QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Aug 6 2012, 09:06 AM)
FACT 1 : What I see is the warranty still "Y" as per stated on the APRIL invoice. TS's Quotation doesn't mentioned about warranty status.
FACT 2 : TL:DR, 1st post, TS just stated he is "UNABLE" to claim warranty because of Impact Damage. Still no fact of Warranty being VOID.
FACT 3 : Nikon staffs in email never said about warranty is VOID.
Tell me, where and when the warranty is VOIDED. Still baseless remarks are being thrown to sellers for GOD KNOW WHY.
To TS/Buyer, I'm still siding you, just because not EVERYONE knows about the missing screws. Heck who will go check about the screws? You buy, you check the outer conditions, plug in to your body then shot fine - DEAL.
WHy have to be sooo complicated.FACT 2 : TL:DR, 1st post, TS just stated he is "UNABLE" to claim warranty because of Impact Damage. Still no fact of Warranty being VOID.
FACT 3 : Nikon staffs in email never said about warranty is VOID.
Tell me, where and when the warranty is VOIDED. Still baseless remarks are being thrown to sellers for GOD KNOW WHY.
To TS/Buyer, I'm still siding you, just because not EVERYONE knows about the missing screws. Heck who will go check about the screws? You buy, you check the outer conditions, plug in to your body then shot fine - DEAL.
Tell me.
With same serial number which have been send to Nikon Center before.
Same diagnostic but original owner choose not to proceed with repair (Warranty void or not not important)
Buyer have proven with fact that the SAME Nikon have problematic before. (Again same serial number)
NOw, should buyer be getting his refund?
Aug 6 2012, 09:12 AM

Quote
0.0166sec
0.80
6 queries
GZIP Disabled