Me being online doesn't mean I'm obligated to give an answer to whatever accusations that are made against me. On the contrary, according to forum rules, I'm given a grace period of 1 week to provide an answer to any question given. Having said that, I will give my answer and asks a few or maybe just a question 6 days later. Cheerio!

P/S moderators and trade enforcers have already been notified

there is always a risk to buy used/demo item. dont depend so much on warranty. User must check the condition upon received. You think by having warranty give you peace of mind? you wont know whether the failure is valid or non -valid for warranty claim so put in your mind that buying used item with warranty is a bonus package not peace of mind as we dont know the 1st user how he use the lens.

Example: might be dropped but still usable so went to sell it. buyer bought it after 1 month spoil and claim warranty but rejected by center due to found internal impact damage.

Don't come in here and throw rubbish and expect people to brain like this. Manufacturer doesn't COVER your physical damage doesn't mean your warranty is VOID once you scratch your lens, for example.

For a simple fact that, I always had my phone casing scratch last time within 6 months of use and I go to Nokia Service Center to change the casing, stating I will need to pay for such, and my WARRANTY is still VALID for another 6 months.

Like I said, this is a mere whether the warranty is still valid or not by the time the money exchanged. I cannot stand when people come in and throw rubbish fact around.


Even I did support buyers side, I believe it's better to judge this on a fair ground basis. And also, Demo unit and Used unit are actually the same. You won't know how one use a stuffs, exactly like what you guys deduced on demo unit.