QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 27 2013, 10:12 AM)
really?
my CX500 served me for years and served me really well.
to backup my experience, here's an article from THW.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/power-...ze,3587-12.htmlHWS also
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Cor...ply-Review/1284Correct though you need to know the fact that:
There are multiple variants of the unit, i.e.:
1. The original CX500 (CWT-built, and 80+ Bronze)
2. The CX500 v2 (same OEM, but 80+ standard)
3. The CMPSU-CX500 (same OEM, no 80+ certification, the exact unit sold in the US)
Heck, some the CX series are even made by Seasonic... *cough* The CX400...
Corsair is notorious for using multiple OEMs, and even the TX series can spread across many OEMs:
1. Original TX-Seasonic
2. TX v2-Seasonic
3. TXM-CWT/Chicony
It's hard to understand the OEM of the power supply without providing the UL number, as the UL number will tell the OEM behind the unit.
Many people would buy despite the Corsair branding and cheap price, but they usually don't have an idea what's behind the unit..
Corsair's quality has been very inconsistent, unlike their older days when a lot of people considered Corsair as a to go brand for power supplies (even Antec can't beat that as their reputation was tarnished by using cheap grade caps, Fuhyyju on the power supplies.)
The CX series is based on CWT DSAII platform, which is one of the lowest end in the CWT platform lineup.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1431436/why-you...uy-a-corsair-cx (Note: This is the CX M series, though the CX series share the same platform as the CX M.
Again, it's a budget unit, so don't expect nice performance from a cheap unit...
This post has been edited by chocobo7779: Dec 27 2013, 10:29 AM