wanna make big buck from his engine but wait for him to post his Gen2 engine flat power curve dynochart 1st lahh
hehehehehehe tongue.gif
JasonKing
post May 30 2006, 08:21 PM

G-Unit
******
Senior Member
1,642 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


not good... GSR turbo is good!
K3nnYkl82
post May 30 2006, 08:36 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ulet @ May 30 2006, 07:45 PM)
ok guys, honest here.
i want to know who kidnap navigator ? he been missing since 19th may.
who kidnap him for the purpose of getting his Gen2 Flat Power Curve Equip With VIM ??
i know u wanna make big buck from his engine but wait for him to post his Gen2 engine flat power curve dynochart 1st lahh
hehehehehehe  tongue.gif
*
i want to know too ler...!
should have kidnap him b4 19th ... who did it faster than me!! ..
Geezzz .. jealous la... his campro 1.6 better than my 4G93P .. tongue.gif
vexus
post May 30 2006, 09:13 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

look at the campro engine. hahahaha
shinjite
post May 30 2006, 10:34 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(soggie @ May 30 2006, 07:40 PM)
And you'll have a hard time tuning the ECU just to get MIVEC and turbo running together.
*
That is why those tuning shops are available at your service
yapws
post May 30 2006, 11:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kepong ~ Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(vexus @ May 30 2006, 09:13 PM)
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

look at the campro engine. hahahaha
*
nice pic. may i know where u took the pic?
K3nnYkl82
post May 30 2006, 11:28 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(yapws @ May 30 2006, 11:24 PM)
nice pic. may i know where u took the pic?
*
picture are form KLIMS 2006
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 01:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


i'm back.....as stated before.....I have limited access to internet...however i would not have anymore comment on all the bashers anymore....they just upsetting me....

Okey, for all Gen2 owners that willing to improve the engine performance via tuning (like the one shown in chart, which is somewhat similar to mine..) there's 2 place to go.

1st one is WJS Hijawan which belongs to Proton Edar, the map is shown in the website http://www.protonhijawan.com This one is FOC for tuning as long as you register as G2C member when you're there. but it's located at T.maju, near Batu pahat summit.

another one is Trend Point at pekeliling which ALSO belongs to Proton Edar. this one you need to pay RM150. Go there look for a guy named Ah Loong(except tuesday), he's the only one knows the thing. others will not know. this one need to pay more, but save the hassle to go to Bt. Pahat if you're in Klang valley.


and finally, to help the campro perform better, I recommened FULL COOLANT FLUSH which means u need to pay some RM1xx to pay all 7bottles of coolant, and you cannot add any water to radiator. coz the heat generated after tuning is incredibly hot if u use normal water + coolant solution.

and I also recommend Either Syntium 5000 or Shell Helix Ultra for each 10k service.

AND, I also recommend for a full X1-R treatment (approved and selling in all Proton Edar Service center for every service. by using X-1R, you can buy a 4ltr Engine oil and top up with it. and it's right on the optimal oil level.

if you miss any of this, you won't get the curve like the one you seen on the page before. This rule does apply to all campro engines.
it might come out a bill of a Volvo service, but If you don't do it...your campro engine will not soar. thumbup.gif

This is what Idid on my Gen2. if you all interested, can have a meet up, I got more tuned Gen2 owner which is more willing to share their joy after a proper tuning.

and I just confirmed one more thing about VIM. the VIM function is actually emulated by the electronic throttle valve. that means it's a variable intake control rather than like the Myvi's VIM, like the photo above. the part with gold color..... doh.gif

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 6 2006, 08:45 PM
ulet
post Jun 6 2006, 02:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


where is the photo navigator ?
soggie
post Jun 6 2006, 02:41 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 01:30 PM)
i'm back.....as stated before.....I have limited access to internet...however i would not have anymore comment on all the bashers anymore....they just upsetting me....

Okey, for all Gen2 owners that willing to improve the engine performance via tuning (like the one shown in chart, which is somewhat similar to mine..) there's 2 place to go.

1st one is WJS Hijawan which belongs to Proton Edar, the map is shown in the website http://www.protonhijawan.com This one is FOC for tuning as long as you register as G2C member when you're there. but it's located at T.maju, near Batu pahat summit.

another one is Trend Point (except tuesday)which ALSO belongs to Proton Edar. this one you need to pay RM150. Go there look for a guy named Ah Loong, he's the only one knows the thing. others will not know. this one need to pay more, but save the hassle to go to Bt. Pahat if you're in Klang valley.


and finally, to help the campro perform better, I recommened FULL COOLANT FLUSH which means u need to pay some RM1xx to pay all 7bottles of coolant, and you cannot add any water to radiator. coz the heat generated after tuning is incredibly hot if u use normal water + coolant solution.

and I also recommend Either Syntium 5000 or Shell Helix Ultra for each 10k service.

AND, I also recommend for a full X1-R treatment (approved and selling in all Proton Edar Service center for every service. by using X-1R, you can buy a 4ltr Engine oil and top up with it. and it's right on the optimal oil level.

if you miss any of this, you won't get the curve like the one you seen on the page before. This rule does apply to all campro engines.
it might come out a bill of a Volvo service, but If you don't do it...your campro engine will not soar. thumbup.gif

This is what Idid on my Gen2. if you all interested, can have a meet up, I got more tuned Gen2 owner which is more willing to share their joy after a proper tuning.

and I just confirmed one more thing about VIM. the VIM function is actually emulated by the electronic throttle valve. that means it's a variable intake control rather than like the Myvi's VIM, like the photo above. the part with gold color..... doh.gif
*
Reading your posting, it seems that your engine is tuned to run leaner than usual, since the engine heat increases after that so-called tuning. Is that what you're referring to?

vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 03:53 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



Shah alam PE also can tune. rm20++ only.

no need tune lah. wasting your $$$$ only. The tuning will automatic gone after 3 ot 4 weeks. It's just waste of time and $$$.
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 04:03 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 01:30 PM)
[color=blue]and finally, to help the campro perform better, I recommened FULL COOLANT FLUSH which means u need to pay some RM1xx to pay all 7bottles of coolant, and you cannot add any water to radiator. coz the heat generated after tuning is incredibly hot if u use normal water + coolant solution.
what full coolant u mean?

you mean 100% concentrate?

proton coolant is premix coolant not 100% concentrate.

save your $$$$ go to spare part shop buy 100% concentrate coolant and mix it with water. It's the same. WHy pay more ?
dstl1128
post Jun 6 2006, 04:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
So the engine generate more heat and need careful cooling. Btw, how much is the total cost for all the changes, tuning and flushing?

QUOTE
This rule does apply to all campro engines.

You mean this only for the Hi-Line version? I mean, is the Campro engine differs with the Hi-Line and standard version?
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 05:58 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



new gen2 generate higher heat than the 1st batch gen2.
1st batch gen2 using APM radiator and super high speed & noisy radiator fan. Temperature about 78 -84c

current gen2 using denso radiator & slince radiator fan. Temperature about 88-90c
eng98
post Jun 6 2006, 07:22 PM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 01:30 PM)
i'm back.....as stated before.....I have limited access to internet...however i would not have anymore comment on all the bashers anymore....they just upsetting me....

Okey, for all Gen2 owners that willing to improve the engine performance via tuning (like the one shown in chart, which is somewhat similar to mine..) there's 2 place to go.

1st one is WJS Hijawan which belongs to Proton Edar, the map is shown in the website http://www.protonhijawan.com This one is FOC for tuning as long as you register as G2C member when you're there. but it's located at T.maju, near Batu pahat summit.

another one is Trend Point (except tuesday)which ALSO belongs to Proton Edar. this one you need to pay RM150. Go there look for a guy named Ah Loong, he's the only one knows the thing. others will not know. this one need to pay more, but save the hassle to go to Bt. Pahat if you're in Klang valley.


and finally, to help the campro perform better, I recommened FULL COOLANT FLUSH which means u need to pay some RM1xx to pay all 7bottles of coolant, and you cannot add any water to radiator. coz the heat generated after tuning is incredibly hot if u use normal water + coolant solution.

and I also recommend Either Syntium 5000 or Shell Helix Ultra for each 10k service.

AND, I also recommend for a full X1-R treatment (approved and selling in all Proton Edar Service center for every service. by using X-1R, you can buy a 4ltr Engine oil and top up with it. and it's right on the optimal oil level.

if you miss any of this, you won't get the curve like the one you seen on the page before. This rule does apply to all campro engines.
it might come out a bill of a Volvo service, but If you don't do it...your campro engine will not soar. thumbup.gif

This is what Idid on my Gen2. if you all interested, can have a meet up, I got more tuned Gen2 owner which is more willing to share their joy after a proper tuning.

and I just confirmed one more thing about VIM. the VIM function is actually emulated by the electronic throttle valve. that means it's a variable intake control rather than like the Myvi's VIM, like the photo above. the part with gold color..... doh.gif
*
woah... need to pay so much ah... den better get be stock lor.. hehehe aiya how fast can i drive wor for a gen2.....
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 6 2006, 02:04 PM)
where is the photo navigator ?
*
as i said, limited access. means i cannot upload or create data burst over here. hope you understand.
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 04:03 PM)
what full coolant u mean?

you mean 100% concentrate?

proton coolant is premix coolant not 100% concentrate.

save your $$$$ go to spare part shop buy 100% concentrate coolant and mix it with water. It's the same. WHy pay more ?
*
they're not premix. i've seen the coolant substance in Hijawan as I mentioned before. they have a tools to measure how mucu water is contained in the coolant. and the result from the proton coolant is "No readings".

So, your statement is not true at all. dude.
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 6 2006, 02:41 PM)
Reading your posting, it seems that your engine is tuned to run leaner than usual, since the engine heat increases after that so-called tuning. Is that what you're referring to?
*
it doas not run leaner. although it's leaner from stoich burning. in fact the fuel is tuned to be richer from the original settings. they have a formula to tune which must be adhere to. not many ppl knows the formula. So, most of the forman don't know it.

I've mentioned at my previous post for where and who to look at for Campro tuning.
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 03:53 PM)
Shah alam PE also can tune. rm20++ only.

no need tune lah. wasting your $$$$ only. The tuning will automatic gone after 3 ot 4 weeks. It's just waste of time and $$$.
*
bashers, I sincerely hope that you can attend our gathering of Chinese Cari Gen2 Club.

all of our member's car are tuned. some even over a year. and no data loss whatsoever.

Bashers, stop posting nuts or I'll call the moderator.
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 6 2006, 04:08 PM)
So the engine generate more heat and need careful cooling. Btw, how much is the total cost for all the changes, tuning and flushing?
You mean this only for the Hi-Line version? I mean, is the Campro engine differs with the Hi-Line and standard version?
*
No, all campro engine include Waja are the same
navigator
post Jun 6 2006, 08:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(eng98 @ Jun 6 2006, 07:22 PM)
woah... need to pay so much ah... den better get be stock lor.. hehehe aiya how fast can i drive wor for a gen2.....
*
after tuning, 4th manual gear can hit 200kph at batu pahat summit road. tested by Hijawan's towkey..... My legs are shakin that time.... only that tiem i realized that my car is a beast.
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 08:55 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



don't listen to navigator. DUn go to batu pahat, WJS hijawan aka mr. law. I'm totally against Hijawan. They are blood sucker service center.
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 6 2006, 08:58 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
RM150 for a tuning .. its quite costly i would say..
ECU tunning perform by Proton Service center .. is RM60 .. which i think is already a bit costly.
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 09:02 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 6 2006, 08:58 PM)
RM150 for a tuning .. its quite costly i would say..
ECU tunning perform by Proton Service center .. is RM60 .. which i think is already a bit costly.
*
got to shah alam, intan matang there rm20++ only. Tune till you satisfy.
kcng
post Jun 6 2006, 09:17 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 09:49 PM)
after tuning, 4th manual gear can hit 200kph at batu pahat summit road. tested by Hijawan's towkey..... My legs are shakin that time.... only that tiem i realized that my car is a beast.
*
erm.... and your point is ?
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 09:20 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 08:42 PM)
they're not premix. i've seen the coolant substance in Hijawan as I mentioned before. they have a tools to measure how mucu water is contained in the coolant. and the result from the proton coolant is "No readings".

So, your statement is not true at all. dude.
*
it's premix coolant. Our radiator is not like renault or alfa or citreon. Longterm use, no good.

i been slaughter b4 by hijawan 8btl of coolant so called 100% full coolant. bullshit! bullshit!.

No need 100% concentrate coolant. Our car is not a racing car or a track car. Wake up dude. You use your car for racing or normal use?
eng98
post Jun 6 2006, 09:20 PM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 08:49 PM)
after tuning, 4th manual gear can hit 200kph at batu pahat summit road. tested by Hijawan's towkey..... My legs are shakin that time.... only that tiem i realized that my car is a beast.
*
u damm sure only ECU tunning??? If only ECU tunning... no way 4th gear can hit 180 above...
eng98
post Jun 6 2006, 09:21 PM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 09:20 PM)
it's premix coolant. Our radiator is not like renault or alfa or citreon. Longterm use, no good.

i been slaughter b4 by hijawan 8btl of coolant so called 100% full coolant. bullshit! bullshit!.

No need 100% concentrate coolant. Our car is not a racing car or a track car. Wake up dude. You use your car for racing or normal use?
*
and if not mistaken.. alot ppl say if use fully coolant can damage our rubber host... dunno how sure it is....
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 09:25 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(eng98 @ Jun 6 2006, 09:21 PM)
and if not mistaken.. alot ppl say if use fully coolant can damage our rubber host... dunno how sure it is....
*
it will cause leaking too to the radiator metal pipe where the oil seal wear off..
eng98
post Jun 6 2006, 09:33 PM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

thats y i was a little bit curious y he ask us to use fully coolant when we all know that it will destroy our radiator.... btw vexus..... u did drop-in for ur air-filter?? hehehhehe
vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 09:34 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



k&n drop in filter. larger snorkel head
eng98
post Jun 6 2006, 09:49 PM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 09:34 PM)
k&n drop in filter. larger snorkel head
*
How is the FC?? if is better.. i will consider for k&n

vexus
post Jun 6 2006, 10:16 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(eng98 @ Jun 6 2006, 09:49 PM)
How is the FC?? if is better.. i will consider for k&n
*
talking about FC is u can't feel it. talking about performance is just little bit. unless you go for custom made airbox by mugen
FunctionX
post Jun 6 2006, 10:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
The coolant is there mostly to provide protection and lubing to the waterpump and the rest of the cooling system and prevent stuff from growing in the coolant lines, aside from acting as anti-freeze and increasing the boiling point of water. It does not conduct heat as well as water.

Water (preferably distilled, microscopic dust is bad for the pump, impeller and everything in general.) is the stuff that takes the heat away from the engine. By itself its boiling point is too low and freezing point too high, which is why we add coolant or water wetter to our coolant mix.

Water wetter is what's used in racing cars and bikes in place of coolants. Why ? Because coolants are slippery. This is bad when some idiot leaks it onto the road you're going to travel over @ 290kph. This is when water wetter is used in place of coolants. The downside is that water wetter doesn't last as long as conventional coolants. You need to change it like 4 times more often than conventional coolants.


In short :

100% coolant = bad heat transfer.
50% coolant = general compromise for temperate climates (mostly for the anti-freeze function when going thru winter)
30% coolant = general mechanic advice for tropical climates (mostly for better heat transfer and increased boiling point)
0% coolant = lower boiling point, better bleed and flush the cooling system more often
rcracer
post Jun 7 2006, 12:57 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

Lets just clear this coolant issue up, the memo issued said '100% coolant replacement' meaning complete flushing of the cooling system before relacing with new fluids, it did not say '100% coolant CONCENTRATION' see the difference???

So gen2 owners use a mixture not 100% concentration.
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 7 2006, 03:22 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 6 2006, 01:30 PM)
i'm back.....as stated before.....I have limited access to internet...however i would not have anymore comment on all the bashers anymore....they just upsetting me....

Okey, for all Gen2 owners that willing to improve the engine performance via tuning (like the one shown in chart, which is somewhat similar to mine..) there's 2 place to go.

1st one is WJS Hijawan which belongs to Proton Edar, the map is shown in the website http://www.protonhijawan.com This one is FOC for tuning as long as you register as G2C member when you're there. but it's located at T.maju, near Batu pahat summit.

another one is Trend Point at pekeliling which ALSO belongs to Proton Edar. this one you need to pay RM150. Go there look for a guy named Ah Loong(except tuesday), he's the only one knows the thing. others will not know. this one need to pay more, but save the hassle to go to Bt. Pahat if you're in Klang valley.


and finally, to help the campro perform better, I recommened FULL COOLANT FLUSH which means u need to pay some RM1xx to pay all 7bottles of coolant, and you cannot add any water to radiator. coz the heat generated after tuning is incredibly hot if u use normal water + coolant solution.

and I also recommend Either Syntium 5000 or Shell Helix Ultra for each 10k service.

AND, I also recommend for a full X1-R treatment (approved and selling in all Proton Edar Service center for every service. by using X-1R, you can buy a 4ltr Engine oil and top up with it. and it's right on the optimal oil level.

if you miss any of this, you won't get the curve like the one you seen on the page before. This rule does apply to all campro engines.
it might come out a bill of a Volvo service, but If you don't do it...your campro engine will not soar. thumbup.gif

This is what Idid on my Gen2. if you all interested, can have a meet up, I got more tuned Gen2 owner which is more willing to share their joy after a proper tuning.

and I just confirmed one more thing about VIM. the VIM function is actually emulated by the electronic throttle valve. that means it's a variable intake control rather than like the Myvi's VIM, like the photo above. the part with gold color..... doh.gif
*
QUOTE(rcracer @ Jun 7 2006, 12:57 AM)
Lets just clear this coolant issue up, the memo issued said '100% coolant replacement' meaning complete flushing of the cooling system before relacing with new fluids, it did not say '100% coolant CONCENTRATION' see the difference???

So gen2 owners use a mixture not 100% concentration.
*
from Navigator ... he says 7 Full bottles of Coolant ... 7 full bottles.. i think he is saying its 100% concentrated coolant rclxms.gif
eng98
post Jun 7 2006, 11:05 AM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

ya.. if 50 percent mixture still need 7 bottles?? u want me to flush 2 times izit???
rcracer
post Jun 7 2006, 11:52 AM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

I would recomend that he drain some of it out and refill with water to get the correct mixture because we had one or tow members whose cars overheated using 100% concentration. Coolant although prevents rust is quite corrosive as well, you can see it eats into the water pump impeller.
ulet
post Jun 7 2006, 08:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


where is mr navigator with his VIM equip CAMPRO engine. im not here to bash to clarify with him. there is no VIM in current CAMPRO engine.
this my e-mail i sent n received from proton itself.

QUOTE
-----Original Message-----
From: ... IkMaL ... [mailto:ikmal_life@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:07 PM
To: I.CARE CENTRE PROTON EDAR
Subject: a few questions


Dear Proton,

i would like to know, for your current CAMPRO engine which is in Gen2 and Waja now. Is it equip with VIM? or is it just normal DOHC 4 cylinder engine with aggrasive camshaft?
in an online forum(lowyat.net forum) , i am now having a tongue fight with another forummer because he insist that the current Campro engine(which he have now) is equip with VIM and get a flat power curve. is that possible for the current Campro engine? as far as i know, current campro engine is not equip with VIM and CPS yet.

Thank You


n Proton replied

QUOTE
Dear Mr Ikmal,

Yes , currently the Campro engine is not equipped with VIM and CPS yet.  No news on it till date, whether it would be available or not.

