Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.16

views
     
gerald7
post Jul 4 2012, 01:24 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jul 4 2012, 01:14 PM)
no la...still will have huge DoF.
http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
go calculate urself...see it say infinity tongue.gif
*
user posted image
the subject is OOF...


user posted image
the DoF is thinner when close


The aboves was shot with the Nikkor 10.5mm on D80

Anyways I rather have AF I'd save up.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:33 pmand you cant do this if you dun have AF!

user posted image
yea abit oof cos I moved a bit. infinity right?
biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by gerald7: Jul 4 2012, 01:34 PM
Everdying
post Jul 4 2012, 01:35 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
maybe i should rephrase.
u still need to MF, but doesnt have to be that accurate cos of the bigger depth of field.

the 10.5mm has MFD of 14cm, at that distance with f/8 there is still 5.45cm of DoF.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:38 pmof cos infinity at 1m...like the pic of those 2 ppl sitting.
u tell me the background not in focus?

u still need to roughly set the MF distance scale...set around 50cm already if subject is about 1m away like the table.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:39 pmu can post all the pics u want to show how great u are at getting OOF shots, but depth of field calculator doesnt lie tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Everdying: Jul 4 2012, 01:39 PM
ojtee
post Jul 4 2012, 01:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(andrewtyy @ Jul 4 2012, 02:43 AM)
I feel like to take macro photography, currently not enough budget for a macro len and check out that wide + close up filter can get in few hundreds. So would like to seek advises from everyone that is it wise to buy close up filter? or just save for a macro len better? If it is worthy, which 1 should I buy? Thanks. smile.gif
Only having 18-105mm and have a stable tripod, few gear only as I'm still a student.

Some of your photo are soft or out of focus, just my 2 cents. I'm newbie too. blush.gif
*
since you are starting off, suggest you get a set of closeup filter first, practise taking photos and see what you are omfortable with, thing about filters is that is quick to put on and take off, and you can use it for a variety of of other lens,

there's also extension tubes, but i believe the tubes will allow dust ot get into the camera sensor, so best to avoid unless you take macro in confined dustfree spaces/areas.

lastly, you'll need alot of patience with macro photogs, and use alot of manual focusing


my hoya close-up filter kit for sale here
gerald7
post Jul 4 2012, 01:49 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jul 4 2012, 01:35 PM)
maybe i should rephrase.
u still need to MF, but doesnt have to be that accurate cos of the bigger depth of field.

the 10.5mm has MFD of 14cm, at that distance with f/8 there is still 5.45cm of DoF.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:38 pmof cos infinity at 1m...like the pic of those 2 ppl sitting.
u tell me the background not in focus?

u still need to roughly set the MF distance scale...set around 50cm already if subject is about 1m away like the table.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:39 pmu can post all the pics u want to show how great u are at getting OOF shots, but depth of field calculator doesnt lie tongue.gif
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif I didnt say the calculator is lying. your initial post said no need to focus jst put to 5.6/f and everything will be fine and dandy. Im just saying, to have a mechanism for focus is better (clearly not shown in my examples, because I chose them for a reason, even with AF still can get OOF shots, and its CLEARLY VISABLE) rather than to do Manual focusing smile.gif chill bro. Im not as technically proficient with calculations and mfd and scales. I flunk maths. rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by gerald7: Jul 4 2012, 01:50 PM
Everdying
post Jul 4 2012, 01:53 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
lol.
no la, thats why i rephrase...still need to roughly set the MF distance...and depends on distance to subject also.
of cos closer it is, the DoF thinner...but its still 5cm at the minimum...just simply set the MF scale roughly around there enough already...
not like some lenses DoF can be like 2cm only tongue.gif

gerald7
post Jul 4 2012, 01:56 PM

r a n d o m l y
*******
Senior Member
2,453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Kuching, Sarawakland


and clearly one needs patience and a good eye to do MF. Which is why I didnt want to try macro photography because I dont have patience and I cant squad down for too long. hehe tummy too big. Im not saying MF is bad or wrong. when playing with the tamron SP90, i MF a lot, didnt like it, but thats the lens I borrowed, thats how I use it. That said, the SP90 hunts a lot.


