What I don't like about the Satria R3 is the EMS only
Still using back Siemens >.>"
Campro Engine Good or Not?
Campro Engine Good or Not?
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 09:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
19,321 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang |
What I don't like about the Satria R3 is the EMS only
Still using back Siemens >.>" |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,198 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Klang Town/Kuching/Miri |
QUOTE(St.Daring @ Mar 31 2007, 01:21 AM) Campro engine is so farking fast...LOL...better than Ferrari... what car are you driving?To hell with Proton cars...really... Honda EX5???? QUOTE(Pro-MX @ Mar 31 2007, 11:27 PM) manual CAMPRO pick up also not that great la dudes....u still got to rev it around 3k-4k to get to the torque powerband and by revving that high it will start to drink more petrol and it will result in high fc any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem.kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio. when you are fast=your fc also fast lah....... any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc. |
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 01:21 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
17,566 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: FFK Division - Klang |
|
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 02:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,464 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE when you are fast=your fc also fast lah....... You try going 20km/h. And I do 80km/h. See who have better FC. QUOTE any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc. That's not the point here. The point is, given the same driving pattern, which one having lower FC. |
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 07:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,245 posts Joined: Oct 2004 From: Selangor |
nothing oledi..
This post has been edited by EpsilonStar: Apr 12 2007, 08:00 PM |
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 10:56 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,429 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: alor star • selangor • skudai |
QUOTE(micwin1437 @ Apr 12 2007, 11:53 AM) what car are you driving? i fyou have driven other 1.6 DOHC engine , the 1K-3K range is nto as sluggish as campro .Honda EX5???? any twincam engine powerband comes in at 4K and above, so it's not only campro engine have this problem. kelisa is the only car in the market that have twincam engine but low FC due to better power to weight ratio. when you are fast=your fc also fast lah....... any car wanna play pick up/drag also consume higher fc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 11:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,413 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Damansara |
How's the SMART engined designed then?
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 01:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
664 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Cheras, KL |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 02:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,429 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: alor star • selangor • skudai |
ya , smart engine is actually developed by DC and it is turbocharged . that is why it is powerful .
the latest smart engnie is from mitsubishi . if you mean smart engine , do youmean SENg engine which means Small-engine , the concept during 2002 ? if notm istaken , that engine was a concept , eventually theRnD on the egnine itself cost alot .since proton is not making any return nowadays , so it is hard for proton to do RnD on it . |
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,336 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
sluggish campro.. sure higher FC..
This post has been edited by Austin123: Apr 13 2007, 06:23 PM |
|
|
Apr 13 2007, 10:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
412 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Isle of Legend |
good..very good..
when go up hill..like turtle lo..LOL.. engine layout actually not so bad...but the engine management is poor.. jus the boleh land hv loads of "pig head" tat dun know how to refine n tuning it..(the gearbox ratios are not precise enuf) |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 07:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
705 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
My opinion is that the Campro isn't the greatest engine out there and is sadly one of the let downs of the Gen2 and Neo.
A winning engine in terms of consumption and power will have the highest torque across the widest rpm range. Unfortunately the Campro doesn't have that characteristic. But to be on the fair side, we cannot simply quote 25yr old engines and compare them to today's less polluting ones. Even today's Civic and Corolla engines are no match for the horsepower racers of yesteryear. |
|
|
Apr 14 2007, 08:47 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
43 posts Joined: Jun 2006 |
im waiting for campro the 3rd generation in 2020 if proton still alive then.. lol
yeah campro is not a very hitech engine or the most superb, but it is the 1st comercialized engine by proton.. it have good top speed and i believe it would do just nice when all the tech thingy get in... maybe we could see something good when cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year... |
|
|
Apr 15 2007, 03:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
274 posts Joined: Jun 2005 From: bamboo river |
QUOTE cps n vim is inserted to the campro end of this year is it? ant wait to see it... |
| Change to: | 0.0186sec
0.45
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 03:51 PM |