Best Regards,
DEVAN
i.care Centre
Proton Edar
1-300-880-888(  General Enquiry  )
1-800-888-398(24Hour Assistance)





tunertoobe
post Jun 7 2006, 09:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Good one ulet. thumbup.gif
scripted
post Jun 8 2006, 01:38 AM

Newbie
****
Senior Member
608 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Im told that campro stands for this tongue.gif
maCAM PROfessional

This post has been edited by scripted: Jun 8 2006, 01:38 AM
ulet
post Jun 8 2006, 02:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(scripted @ Jun 8 2006, 01:38 AM)
Im told that campro stands for this tongue.gif
maCAM PROfessional
*
Lameeeeee..... whistling.gif
chairmanmeow
post Jun 8 2006, 03:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,156 posts

Joined: Aug 2005


campro engine without camprofiling. riminds me of the crap when proton first came out. the 1.5i did not stand for injection, but istemewa. gues what even the first generation of proton had abs. yes, they did, the advance braking system. laugh.gif
soggie
post Jun 8 2006, 09:05 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 7 2006, 08:29 PM)
where is mr navigator with his VIM equip CAMPRO engine. im not here to bash to clarify with him. there is no VIM in current CAMPRO engine.
this my e-mail i sent n received from proton itself.
n Proton replied
*
Thank you. This ends the whole navigator shebang. Sorry to break it to you campro supporters, but VIM and Cam Profiling will be a long way before you'll see it in real engines. For now, you just gotta live with the peculiar torque curve.
ulet
post Jun 8 2006, 10:41 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 8 2006, 09:05 AM)
Thank you. This ends the whole navigator shebang. Sorry to break it to you campro supporters, but VIM and Cam Profiling will be a long way before you'll see it in real engines. For now, you just gotta live with the peculiar torque curve.
*
see it in Proton engine... maybe some time but VIM and CPS is already in engine. in Volvo engine though, in their latest S80 3200cc engine.
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:14 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 6 2006, 09:17 PM)
erm.... and your point is ?
*
refering to "i'm not the one driving recklessly to test my car" that's all
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 09:20 PM)
it's premix coolant. Our radiator is not like renault or alfa or citreon. Longterm use, no good.

i been slaughter b4 by hijawan 8btl of coolant so called 100% full coolant. bullshit! bullshit!.

No need 100% concentrate coolant. Our car is not a racing car or a track car. Wake up dude. You use your car for racing or normal use?
*
sorry, basher's quote are ignored. I won't trust a word of bashers. I only believe machines and actual result. there's one car overheated after tuning by using premix collant and ok after a full coolant flush
ulet
post Jun 8 2006, 11:28 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:14 AM)
refering to "i'm not the one driving recklessly to test my car" that's all
*
QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:16 AM)
sorry, basher's quote are ignored. I won't trust a word of bashers. I only believe machines and actual result. there's one car overheated after tuning by using premix collant and ok after a full coolant flush
*
no apologize for gave other wrong info that Campro engine is equip with VIM and can achieve flat power curve ??
btw, that is not the words from basher, it is the words from proton itself.
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 7 2006, 08:29 PM)
where is mr navigator with his VIM equip CAMPRO engine. im not here to bash to clarify with him. there is no VIM in current CAMPRO engine.
this my e-mail i sent n received from proton itself.
n Proton replied
*
refering to this, I have to clarify that the VIM is done on "emulation" ( didn't I mentioned it before? I do remember I said that) which is controlled by electronic throttle. while real VIM is what we can see on the display engine in KLIMS which the tube is in gold color.

the result is as what you seen in the torque chart after tuning. a near flat curve between 4000 to 5500 rpm and not only a max torque point. which I already stated before. someone posted the torque chart on pg 8. So i assume mine is not so important to post up ATM. until my internet line is restored.

Did I made myself clear on the VIM thing?

I do not wish to creat havoc here. but when someone said campro worth nothing on performance, I do have to it clear to it coz it's not the case when you refering to me and my other friends who owns Gen2. from 1.3 to 1.6 HL.

ppl like Vexxx which will only post -ve comment is an act of bashers. I do hope this kind of ppl canchange their attitude and don't act stupid.

thanks ulet and others for some statement. I will revise back how does the VIM thing run in emulation and why my mechanics shows that so called VIM settings to me


dstl1128
post Jun 8 2006, 11:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
I have to clarify that the VIM is done on "emulation"

As of your claim, I think every engine do have VIM afterall.
soggie
post Jun 8 2006, 02:37 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:28 AM)
refering to this, I have to clarify that the VIM is done on "emulation" ( didn't I mentioned it before? I do remember I said that) which is controlled by electronic throttle. while real VIM is what we can see on the display engine in KLIMS which the tube is in gold color.

the result is as what you seen in the torque chart after tuning. a near flat curve between 4000 to 5500 rpm and not only a max torque point. which I already stated before. someone posted the torque chart on pg 8. So i assume mine is not so important to post up ATM. until my internet line is restored.

Did I made myself clear on the VIM thing?

I do not wish to creat havoc here. but when someone said campro worth nothing on performance, I do have to it clear to it coz it's not the case when you refering to me and my other friends who owns Gen2. from 1.3 to 1.6 HL.

ppl like Vexxx which will only post -ve comment is an act of bashers. I do hope this kind of ppl canchange their attitude and don't act stupid.

thanks ulet and others for some statement. I will revise back how does the VIM thing run in emulation and why my mechanics shows that so called VIM settings to me
*
navigator, the intake manifold is a complex thing, but it is surprisingly simple to understand. And so is the VIM mechanism. I've pointed this out countless times, to fall on deaf ears.

the VIM works by having two seperate runner tubes for air intake. This works on the idea that a longer runner tube provides more torque in low engine speeds, and a shorter runner tube gives more power on higher engine speeds. this is achieved by having two tubes of seperate length attached to the intake manifold, and a valve controlled by the ECU to open at the correct engine speeds.

The CORE idea behind the VIM is the different length of the tubes, and that is physical, there is no way to "electronically emulate" the working of the VIM. As for your "electronic throttle", I plead to you to actually look at your engine. Open up the intake, and tell me where is this so-called "electronic throttle". There is no such thing on the Gen-2. There's a throttle body, and that's mechanical. And the throttle body is controlled by your pedal, not by some electronic chip.

The bottomline is, there's no VIM in the engine, and to say there's a way to electronically emulate the VIM is equivalent to saying a subro works like a turbocharger. I believe so far you've provided a lot of misleading information regarding the Campro engine and have yet to provide any argument to proof your point, with sufficient facts backing them up.

And where's your dyno chart? So far I've seen others provide dyno charts to show the pathetic torque curve of the Gen-2, but none of them showed a linear torque curve. Please provide that dyno chart of yours to proof your statements before you proceed. And BTW, the power dip is located at the 2500-3000 rpm range, and beyond that you get a pretty normal looking torque curve. The dip itself is the one causing the trouble, and if your chart shows that you can eliminate this dip, then your arguments would have credit.

Otherwise, you're just an ignorant fool believing everything the mechanic tells you. No offense.

soggie
post Jun 8 2006, 02:42 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


Actually, I found out where you're wrong. In your quote:

QUOTE
and I just confirmed one more thing about VIM. the VIM function is actually emulated by the electronic throttle valve. that means it's a variable intake control rather than like the Myvi's VIM, like the photo above. the part with gold color.....
Are you mistaking Variable Intake Manifold with Variable Valve Timing? Myvi DOES NOT (censored) HAVE VARIABLE INTAKE MANIFOLD. Lemme rephrase that...

Myvi does NOT have VIM, nor does Gen-2

What Myvi has is called VVTi, which stands for Variable Valve Timing (intelligent), which is a totally diferent mechanism than the VIM. I hope you can explain all your misleading technical designations and get all your terms right before confusing the other people here about all your wild claims.

Thanks.

This post has been edited by soggie: Jun 8 2006, 02:42 PM
kcng
post Jun 8 2006, 03:25 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 12:14 PM)
refering to "i'm not the one driving recklessly to test my car" that's all
*
show us your chart...
or is it your inferiority complex kicks in ?

internet line down for about 1 month ?
as slow as tmnet work, they wont need 1 month to get a line up....
and,
ever heard of thumb drive and upload from cyber cafe ?

no time to do it ?
but got time to quote and reply us ?

er.................
doh.gif doh.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 03:42 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 8 2006, 02:42 PM)
Actually, I found out where you're wrong. In your quote:
Are you mistaking Variable Intake Manifold with Variable Valve Timing? Myvi DOES NOT (censored) HAVE VARIABLE INTAKE MANIFOLD. Lemme rephrase that...

Myvi does NOT have VIM, nor does Gen-2

What Myvi has is called VVTi, which stands for Variable Valve Timing (intelligent), which is a totally diferent mechanism than the VIM. I hope you can explain all your misleading technical designations and get all your terms right before confusing the other people here about all your wild claims.

Thanks.
*
gosh!!!.... rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

He doesnt even know how to differenciate a Variable Valve Timing and a Variable Intake Manifold??? Both stuff are totally unrelated ... notworthy.gif

you are the man ! notworthy.gif rclxms.gif biggrin.gif
mockv1per
post Jun 8 2006, 04:23 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
actually, MYVI uses DVVT tongue.gif
Dynamic Variable Valve Timing from Daihatsu,
aka VVTI from Toyota. same thing..
kevinhkw
post Jun 8 2006, 04:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
264 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Selangor Darul Ehsan


QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 6 2006, 09:02 PM)
got to shah alam, intan matang there rm20++ only. Tune till you satisfy.
*
Hi Vexus

Can you provide the address for the intan matang proton branch? Plan to tune my Gen 2 car. Thank you for your kindness! notworthy.gif
soggie
post Jun 8 2006, 04:56 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(mockv1per @ Jun 8 2006, 04:23 PM)
actually, MYVI uses DVVT tongue.gif
Dynamic Variable Valve Timing from Daihatsu,
aka VVTI from Toyota. same thing..
*
My bad. Its called DVVT but the operation is the same as VVTi from Toyota tongue.gif
dstl1128
post Jun 8 2006, 04:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
So Campro engine looks like a plain vanilla 16-valve DOHC but with high water temperature.

One word - dangerous.

K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 05:36 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 8 2006, 04:58 PM)
So Campro engine looks like a plain vanilla 16-valve DOHC but with high water temperature.

One word - dangerous.
*
agree... but need to add something there...

its actually plain vanilla 16-valve DOHC engine..
but then.. proton named it .. special vanilla flavor with special brew .. tongue.gif
soggie
post Jun 8 2006, 08:11 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 8 2006, 04:58 PM)
So Campro engine looks like a plain vanilla 16-valve DOHC but with high water temperature.

One word - dangerous.
*
No actually its a plain vanilla 16-valve DOHC 1.6 Litre engine with a long stroke supposedly for more torque but then tehre's a torque dip in the low power range, which makes it a joke. The high water temperature i believe is because navigator tuned his gen2 to run leaner, causing more powerful combustion at the cost of higher temperature.
vexus
post Jun 8 2006, 10:06 PM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:28 AM)

ppl like Vexxx which will only post -ve comment is an act of bashers. I do hope this kind of ppl canchange their attitude and don't act stupid.

*
what is this mr. ah beng mad.gif mad.gif vmad.gif vmad.gif mad.gif bruce.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 10:12 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 8 2006, 10:06 PM)
what is this mr. ah beng  mad.gif  mad.gif  vmad.gif  vmad.gif  mad.gif  bruce.gif
*
cool down man .. cool down ..

forget about it..
everyone knows who is barking .. who is not.. biggrin.gif
kcng
post Jun 8 2006, 10:20 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 8 2006, 11:12 PM)
cool down man .. cool down ..

forget about it..
everyone knows who is barking .. who is not..  biggrin.gif
*
agreee...
and his almighty campro dont perform up to par with v-tec...

kena con by PE sales person saying gentu can tapao vtec
whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif

thats why he must angkat his face high high...
whistling.gif whistling.gif

later if engine cannot fight liao...
he will say his gen2 handling tapao bmw

whistling.gif whistling.gif
BooMer86
post Jun 8 2006, 10:40 PM

Noobi
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


i don like the new campro engine
the acceleration is very slow and not responsive compared to wira.
donno why... but at 80-90 kmh.. It is smooth and quiet..
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 10:46 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(BooMer86 @ Jun 8 2006, 10:40 PM)
i don like the new campro engine
the acceleration is very slow and not responsive compared to wira.
donno why... but at 80-90 kmh.. It is smooth and quiet..
*
the reason behind that .. its because of the cam using in the campro engine.
the powerband is at the upper RPM range..
thats why when ur RPM higher .. it will become smoother..

but 'SOMEONE' claim his car different after tune .. get smooth curve .. flat torque curve.. whistling.gif
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 8 2006, 02:37 PM)
And where's your dyno chart? So far I've seen others provide dyno charts to show the pathetic torque curve of the Gen-2, but none of them showed a linear torque curve. Please provide that dyno chart of yours to proof your statements before you proceed. And BTW, the power dip is located at the 2500-3000 rpm range, and beyond that you get a pretty normal looking torque curve. The dip itself is the one causing the trouble, and if your chart shows that you can eliminate this dip, then your arguments would have credit.

Otherwise, you're just an ignorant fool believing everything the mechanic tells you. No offense.
*
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...=post&id=108939<--- please click this to see the torque chart. lower one is before tuning anf upper one is after tuning. after tuned campro comes with a torque range without even need the VVT or CPS thingie. this is not my car's chart yet, wanna contact the owner and buy his engine at million?????? doh.gif

dude, is this justify all your thought? and as I said, FOR THIS PARTICULAR MOMEMT I CANNOT UPLOAD ANY ATTACHMENT YET. and unless you pay me to go cafe, I won't do it.

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 8 2006, 11:33 PM
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 8 2006, 02:42 PM)
Actually, I found out where you're wrong. In your quote:
Are you mistaking Variable Intake Manifold with Variable Valve Timing? Myvi DOES NOT (censored) HAVE VARIABLE INTAKE MANIFOLD. Lemme rephrase that...

Myvi does NOT have VIM, nor does Gen-2

What Myvi has is called VVTi, which stands for Variable Valve Timing (intelligent), which is a totally diferent mechanism than the VIM. I hope you can explain all your misleading technical designations and get all your terms right before confusing the other people here about all your wild claims.

Thanks.
*
that was funny, why a lot of ppl told me that the black steel pipe is for VIM? ok, i'm totally confused.
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 8 2006, 03:25 PM)
show us your chart...
or is it your inferiority complex kicks in ?

internet line down for about 1 month ?
as slow as tmnet work, they wont need 1 month to get a line up....
and,
ever heard of thumb drive and upload from cyber cafe ?

no time to do it ?
but got time to quote and reply us ?

er.................
doh.gif  doh.gif
*
dude, my office line prohibited any data burst or my terminal will be barred from internet for a few days. Sometimes i do wonder, aren't you ppl knows IT? need me to explain any further?
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kevinhkw @ Jun 8 2006, 04:53 PM)
Hi Vexus

Can you provide the address for the intan matang proton branch? Plan to tune my Gen 2 car. Thank you for your kindness! notworthy.gif
*
from what i understand, intan matang's tuning is not up to what Hijawan or trendpoint provide. they just merely boost up the idle timing to give a false impression.

this is feedback from some G2C member.

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 8 2006, 11:48 PM
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(vexus @ Jun 8 2006, 10:06 PM)
what is this mr. ah beng  mad.gif  mad.gif  vmad.gif  vmad.gif  mad.gif  bruce.gif
*
dude, prove me you're not bashers. I already shows my minimal respect by not totally post up yous name.
navigator
post Jun 8 2006, 11:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 8 2006, 10:20 PM)
agreee...
and his almighty campro dont perform up to par with v-tec...

kena con by PE sales person saying gentu can tapao vtec
whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif

thats why he must angkat his face high high...
whistling.gif whistling.gif

later if engine cannot fight liao...
he will say his gen2 handling tapao bmw

whistling.gif whistling.gif
*
oh, yeah, Campro sux till ppl compared it with mazda 3 in taiwan. doh.gif

campro do not have the ability to beat B16x series engine. No pickup, yeah, most of the Gen2 out there have a relatively bad performance.

seems like most of the ppl don't buy the fact that campro is very flexible especially on ECU settings. last thing to tell you all is Campro's ECU do come with MAT sensor. which means the car is pre-equiped with turbo friendly ECU.

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 8 2006, 11:45 PM
Futura
post Jun 8 2006, 11:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya



Ok enough of debate guys...

@navigator: which place do you recommend to do ecu remapping for campro?

This post has been edited by Futura: Jun 8 2006, 11:47 PM
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 11:49 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Futura @ Jun 8 2006, 11:46 PM)
Ok enough of debate...which place do you recommend to do ecu remapping for campro?
*
he has already recommend a RM150 tunning + RM1xx radiotor flush ... check his previous post.. whistling.gif whistling.gif

go try out .. see if urs get a flat torque cruve.. and prove to us that we are wrong .. rclxm9.gif

hope u wont get CoNNeD thumbup.gif GooD LucK! laugh.gif
Futura
post Jun 8 2006, 11:53 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,896 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Subang Jaya



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 8 2006, 11:49 PM)
he has already recommend a RM150 tunning + RM1xx radiotor flush ... check his previous post..  whistling.gif  whistling.gif

go try out .. see if urs get a flat torque cruve.. and prove to us that we are wrong ..  rclxm9.gif

hope u wont get CoNNeD  thumbup.gif GooD LucK!  laugh.gif
*
Errr, so cheap meh ecu remapping? I thought reaching RM900?
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 8 2006, 11:54 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Futura @ Jun 8 2006, 11:53 PM)
Errr, so cheap meh ecu remapping? I thought reaching RM900?
*
its not remapping .. its juz TUNNING .. He stated tat..

kcng
post Jun 8 2006, 11:57 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 9 2006, 12:23 AM)
dude, my office line prohibited any data burst or my terminal will be barred from internet for a few days. Sometimes i do wonder, aren't you ppl knows IT? need me to explain any further?
*
RM 1.50 for 30 mins of Cyber cafe usage....

not enough time ?

or u doing PS on your DYNO chart now ?
ong_alien69
post Jun 9 2006, 12:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(mockv1per @ Apr 30 2006, 02:27 AM)
its japan plate number if im not mistaken.. not far from my frens place, he used to stay there.
*
sir...if u cant understand chinese, dont say anything lah,so paiseh

tat lemon yellow Gen2 is my taiwan fren,his ID in other forum is 北都小飛 (bei du xiao fei),i dont care u can read chinese or not

u was really mistake!
ong_alien69
post Jun 9 2006, 12:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
4 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 8 2006, 11:54 PM)
its not remapping .. its juz TUNNING .. He stated tat..
*
navigator is right, only TUNNING, and u can feel the change...

the original setting form proton is too bad... sad.gif
navigator
post Jun 9 2006, 12:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 8 2006, 11:57 PM)
RM 1.50 for 30 mins of Cyber cafe usage....

not enough time ?

or u doing PS on your DYNO chart now ?
*
i'm too stingy and hate the environment of cafe. or you come and have a meetup, i have a handful of GEN2 owner acknowledged your ignorance and willing to show you your ignorance.
mockv1per
post Jun 9 2006, 02:01 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
back to topic, no need to argue about campro coz i think its a bad engine..

anyway, the biggest cc for campro will be the current 1.6L in Gen2 and Waja.
for the 1.8L to 2.2L, Proton will use Petronas E01 engine... wub.gif

In the future(hopefully), get yourself a Proton with E01 engine tongue.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by mockv1per: Jun 9 2006, 02:42 AM
coltrain
post Jun 9 2006, 03:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
119 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


hmm....i'm also a Gen2 owner.
well,if u ask me wat i like about the car and dislike
I like,
the design of the car and the interior.

dislike,
the quality of the chasis,parts and the interior too plastic.

my Gen2 is the 1st batch(2004) one,
starting that time,i fix alot on this car,like
dics rotars(fix 2 times damn),power windows bracket,plug core,exhaust and some other minor parts...
the most headache place the is dics rotars,the quality really like shit. The surface easy to get unsmooth(hope u know wat i mean).
for the engine?so so for me,i try race before with my friend Satria 4G91 1.5 DOHC.pickup i lose,long run i win. if my car are manual,i got confident to win pick up and long run on him.oh yah,that time my car still stock and my friend change straight pipe already.
compare with Wira 1.5 ?i think Gen2 no problem with it.

if compare with VTEC or MIVEC ?? no need say anything,they can "bungkus" me anytime.

take my car for tuning ?for better performance ?
might as well just go for Mivec or GSR ?!!since u want performance...
if after tune,FC lower than before.I might will consider about it.

