I look good in that photo haha

+1000000000000000000

TS just proceed to make a police report against him.

Hahahha, he wants to make report u for defamation and fraud? Later hire lawyer also say no money...

Really have all sorts of reasons to protect himself

Again, I thought you are well prepared with your answers and questions. And for your info, I did read this issue properly. again

Silverfire himself stated that he will give his questions and answers after 6 days on 31st July 2012. But funny thing happened that the questions came out 1 by 1 on 2nd August 2012 by 12:08AM, 09:37AM and 09:54AM. So I guesss there will be a lot more question on 6th August 2012

Suspicious I try to brain upcoming questions will come out from him lol

Please judge by reading it clearly before deciding whether seller is decent or not.

Yes, he previously did deal with you before but that doesn't mean he is "decent" in this case.

Please don't support blindly.

I don't support him in this case. I just stating that we did have a good conversation before, that's all.

Will read this case from the first page tonight. And yes, this is not the first time Silverfire been into this kind of problem before.

3rd time I'm asking, not sure how many times I have to repeat. Sigh.

1st report, warranty applicable.
2nd report, warranty void due to impact damage? So so suspicious. Not accusing you or anything, just pointing out


Read above, worried if I state 6 days later, he can't answer and I have to ask again and again repeatedly until the question is gone with pages at the rate this thread is increasing. I think I will still be asking the same questions 6 days later. Sigh.

Good tactic really, just dodge all my questions and blame everything on me. Bravo.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Aug 2 2012, 06:10 PM

Why don't u go and ask Nikon? I'm trying to frame and fraud u right? Why don't u go and call Nikon? Or email them? And also please make a police report. U dared to?

---

Added on August 2, 2012, 6:27 pmAnd also can't u read the first report properly? It also stated Impact Damage. How?

U don't really know how to read or u're acting retard?

This post has been edited by Izwan898: Aug 2 2012, 06:28 PM

So is there any reply from nikon for the screw parts? should come cheap.


dont see where this is going.. since the product is now having a RM1.2k damage tagged to it.

They can give me the screws but it's no use. The holes where the screws should be in were all loose...cannot screw anymore...nikon technician said they can give me those screws but it will only be a waste...no use...

guess mod have to start review back Silverfire selling history habit's.

Nikon center already gave the service report.

to me both also have fault on their side

Seller- male in camera yet doesn't inspect the item and didn't explain item in detail condition

Buyer- male in camera yet doesn't inspect the item upon receive. Only notice demo in the receipt.

Both are so fail in buying/selling used or demo item in photography gadget.

Errr, why are you asking the same questions again? Answers were already given in the last 2 pages? Dodging?

I disagree with this, bcos seller stated that it still have 7 months manufacturer warranty (peace of mind), so the best way to test is use it. Of course, if found any problem after an agreed period of time, buyer cannot blame seller, instead claim from manufacturer, but in this case, the official warranty already voided before sold to him.

please read before giving any more comments.

the reason that the two screw is missing is the "female" side "thread" is worn out.

The screw is useless as it won't be able to tighten firmly.

---

Added on August 2, 2012, 10:37 pmShhessshhh
you just don't get it!!!!


(1) Warranty still valid the 1st time until Nikon discovered two screw were missing and internal "impact damage" which is not cover by warranty.
Since the original owner refuse to pay for the 1.2K repair fee,
Nikon have "mark" the Nikon Lens with description "etc two screw missing..etc etc etc" by indicating serial number for future referance.
and at same time, update in their system that warranty is void even though still got 7 month left.

Warranty cover manufacturing defects NOT Impact damage

(2)Current buyer sent in to Nikon Center for 2nd time since Seller indicate it still have 7 month warranty left.
From Nikon database, it show that warranty is VOID as it is a repeat case.

SO , what the blooody suspicious you talking about?

Arrogant seller who reallly trying to find loopholes from paying.

---

Added on August 2, 2012, 10:40 pmyeah, you can quote you have deal without any problem with him before.

BUT do you really have to add insult to this thread by stating

"Please, please start studying Human Right and stop embarrassing yourself[COLOR=red].

I don't follow up this case neatly[SIZE=1][SIZE=7][COLOR=blue] but Silverfire is a decent forumer that did help me with Roccat Kave stuff before.





This post has been edited by MakNok: Aug 2 2012, 10:40 PM

no need to explain bro coz silverfire already knew the answer..he just like to play around to show his arrogant...
i wonder if he still can keep his blue hair on prison?

Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Here's my conversation with him on 1st July...he told me to send to nikon for warranty claim...

" Izwan Haffez Che Azmi, attempted conman, defamation and fraud artist "

lol..without any proof this silverfire boy call this izwan conman...at least izwan got proof and people can judge who is conman here...ur proof? only ur playing around word as proof...

p/s: looking both picture seller and buyer , izwan look far more handsome compare to this bluehair silverfire...also from the picture i bet we can judge which one is conman...hahahaha

hehe thank u bro...

This summarize the whole case...the seller don't deserve safe trader tag anymore!

This is getting longer, longer and longer

This post has been edited by mrkenn: Aug 3 2012, 01:23 AM

so what did the police say after you report? how many days for them to start investigating? What happens next?