Added on July 4, 2012, 1:58 pm
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jul 4 2012, 01:53 PM)
lol.
no la, thats why i rephrase...still need to roughly set the MF distance...and depends on distance to subject also.
of cos closer it is, the DoF thinner...but its still 5cm at the minimum...just simply set the MF scale roughly around there enough already...
not like some lenses DoF can be like 2cm only tongue.gif
*
yup. I guess the best advice is to learn the lens that you have and live with it(if cant, then sell it lo). All the reviews would not mean anything unless you take it and use it. brows.gif

This post has been edited by gerald7: Jul 4 2012, 01:58 PM
f5calvin
post Jul 4 2012, 09:42 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


tammy 17-50 non vc is now 1250..jz for info..

user posted image
Dispersion! by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

Dispersion effect..
hidden830726
post Jul 4 2012, 10:29 PM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jul 4 2012, 09:42 PM)
tammy 17-50 non vc is now 1250..jz for info..

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Dispersion effect..
*
How u make the effect? on camera or post processing?
onscreen
post Jul 4 2012, 10:56 PM

Nomby
****
Senior Member
675 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ, Selangor


Its a photoshop effect. Displacement effect. An abstract digital art form that took the world by storm as the style were greatly mastered and used in the year between 2006 ~ 2010.
f5calvin
post Jul 5 2012, 12:02 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Jul 4 2012, 10:29 PM)
How u make the effect? on camera or post processing?
*
photoshopped.. Quite simple..all u need is brush plug-in.. this is first time im doin it so vy rough work..
Calvin Seak
post Jul 5 2012, 12:37 AM

Hiring, TTDI, KL only
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Oct 2008

QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jul 5 2012, 12:02 AM)
photoshopped.. Quite simple..all u need is brush plug-in.. this is first time im doin it so vy rough work..
*
Is that you in real life? biggrin.gif

Nice nice!
piscesguy
post Jul 5 2012, 07:10 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,965 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
user posted image

Busy Tourist at Petaling Street.

Wide open at F1.8, 1/100sec , ISO800


hidden830726
post Jul 5 2012, 07:29 AM

Moko the Linaslayer
*******
Senior Member
2,847 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jul 5 2012, 07:10 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Busy Tourist at Petaling Street.

Wide open at F1.8, 1/100sec , ISO800
*
hmm, my humble view, street photograph pov..... can improve. hmm.gif

This post has been edited by hidden830726: Jul 5 2012, 07:30 AM
f5calvin
post Jul 5 2012, 08:44 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Jul 5 2012, 12:37 AM)
Is that you in real life? biggrin.gif

Nice nice!
*
No it's not me like that in real life..u'll see me in a whole person..haha..Lol..
Everdying
post Jul 5 2012, 08:47 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i think nikon is going to release a new expensive flash soon tongue.gif
f5calvin
post Jul 5 2012, 08:55 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jul 5 2012, 08:47 AM)
i think nikon is going to release a new expensive flash soon tongue.gif
*
Why u think so? Nikon now has the best flash sb910.. i dun think it'll release leh..
Everdying
post Jul 5 2012, 08:58 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jul 5 2012, 08:55 AM)
Why u think so? Nikon now has the best flash sb910.. i dun think it'll release leh..
*
cos canon released this - http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/03/02/Canon-EOS-Accesories

f5calvin
post Jul 5 2012, 09:06 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


oh i see..haha..maybe next yr..
celciuz
post Jul 5 2012, 09:14 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
With the 600EX-RT appearing, those radio triggers company is going to get hit. *Cough* PocketWiz haha!

*makes me regret getting it sad.gif*
seather
post Jul 5 2012, 09:31 AM

xXxXxXxXx
******
Senior Member
1,335 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jul 5 2012, 08:47 AM)
i think nikon is going to release a new expensive flash soon tongue.gif
*
sweat.gif sweat.gif i juz bought a SB910 ler

SB1000 hmm.gif laugh.gif

126 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0277sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 01:02 PM