Oxigen
post Jun 9 2006, 03:35 AM

Need Help Newbie®
******
Senior Member
1,532 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: -Kopend @ Anfield-
wah, really all want their opinon here to stand out aa...
for me, gen-2 is a fairly good car. FC is okay.....engine is kinda smooth.
for me the bonus is the handling....nice. price = no comments! tongue.gif

-cheers-

WhitE LighteR
post Jun 9 2006, 08:46 AM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Wah.... i saw a few page back someone tune the car to achieve 130bhp with such a nice torque curve flat all the way at 130hp for quite a wide area of rpm. Serious ar it can achieve that? Any mod? Thts test is measure on the wheel rite? If thts true then the engine not bad wor.... compare to the original one which achieve 110 bhp only at the end of the rpm range.
vexus
post Jun 9 2006, 08:51 AM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:27 PM)
dude, prove me you're not bashers. I already shows my minimal respect by not totally post up yous name.
*
get lost lah u king of talk cock. I duwan hear u sin ka lan about campro.
WhitE LighteR
post Jun 9 2006, 08:56 AM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Cool down bro... later kena warning by mod
kcng
post Jun 9 2006, 09:19 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



or we all go pay him a visit in setapak....

how about that ?
limsy
post Jun 9 2006, 10:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
Sorry guys, cant help but notice all the pro is here so i MUST have your opinion. tongue.gif
Point 1: Campro (Gen2, WAJA) is BAD ... but still better than WIRA
Point 2: Campro is SLOW to respond, BAD for jams.
Point 3: Once speed reach 80km+, Campro is smooth.
k. Reason is i sort of decided to get a WAJA ... but seeing proton STILL sell WAJA with OLD ENGINE at SAME price w CAMPRO. I cannot make up my mind which to take. sad.gif
Help? My main usage is driving to work, so JAM is a norm. Also, i will need to pass roller coaster road like Genting every day. (luckily short distance)
When i drive, i like to feel POWER and i hate kena CUT QUEUE.
(so if slow to pickup in jam.. u know lah.. always kena slot in one)
I dont care about TOP SPEED, i usually drive around 80-100km only.
Thanks.

dstl1128
post Jun 9 2006, 11:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
You need a 2nd hand Honda City iDSI

This post has been edited by dstl1128: Jun 9 2006, 11:22 AM
JasonKing
post Jun 9 2006, 11:38 AM

G-Unit
******
Senior Member
1,642 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


campro not good.... go for bmw lah bro....the best!
vexus
post Jun 9 2006, 11:49 AM

Master of Eatery & Sleeping
*******
Senior Member
6,660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Palace of sexology



looking for quieter cabin, less engine sound. go for honda or toyota or hyundai.
shinjite
post Jun 9 2006, 01:00 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(coltrain @ Jun 9 2006, 03:27 AM)
hmm....i'm also a Gen2 owner.
well,if u ask me wat i like about the car and dislike
I like,
the design of the car and the interior.

dislike,
the quality of the chasis,parts and the interior too plastic.

my Gen2 is the 1st batch(2004) one,
starting that time,i fix alot on this car,like
dics rotars(fix 2 times damn),power windows bracket,plug core,exhaust and some other minor parts...
the most headache place the is dics rotars,the quality really like shit. The surface easy to get unsmooth(hope u know wat i mean).
for the engine?so so for me,i try race before with my friend Satria 4G91 1.5 DOHC.pickup i lose,long run i win. if my car are manual,i got confident to win pick up and long run on him.oh yah,that time my car still stock and my friend change straight pipe already.
compare with Wira 1.5 ?i think Gen2 no problem with it.

if compare with VTEC or MIVEC ?? no need say anything,they can "bungkus" me anytime.

take my car for tuning ?for better performance ?
might as well just go for Mivec or GSR ?!!since u want performance...
if after tune,FC lower than before.I might will consider about it.
*
Wah 4G91 DOHC also lose?? Like that consider not bad ler at least,,,XD

dstl1128
post Jun 9 2006, 01:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
1.5L vs 1.6L but 1.6L win the 1.5L?
shinjite
post Jun 9 2006, 01:32 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


if compare spec to spec both engines should be nearly the same stock
Why don't you try it against a 4G92 SOHC 1.6 and see? smile.gif
soggie
post Jun 9 2006, 02:12 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:21 PM)
that was funny, why a lot of ppl told me that the black steel pipe is for VIM? ok, i'm totally confused.
*
navigator, i hope you actually know how does a VIM device looks like, because as far as my eyes can see, there's no such thing on the Gen2. I hope you're the kind of person that believes in cold hard facts more than hearsay. Proton has already said that there is no VIM in their engine. Who would you choose to believe? Proton, or the mechanics? Even if you choose to believe in yourself, go find the VIM in the engine, ask several mechanics to help you out. If you can find it, then I'd gladly admit my mistake. If not, I believe its common courtesy to apologize for your misinformation regarding that.
soggie
post Jun 9 2006, 02:26 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 8 2006, 11:20 PM)
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...=post&id=108939<--- please click this to see the torque chart. lower one is before tuning anf upper one is after tuning. after tuned campro comes with a torque range without even need the VVT or CPS thingie. this is not my car's chart yet, wanna contact the owner and buy his engine at million?????? doh.gif

dude, is this justify all your thought? and as I said, FOR THIS PARTICULAR MOMEMT I CANNOT UPLOAD ANY ATTACHMENT YET. and unless you pay me to go cafe, I won't do it.
*
navigator, that doesn't answers my question. all the while you are maintaining that campro engine is good because it can be tuned for a flatter torque curve, and that it has VIM in it. You even went as far as claiming the name of Campro is because it has a different profile, when it is just a more aggressive profile and nothing special about it. And its not named Campro because of that, Campro refers to the mechanism, and has nothing to do with cam profiles.

All these misinformation you did not even try to explain, or proof your words. To people who really know the Campro engine, we're actually very amused to see somebody creating such gross misinformation and mislead all the ignorant people in FnF.

Now that your points are proven wrong again and again, I can only wonder when will you finally have the guts to admit your mistakes and indulge everybody in the real fact - Campro is just a plain vanilla DOHC 1.6 engine, with no extra technology in it. And to say you need a tune-up to get a flat torque curve still doesn't make it a good engine because any car with such a tune-up can get much better performance from it. An easy way is to run the engine leaner, and its basically a free DIY process to gain 10-15% power.
mockv1per
post Jun 9 2006, 02:51 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
CamPro is nothing but just name. No Cam Profile Switching and Variable Intake Manifold technology inside the current 1.3L and 1.6L campro engine. Maybe in the next one or two years time they will have that technology in the so called campro engine.. or maybe never..
it is a stupid action by proton by not using the Petronas E01 engine years ago and develop their own CamPro engine. and now they want to collaborate with Petronas to build E01 range engine for them. shocking.gif

E01e: Originally rated for Euro-2 specifications, the engine was up to Euro 3 early last year.
WhitE LighteR
post Jun 9 2006, 03:01 PM

WhitE LighteR Is Black~
********
All Stars
10,340 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Damn ... wonder what kind of performance we will be getting from EO1... haihz... sad.gif
mockv1per
post Jun 9 2006, 03:05 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
E01? as good as Honda's K20A or even better.. wub.gif

and from wikipedia :
Proton Campro - Still under development, said to be based on Lotus technology which developed Porsche's VarioCam
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 9 2006, 03:15 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(limsy @ Jun 9 2006, 10:26 AM)
Sorry guys, cant help but notice all the pro is here so i MUST have your opinion.    tongue.gif
Point 1: Campro (Gen2, WAJA) is BAD ... but still better than WIRA
Point 2: Campro is SLOW to respond, BAD for jams.
Point 3: Once speed reach 80km+, Campro is smooth.
k. Reason is i sort of decided to get a WAJA ... but seeing proton STILL sell WAJA with OLD ENGINE at SAME price w CAMPRO.  I cannot make up my mind which to take.  sad.gif
Help? My main usage is driving to work, so JAM is a norm.  Also, i will need to pass roller coaster road like Genting every day. (luckily short distance) 
When i drive, i like to feel POWER and i hate kena CUT QUEUE. 
(so if slow to pickup in jam.. u know lah.. always kena slot in one)
I dont care about TOP SPEED, i usually drive around 80-100km only.
Thanks.
*
If u really wants a WAJA .. no other choice.. i would says the waja with mitsubishi engine (4G18) ..it has a peak torque at 2750 rpm .. since u says always JAM .. sure it suits more.. CAMPRO has a peak torque at 4000 rpm (u need to reverb more to get the power out of it).

Something to Clarify, your first point!.. u said Campro (Gen2,WAja) is better than Wira... that is way wrong ... try compare with a Wira LE (1.8 DOHC) .. tongue.gif .. i would say campro would even smell his Arse... tongue.gif .. tongue.gif
limsy
post Jun 9 2006, 04:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
oo.. there's a WIRA LE??? dont see it in their website leh...
i just check w a proton outlet.. say they dont have stock for old engine liao.. *sob*

Guess i will have to be a good citizen and support Waja Campro lor.. sigh... i hope i dont regret this.

I dont wanna 2nd hand car.. i scared i got cheated and ended up with something i need to fix all the time. sad.gif

Anyways... its NOT that BAD ya? NO.. dont answer me. Somehow i feel its BEST to NOT know. tongue.gif

limsy
post Jun 9 2006, 04:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
148 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 9 2006, 03:15 PM)
CAMPRO has a peak torque at 4000 rpm (u need to reverb more to get the power out of it).
Hrmm.. pardon my noobness.... but whats reverb? some kindof tuning? this mean IF i do something to my Waja Campro, it can improve its performance?
approx how much r these fixings ah? Thanks.
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 9 2006, 04:20 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(limsy @ Jun 9 2006, 04:03 PM)
oo.. there's a WIRA LE??? dont see it in their website leh...
i just check w a proton outlet.. say they dont have stock for old engine liao.. *sob*

Guess i will have to be a good citizen and support Waja Campro lor.. sigh... i hope i dont regret this.

I dont wanna 2nd hand car.. i scared i got cheated and ended up with something i need to fix all the time.  sad.gif

Anyways... its NOT that BAD ya?  NO.. dont answer me.  Somehow i feel its BEST to NOT know.  tongue.gif
*
QUOTE(limsy @ Jun 9 2006, 04:06 PM)
Hrmm.. pardon my noobness.... but whats reverb? some kindof tuning? this mean IF i do something to my Waja Campro, it can improve its performance?
approx how much r these fixings ah?  Thanks.
*
I think u already wanted the Campro Waja so badly.. hehe
so wats the point asking question d... since u already made up ur decision, they will juz spoilt the image of a so call "good waja campro" in ur mind.

Btw, Reverb to 4000rpm .. means .. u know the RPM meter?? the one with scale 0 ~ 8 or 9 ... x 1000 one ... for campro engine .. means when the RPM reaches 4000 (that is quite high .. almost mid of the reverb) ..there u get ur maximum torque... for the normal waja .. u get the max torque at 2750 rpm .. which is good for average driving .. becoz u wont pedal all the way when u are driving slow.. biggrin.gif

SUSceo684
post Jun 9 2006, 04:37 PM

Component Burner
********
All Stars
11,667 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang/Subang




You *might* save more repair costs with a new waja vs used honda city ~03 year...

but you will definitely use more petrol.
dstl1128
post Jun 9 2006, 06:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Most likely you might spend more repair cost on new Waja than a used City iDSI.


Anyway, with Waja body and Campro characteristic, anybody try that before? How zippy it goes?

Honda City has max torque 131Nm at 2700rpm,
Campro has its torque 107Nm at 3000rpm, max torque 129Nm at 4600rpm (from chart).


This post has been edited by dstl1128: Jun 9 2006, 06:43 PM
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 9 2006, 07:02 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 9 2006, 06:38 PM)
Most likely you might spend more repair cost on new Waja than a used City iDSI.
Anyway, with Waja body and Campro characteristic, anybody try that before? How zippy it goes?

Honda City has max torque 131Nm at 2700rpm,
Campro has its torque 107Nm at 3000rpm, max torque 129Nm at 4600rpm (from chart).
*
City -> 2700rpm -> 131Nm
Cam -> 3000rpm -> 107Nm
-> 4000rpm -> 129Nm

darn, thats weak... IdSi .. runs much smoother for city drive ..
rcracer
post Jun 9 2006, 07:05 PM

?????
*******
Senior Member
3,772 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(limsy @ Jun 9 2006, 04:06 PM)
Hrmm.. pardon my noobness.... but whats reverb? some kindof tuning? this mean IF i do something to my Waja Campro, it can improve its performance?
approx how much r these fixings ah? Thanks.
*
Eh dun let the perception that the Campro is slow to respond lah, it's really over exaggerated. Take it from me who has been driving that engine for 2 years.

Also to compare the IDSI and Campro bring out the IDSI chart too please, honda's figures i can almost gurantee are not accurate, it's either inflated or measured at the flywheel not on wheel.

This post has been edited by rcracer: Jun 9 2006, 07:09 PM
Kampung2005
post Jun 9 2006, 07:07 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
campro in gen2 is sufficient for normal driving, at least that what i felt in a gen2, in real life...but proton should have put in VVT into campro engine to improve efficiency and low-end torque
shinjite
post Jun 9 2006, 11:28 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


I wonder whats the torque curve for my Wira 1.6~~~XD

But seriously, max torque at 4000rpm is too high.....
zeustronic
post Jun 10 2006, 12:06 AM

Retire OC Into Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,605 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell


QUOTE(Kampung2005 @ Jun 9 2006, 08:07 PM)
campro in gen2 is sufficient for normal driving, at least that what i felt in a gen2, in real life...but proton should have put in VVT into campro engine to improve efficiency and low-end torque
*
Would be better if Campro engine with VVT or VTC... suitable for all condition...

This post has been edited by zeustronic: Jun 10 2006, 12:06 AM
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 10 2006, 12:39 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jun 9 2006, 11:28 PM)
I wonder whats the torque curve for my Wira 1.6~~~XD

But seriously, max torque at 4000rpm is too high.....
*
Go Dyno and let us know .. tongue.gif tongue.gif
navigator
post Jun 10 2006, 02:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 9 2006, 02:26 PM)
navigator, that doesn't answers my question. all the while you are maintaining that campro engine is good because it can be tuned for a flatter torque curve, and that it has VIM in it. You even went as far as claiming the name of Campro is because it has a different profile, when it is just a more aggressive profile and nothing special about it. And its not named Campro because of that, Campro refers to the mechanism, and has nothing to do with cam profiles.

All these misinformation you did not even try to explain, or proof your words. To people who really know the Campro engine, we're actually very amused to see somebody creating such gross misinformation and mislead all the ignorant people in FnF.

Now that your points are proven wrong again and again, I can only wonder when will you finally have the guts to admit your mistakes and indulge everybody in the real fact - Campro is just a plain vanilla DOHC 1.6 engine, with no extra technology in it. And to say you need a tune-up to get a flat torque curve still doesn't make it a good engine because any car with such a tune-up can get much better performance from it. An easy way is to run the engine leaner, and its basically a free DIY process to gain 10-15% power.
*
I'm back. about the VIM thing, I do aware that there's an misleading info. I will get in touch with the mechs who told me all these things and ask him to explain this VIM stuff.

As far as I know, I do understand that the VIM works by it's practical design. but honestly I never acknowledged by the mechs where is it located, and that's why I would like to ask anyone qho knows the PDT and how the campro is tuned to explain. and why is the flat torque curve shown after tuning. but you guys never corrent all these but instead keep on said that i'm a plain cheater, con man blah blah, which makes me really upset and annoyed. Some even keep on forcing me by showing the chart which I promised to post up ONLY after i get my streamyx. What's the point again?

I'm still seeking an answer of how does an engine with no CPS & VIM achieve a flat torque curve and the 80% torque margin is maintain on a wide band. and do not saying some stupid thing like have to tune blah blah. there's a lot of cars out there can't even alter their ECU settings.

I do hope when I'm sharing something, ppl can reply with their honest and not emotionally.

Anyone are welcome to pay me a visit and there's some other owner acknowledged the mishap over here and do willing to show their joy for owning a GEN2.



K3nnYkl82
post Jun 10 2006, 03:36 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 10 2006, 02:50 PM)
I'm back. about the VIM thing, I do aware that there's an misleading info. I will get in touch with the mechs who told me all these things and ask him to explain this VIM stuff.

As far as I know, I do understand that the VIM works by it's practical design. but honestly I never acknowledged by the mechs where is it located, and that's why I would like to ask anyone qho knows the PDT and how the campro is tuned to explain. and why is the flat torque curve shown after tuning. but you guys never corrent all these but instead keep on said that i'm a plain cheater, con man blah blah, which makes me really upset and annoyed. Some even keep on forcing me by showing the chart which I promised to post up ONLY after i get my streamyx. What's the point again?

I'm still seeking an answer of how does an engine with no CPS & VIM achieve a flat torque curve and the 80% torque margin is maintain on a wide band. and do not saying some stupid thing like have to tune blah blah. there's a lot of cars out there can't even alter their ECU settings.

I do hope when I'm sharing something, ppl can reply with their honest and not emotionally.

Anyone are welcome to pay me a visit and there's some other owner acknowledged the mishap over here and do willing to show their joy for owning a GEN2.
*
Navigator, its not that they 'Do Not Wanna Correct all these'. is not that they 'Do Not Wanna Tell u why ur engine can achieve a flat torque curve after tune'....

The main point is .. no one will believe ur engine can achieve flat torque curve until ur Dyno chart is shown to us.. laugh.gif

Basically, not one of us here believe that Cam pro can do that.. like u say, u dun have a fast line to upload ur dyno chart, its just like u telling someone u won a lottery but u dunno where the ticket is. you dont have anything to prove to us.. so u cant blame them bashing ur Cam Pro.

Well, i do agree with most of them, its juz marketing strategy by Proton... and its a plain vanila 1.6 DOHC engine.. biggrin.gif .. find a way .. go cc pay RM2 lar.. then upload ur Dyno chart... and prove us wrong the... tongue.gif
kcng
post Jun 10 2006, 07:37 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 04:36 PM)
Navigator, its not that they 'Do Not Wanna Correct all these'. is not that they 'Do Not Wanna Tell u why ur engine can achieve a flat torque curve after tune'....

The main point is .. no one will believe ur engine can achieve flat torque curve until ur Dyno chart is shown to us..  laugh.gif

Basically, not one of us here believe that Cam pro can do that.. like u say, u dun have a fast line to upload ur dyno chart, its just like u telling someone u won a lottery but u dunno where the ticket is. you dont have anything to prove to us.. so u cant blame them bashing ur Cam Pro.

Well, i do agree with most of them, its juz marketing strategy by Proton... and its a plain vanila 1.6 DOHC engine..  biggrin.gif .. find a way .. go cc pay RM2 lar.. then upload ur Dyno chart... and prove us wrong the...  tongue.gif
*
i did ask him to go cc
and he dowan...
so what else we can do then ?

come on, i have heard people say campro can tapao vtec and all...
when i ask them to go up against my i-vtec, they all like no noise liao...

so ?
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 10 2006, 08:02 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(darthvadersidious @ Apr 29 2006, 09:20 PM)
i will say campro engine is as good as vtech, even better...
*
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 10 2006, 07:37 PM)
i did ask him to go cc
and he dowan...
so what else we can do then ?

come on, i have heard people say campro can tapao vtec and all...
when i ask them to go up against my i-vtec, they all like no noise liao...

so ?
*
he is not the one who says campro is better than Vtec ..

The one who said it ... 1 word for him .. Genius. notworthy.gif rclxms.gif

whistling.gif
zeustronic
post Jun 10 2006, 08:14 PM

Retire OC Into Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,605 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 09:02 PM)
he is not the one who says campro is better than Vtec ..

The one who said it ... 1 word for him .. Genius.  notworthy.gif  rclxms.gif

whistling.gif
*
Wah got so kua chiong bor Campro better VTEC.... I would like to see a 400m Drag test...
shinjite
post Jun 10 2006, 11:23 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 12:39 AM)
Go Dyno and let us know .. tongue.gif tongue.gif
*
Dyno test not cheap leh tongue.gif

4G92 MIVEC also lose to Vtec in drag, and you're talking about Campro beating Vtec?? XD

This post has been edited by shinjite: Jun 10 2006, 11:25 PM
soggie
post Jun 10 2006, 11:31 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 10 2006, 02:50 PM)
I'm back. about the VIM thing, I do aware that there's an misleading info. I will get in touch with the mechs who told me all these things and ask him to explain this VIM stuff.

