I already made a police report before to get the previous owner quotation...now have to make a new one asking the commercial crime to investigate this case...last time the police officer already offered me to report directly to commercial crime but I hesitated thinking that the previous owner's quotation will just do for the time being...but after looking at this boy's arrogant comments, I will make a new report asap...

Buyer- male in camera yet doesn't inspect the item upon receive. Only notice demo in the receipt.

there is always a risk to buy used/demo item. dont depend so much on warranty. User must check the condition upon received. You think by having warranty give you peace of mind? you wont know whether the failure is valid or non -valid for warranty claim so put in your mind that buying used item with warranty is a bonus package not peace of mind as we dont know the 1st user how he use the lens.

Example: might be dropped but still usable so went to sell it. buyer bought it after 1 month spoil and claim warranty but rejected by center due to found internal impact damage.

Already PM goldfries and wkKay but no reply...apis cannot do anything...that's what he told me...

FACT 1 : What I see is the warranty still "Y" as per stated on the APRIL invoice. TS's Quotation doesn't mentioned about warranty status.
FACT 2 : TL:DR, 1st post, TS just stated he is "UNABLE" to claim warranty because of Impact Damage. Still no fact of Warranty being VOID.
FACT 3 : Nikon staffs in email never said about warranty is VOID.

Tell me, where and when the warranty is VOIDED. Still baseless remarks are being thrown to sellers for GOD KNOW WHY.

To TS/Buyer, I'm still siding you, just because not EVERYONE knows about the missing screws. Heck who will go check about the screws? You buy, you check the outer conditions, plug in to your body then shot fine - DEAL.

Now we have to see this case as 2 different scenarios.
It's not complicated and I think everyone is missing out, because you just assume that the warranty is void.

If Silverfire sell the lens, whether he is aware or not about the warranty status, which already voided before the Money transactions happens between him and Izwan, then I believe Izwan deserve a FULL refund from seller. This matter because Silverfire should've check the warranty status with Nikon before selling them off from his possession.

But if Silverfire sell the lens and the warranty is still valid, the problem starts here. I'm not trying to suspect Izwan, but this is his part of fault also, not checking the warranty status and also the gap time when he file the complain. The refund should be looks more like partial.

Ya I know nobody would bother to check up on the warranty at all.

Just trying to clarify here, before someone would claim the warranty is void after 1 time warranty claim.
Still no fact or statement about when the warranty is being void btw.

I thought he said that salvatore guy will be back by 20th? can u quote him saying that here? thanks.

okok ..Im a noob to these stuff.

Gonna get a good camera next time, I love beautiful pictures too.

Btw, Silverfire lost his "Safe Trader" tag, but still have to refund, ... not worth it. If he settle privately with you then its all happy ending, he keeps his tag and you got what you deserve. 
Verdict: Izwan won , heck even if you don't get back enough money him, but still safe trader gone !!! That tag is priceless !