As far as I know, I do understand that the VIM works by it's practical design. but honestly I never acknowledged by the mechs where is it located, and that's why I would like to ask anyone qho knows the PDT and how the campro is tuned to explain. and why is the flat torque curve shown after tuning. but you guys never corrent all these but instead keep on said that i'm a plain cheater, con man blah blah, which makes me really upset and annoyed. Some even keep on forcing me by showing the chart which I promised to post up ONLY after i get my streamyx. What's the point again?

I'm still seeking an answer of how does an engine with no CPS & VIM achieve a flat torque curve and the 80% torque margin is maintain on a wide band. and do not saying some stupid thing like have to tune blah blah. there's a lot of cars out there can't even alter their ECU settings.

I do hope when I'm sharing something, ppl can reply with their honest and not emotionally.

Anyone are welcome to pay me a visit and there's some other owner acknowledged the mishap over here and do willing to show their joy for owning a GEN2.
*
I think you're not getting my point after so many posts. You are the one who insisted that VIM exist on the Campro, and you were so sure of it that you are willing to again and again disprove claims by those who know better, even to the extend of ignoring an official reply from Proton itself.

Our point had always been simple - PROOF US WRONG. We know 100% that VIM does not exist on the campro, because unlike some of the people in FnF, we actually know where the intake manifold is, how it looks like, and how a VIM should look like. And from our observations there is nothing new on the intake manifold, just plain vanilla 1.6 DOHC EFI manifold, nothing more, nothing less. So we're extremely eager to allow you to proof us wrong (which would be a rude shock and some of us would be taking engine 101 class again), and show exactly where the VIM is hidden.

But up until now you have not replied to that matter, and kept insisting that the flat torque curve is due to campro having a VIM mechanism. So you better clear up that fact before more noobies fall prey to your misinformation (if its false) and decide to promote campro to other people as having VIM, and quoting you for that fact, thus humiliating both you and them.

So let us reduce the scope of this debate to clear up on these two things:

1) Does VIM exist in Campro?

2) Can Campro be tuned to have a flat torque curve?

Until you can answer those two questions satisfactorily and with facts and proof, I don't think anybody will take you seriously here.
kcng
post Jun 11 2006, 12:53 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 09:02 PM)
he is not the one who says campro is better than Vtec ..

The one who said it ... 1 word for him .. Genius.  notworthy.gif  rclxms.gif

whistling.gif
*
its not him.... but somewhere in this forum, i swear i read before....

QUOTE(zeustronic @ Jun 10 2006, 09:14 PM)
Wah got so kua chiong bor Campro better VTEC.... I would like to see a 400m Drag test...
*
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jun 11 2006, 12:23 AM)
Dyno test not cheap leh tongue.gif

4G92 MIVEC also lose to Vtec in drag, and you're talking about Campro beating Vtec?? XD
*
its some where in FnF a while back... i am searching through... there is a forumer that says campro can beat v-tec.

mockv1per
post Jun 11 2006, 12:55 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
i think that guy who says campro is better than Vtec is just being sarcastic tongue.gif
kcng
post Jun 11 2006, 12:59 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(mockv1per @ Jun 11 2006, 01:55 AM)
i think that guy who says campro is better than Vtec is just being sarcastic tongue.gif
*
no ler....
i remember the forumer say something like this....
a campro if driven by a good driver, can tapao v-tec without problem....

something like that la... exact words i not sure...
zeustronic
post Jun 11 2006, 01:55 AM

Retire OC Into Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,605 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 11 2006, 01:59 AM)
no ler....
i remember the forumer say something like this....
a campro if driven by a good driver, can tapao v-tec without problem....

something like that la... exact words i not sure...
*
Campro can tapao VTEC.... Never heard of that b4... what bout B16B vs Campro?


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 11 2006, 01:57 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(zeustronic @ Jun 11 2006, 01:55 AM)
Campro can tapao VTEC.... Never heard of that b4... what bout B16B vs Campro?
*
B16B also got VTEC ler..
the picture u post one .. VTEC + Turbo somemore ..

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jun 11 2006, 01:58 AM
shinjite
post Jun 11 2006, 07:19 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


I think no need MIVEC ler, compare it with 4G93P NA first and see tongue.gif
ulet
post Jun 11 2006, 08:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


i think lotus elise should dump the old k-rover engine.
it should change to 1.6campro supercharge + turbocharge.
zeustronic
post Jun 11 2006, 09:01 AM

Retire OC Into Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,605 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: A Place Between Heaven & Hell


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 11 2006, 09:00 AM)
i think lotus elise should dump the old k-rover engine.
it should change to 1.6campro supercharge + turbocharge.
*
I think Proton WAJA & SRM will have Supercharge by Klemann... I would like see some Campro fans mod their engine with turbo or supercharge...

This post has been edited by zeustronic: Jun 11 2006, 09:04 AM
tunertoobe
post Jun 11 2006, 10:07 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 11 2006, 08:00 AM)
i think lotus elise should dump the old k-rover engine.
it should change to 1.6campro supercharge + turbocharge.
*
Lotus already dumped the old rover engine and used a Toyota unit.
navigator
post Jun 11 2006, 10:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 03:36 PM)
Navigator, its not that they 'Do Not Wanna Correct all these'. is not that they 'Do Not Wanna Tell u why ur engine can achieve a flat torque curve after tune'....

The main point is .. no one will believe ur engine can achieve flat torque curve until ur Dyno chart is shown to us..  laugh.gif

Basically, not one of us here believe that Cam pro can do that.. like u say, u dun have a fast line to upload ur dyno chart, its just like u telling someone u won a lottery but u dunno where the ticket is. you dont have anything to prove to us.. so u cant blame them bashing ur Cam Pro.

Well, i do agree with most of them, its juz marketing strategy by Proton... and its a plain vanila 1.6 DOHC engine..  biggrin.gif .. find a way .. go cc pay RM2 lar.. then upload ur Dyno chart... and prove us wrong the...  tongue.gif
*
but pal, someone DID shown that the tuned Campro with nearly 2000rpm flat torque curve! Even without mine?

So why still not believe?
navigator
post Jun 11 2006, 10:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 10 2006, 07:37 PM)
i did ask him to go cc
and he dowan...
so what else we can do then ?

come on, i have heard people say campro can tapao vtec and all...
when i ask them to go up against my i-vtec, they all like no noise liao...

so ?
*
Dude, did you ask me to go TT? PM me plz. I never see your any post asking me for TT.

I will try to arrange as many tuned Gen2 as possible and also some Savvy. if you all are curiuos.
navigator
post Jun 11 2006, 10:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 10 2006, 08:02 PM)
he is not the one who says campro is better than Vtec ..

The one who said it ... 1 word for him .. Genius.  notworthy.gif  rclxms.gif

whistling.gif
*
.........I won't say that. as I understand that VTEC is a matured technology, even new Campro with CPS will not have the same achieve as it does. Look at F22C on S-2000.....
navigator
post Jun 11 2006, 10:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(shinjite @ Jun 10 2006, 11:23 PM)
Dyno test not cheap leh tongue.gif

4G92 MIVEC also lose to Vtec in drag, and you're talking about Campro beating Vtec?? XD
*
Dyno not expensive lah......RM90 only. it will be expensive when u use Stupid AFC to tune from Dyno..... I see Most of the P2 cars did it.
CooShyRee
post Jun 11 2006, 10:14 AM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



navigator, can u pls use the EDIT button instead of doin multiple posting like this??
navigator
post Jun 11 2006, 10:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 10 2006, 11:31 PM)
I think you're not getting my point after so many posts. You are the one who insisted that VIM exist on the Campro, and you were so sure of it that you are willing to again and again disprove claims by those who know better, even to the extend of ignoring an official reply from Proton itself.

Our point had always been simple - PROOF US WRONG. We know 100% that VIM does not exist on the campro, because unlike some of the people in FnF, we actually know where the intake manifold is, how it looks like, and how a VIM should look like. And from our observations there is nothing new on the intake manifold, just plain vanilla 1.6 DOHC EFI manifold, nothing more, nothing less. So we're extremely eager to allow you to proof us wrong (which would be a rude shock and some of us would be taking engine 101 class again), and show exactly where the VIM is hidden.

But up until now you have not replied to that matter, and kept insisting that the flat torque curve is due to campro having a VIM mechanism. So you better clear up that fact before more noobies fall prey to your misinformation (if its false) and decide to promote campro to other people as having VIM, and quoting you for that fact, thus humiliating both you and them.

So let us reduce the scope of this debate to clear up on these two things:

1) Does VIM exist in Campro?

2) Can Campro be tuned to have a flat torque curve?

Until you can answer those two questions satisfactorily and with facts and proof, I don't think anybody will take you seriously here.
*
1)I do understand the Current S4PH does not have the VIM mechanisam. But My mech assures me that By manipulating the Throttle body, it can achieve the VIM effect..... I will say it has the VIM because that dude shows me something in PDT(Proton Diagnostic tools for who don't know) that convinced me that it can do something like VIM. Which has effect on Pneumatic drag and resonance effect. I will confirm with him. But not now because he's not in KL. So, can you just let me confirm with my mech when I have the time and just halt this on comment??

2) Dude, I tot someone had shown the Dyno Chart before me?
user posted image

What the hell is this?????

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 11 2006, 10:21 AM
ulet
post Jun 11 2006, 11:24 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Jun 11 2006, 10:07 AM)
Lotus already dumped the old rover engine and used a Toyota unit.
*
i think they still used the old rover engine for UK market but for US makret, they change it to toyota engine.
not right ka ?
ulet
post Jun 11 2006, 11:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 11 2006, 10:16 AM)
2) Dude, I tot someone had shown the Dyno Chart before me?
user posted image

What the hell is this?????
*
dude, that chart we dont know what he did to the car. he might already change straight pipe, 4-2-1, extractor, better flow air filter and bla bla.
but for u, u said is just by tuning it and can achieve that.
that we cannot believe !
if u can achieve tht by tuning only, why proton dont use it ? all this time their campro engine is get bash by people in msia market or oversea market for their lack of low end torque.
mockv1per
post Jun 11 2006, 12:12 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 11 2006, 11:24 AM)
i think they still used the old rover engine for UK market but for US makret, they change it to toyota engine.
not right ka ?
*
they change it already.. now with toyota's 1.8L engine..

New Models: Lotus launches lead-in Elise
09 Jun 06 15:37

Lotus is fitting the Toyota 1.8-litre engine in the Elise for the European market, replacing the previous entry-level models with the Rover K-series engine.

The Elise S features a 136bhp version of the 1.8 VVTi unit, good for 128mph and 0-60mph in 5.8 seconds. Specification is the same as for the rest of the range, though a limited-slip differential will not be on offer as an option. Prices start from just 23,995.

The Elise S goes on sale in the UK and other European countries in July, with sales in Japan following in September. It will not go to the US, however, where the 190bhp 'federal' Elise with the same engine is already available.

source: 4car

soggie
post Jun 11 2006, 01:36 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 11 2006, 10:16 AM)
1)I do understand the Current S4PH does not have the VIM mechanisam. But My mech assures me that By manipulating the Throttle body, it can achieve the VIM effect..... I will say it has the VIM because that dude shows me something in PDT(Proton Diagnostic tools for who don't know) that convinced me that it can do something like VIM. Which has effect on Pneumatic drag and resonance effect. I will confirm with him. But not now because he's not in KL. So, can you just let me confirm with my mech when I have the time and just halt this on comment??

2) Dude, I tot someone had shown the Dyno Chart before me?
user posted image

What the hell is this?????
*
My answers:

1) Firstly, if you have any faint idea about what a throttle body is, you'll understand what utterly bullcrap your mechanic just told you. And if you understand how a VIM works, you'll be even more sure of what utterly crap you've just gotten from your mechanic. A PDT is a diagnostic tool - but what does it show? Torque/HP figures? How does it get all those figures? But calculation or by real dyno runs? Please make sure of all these factors before you even begin to claim on how a throttle body can simulate a VIM effect. Because if your claim is true, then ur mechanic deserves a nobel prize for being smarter than the guys in porsche, BMW, Merz, Ferrari and other famous car makers who spend billions upon billions to create such an effect with complex mechanisms only to be pwned by a under-the-tree mechanic who can achieve it with a simple throttle body tune.

2) The dyno chart isn't yours, and who knows what other items had the person mod onto his Gen2? Please take some time, show your dyno, before you attempt to continue the debate. As I've said earlier, no matter what you attempt to proof here, if you don't have your dyno chart to back you up, its just wild claims. We'll wait for you, don't worry.
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 11 2006, 02:55 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
Attached Image

Throttle body is totally control by mechanisem ..non electronic .. except for the servo. VIM effect ... <b>WOW</b> ... ur mechanic... Genius... rclxms.gif
kcng
post Jun 11 2006, 09:37 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 11 2006, 11:11 AM)
Dude, did you ask me to go TT? PM me plz. I never see your any post asking me for TT.

I will try to arrange as many tuned Gen2 as possible and also some Savvy. if you all are curiuos.
*
i did not say it was you.... but some one else in this forum some time ago....
until now that forumer has not reply to my pm to meet up and see his almighty campro engine....
kcng
post Jun 12 2006, 11:28 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



Quiet already one ?

where is the dyno chart ?
kcng
post Jun 14 2006, 07:08 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



We are still waiting for the dyno chart....
soggie
post Jun 14 2006, 09:02 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


Give him some time ler.
kcng
post Jun 14 2006, 09:03 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 14 2006, 10:02 AM)
Give him some time ler.
*
about 2 days already....
until end of this week and see...
Cahill
post Jun 14 2006, 10:27 AM

-- Type (R) --
*******
Senior Member
2,754 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: St. James Park
QUOTE(zeustronic @ Jun 11 2006, 01:55 AM)
Campro can tapao VTEC.... Never heard of that b4... what bout B16B vs Campro?
*
not even need B-series, no offence but it's really disrespect to compare legendary B-series with campro whistling.gif hehe...even D-series sohc vtec produce more hp than campro biggrin.gif
mockv1per
post Jun 14 2006, 11:04 AM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
just wait for the supercharged CamPro inside Waja Z? that if they supercharged it.. brows.gif
kcng
post Jun 14 2006, 11:09 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(mockv1per @ Jun 14 2006, 12:04 PM)
just wait for the supercharged CamPro inside Waja Z? that if they supercharged it..  brows.gif
*
the power window blow faster?
icon_question.gif
soggie
post Jun 14 2006, 11:46 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


Actually, i think supercharging the 1.6 is a good move. The waja needs more torque to handle its chassis. Not sure the FC increase will be justified tho.
shikamaru5314
post Jun 14 2006, 11:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kl


Agreed. But sc doesn't mean higer fc right ? because vw tsi spec look low fc to me.
shinjite
post Jun 14 2006, 12:35 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Well it depends though~~~right foot, driving conditions
FunctionX
post Jun 14 2006, 12:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 14 2006, 11:46 AM)
Actually, i think supercharging the 1.6 is a good move. The waja needs more torque to handle its chassis. Not sure the FC increase will be justified tho.
*
I'm still wondering why they didn't opt for turbocharger instead.
cost vs complexity factor ?
ulet
post Jun 14 2006, 01:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(FunctionX @ Jun 14 2006, 12:39 PM)
I'm still wondering why they didn't opt for turbocharger instead.
cost vs complexity factor ?
*
supercharger is much more easier in maintanence.
summore campro engine lack of low end torque and they try to eliminate it by putting supercharger. if put turbocharger, it need time before the turbocharger kick in and usually start at 2000rpm and above. supercharger start from the lowest RPM but end early.
soggie
post Jun 14 2006, 03:32 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(FunctionX @ Jun 14 2006, 12:39 PM)
I'm still wondering why they didn't opt for turbocharger instead.
cost vs complexity factor ?
*
Turbo aint suited for campro I guess. It needs more low down torque for daily driving , considering Waja is a normal sedan.

QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 14 2006, 01:07 PM)
supercharger is much more easier in maintanence.
summore campro engine lack of low end torque and they try to eliminate it by putting supercharger. if put turbocharger, it need time before the turbocharger kick in and usually start at 2000rpm and above. supercharger start from the lowest RPM but end early.
*
I disagree. Supercharge is a more complex mechanism compared to turbocharger. Generally in maintennance terms, more parts = more hassel, and more failure potential. Therefore a turbo theoratically is much easier on maintennance. Besides, there aren't a lot of SC experts in malaysia. More turbo heads here. But you might be right if the SC is well built - they have very little dependence on other parts (turbo needs engine oil, good oil lines and so on), and thus might potentially run more reliable than conventional turbos.
kcng
post Jun 14 2006, 11:34 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



still got no dyno chart ?
whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 15 2006, 12:47 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
Guess wat ... my fren driving a Gen2 also .. i ask told him someone was debating with us .. can get flat torque . he says . his arse lar.. hahaha..
then i say hij-- dunno wat wan d... then he says .. oh .. tat tuner.. he says very famous.. but blood suckers.. i i believe nothing much he can do .. tongue.gif
navigator
post Jun 15 2006, 07:23 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 11 2006, 11:36 AM)
dude, that chart we dont know what he did to the car. he might already change straight pipe, 4-2-1, extractor, better flow air filter and bla bla.
but for u, u said is just by tuning it and can achieve that.
that we cannot believe !
if u can achieve tht by tuning only, why proton dont use it ? all this time their campro engine is get bash by people in msia market or oversea market for their lack of low end torque.
*
dude, if you ever know a campro, you'll know, this chart is not done by modification!

even it is, the figure here shown can only be spark plug and filter element only! If u think I'm bluffing, Plz Visit Speedworks @ J.222 PJ, they have a complete chart on Gen2 Improvement for every modification. Currently their highest stage is Campro Turbo which so far achieved 194BHP and it's not yet fine tuned.

Now this start to question me, whenever you ppl said how expert are you all on campro, but you ppl not even know what is PDT????

If anyone can proof that the campro Throttle body is controlled by cable pulley which is what i meant mechanically, I EAT MY OWN ENGINE! else shut up plz. Mr K
The electronically i meant is Computer controlled Servo on Throttle body like the Civic 2006!!!

Ok, i start to believe this dude is bullcraping, I might go to CoE for a visit. coz this dude start to tell me that the Campro is equipped with CPS, and it's profile are changed at around 5000rpm. he shown me the PDT figure (again.....) so, I keep my word on how the shit of the VIM and SPC is happening. he had too much jargon which I don even understand. I think the best bet is go to CoE or Tg malim for a visit.

And where's the dude said that he wanna TT with me? Plz arrange it. It's not easy to call most of my member out for showdown.

sorry for multi posting, I will use up the edit button next time.

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 15 2006, 07:37 AM
navigator
post Jun 15 2006, 07:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 15 2006, 12:47 AM)
Guess wat ... my fren driving a Gen2 also .. i ask told him someone was debating with us .. can get flat torque . he says . his arse lar.. hahaha..
then i say hij-- dunno wat wan d... then he says .. oh .. tat tuner.. he says very famous.. but blood suckers.. i i believe nothing much he can do .. tongue.gif
*
i went there coz i made comparison with other PE's service dealer. So far the only dude that the tuning skill is on par with Hijawan is the one i said at pekeliling. I admit he's service is blood sucking coz everytime i went there, there's sure a lot of stuff to change. but after comparison, I can say parts cost are actually almost the same. So, up to u if U wanna go, no harm for me.

Ask that dude to try his car wheel spin on 2nd gear. hahahahahaha
ulet
post Jun 15 2006, 07:52 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 15 2006, 07:23 AM)
dude, if you ever know a campro, you'll know, this chart is not done by modification!

even it is, the figure here shown can only be spark plug and filter element only! If u think I'm bluffing, Plz Visit Speedworks @ J.222 PJ, they have a complete chart on Gen2 Improvement for every modification. Currently their highest stage is Campro Turbo which so far achieved 194BHP and it's not yet fine tuned.

Now this start to question me, whenever you ppl said how expert are you all on campro, but you ppl not even know what is PDT????
*
Dude, filter element (open pod + enclose heat shield + CAI) already can give extra 5-8HP lah ! yes, we never says campro cannot achieve high figure or flat power curve without modification but what we TOTALLY DISAGREE is u can achieve FLAT POWER CURVE by just tuning it(play with the standard ECU) !

navigator
post Jun 15 2006, 11:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 15 2006, 07:52 AM)
Dude, filter element (open pod + enclose heat shield + CAI) already can give extra 5-8HP lah ! yes, we never says campro cannot achieve high figure or flat power curve without modification but what we TOTALLY DISAGREE is u can achieve FLAT POWER CURVE by just tuning it(play with the standard ECU) !
*
oh, gosh...plz visit Speedworks for more detail. I'm not pro enough to explain to all the campro pros in Lowyat.net which don't even know the characteristics of modded campro.

and the dude i'm trying to argue with VIM and CPS things show me this:
http://www.proton.com/innovation/rnd/campro.php

Now i do start to think that i shouldn't waste my time here as someone just think that I'm a clown or something and make joke of me?

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 16 2006, 12:00 AM
prozac
post Jun 16 2006, 12:06 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


If there is CPS, the peak power should come in at a higher RPM, as the profiles allow for better torque production at the upper RPMs.

Yes, I saw the turbo Gen2 at Speedworks myself. Not sure about cost tho...IMO they should price it below that of a GSR transplant.
neo79
post Jun 16 2006, 12:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
CPS? Cam Profile Shifting? Hahaha, not yet in Campro lah. Not so soon. This tech was developed by Lotus. About same concept as VVTi.

Beating a B-series? Why not match it with a 4AG first? Hehehe...

BTW, the Campro is a re-engineered 4G18P engine. Nothing special but just normal run of the mill engine. Its a long stroke engine which is supposed to deliver good low end torque and fuel economy. But somehow the tuning done by PROTON makes it very good in mid range, and low range suffers. Its the same as in the Waja 4G18P. Somehow, the 4G18 from Lancer shows the same characteristics. Hahaha...

Anyway, I try not to believe figures that comes out from tuning shop. Not to say they are not credible, but I myself have my own doubts...

No need to argue over this one lah... Pointless one I tell you...
shinjite
post Jun 16 2006, 02:00 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Waja's 4G18P is better at low end thus good for city driving smile.gif
soggie
post Jun 16 2006, 08:01 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


Again, tons of claims but nothing to back it up. I have met mechanics who once insisted that subro works. And "experts" on engines that told me to fill engine oil beyond the max point - when the engine is running. Also, I have seen automotive engineers graduating from Japan "proofing" to me that a simple exhaust tune can releast 30 horse power in my evo engine.

I'm not really surprised that navigator's mechanic is fanatically convinced that a Proton has a CPS and VIM technology within. Lots of idiots and ignorant people around here. I'm more surprised with people who refuse to face the truth and insist that these joker mechanics are right and futilely try to proof their correctness even when faced with overwhelming contradictory evidences.

Nobody here is claiming to be Campro experts. Just so that the Campro does not come with VIM and CPS is a common knowledge in almost all car mod enthusiasts (even Gen2 owners themselves), that we know when a person claim that Gen2 has VIM and CPS, its 100% safe to disproof him.

Finally, any engine can achieve high horsepower figures with mods. Don't have to go to speedworks. Go to ZTH or 4GTuners, and you can see even 4G15 hitting 160-170 horses with various mods. Not to mention 4G15s pulling 190 horses with fully race cam profiles. But then again, with all these mods, certain things are sacrificed. Some engines have terrible fuel efficiency, some have terrible low end power. This brings us back to the original argument - why did the automotive manufacturers not tune it for maximum power when the engine is capable of doing so?

Because from an automotive manufacturer's viewpoint, a good engine is a compromise between FC, Emission, Power, Torque and Reliability. Therefore they try their best to optimize the engine to shine in every area. And an engine's true worth is determined by how they can improve on one of that area without significantly sacrificing another factor. So far, Campro have not proven itself to be popular within the modding circuit (other than within those fanatical Gen2 people who even go as far to claim their Gen2 beats Skylines and Evos on the street), and there must be a reason to it. Gen2's Campro is meant for daily driving, but sucks at it in its factory form. This alone is a mistake, the first chink in its reputation.
dstl1128
post Jun 16 2006, 12:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
About same concept as VVTi.

CPS are suppose to be like VTEC, the cam profiling as in cam lifting. VVTi are cam phasing, but still absent in current Campro. There are report saying Volvo used it (the Lotus Campro engine with Campro)? But I really have hard time googling for it. Anyone have links?

And VIM are suppose to be like TVIS of 4AGE in which Toyota later get rid of it on its latest generations.



QUOTE
http://www.proton.com/innovation/rnd/campro.php

Reality is that all the real-life Proton Campro engine (fitted in Gen2 and Waja) shows mediocre torque in the low-end which is entire against the claim in the Proton site. Until Proton does have it, it is just brochure grade information.

ulet
post Jun 16 2006, 12:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


check for latest volvo s80 engine.
the engine is 3200cc straight 6.
eone
post Jun 16 2006, 01:10 PM

Prime
*******
Senior Member
2,678 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PutraCyberjaya



QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 16 2006, 08:01 AM)
So far, Campro have not proven itself to be popular within the modding circuit (other than within those fanatical Gen2 people who even go as far to claim their Gen2 beats Skylines and Evos on the street), and there must be a reason to it.
yo man, last time i drove my lil bro's evo7 puma edition (rally tuned), even waja can outspeed it doh.gif..

now he's using a dc5, also loose to me ^^, maybe he ain't got skill enough
soggie
post Jun 16 2006, 01:54 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(eone @ Jun 16 2006, 01:10 PM)
yo man, last time i drove my lil bro's evo7 puma edition (rally tuned), even waja can outspeed it doh.gif..

now he's using a dc5, also loose to me ^^, maybe he ain't got skill enough
*
First thing is, all Japanese cars (integra, evo... yada yada) have a speed cut at 180 kmph. Waja does not have it. THerefore you just need to push to 190 and you'll win. I assume your "race" is done on the highway, fifth gear, fighting for top speed. Take the evo 7 and waja down to sepang, let some good driver drive both cars, and then the real results will show.
dstl1128
post Jun 16 2006, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
*repeated post*

This post has been edited by dstl1128: Jun 16 2006, 02:02 PM
dstl1128
post Jun 16 2006, 02:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
yo man, last time i drove my lil bro's evo7 puma edition (rally tuned), even waja can outspeed it ..

Maybe your lil bro rev cut or limit cut that evo7 just in case you just don't know how to control and trash his baby.

QUOTE
now he's using a dc5, also loose to me ^^, maybe he ain't got skill enough

As a lil bro, maybe he also give face to you, "cheh this challenge is unfair everybody already know waja cannot win dc5 so i giv my bro hi little bit let him win".
mockv1per
post Jun 16 2006, 02:22 PM

ܝܘܚܢܢ ܒܝܬ ܐܦܪܝܡ
*******
Senior Member
4,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: soviet sarawak, borneo.
QUOTE(dstl1128 @ Jun 16 2006, 12:00 PM)
CPS are suppose to be like VTEC, the cam profiling as in cam lifting. VVTi are cam phasing, but still absent in current Campro. There are report saying Volvo used it (the Lotus Campro engine with Campro)? But I really have hard time googling for it. Anyone have links?

And VIM are suppose to be like TVIS of 4AGE in which Toyota later get rid of it on its latest generations.
Reality is that all the real-life Proton Campro engine (fitted in Gen2 and Waja) shows mediocre torque in the low-end which is entire against the claim in the Proton site. Until Proton does have it, it is just brochure grade information.
*

The valvetrain features VCT (Variable Cam Timing) and CPS (Cam Profile Switching) on the inlet side - two key elements in providing the engine with excellent driveability and flexibility.

CPS (Cam Profile Switching) means that the camshaft is designed such that the inlet valves are lifted to two different heights depending on engine speed and load.

In normal driving, with normal throttle opening and low engine revs, fuel consumption is modest at the same time as torque is sufficient to provide good driveability.

In more enthusiastic driving involving full throttle opening and high engine revs, the engine responds instantly to the accelerator and provides a massive thrust of power, both at low and at high speeds.

"In principle, Cam Profile Switching creates two engines in one," explains Derek Crabb. "We can unite widely differing demands on one and the same engine and easily meet the requirements of customers with entirely different wishes. For instance, we can equally easily satisfy customers who prioritise performance as well as those who are more interested in driving comfort and fuel economy."

VIS (Variable Intake System) has been equipped with two throttle flap valves which adjust the intake manifold volume to suit the current driving situation. This results in a uniformly high and broad torque curve.

"Through precise interplay with the flap valves we actually get three different torque curves that are integrated with one another," says Derek Crabb. "Consequently, we can exploit the engine's capacity to the maximum and extract the highest possible power throughout the rev range. The result is alert response to the accelerator pedal at both low and high speeds, with both generous power and good driveability."

source: http://www.volvocars.com/corporation/NewsE...E556B4BBECBB%7D
eone
post Jun 16 2006, 02:40 PM

Prime
*******
Senior Member
2,678 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PutraCyberjaya



QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 16 2006, 01:54 PM)
First thing is, all Japanese cars (integra, evo... yada yada) have a speed cut at 180 kmph. Waja does not have it. THerefore you just need to push to 190 and you'll win. I assume your "race" is done on the highway, fifth gear, fighting for top speed. Take the evo 7 and waja down to sepang, let some good driver drive both cars, and then the real results will show.
*
yeah, i know that, just to say that evo is beaten kaw kaw.. really hate when seeing that waja overtake me, siap gelak2 time diaorng overtake me, siot tull
soggie
post Jun 16 2006, 04:35 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(eone @ Jun 16 2006, 02:40 PM)
yeah, i know that, just to say that evo is beaten kaw kaw.. really hate when seeing that waja overtake me, siap gelak2 time diaorng overtake me, siot tull
*
I own a Waja and a Satria GTi with an Evo 2 engine inside it, and I am extremely sure the Waja is no match for Evo 7 when going from 110 to 180 (speed cut for Evo). It'll surprise you how easy it is for a turbocharged engine to push the car in high speeds to even higher speeds, especially for a properly maintained one (not like mine, jerking on WOT tongue.gif). But that's just on top speed. Would love to see them duke it out in Sepang.
pacer
post Jun 17 2006, 01:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

My first post in this thread after an agonizing 18 pages... haha

First of all, THE Campro DOES NOT HAVE CPS AND VIM... like everybody in this world knows EXCEPT NAVIGATOR blink.gif

I would also like to point out, if the campro engine can achive 160+hp during testing, then tell me why the R3 guys didnt utilise this during their recent rally project car which produce ard 140-150hp?

Abt the throttle body thingy, the Campro engine is controlled by a "Drive By Wire" throttle. that means that the accelerator padal and the throttle body is conected by a wire (through a computer box (EMS)) and not a cable.

About the flat throttle curve. Yes, it is possible, but not through tuning only. it can be done through proper calculations on the camshaft profiling (like the one done on the R3 car). Didnt think they would be crazy enuf to use the stock torque curve would you?

Abt hijauan, I have known a few ppl who has tuned this car there. What i wanna say may offend but... DEAL WITH IT!
Ask any layman after they change engine oil, gear oil, coolant, new tuning (will go into that later), and of course some services, how will the car feel?
The answer.... of course more powerful.
With the added help of X1R which is a friction reducer, i am sure the engine will be more willing to rev. So pls be the judge on this tuning method.

And speaking of tuning, the PDT2000 is a tuning gadget for the EMS system for the Campro engine. But being able to use one before, i would like to point out that other than recalibrating the throttle position, the idle timing, security codes, airbags
function and abs.(apart from fault codes)... the gadget can only display relavent parameters about the engine... so i still dunno how hijauan can TUNE the EMS. The EMS can only be tuned if u have a developers unit from siemens.

Being a Gen2 owner myself. i would like to say this engine is nothing fantastic. Yes, it is powerful (mine is moded of couse but i will not talk about it here), responsive.... but only in the higher range (3500-6500). yes it can go 210km/h... but not fairly easily. 4th gear can make 190 though.

About the car (nothing to be proud of,interior quality sucks)
Why i bough the car.... the handling rocks... thumbup.gif

So plsssss. don bash me ok sweat.gif

This post has been edited by pacer: Jun 17 2006, 01:39 AM
imperialrealcs
post Jun 17 2006, 02:33 AM

IMPERIAL DEATH STAR!
*******
Senior Member
6,724 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seri Petaling



QUOTE(pacer @ Jun 17 2006, 01:38 AM)
rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif

My first post in this thread after an agonizing 18 pages... haha

First of all, THE Campro DOES NOT HAVE CPS AND VIM... like everybody in this world knows EXCEPT NAVIGATOR  blink.gif

I would also like to point out, if the campro engine can achive 160+hp during testing, then tell me why the R3 guys didnt utilise this during their recent rally project car which produce ard 140-150hp?

Abt the throttle body thingy, the Campro engine is controlled by a "Drive By Wire" throttle. that means that the accelerator padal and the throttle body is conected by a wire (through a computer box (EMS)) and not a cable.

About the flat throttle curve. Yes, it is possible, but not through tuning only. it can be done through proper calculations on the camshaft profiling (like the one done on the R3 car). Didnt think they would be crazy enuf to use the stock torque curve would you?

Abt hijauan, I have known a few ppl who has tuned this car there. What i wanna say may offend but... DEAL WITH IT!
Ask any layman after they change engine oil, gear oil, coolant, new tuning (will go into that later), and of course some services, how will the car feel?
The answer.... of course more powerful.
With the added help of X1R which is a friction reducer, i am sure the engine will be more willing to rev. So pls be the judge on this tuning method.

And speaking of tuning, the PDT2000 is a tuning gadget for the EMS system for the Campro engine. But being able to use one before, i would like to point out that other than recalibrating the throttle position, the idle timing, security codes, airbags
function and abs.(apart from fault codes)... the gadget can only display relavent parameters about the engine... so i still dunno how hijauan can TUNE the EMS. The EMS can only be tuned if u have a developers unit from siemens.

Being a Gen2 owner myself. i would like to say this engine is nothing fantastic. Yes, it is powerful (mine is moded of couse but i will not talk about it here), responsive.... but only in the higher range (3500-6500). yes it can go 210km/h... but not fairly easily. 4th gear can make 190 though.

About the car (nothing to be proud of,interior quality sucks)
Why i bough the car.... the handling rocks... thumbup.gif

So plsssss. don bash me ok sweat.gif
*
wah, SRM white paper wrote max speed 195kmh nia for 1.6manual.. ur car faster than SRM rclxms.gif
soggie
post Jun 17 2006, 10:06 AM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


Well I stand corrected on the throttle body issue. But I'm still waiting for navigator to come out with his explanation on how to simulate the VIM. That's one bullcrap I'd like to get cleared.
kcng
post Jun 17 2006, 10:20 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



Its about 5 days already....
How ?
Still waiting for dyno chart too...

OT : Soggie, I race with your car with my bicycle okie ? see who reach 10km/h first... tongue.gif biggrin.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 17 2006, 04:51 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 17 2006, 10:20 AM)
Its about 5 days already....
How ?
Still waiting for dyno chart too...

OT : Soggie, I race with your car with my bicycle okie ? see who reach 10km/h first...  tongue.gif  biggrin.gif
*
ur bicycle comes with SPEEDO ?? laugh.gif
shinjite
post Jun 17 2006, 06:13 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


Maybe his bike equipeed with NoS XD
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 17 2006, 07:45 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jun 17 2006, 06:13 PM)
Maybe his bike equipeed with NoS XD
*
Cheh!! .. nothing to be proud off... NOS need to be refill..
my bicycle comes with VIM and CPS .. tongue.gif

u guys car's throttle body drive using cable .. or wire .. mine DIRECT use my leg .. tongue.gif

As for the COolant... my bicycle dun use any.. mineral water, soft drinks, liquir will do .. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by K3nnYkl82: Jun 17 2006, 07:46 PM
kcng
post Jun 18 2006, 01:12 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 17 2006, 05:51 PM)
ur bicycle comes with SPEEDO ??  laugh.gif
*
QUOTE(shinjite @ Jun 17 2006, 07:13 PM)
Maybe his bike equipeed with NoS XD
*
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 17 2006, 08:45 PM)
Cheh!! .. nothing to be proud off... NOS need to be refill..
my bicycle comes with VIM and CPS ..  tongue.gif

u guys car's throttle body drive using cable .. or wire .. mine DIRECT use my leg .. tongue.gif

As for the COolant... my bicycle dun use any.. mineral water, soft drinks, liquir will do .. tongue.gif
*
wah....
vmad.gif sign0006.gif sign0006.gif

i asking soggie only ler... not u both
whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif
u both sign0006.gif sign0006.gif

lol...

anyway i am still waiting for the chart...
sighs...
soggie
post Jun 18 2006, 12:48 PM

Braindead
*******
Senior Member
3,872 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: 10001011010101


QUOTE(kcng @ Jun 17 2006, 10:20 AM)
Its about 5 days already....
How ?
Still waiting for dyno chart too...

OT : Soggie, I race with your car with my bicycle okie ? see who reach 10km/h first...  tongue.gif  biggrin.gif
*
Can, no prob. Since its a bicycle vs car match, engines are not allowed. So I'll open the door and use my leg to move. tongue.gif Come lar, see who reaches 10km/h first!

PS: Anybody wanna sponsor me good shoes with good traction? laugh.gif
keith_hjinhoh
post Jun 18 2006, 12:52 PM

Need My Service?
*******
Senior Member
2,656 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Oh well, any previous Gen2 owner here? How's the fc of Gen2 Campro for 1.6?
gigsvoo
post Jun 18 2006, 01:09 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
76 posts

Joined: May 2006
i try to make this short, it is the fact that DOHC hardly get good torque by design, while SOHC will perform better in that area.

i owned a SOHC 12V G4EB3 engine car in 1.5L displacement and also a DOHC 16V SP4H engine in 1.6L displacement, both with almost the same mod except the later does not use synthetic oil and iridium plugs and 3" CAI compared with the previous one, my SOHC can tapao the DOHC in low end. one simple example is driving up and down my apartment car park.

anothe example is to achieve 0-100km/h test. the SOHC can achieve 11.2 secs but the DOHC needs 12 secs.

so in joining the bashing and proofing rally, i would say Campro (they named it, or maybe i shall say Gen2 engine) is just a plan vanilla DOHC 16V 1.6L displacement engine, AND READ ME LIPS CAREFULLY.... UNLESS IT IS PERFECTLY TUNED. (DISCLAIMER RESERVED).

so, there is nothing more to be argue here, its all about the fact of money. my SOHC cost me RM6XK++ while DOHC cost me RM5XK++.

if wanna talk about FC, DOHC give me better FC becoz its a MT, but SOHC ones also not bad. both cars in the margin of RM50 runs around 300-360km before the next pump.

if wanna talk about handling, SOHC car can tapao my DOHC car, my cornering plus steerling responsiveness and turning ratio can tapao the DOHC in any way.

if wanna talk about interior design, my SOHC also can tapao the DOHC in any aspect.

if wanna talk about safety, lagi no need to talk, my SOHC achieve 5 stars front, 4 stars rear under USA NCHTUSA (what-so-ever abbrv) while my DOHC can easily being dented using my right foot lean against.

if wanna talk about spacious, my SOHC although have a smaller size of car, but interior spaces is larger, at least to put my head as i m topped 180cm in height. i can easily rest my balls comfortable during a long drive using SOHC.

so, you might ask me, if DOHC sux my balls under my dig, what i buy the DOHC? well, there are numerous reasons:

1. the DOHC is cheap for 1.6L displacement engine.

2. the DOHC spare parts are easier to find

3. the DOHC gives me MT and better FC

4. the DOHC just take me from point A to point B, i never tend to do dyno to showcase or race at F1.

5. the DOHC makes me think i am Schumacher or Karanjit Singh although my balls are not up to that par.

SO, MY PERSONAL CONCLUSIONS ARE:

- THESE ARE MY OWN SHARING, USING MY OWN CARS, MY OWN TUNING, MY OWN BASHING, SO I DUN START A FLAME HERE. SO IF ANYONE WANTED TO COMPARE CARS OR ENGINE, YOU BETTER HAVE ALL OF THEM IN UR GARAGE, THEORY, BOOKS, STUDIES, CERTIFICATIONS OR EVEN YOUR DAD'S COMMENTS STILL AS NOT GOOD ENUF FOR LOOKING AT UR OWN BALLS UNDER YOUR PANTS.

- I DO NOT THINK THAT THERE IS A UNIVERSAL, 100% CUN GUIDE TO DETERMINE WHOS IS GOOD AND WHOS BAD

- I ALSO BELIEVE EVERY DECISION MADE OF OUR FELLOWS MEMBERS HERE ARE GIVEN JUDGEMENT AND JUSTIFICATION "ON THAT MOMENT" OF TIME BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION ON HAND, I ALSO REGRET TO DO THIS MOD THAT MOD AFTER SOME TIME, WHY? BECAUSE TIME PASSED, PEOPLE CHANGED, MY BALLS DIFFERENT

- FROM TIME TO TIME WE DRIVE IN DIFFERENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, DIFFERENT ROUTE, DIFFERENT EMOTIONS ON THE ROAD, SO THERE IS NO GOLDEN RULES THAT GOVERNS ALL OUR READINGS AND FEELINGS ARE CONSISTENT AND ROBOMATICALLY RECORDED, ITS ALL IN OUR HEAD AND OUR BRAINS.

SO FELLAS, I GUESS IT IS NOT THAT IMPORTANT ANYMORE TO ASK SOMEONE TO SHOW THEIR DYNO OR THEIR BALLS, IT MAKES NO POINTS AND NO ONE WILL BE HONOURED A GRAMMY OR NOBEL PRIZE AFTERALL, IF WE ARE CONSIDERING NEWBIES IN THIS FORUM OR NEWBIES TO CAR UNDERSTANDING, I GUESS THEY ALL HAVE THEIR OWN BALLS UNDER THEIR PANTS, WE DO NOT NEED TO MEASURE THEIR BALLS SIZE USING OUR MEASUREMENT TAPES, LET THEM DO THE JUSTIFICATION, END OF THE DAY THEY CAN'T BLAMED ANYONE AND NO ONE IS GOING TO HOLD THEIR BALLS IF THEY FALLS, RIGHT?

ok, i had written enough, my hands are tired and my brain is shutting down after read this crazy topic for over 20 pages long, i start to unconcious now, so you guys can bash me now... laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
navigator
post Jun 18 2006, 07:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


okay, I'm not trying to argue with the CPS thingie. but if a dude (and remember that this dude is not from Hijawan) which can really prove to me that by tuning the ECU, the car can achieve a far more better performance. Who do i believe? you ppl from an IT FORUM or an ECU engineer?

and i've ask extensively this time about the CPS and VIM. he said while the VIM is controlled the Electronic throttle body and there's some special intake routings which is hidden behind the engine and can't show to me, The CPS system he showed me how does it works by showing a valve tappet extracted from a faulty campro engine.

The basic concept of the CPS is from the Lotus and the system is currently used in The Porsche's VarioCam Plus. one of the plus on this CPS system is it's simplicity compared to japanese design. The CPS engaging mechanism is just a additional ring with tappet to lock the ring into the valve when the high cam lobe is needed. and The profile is switched at between 4000rpm to 5000rpm whenever the ECU seems fit. I've done some research before i typed these in and indeed the Porsche variocam is same as the campro CPS and it's used under license of Proton/Lotus.

unfortunately, the stock ECU is not properly configured and sadly, not many techies out there knows how to deal with this because they simply do not think much about this campro engine. but some of the senior Service Advisor which attended the campro ECU Training will realized that there's some settings to properly activate the system and fine tune the throttle body settings. Some of the ECU even had a totally wrong software inside such as manual car but fitted with auto settings or vice versa. chich caused the majority critics of the underpower.

i called up the i-care center for conformation and as ulet said, they deny the CPS and VIM thing on Campro. but further interrogation on the phone prove that they do not have the necessary technical skill to answer my problem and just said: "I will get back with you on this" which I still yet to wait for an answer.

if you still think i'm bluffing, laugh your socks off and just ignore whatever i said. i will not trying to prove anything else as most of the ppl here just acted like i'm ignorant.

and I'm still waiting the PM that asking me for a ride. My fellow gen2 Clan and I am more than willing to prove that Stock Standard ECU tuned Gen2 can really shine.

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 18 2006, 07:35 PM
Da Wei
post Jun 18 2006, 07:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: May 2006


i also just read these 18 pages and my mind is also starting to get bashed up too tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Da Wei: Jun 18 2006, 07:56 PM
ulet
post Jun 18 2006, 07:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(navigator @ Jun 18 2006, 07:31 PM)
okay, I'm not trying to argue with the CPS thingie. but if a dude (and remember that this dude is not from Hijawan) which can really prove to me that by tuning the ECU, the car can achieve a far more better performance. Who do i believe? you ppl from an IT FORUM or an ECU engineer?

and i've ask extensively this time about the CPS and VIM. he said while the VIM is controlled the Electronic throttle body and there's some special intake routings which is hidden behind the engine and can't show to me, The CPS system he showed me how does it works by showing a valve tappet extracted from a faulty campro engine.

The basic concept of the CPS is from the Lotus and the system is currently used in The Porsche's VarioCam Plus. one of the plus on this CPS system is it's simplicity compared to japanese design. The CPS engaging mechanism is just a additional ring with tappet to lock the ring into the valve when the high cam lobe is needed. and The profile is switched at between 4000rpm to 5000rpm whenever the ECU seems fit. I've done some research before i typed these in and indeed the Porsche variocam is same as the campro CPS and it's used under license of Proton/Lotus.

unfortunately, the stock ECU is not properly configured and sadly, not many techies out there knows how to deal with this because they simply do not think much about this campro engine. but some of the senior Service Advisor which attended the campro ECU Training will realized that there's some settings to properly activate the system and fine tune the throttle body settings. Some of the ECU even had a totally wrong software inside such as manual car but fitted with auto settings or vice versa. chich caused the majority critics of the underpower.

i called up the i-care center for conformation and as ulet said, they deny the CPS and VIM thing on Campro. but further interrogation on the phone prove that they do not have the necessary technical skill to answer my problem and just said: "I will get back with you on this" which I still yet to wait for an answer.

if you still think i'm bluffing, laugh your socks off and just ignore whatever i said. i will not trying to prove anything else as most of the ppl here just acted like i'm ignorant.

and I'm still waiting the PM that asking me for a ride. My fellow gen2 Clan and I am more than willing to prove that Stock Standard ECU tuned Gen2 can really shine.
*
to prove u r right or wrong is dynochart before and after hijawan tuning, thats all we ask. nothing more
K3nnYkl82
post Jun 18 2006, 08:36 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(ulet @ Jun 18 2006, 07:43 PM)
to prove u r right or wrong is dynochart before and after hijawan tuning, thats all we ask. nothing more
*
First, he says he is right .. and will prove it if he got an internet line
now, he says he dun wanna prove coz everyone think he is ignorent.. tongue.gif rclxms.gif whistling.gif

Proton damn good la guys... they cant even fix a power window but then they are able to hide the VIM route from the user till cannot show them where it is!!.. Hooray!!!.. Bravo proton!! rclxms.gif notworthy.gif .. seems like they (proton) spend all the time R&D how to hide the VIM rather than fixing those faulty Power Windows. whistling.gif
navigator
post Jun 19 2006, 08:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Desa Petaling, Kay El


QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Jun 18 2006, 08:36 PM)
First, he says he is right .. and will prove it if he got an internet line
now, he says he dun wanna prove coz everyone think he is ignorent.. tongue.gif rclxms.gif whistling.gif

*
I will be more than willing to show you when I had the line, but what do u guys responded? you guys just thought that I'm a mere joker?!

After numerous thread around the F&F, I've seen you all does not favour that the gen2 is in fact better than you think. I forseen that even I shown the dyno, you all will still think that it's photo chopped and whatsoever.

if you all upsetted me, why should I care for the demand anymore? Just wait until i had the line and mood to post it up. dude vmad.gif

This post has been edited by navigator: Jun 19 2006, 09:02 PM
thunderbird
post Mar 16 2007, 05:55 PM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



Case close? Potong Stim
INFeRNO
post Mar 16 2007, 06:02 PM

Lord and Master
******
Senior Member
1,754 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Balham, London



This is interesting... Navigator, c'mon mate, show us some proof!
ulet
post Mar 16 2007, 06:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,703 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur


u thunderbird, no work to do ka? dig a very very old thread. tht fella "malu" gone aedi now u going to make him malu again... ish ish ish brows.gif
thunderbird
post Mar 16 2007, 06:59 PM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



today MC at home, so nothing to do. Plan to buy Waja, so looking around for campro and found this thread.

I think that guy lost his navigation, so couldn't come back here...

ehehehehe
tom_k3nt
post Mar 16 2007, 07:17 PM

R - E -S - P - 3 -C - T
******
Senior Member
1,068 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pahang - Kuantan | Selangor - Damansara



I feel the performance for Campro is sluggish.... Tested drived a Auto 1... Still prefer Mitsu Engine...
kcng
post Mar 16 2007, 07:21 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



ah the legendary navigator...
lol
until now still nothing to back his words
doh.gif doh.gif
thunderbird
post Mar 16 2007, 07:26 PM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 16 2007, 07:21 PM)
ah the legendary navigator...
lol
until now still nothing to back his words
doh.gif doh.gif
*
His last active date is 2006. I guess he is not dare to come here anymore

or maybe register a new id? rclxub.gif

eeheheehe
RoxyMunky
post Mar 16 2007, 07:31 PM

MalaoZai
******
Senior Member
1,852 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: MalaoLand


kesian the fella.... he got the "semangat patriotik" in him lar... laugh.gif

test drive one before, manual sommore..... the power really kicks in only when it hits 3800rpm.... sweat.gif

proton should think that the petrol price in Malaysia is cheap... laugh.gif


tunertoobe
post Mar 16 2007, 10:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Well, the Campro engine is good.
The original question to this thread was,"is Campro engine good or not?"
Well, it gets the car moving and is decently reliable with proper maintenance.
With cam-profiling, and better low-end torque and better reliability(not saying its bad now), it will be a GREAT engine.

It is a decent engine as it is.
The 1.3 in particular is quite impressive. 94hp from 1.3. That's mighty close to Honda's 110 hp 1.5 VTEC. I'm talking about specific horsepower output BTW.

It's a good engine, but it can be better.

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Mar 16 2007, 10:19 PM
kcng
post Mar 17 2007, 01:20 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(thunderbird @ Mar 16 2007, 07:26 PM)
His last active date is 2006. I guess he is not dare to come here anymore

or maybe register a new id?  rclxub.gif

eeheheehe
*
that i dunno la.....

QUOTE(RoxyMunky @ Mar 16 2007, 07:31 PM)
kesian the fella.... he got the "semangat patriotik" in him lar... laugh.gif

test drive one before, manual sommore..... the power really kicks in only when it hits 3800rpm.... sweat.gif

proton should think that the petrol price in Malaysia is cheap... laugh.gif
*
lol bro, quite a number of cars torque also around 3k - 4k range la
tongue.gif

so u say leh?
tongue.gif

--------------------------

shinjite
post Mar 17 2007, 02:53 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


my torque max also at 4.88K rpm only tongue.gif

navigator KOed liao ah? Sad....after a lot of trash talking
tokdukun
post Mar 17 2007, 10:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Too lazy to go through 19 pages, sory.

Bt my honest opinion is Campro is nt the kind of engine for Toyota-type of ppl ie ppl who are nt into driving experience and pleasure at all. Those kind of ppl will complain "it's thirsty", "it's sluggish at low speed", "blablabla....". Sure, it's a bit slow at lower gear, bt at higher speed, it shines. My experience wit my fren's Gen2 was a nice one, for a basic engine w/o CPS/VTEC/whatever, it definitely is better than the Altis, Sentra and the old Civic 1.7 engine.

Bt bcuz my fren is an idiot, he dunno how to take care of his car. Baru 15k on the mileage, edi broke the timing belt, hv to send to shop for over a month, and by this time, as u'd expect, he's a Proton basher.
thunderbird
post Mar 17 2007, 11:02 PM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



How about a challenge with 4g92 4g92mivec? or maybe B16A?

Same 1.6 group. I know Mit has Mivec and Honda has VTEC tech,

but who cares, as long as in 1.6 and u have ur own tech to boost

the engine horse power and ppl will respect.
Bernard Yeo
post Mar 17 2007, 11:02 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
570 posts

Joined: May 2006
QUOTE(tokdukun @ Mar 17 2007, 10:24 PM)
Too lazy to go through 19 pages, sory.

Bt my honest opinion is Campro is nt the kind of engine for Toyota-type of ppl ie ppl who are nt into driving experience and pleasure at all. Those kind of ppl will complain "it's thirsty", "it's sluggish at low speed", "blablabla....". Sure, it's a bit slow at lower gear, bt at higher speed, it shines. My experience wit my fren's Gen2 was a nice one, for a basic engine w/o CPS/VTEC/whatever, it definitely is better than the Altis, Sentra and the old Civic 1.7 engine.

Bt bcuz my fren is an idiot, he dunno how to take care of his car. Baru 15k on the mileage, edi broke the timing belt, hv to send to shop for over a month, and by this time, as u'd expect, he's a Proton basher.
*
Toyota is the most successful car company in the world. Logic would lead one to believe that they would include driving pleasure into their products, otherwise they would go bust.

If Gen2 gives a better driving experience than Toyota, then it should have even quicker throttle response at low gears, more torque, yet still shines at higher speeds. Because most driving done is city driving, who would appreciate "sluggish" performance at each junction or traffic light?

Even my friend who thrash his 10yr old car at the Sepang circuit hasn't broken his timing belt. What exactly did your friend do to break his timing belt?
thunderbird
post Mar 17 2007, 11:13 PM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



QUOTE(Bernard Yeo @ Mar 17 2007, 11:02 PM)
Toyota is the most successful car company in the world. Logic would lead one to believe that they would include driving pleasure into their products, otherwise they would go bust.

If Gen2 gives a better driving experience than Toyota, then it should have even quicker throttle response at low gears, more torque, yet still shines at higher speeds. Because most driving done is city driving, who would appreciate "sluggish" performance at each junction or traffic light?

Even my friend who thrash his 10yr old car at the Sepang circuit hasn't broken his timing belt. What exactly did your friend do to break his timing belt?
*
An Idiot driver can break the timing belt? Totally disagree with a new car somemore. My bet would go to the "high tech" engine itself. whistling.gif
kcng
post Mar 17 2007, 11:22 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(thunderbird @ Mar 17 2007, 11:02 PM)
the engine horse power and ppl will respect.
*
my dad's car has 500HP on wheels...
now respect...
doh.gif

QUOTE(thunderbird @ Mar 17 2007, 11:13 PM)
An Idiot driver can break the timing belt? Totally disagree with a new car somemore. My bet would go to the "high tech" engine itself.  whistling.gif
*
ever heard of manufacturer defects ?
u sure your "MIVEC" is 100% defects free ?
Vervain
post Mar 17 2007, 11:58 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
altis got timing chain. now try breaking it
thunderbird
post Mar 18 2007, 01:25 AM

SO what?
******
Senior Member
1,811 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 17 2007, 11:22 PM)
my dad's car has 500HP on wheels...
now respect...
doh.gif
ever heard of manufacturer defects ?
u sure your "MIVEC" is 100% defects free ?
*
Ya ya, ur dad has a 500hp car. my GrandPa has 501hp. doh.gif

So, who's next after u bring out ur papa?

Not 100% but at least a lot more better than vanilla dohc engine. whistling.gif


eng98
post Mar 18 2007, 01:52 AM

Come and suX me...
*******
Senior Member
3,311 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: In a pee jay

i dun really believe the belt break so easily..since campro is using 1 belt system.... but campro engine the belt tensioner always got fault.. damm jia lat
munky
post Mar 18 2007, 02:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,971 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


conclusion : engineers > marketing ppl tongue.gif


kcng
post Mar 18 2007, 10:41 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(thunderbird @ Mar 18 2007, 01:25 AM)
Ya ya, ur dad has a 500hp car. my GrandPa has 501hp. doh.gif

So, who's next after u bring out ur papa?

Not 100% but at least a lot more better than vanilla dohc engine. whistling.gif
*
bring out my mom ?
doh.gif doh.gif
sarcasm fail......
doh.gif doh.gif
rolleyes.gif

if not 100% then also can break
rolleyes.gif

until then, another noob in da house
rolleyes.gif

and what is your define better is?
rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by kcng: Mar 18 2007, 10:44 AM
tokdukun
post Mar 28 2007, 09:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(Bernard Yeo @ Mar 17 2007, 11:02 PM)
Toyota is the most successful car company in the world. Logic would lead one to believe that they would include driving pleasure into their products, otherwise they would go bust.

If Gen2 gives a better driving experience than Toyota, then it should have even quicker throttle response at low gears, more torque, yet still shines at higher speeds. Because most driving done is city driving, who would appreciate "sluggish" performance at each junction or traffic light?

Even my friend who thrash his 10yr old car at the Sepang circuit hasn't broken his timing belt. What exactly did your friend do to break his timing belt?
*
It's nt sluggish, it's just that it gets better at a higher gear, I can feel it somehow.
I've driven the Vios, n my opinion is, in terms of driving, it felt more boring than my dad's Waja yawn.gif

Let me tell you the detail:
1. He once drive fast at a bumper, when he was landing, he broke the radiator of the car!! He then go service at some place I dunno, bt it's nt a Proton dealer. Little did he realised the engine was "sabotaged" by the mechanic.

2. A few hundred km later, that's when the timing belt snap. He sent to Proton CoE at USJ4 for service for over a month, n the Proton guy told him abt that some kinda modification hv been done to the car, whichever exactly, I can't remember, bt it's believed to be the cause for the belt to give way.

I hv no idea what action he took next, I didn't even bother to find out the details, sory, bt since then, he regretted nt listening to my advice of gettin a 2nd hand Jap saloon. Poor guy........
pacer
post Mar 28 2007, 10:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
timing belt snap is not common on a proton, unless of course u have used chepo belts in the first place. ori campro belts are from MITSUBOSHI.. they are really reliable. even cars in MME race use them...

maybe ur friends car had some defect, but then which car company does not, even rolls royce also got ppl complain LOL...

btw, what did ur friend mod until warranty void, seems serious. Proton are quite linient in warranty terms compared to other manufacturers, they only void warranty on the areas u mod compared to some where the void the whole car warranty
tokdukun
post Mar 28 2007, 11:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Rly ah? Hm.....that faggot.....long time nvr contact edi.......too bz wit his gf. hmph.

Despite this mishap, I dun blame this incident on Proton, it's rather cuz he got conned by a greedy mechanic. Bt a trivia: on the 1st day, he took us out for an outing. Guess what? The driver's door was too hard to open, he pushed harder, then can open, but.........it then cannot be opened from the outside!! So we had to open his door for him, lol.

It's nt our 1st encounter though. The week before, we checked out the (then) newly launched Savvy at Glenmarie. The Gen2 on display there cannot open the rear left door, then I keep on telling him "Jgn beli Gen2, ni hah, ko beli nanti jadi camni la.....", true enuf, it happened.........

This post has been edited by tokdukun: Mar 28 2007, 11:05 PM
pacer
post Mar 28 2007, 11:08 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(tokdukun @ Mar 28 2007, 11:02 PM)
Rly ah? Hm.....that *******.....long time nvr contact edi.......too bz wit his gf. hmph.

Despite this mishap, I dun blame this incident on Proton, it's rather cuz he got conned by a greedy mechanic. Bt a trivia: on the 1st day, he took us out for an outing. Guess what? The driver's door was too hard to open, he pushed harder, then can open, but.........it then cannot be opened from the outside!! So we had to open his door for him, lol.

It's nt our 1st encounter though. The week before, we checked out the (then) newly launched Savvy at Glenmarie. The Gen2 on display there cannot open the rear left door, then I keep on telling him "Jgn beli Gen2, ni hah, ko beli nanti jadi camni la.....", My mouth dam masin..........
*
haha, he must be damn pissed off at you.... LOL
proton QC is hopeless la, even mine also all doors misalign.., but to be fair i took the car from the stockyard so they didnt do a PDI for me... anyway its just the alighment.

my gen2 has been problem free for me so far for the past 1.5 yrs, well other than the O2 sensor kong and a bodywork problem that was solved after some time, thats about it... other than that its just normal servicing, and after mods its still feels better... smile.gif
tokdukun
post Mar 29 2007, 01:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Hm........guess so, my curse for nt listening to me, muahahahaha.

I read in Paul Tan some time back, u need to manually re-align the door thing......that thing, dunno what's it called edi, cuz the staff stupid never put properly, so owner himself hv to DIY. What kind of mental lah..........build car half finished. sigh.......
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 29 2007, 01:46 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


campro engine is build to last and it is actually build to meet the racing spec.
one of the proton engineer told my brother before .
tokdukun
post Mar 29 2007, 02:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


I thought so.....use to remember when last time Proton promoting Gen2, said the engine tested how many terrains in how many countries over thousands n thousands of miles, blablabla, bt all I know is that the Campro certainly hv the potential. Just that atm, it's "naked". Give it some VTEC or w/e, it can definitely be better.

It isn't that bad in fc too. Bt then again, this is extremely dependant on driving style n condition.....if wanna ultra kedekut, then no air cond, constant 90km/h all the time, dun press brake at all, that's torture..........n life threathening
kcng
post Mar 29 2007, 09:57 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(tokdukun @ Mar 29 2007, 02:27 AM)
I thought so.....use to remember when last time Proton promoting Gen2, said the engine tested how many terrains in how many countries over thousands n thousands of miles, blablabla, bt all I know is that the Campro certainly hv the potential. Just that atm, it's "naked". Give it some VTEC or w/e, it can definitely be better.

It isn't that bad in fc too. Bt then again, this is extremely dependant on driving style n condition.....if wanna ultra kedekut, then no air cond, constant 90km/h all the time, dun press brake at all, that's torture..........n life threathening
*
all cars also same la....

u main pedal to the metal, what ever fuel-saving tech your engine have also useless la
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

u drive normal, FC will be good....
u drive ganas, please la.... how to get good FC ?
doh.gif doh.gif

my previous civic, RM90 go 300 km only.... so i need to bash my i-vtec ?
doh.gif
CFS
post Mar 29 2007, 06:34 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
307 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur Cheras


QUOTE(soggie @ Jun 14 2006, 11:46 AM)
Actually, i think supercharging the 1.6 is a good move. The waja needs more torque to handle its chassis. Not sure the FC increase will be justified tho.
*
wa taking me almost 2hours to read through 20pages now oso abit pening lolz....supercharging it? can oni 1 penang lang do it b4 haha...which is electric supercharger....belt driven? impossible unless change the whole chassis mounting....the belt area is too near to the left side no place to put supercharger there....speedwork turbo charged car? saw it as well...haha do u know they blew a couple of engine when trying to boost till 1.5bar lolz....anyway i not sure abt current ler...haha btw i luv the super sixteen campro lolz...200hp lolz...haha wish dat engine was in my car.....haha but surely cannot be daily driven haha...agree i driven honda *b16b & b18c* as well...when vtec open wahlao u can see petrol drinking....haha but who cares power is there lolz....
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 29 2007, 06:57 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


the i-VTEC or VTEC is actually not like gaining power at low FC .
the reason is it is actuallty activating the VTEC to allow more air enters the combustion , if not mistaken , more lean combustion hence more fuel will be injected .
just a normal 5K and VTEC 5K , VTEC 5K will have higher power whilst normal 5K rpm will be slightly lower .

at the same time , why bashing campro or supporting campro ?
it is just an engine . the problem with the engine is solved , well , you can compare Campro with hyundai's own first RnD engine last few years , high FC , low power ... but now hyundai is better in terms of that.
and why compare VTEC and Campro ? the main reason behind this comparision is to compare about technology developement . the easiest is to compare Campro with the Hyundai engine , hyundai is now mass producing CVVT engine whilst campro is still struggling .
ya , proton has the technology to produce CPS engine , but what the heck if they have the techonology but yet they cannot produce it into production . it is like having a DAD who is an automotive engineer but his own car is like a car from a junk yard . and for sure , CPS on gen2 has been discussed years back . and there are rumour that it will come out in 2005 , then 2006 then mid-2007 . it is endless ...
well , i dont bash proton or support proton for no valid reason . Campro is an engien which is good for normal usage , especially highway driving . it is good in the sense that it is normal . but when you look into the current developement of the cars around , ppl are leaping forward , while we are still using non-VVT engine . it isn't really something which can be argue .
maybe proton supporter will say that 'myvi DVVT doesn't brings out low FC also!' ... ya , it might not give out low FC , but in the other way , it brought out the full potential from the engine , where most of the rpm level are smooth to be run at . the easiest is to take as comparision is the non-DVVT kembara and the new DVVT kembara . two similar capacity engine , but hell lot difference in driving .
if proton were to put the VVT technology into the campro , it will solve it's low end power and the current high-end rpm power will be maximize .

This post has been edited by BridgestoneRE711: Mar 29 2007, 07:01 PM
kcng
post Mar 29 2007, 07:21 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



now how exactly do people define lack of low end power ?
car cannot move ?
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 29 2007, 07:53 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


campro is an evidence that there is lack of low end power .
you are basically asking the same thing that ,

"now how ppl define bad handling ?
car cannot take corner?"


Added on March 29, 2007, 7:57 pmwell, i got both gen2 and waja in my house.
gen2 is definately bad in low end power . the power from 1000-3000 is kinda dip .. you floor your pedal is like you are not flooring the pedal at all , the only uumph comes in at 3500rpm .
to get proper spec on lack of low end power, go take the dyno chart from paultan.org .

This post has been edited by BridgestoneRE711: Mar 29 2007, 07:57 PM
tokdukun
post Mar 29 2007, 08:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


Yeah, the torque curve is very weird for the Campro.....bt past 3k rpm, it becomes alive, muahahahaha.

There's the issue of reliability as well in making the engine. Obviously, that is something Proton cannot seek Lotus, cuz Lotus themselves are Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious, so the engineers hv to work very hard.

Proton is, no doubt behind the schedule, bt considering important keys to make sure the engine is as reliable at 160,000km as it was from the start, that is something that requires a lot of work and time. They've probably succeeded in making them so w/o the CPS, bt by adding the CPS, they've gotta more thousands of miles of testing n all, lots of $$$, which is tricky considering their current dire condition, n if it didn't work, they've to change the design etcetcetc.

To boost the engine, the simplest way is of course to supercharge or turbocharge the engine or remap ECU or w/e, bt it won't become easy for the people who had to give 5-year warranty. They already are in the red for the past 3 quarter years, they can't afford to make any mistake with the Campro wit CPS.
pacer
post Mar 29 2007, 08:56 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
i really dont see the problem with campro, yes torque is a bit low in the lower rpm but then is that a real issue???

i have had a waja 4g18 b4 this and now a gen2. i dont see the issue if u know how to harness the power of the engine. different engine design has different character.

u dont go high revving a diesel engine. you dont see people compaling that diesel has low HP.

the campro is a high revving engine and that is the main character, if u want low end torqe buy a savvy smile.gif
kcng
post Mar 29 2007, 09:31 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 29 2007, 07:53 PM)
campro is an evidence that there is lack of low end power .
you are basically asking the same thing that ,

"now how ppl define bad handling ?
car cannot take corner?"


Added on March 29, 2007, 7:57 pmwell, i got both gen2 and waja in my house. 
gen2 is definately bad in low end power . the power from 1000-3000 is kinda dip .. you floor your pedal is like you are not flooring the pedal at all , the only uumph comes in at 3500rpm .
to get proper spec on lack of low end power, go take the dyno chart from paultan.org .
*
i dont feel campro is sluggish in low rpm
weird right ?

initially for the first few days, yes it felt like the car cannot move... then i have a look at my driving style...
before this i used to go over bump at 2nd or 3rd gear and the car (iswara manual / kancil manual) will still jalan...
i tried that with a campro engine and really it struggle to move...
then i shift lower, ie. 1st gear and problem solve....
sometimes, driving style for different car is different....

power from 1k-3k rpm dip ? nope, i dont feel it dipping at all... its more like how are u gonna make the most out of the available power....

no offence dude, but seriously i dont give a hoot about dyno charts....
a kancil can output 1000WHP for all i care.....

i still can accelerate albeit slower at 5th gear @ 50 km/h
smile.gif
with 4 person in the car.....

maybe your gen2 ECU kot ?
tongue.gif
pacer
post Mar 29 2007, 09:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
what to do, some ppl think that all cars are built alike... blush.gif
tokdukun
post Mar 29 2007, 11:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
376 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


QUOTE(pacer @ Mar 29 2007, 08:56 PM)
u dont go high revving a diesel engine. you dont see people compaling that diesel has low HP.
*
Maybe cuz they're nt Proton? lol.

I rly want to test drive Neo when I get the chance. It was said that they change gear ratio n all, so just wanna compare what's rly that change has effect on the car. Besides, Neo looks quite attractive n European-ish, n I liked sitting inside it. The seats are comfortable n hugging, well, it's a bucket seat after all. And since I'm just 165cm, I hv no problem wit it being low, lol.
KeV
post Mar 29 2007, 11:41 PM

www.kampar.net
Group Icon
VIP
6,758 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sunway
actually its semi bucket, since i own one, but im driving auto, so dont hate me tongue.gif

campro engine was really unreliable back to gen2 first batch, my cousins car went up in smokes, faulty spark plugs, thank god under-warranty, too bad cant get compensation, only replacement for a new engine, sold the car instantly, got the new hilux

worried about the same problem, when my dad wanted to buy me a neo, well i guess its done the beta stage and the engine is cool biggrin.gif
theanswer
post Mar 30 2007, 12:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


Compare to the old Proton's 1.6 engine, Campro engine a bit sluggish at low rpm. Campro engine kick at 4000rpm. Thats why we hear ppl can do 200km/h using gen2..(campro engine). Plus, fc gonna be a bit higher than before. Because the old 1.6 engine, torque kick at 3000rpm..run smoothly at low rpm.
ecko
post Mar 30 2007, 12:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
129 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
campro engine is a total suck...now im learning about internal combustion engine...my lecture told me that this engine is suck big time....this engine never pass the relability test....but because of politics..this engine stilll intstall in gen2 and now waja...they install it in waja because..proton has produce this campro engine more that the demand....but the market for gen2 not that good..so as a result they install it on waja...juz to clear their stock...stupid politics..
Oly
post Mar 30 2007, 12:18 AM

Permanent Banned
*******
Senior Member
3,827 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Here On The Chair Status : Eating Donut

engine performance is differ from engine to engine...even if ur engine is no 1 in production and u got 160 bhp and that doesnt mean the no 2 engine will also get the same power like yours...it will differ...higher or lower...unless u buy a ferrari or a lambo which is each engine is built by hand ,tuning and dyno till it is proven to chuck out the listed bhp and torque...
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 30 2007, 01:22 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 29 2007, 09:31 PM)
i dont feel campro is sluggish in low rpm
weird right ?

initially for the first few days, yes it felt like the car cannot move... then i have a look at my driving style...
before this i used to go over bump at 2nd or 3rd gear and the car (iswara manual / kancil manual) will still jalan...
i tried that with a campro engine and really it struggle to move...
then i shift lower, ie. 1st gear and problem solve....
sometimes, driving style for different car is different....

power from 1k-3k rpm dip ? nope, i dont feel it dipping at all... its more like how are u gonna make the most out of the available power....

no offence dude, but seriously i dont give a hoot about dyno charts....
a kancil can output 1000WHP for all i care.....

i still can accelerate albeit slower at 5th gear @ 50 km/h
smile.gif
with 4 person in the car.....

maybe your gen2 ECU kot ?
tongue.gif
*
well , gen2 is just 1 year old .
with modified filter system . KnN . still feel the dip .
actually just get the fact right , you can just used to the underpowered at low rpm , eventually if u have driven a kancil for 3 years ,suddenly change to satria 1.3 , you still feel the power increase alot .
if u use satria 1.3 for 3 years , then sit in kancil , first month you will feel the engine is actually struggling . in long term , you will just get used to it .

i wonder why , journalist all said the campro is sluggish at low-rpm , UK-journalist also say it is slow at low-rpm , local reporter in the-star also said that the engine is tuned for low FC at low rpm that is why it is underpowered , EVEN PROTON ENGINEER TOLD MY BROTHER(his friend is in proton) THAT IT HAS HIGH-END POWER BAND rather than LOW END power just becasue they are making it's characteristic to be sporty , and one of the problem which leads to the LOW END power is actually the manifold of the air intake design .
but u still denying the fact that it is powerful at low-rpm .

no body wins at this level , no body deserve a price . but the fact is just campro is not build for low-end torque.

user posted image
this is a good evidence which shows that it is sluggish at lower rpm , due to it's torque only comes out at slightly higher band .
one of the reason they engineered this way is for the speeding pleasure , that is why campro engine only shines when u are travelling on highway .
and i also wonder how can u feel no dipping at all when the chart already told us that the power at 2500-3000rpm will dip down when the waja 4G18's is goign up ? "its more like how are u gonna make the most out of the available power.... ." quote redefined .


Added on March 30, 2007, 1:38 am
QUOTE(ecko @ Mar 30 2007, 12:15 AM)
campro engine is a total suck...now im learning about internal combustion engine...my lecture told me that this engine is suck big time....this engine never pass the relability test....but because of politics..this engine stilll intstall in gen2 and now waja...they install it in waja because..proton has produce this campro engine more that the demand....but the market for gen2 not that good..so as a result they install it on waja...juz to clear their stock...stupid politics..
*
do you mind to tell which uni u are from?
well , my brother's frined is working in proton . she is not a bias person . well , the fact is she knwos proton quality sucks , ... but the engine and the chassis has been given a very important task , that is actually what tengku mahaleel wanted the car ,a good driver car . lots of RnD is about the chassis and the engine .
and the campro engine is actually beyond what is required. all the blocks are casted from different place. the engine block is engineered in US , material . and the engine block is manufactured from ..europe or australia forgotten already .
proton is just engineering the engine to what they needed and also do some studies on it .
don't get me wrong that campro is so so reliable . but in fact , campro is just not a cincai job in proton .

unless the lectuere knows the envirnoment inside. but yes , politicial influence is very terrible at proton .

This post has been edited by BridgestoneRE711: Mar 30 2007, 01:38 AM
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 09:35 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 30 2007, 01:22 AM)
well , gen2 is just 1 year old .
with modified filter system . KnN . still feel the dip .
actually just get the fact right , you can just used to the underpowered at low rpm , eventually if u have driven a kancil for 3 years ,suddenly change to satria 1.3 , you still feel the power increase alot .
if u use satria 1.3 for 3 years , then sit in kancil , first month you will feel the engine is actually struggling . in long term , you will just get used to it .

i wonder why , journalist all said the campro is sluggish at low-rpm , UK-journalist also say it is slow at low-rpm , local reporter in the-star also said that the engine is tuned for low FC at low rpm that is why it is underpowered , EVEN PROTON ENGINEER TOLD MY BROTHER(his friend is in proton) THAT IT HAS HIGH-END POWER BAND rather than LOW END power just becasue they are making it's characteristic to be sporty , and one of the problem which leads to the LOW END power is actually the manifold of the air intake design .
but u still denying the fact that it is powerful at low-rpm .

no body wins at this level , no body deserve a price . but the fact is just campro is not build for low-end torque.

user posted image
this is a good evidence which shows that it is sluggish at lower rpm , due to it's torque only comes out at slightly higher band .
one of the reason they engineered this way is for the speeding pleasure , that is why campro engine only shines when u are travelling on highway .
and i also wonder how can u feel no dipping at all when the chart already told us that the power at 2500-3000rpm will dip down when the waja 4G18's is goign up ? "its more like how are u gonna make the most out of the available power.... ." quote redefined .

*
good info there......
i own a 2 litre car before shifting to this campro engine....

to tell u frankly, i am not a car junkie and such....

and to tell u frankly again, the sub 3k rpm between my previous civic and this neo is not much of a difference...... of course the civic pack more punch but that is because the displacement is higher

yes, chart will show the lack of low end power, but in daily usage..... does it really matter ?

the bolded part <--- u want to rephrase it ar ?
tongue.gif

i am looking at a daily usage point of view tho, just to let u know...
tongue.gif
theanswer
post Mar 30 2007, 11:15 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,024 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Kajang


still looking fwd to drive any campro engine proton. sad.gif
ahfatt78
post Mar 30 2007, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


this argument still continue??? my god...
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 11:28 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(theanswer @ Mar 30 2007, 11:15 AM)
still looking fwd to drive any campro engine proton. sad.gif
*
go to the showroom...

QUOTE(ahfatt78 @ Mar 30 2007, 11:16 AM)
this argument still continue??? my god...
*
its not arguement.....
doh.gif
its fact exchanging....

which i think our bro bridgestone is doing a good job...
nod.gif
PowerDunk
post Mar 30 2007, 11:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 29 2007, 09:31 PM)
i dont feel campro is sluggish in low rpm
weird right ?

initially for the first few days, yes it felt like the car cannot move... then i have a look at my driving style...
before this i used to go over bump at 2nd or 3rd gear and the car (iswara manual / kancil manual) will still jalan...
i tried that with a campro engine and really it struggle to move...
then i shift lower, ie. 1st gear and problem solve....
sometimes, driving style for different car is different....

power from 1k-3k rpm dip ? nope, i dont feel it dipping at all... its more like how are u gonna make the most out of the available power....

no offence dude, but seriously i dont give a hoot about dyno charts....
a kancil can output 1000WHP for all i care.....

i still can accelerate albeit slower at 5th gear @ 50 km/h
smile.gif
with 4 person in the car.....

maybe your gen2 ECU kot ?
tongue.gif
*
Aiya you shift to 1st gear your engine rev faster and then gearing is lower of course got power la. duh. It's the same for any car.

But Campro doesn't have low end power is true. Even 1.5 vvti vios has better low end torque than campro.

ellimist
post Mar 30 2007, 11:38 AM

Still a Yui-tard
*******
Senior Member
6,106 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang



QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 30 2007, 09:35 AM)
yes, chart will show the lack of low end power, but in daily usage..... does it really matter ?
*
What kinda daily usage? I know ur constantly on the highway and all,but some ppl's "daily usage" mostly constitutes slow city driving tongue.gif
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 11:41 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(PowerDunk @ Mar 30 2007, 11:38 AM)
Aiya you shift to 1st gear your engine rev faster and then gearing is lower of course got power la. duh. It's the same for any car.

But Campro doesn't have low end power is true. Even 1.5 vvti vios has better low end torque than campro.
*
understand the statement
doh.gif doh.gif
**adjustment in driving style**
get the hint ?
doh.gif

QUOTE(ellimist @ Mar 30 2007, 11:38 AM)
What kinda daily usage? I know ur constantly on the highway and all,but some ppl's "daily usage" mostly constitutes slow city driving tongue.gif
*
i am stuck in the stupid damansara jam all the time la....
tongue.gif
shinjite
post Mar 30 2007, 02:21 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(PowerDunk @ Mar 30 2007, 11:38 AM)
Aiya you shift to 1st gear your engine rev faster and then gearing is lower of course got power la. duh. It's the same for any car.

But Campro doesn't have low end power is true. Even 1.5 vvti vios has better low end torque than campro.
*
Vios is light, plus having VVT-I technology...and its low end torque even beats my 92p
CFS
post Mar 30 2007, 05:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
307 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur Cheras


QUOTE(ahfatt78 @ Mar 30 2007, 11:16 AM)
this argument still continue??? my god...
*
haha fatt kor oso come adi lolz...hehe i oso blur blur read till 20+ pages gila haha still hot topic lolz doh.gif
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 30 2007, 07:17 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


well , it is not arguement .
because i am not a proton supporter nor basher . i am just in the middle . thats why it is not a an arguement .

unless u know hwo to shift well , always keep your rpm above 3000rpm. then the car will not underpowered .

or else , town driving where the power required is 1500-2500rpm . really susah for gen2 .

btw , i mean underpowered for Auto Campro . Manual campro , wont feel the lagg of power .


Added on March 30, 2007, 9:34 pma good engine is like a good road , no pot holes or whatever .
a underpowered engine is a road with speed humps ...
you can opt not to bother the speed humps , and it wont function as a speed hump already ..
same like you can just avoid the low-end powerless by using higher rpm .

but the fact remains that , the road is still a road with the speed humps . where the campro is still an underpowered low-end rpm engine .

This post has been edited by BridgestoneRE711: Mar 30 2007, 09:34 PM
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 09:36 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 30 2007, 07:17 PM)
well , it is not arguement .
because i am not a proton supporter nor basher . i am just in the middle . thats why it is not a an arguement .

unless u know hwo to shift well , always keep your rpm above 3000rpm. then the car will not underpowered .

or else , town driving where the power required is 1500-2500rpm . really susah for gen2 .

btw , i mean underpowered for Auto Campro . Manual campro , wont feel the lagg of power .


Added on March 30, 2007, 9:34 pma good engine is like a good road , no pot holes or whatever .
a underpowered engine is a road with speed humps ...
you can opt not to bother the speed humps , and it wont function as a speed hump already ..
same like you can just avoid the low-end powerless by using higher rpm .

but the fact remains that , the road is still a road with the speed humps . where the campro is still an underpowered low-end rpm engine .
*
mine is a manual 1.6

dude u going for the TT tomorrow ?
drive your gen2 there la......
Vervain
post Mar 30 2007, 10:20 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
i used to drive a 2.0 old saloon. when i switched to a proton waja campro. i was a bit disappointed when most forumers here bashed the lousy campro on low torque. indeed, with a auto transmission, its hard to feel the engine perform.

*facts*
the car has a terrible reaction on situations when you're on a almost standstil condition to instantaneous acceleration. the transmission and the engine would take a long time to reshift down or increase its power when you needed most. thus i was very disappointed on driving the car.
i realized the engine can kick in beyond 2.8k rpm but most of the time it just upshift before your needle reaches 3k.

*facts*
one day, i accidentally push the car to its limit. I was waiting on a traffic light with an annoying bmw beemer kept flashing because of my slow driving. the traffic was clear up ahead with straight roads. once green, i floored the pedal e.g pedal to the metal. it was the max. the engine roared and i can see the needle shoot faster than any previous car i've owned. the RPM was so fast that the transmission shifted up around 6k. i was smoking the beamer behind till we reach the toll. after the incident, my perspective on the engine changed. yeah, it is terrible on low torque. but hey, its just to make sure you dun really speed fast on city driving. engine wise is smooth at all time. even when its reving less than 3k. noise wise is quiet, almost a quiet as a v6 engine.

conclusion, i can live with the engine. as on highway drives, the engine shines.
Tanakwagu_noh
post Mar 30 2007, 10:52 PM

Photographer
*****
Senior Member
866 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: "Pak Pak Kangku Noh"



So far my Waja Auto Campro didnt give me any problem...and i proud of it... flex.gif compare to my last iswara..a lot of improvement national car.. icon_rolleyes.gif
DreMAx
post Mar 30 2007, 11:21 PM

Nature's Best Music
*******
Senior Member
3,799 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: All Over The Place


QUOTE(Tanakwagu_noh @ Mar 30 2007, 10:52 PM)
So far my Waja Auto Campro didnt give me any problem...and i proud of it... flex.gif compare to my last iswara..a lot of improvement national car.. icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Campro engine being good or not is a very big thing to talk about. What makes the engine good is how you treat the engine right?
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 30 2007, 11:44 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(DreMAx @ Mar 30 2007, 11:21 PM)
Campro engine being good or not is a very big thing to talk about. What makes the engine good is how you treat the engine right?
*
i think they are focusing on the performance of the particular engine rather than the reliablity of it .. hmm.gif
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 11:49 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



yeah, the current topic is the low end torque of the campro engine...

but from what i can see so far

on a gen2, campro low end has lack of power (ECU maybe?)
on a waja, i am not sure (has not been on a waja campro b4)
on a neo, low end is ok but nothing to shout about (owner ma tongue.gif)
egiewan
post Mar 30 2007, 11:53 PM

aL-|ncognito
*******
Senior Member
6,777 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur



Oh my someone said smoked a Beemer shocking.gif Waja really that fast ah? drool.gif
kcng
post Mar 30 2007, 11:56 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(egiewan @ Mar 30 2007, 11:53 PM)
Oh my someone said smoked a Beemer shocking.gif Waja really that fast ah? drool.gif
*
BMW half trottle ?
tongue.gif
egiewan
post Mar 30 2007, 11:57 PM

aL-|ncognito
*******
Senior Member
6,777 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur



QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 30 2007, 11:56 PM)
BMW half trottle ?
tongue.gif
*
Maybe on par with a 318 but 325 die wei laugh.gif Plus the newer version of 318i's has 200Nm which is very impressive drool.gif

This post has been edited by egiewan: Mar 30 2007, 11:58 PM
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:01 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(egiewan @ Mar 30 2007, 11:57 PM)
Maybe on par with a 318 but 325 die wei laugh.gif Plus the newer version of 318i's has 200Nm which is very impressive drool.gif
*
should be 318i la...

318i is not that powerful... only the BMW logo gives it aura only
tongue.gif

seen a stock manual putra flat out smoke a 318i before
tongue.gif

325i is notworthy.gif
tongue.gif
vin_ann
post Mar 31 2007, 12:03 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,912 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:01 AM)
should be 318i la...

318i is not that powerful... only the BMW logo gives it aura only
tongue.gif

seen a stock manual putra flat out smoke a 318i before
tongue.gif

325i is notworthy.gif
tongue.gif
*
NEO stil the best 1 lol.............
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:06 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(vin_ann @ Mar 31 2007, 12:03 AM)
NEO stil the best 1 lol.............
*
u mai siao....

i just got smoked nicely by a stock putra just now
damn 9 fast man that putra......
doh.gif

at 180 that fella pull away so fast
blink.gif
vin_ann
post Mar 31 2007, 12:12 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,912 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:06 AM)
u mai siao....

i just got smoked nicely by a stock putra just now
damn 9 fast man that putra......
doh.gif

at 180 that fella pull away so fast
blink.gif
*
ur foot is not elephaNT foot mah...
tht y u get smoked...

K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:15 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:06 AM)
u mai siao....

i just got smoked nicely by a stock putra just now
damn 9 fast man that putra......
doh.gif

at 180 that fella pull away so fast
blink.gif
*
my stock putra easily goes up to 190.. tongue.gif
dunno bout the top speed thou ... i have been to 205.. dare not go beyond that..

my fren use to says .. it is not the top speed that matters .. it is whether u got balls to go with it ... lolz...

thou after 190.. it will climb much slower.. wind drag perhaps

kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:17 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(vin_ann @ Mar 31 2007, 12:12 AM)
ur foot is not elephaNT foot mah...
tht y u get smoked...
*
no point flooring la.... the ECU got your driving style programmed liao la...
just tap and it will adjust accordingly la
doh.gif

QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:15 AM)
my stock putra easily goes up to 190.. tongue.gif
dunno bout the top speed thou ... i have been to 205.. dare not go beyond that..

my fren use to says .. it is not the top speed that matters .. it is whether u got balls to go with it ... lolz...

thou after 190.. it will climb much slower.. wind drag perhaps
*
i think that guy must be doing 210-220 easily.....
at 180 that fella just pull away like i am standing still....

judging from the sound of the engine, that guy must have downshifted to 4th and redline it to pull away then shift up again....
damn fast wei...
blink.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:20 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:17 AM)
no point flooring la.... the ECU got your driving style programmed liao la...
just tap and it will adjust accordingly la
doh.gif
i think that guy must be doing 210-220 easily.....
at 180 that fella just pull away like i am standing still....

judging from the sound of the engine, that guy must have downshifted to 4th and redline it to pull away then shift up again....
damn fast wei...
blink.gif
*
perhaps.. i remember when im doing 205 .. the rpm was around 5k ++..
but no point comparing a plain vanila CAMPRO 1.6 with a 4G93 DOHC 1.8 ..
defenately the 4G93 torque can overcome ur campro.
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:22 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:20 AM)
perhaps.. i remember when im doing 205 .. the rpm was around 5k ++..
but no point comparing a plain vanila CAMPRO 1.6 with a 4G93 DOHC 1.8 ..
defenately the 4G93 torque can overcome ur campro.
*
yeah that i know,
just amazed at the speed it pull away at 180
real fast
drool.gif

unfortunately i cant find a putra, thats why i settle for neo
sad.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:29 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:22 AM)
yeah that i know,
just amazed at the speed it pull away at 180
real fast
drool.gif

unfortunately i cant find a putra, thats why i settle for neo
sad.gif
*
at least urs is a new car...
i got mine a year a go ..
thou its 9 years old.. never gave me any problem

the previous owner .. i suspect is an ALIEN .. lolz.. i got this putra.. totally stock ... sport rim stock .. even the casatte player .. wire never being cut.. lolz...
speaker original .. cannot use d .. lolz

kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:31 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:29 AM)
at least urs is a new car...
i got mine a year a go ..
thou its 9 years old.. never gave me any problem

the previous owner .. i suspect is an ALIEN .. lolz.. i got this putra.. totally stock ... sport rim stock .. even the casatte player .. wire never being cut.. lolz...
speaker original .. cannot use d .. lolz
*
sigh, i really was looking for a putra...
the older one with ABS and airbags...

but could not find...
i found la, but engine is a 1.8 GSR wan...

i want the stock putra so i can mod myself
sad.gif

aihz, yeah as u say, at least mine is a new car....
but damn putra is fast, mine is slow like turtle
sad.gif
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 31 2007, 12:36 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 30 2007, 09:36 PM)
mine is a manual 1.6

dude u going for the TT tomorrow ?
drive your gen2 there la......
*
i drive my waja . gen2 is my brother's .
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 12:38 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:36 AM)
i drive my waja . gen2 is my brother's .
*
bawak gen2 la....

so can see the difference..
tongue.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:45 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:31 AM)
sigh, i really was looking for a putra...
the older one with ABS and airbags...

but could not find...
i found la, but engine is a 1.8 GSR wan...

i want the stock putra so i can mod myself
sad.gif

aihz, yeah as u say, at least mine is a new car....
but damn putra is fast, mine is slow like turtle
sad.gif
*
putra comes with ABS .. but no airbags... :-)

akRia
post Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM

...~+noob+~...
******
Senior Member
1,998 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: boooolehland
my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80.... laugh.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 12:54 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(akRia @ Mar 31 2007, 12:47 AM)
my friend's gen2(is campro right? LOL) ,naik bukit / break in front of bukit-alike traffic,when from N (pull handbrake ma) to D ,the car will fall back behind,have to tekan minyak kao kao only can move...2years + car adi i think,the car cant U-turn in one lane one ,before going highway,almost no power one haha,the engine also start giving quite loud sound when driving at 80.... laugh.gif
*
campro has quite a bad early torque .. especially for AUTO...
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


as i said ,
that is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine .
it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm .
which is almost perfect for highway driving .

but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kcng , that is your problem .
i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough.
St.Daring
post Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
339 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Isle of Pinang



Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari... rolleyes.gif
To hell with Proton cars...really...
shinjite
post Mar 31 2007, 04:28 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 12:31 AM)
sigh, i really was looking for a putra...
the older one with ABS and airbags...

but could not find...
i found la, but engine is a 1.8 GSR wan...

i want the stock putra so i can mod myself
sad.gif

aihz, yeah as u say, at least mine is a new car....
but damn putra is fast, mine is slow like turtle
sad.gif
*
There is no replacement for displacement mah smile.gif
kcng
post Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:45 AM)
putra comes with ABS .. but no airbags... :-)
*
tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ?

QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 12:55 AM)
as i said ,
that is the characteristic of the proton CAMPRO engine .
it is build for high-end power , the power band is at 3000-4000rpm .
which is almost perfect for highway driving .

but for city driving , we often need it at 2000-3000rpm , but the torque is dip down rather than climbing up . hence u can feel that it is sluggish at low speed .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kcng , that is your problem .
i prefer to drive waja . no need to compare , just simply ask ppl about how the campro behaves is already enough.
*
nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpm
dont feel the dip in power...

but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm.
smile.gif
K3nnYkl82
post Mar 31 2007, 10:41 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(kcng @ Mar 31 2007, 08:05 AM)
tot the 1997 (or something around that time) putra comes with airbags ?
nah, its ok, i got no issue with the torque for campro at 1-3k rpm
dont feel the dip in power...

but i did not say it is powerful at 1-3k rpm.
smile.gif
*
difference between 97" putra and 2000 putra is the ECU .. 5537 and 0450 ..
accessories .. 97" putra -> Recaro Njoy + momo steering + momo gearknob
2000 putra -> Recaro Njoy + Proton steering + proton gearknob .. tongue.gif

The is no Airbag for putra.. unless u mod it lar.. get it from GTI and place in the putra.. but u will sacrifice the MOMO steering.. biggrin.gif
BridgestoneRE711
post Mar 31 2007, 11:45 AM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


as comparision , your's is the manual , it is logic if you dont feel there is some dip in power .

pacer
post Mar 31 2007, 10:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
618 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
QUOTE(BridgestoneRE711 @ Mar 31 2007, 11:45 AM)
as comparision , your's is the manual , it is logic if you dont feel there is some dip in power .
*
so the moral of the story is want a campro buy a manual thumbup.gif
Pro-MX
post Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM

Izay
******
Senior Member
1,259 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by Pro-MX: Mar 31 2007, 11:29 PM
Vervain
post Mar 31 2007, 11:56 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
yeah. 318 model

brudder, most putra have undergo transplant so it can definately smoke any national cars.

campro pick up is not great but still, its smooth.
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 1 2007, 01:07 AM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Vervain @ Mar 31 2007, 11:56 PM)
yeah. 318 model

brudder, most putra have undergo transplant so it can definately smoke any national cars.

campro pick up is not great but still, its smooth.
*
mine still stock .. yet still can smoke lots of national car.. :-)
kcng
post Apr 1 2007, 01:43 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



stock putra power la wei........

Creative
post Apr 1 2007, 05:48 AM

Getting Started
Group Icon
VIP
61 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Shah Alam


aiya.. how come this thread turned into CamProblem :/

This post has been edited by Creative: Apr 1 2007, 05:50 AM
Vervain
post Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM

Scathach
*******
Senior Member
5,464 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
just wondering, which is powerful gti or putra?

no la. this thread has become a CamPur thread
K3nnYkl82
post Apr 1 2007, 04:51 PM

NewBie
*******
Senior Member
2,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mars
QUOTE(Vervain @ Apr 1 2007, 04:33 PM)
just wondering, which is powerful gti or putra?

no la. this thread has become a CamPur thread
*
both putra and GTI have the same engine and power.
but handling wise .. of coz GTI .. tuned by lotus.
power to weight ratio.. i would says putra.. its lighter.. thous sacrificing the stability a bit compare with GTI.

juz my 2 cents.
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 1 2007, 09:01 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


ya .
but the problem with the GTi is , although it has negative lift aerodynamic bodykit design and rear wing .
but the absence of the tail actually make the car not so good handler in top speed .
i still think Putra is the most handsome proton-mistubisi car . of course ,GTi is better looking , but what i mean is stock .

Drian
post Apr 2 2007, 02:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


If you need to rev to get the power, then your FC will suffer dramatically. That's why low end torque is very important in city driving and also highway. Higher torque allows your car to move at higher speed without revving the engine.

Imagine driving at 110km/h at 2000 rpm vs 110 km/hh at 3500 rpm, definitely the one at 3500rpm will consume A lot more of fuel.

It's similar to advanza 1.3. Driving at 120km/h nearly 4000rpm++ compared to vios 3000rpm and the fuel consumption was worst than a vios. Car pool back to KL on an advanza and i was surprise how much fuel it drank.

This post has been edited by Drian: Apr 2 2007, 02:31 PM
ahfatt78
post Apr 2 2007, 06:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


u want save money on petrol, please dont drive; walk instead, good for u and environment also. tongue.gif
ahaw
post Apr 8 2007, 07:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
274 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: bamboo river
4A-GEU - AE86 (84-85) - 1587cc - Max power (hp)130@6600
- Max torque (kg/cm)15.2@5200

4A-GELU - AE92 (90-91) - 1587cc - 140 @7200 - 15.0 @6000

4A-GLEU - AE111 Japan (96-2000) - 1587cc - 165 @7800 - 16.5 @5600

S4PH - neo/gen2 - 1597 cc - 110 bhp (82 kW) @ 6,500 - 148 N-m @ 4,000

S4PE - neo - 1332 cc - 94 bhp (70 kW) @ 6,000 - 120 N-m @ 4,000 rpm

FIRE14 - fiat panda - 1368cc - 99bhp@6000 - 97lb ft@4250

satria r3 use 4g93p i think... 1.8 with 140 bhp

just my 2 cent

QUOTE
Our findings has shown the standard Gen.2 bodyshell is stiffer than that of the double seem-welded Satria R3, therefore additional structural strengthening has not been required other than anodised aerospace grade aluminum bars between the front and rear strut towers.
http://www.racerallyresearch.com/gen2_r3/gen2_index.html


This post has been edited by ahaw: Apr 8 2007, 07:38 PM
shinjite
post Apr 8 2007, 09:29 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


What I don't like about the Satria R3 is the EMS only
Still using back Siemens >.>"
micwin1437
post Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,197 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang Town/Kuching/Miri



QUOTE(St.Daring @ Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM)
Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari... rolleyes.gif
To hell with Proton cars...really...
*
what car are you driving?

Honda EX5???? biggrin.gif

QUOTE(Pro-MX @ Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM)
manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc rclxub.gif
*
any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem.

kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio.

when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
kcng
post Apr 12 2007, 01:21 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(micwin1437 @ Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM)
when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
*
exactly and there is still people who dun understand this concept
doh.gif
dstl1128
post Apr 12 2007, 02:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,464 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE
when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......

You try going 20km/h. And I do 80km/h. See who have better FC. tongue.gif


QUOTE
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.

That's not the point here. The point is, given the same driving pattern, which one having lower FC.
EpsilonStar
post Apr 12 2007, 07:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,245 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Selangor


nothing oledi..

This post has been edited by EpsilonStar: Apr 12 2007, 08:00 PM
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 12 2007, 10:56 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


QUOTE(micwin1437 @ Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM)
what car are you driving?

Honda EX5???? biggrin.gif
any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem.

kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio.

when you are fast=your fc also fast lah.......
any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc.
*
i fyou have driven other 1.6 DOHC engine , the 1K-3K range is nto as sluggish as campro .
Soulsareworthless
post Apr 12 2007, 11:33 PM

Madridista
*******
Senior Member
3,413 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Damansara


How's the SMART engined designed then?
sledgehammer
post Apr 13 2007, 01:04 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
664 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Cheras, KL


QUOTE(Soulsareworthless @ Apr 12 2007, 11:33 PM)
How's the SMART engined designed then?
*
if i am not mistaken the smart engine is turbocharged....
BridgestoneRE711
post Apr 13 2007, 02:29 PM

♦ ♣ ♥ ♠
*******
Senior Member
3,429 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: alor star • selangor • skudai


ya , smart engine is actually developed by DC and it is turbocharged . that is why it is powerful .
the latest smart engnie is from mitsubishi .

if you mean smart engine , do youmean SENg engine which means Small-engine , the concept during 2002 ? if notm istaken , that engine was a concept , eventually theRnD on the egnine itself cost alot .since proton is not making any return nowadays , so it is hard for proton to do RnD on it .
Austin123
post Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,336 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


sluggish campro.. sure higher FC..

This post has been edited by Austin123: Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM
shift2
post Apr 13 2007, 10:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
412 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Isle of Legend



good..very good..
when go up hill..like turtle lo..LOL..
engine layout actually not so bad...but the engine management is poor..
jus the boleh land hv loads of "pig head" tat dun know how to refine n tuning it..(the gearbox ratios are not precise enuf)
prozac
post Apr 14 2007, 07:45 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
705 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


My opinion is that the Campro isn't the greatest engine out there and is sadly one of the let downs of the Gen2 and Neo.

A winning engine in terms of consumption and power will have the highest torque across the widest rpm range. Unfortunately the Campro doesn't have that characteristic.

But to be on the fair side, we cannot simply quote 25yr old engines and compare them to today's less polluting ones. Even today's Civic and Corolla engines are no match for the horsepower racers of yesteryear.
riderx
post Apr 14 2007, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
im waiting for campro the 3rd generation in 2020 if proton still alive then.. lol

yeah campro is not a very hitech engine or the most superb, but it is the 1st comercialized engine by proton.. it have good top speed and i believe it would do just nice when all the tech thingy get in...

maybe we could see something good when cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year... tongue.gif
ahaw
post Apr 15 2007, 03:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
274 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: bamboo river
QUOTE
cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year


is it? ant wait to see it...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1302sec    1.00    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 11:37 AM