Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

167 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Sony RX100, New standard for compact camera ?

views
     
lwliam
post Jul 31 2012, 02:56 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(0300078 @ Jul 27 2012, 08:54 AM)
yup camera looks nice but still it is Sony to me.... need to wait till the mass got the camera and more review come out first then only decide.
Got feeling next year compact will all come with big sensor. Especially something from canon. G1x already fitted with big sensor but then come a EOS-M which fit a even bigger sensor into a body. So now i am looking forward on what is the G2x and S105 gonna look like. Bigger sensor + faster lens.
*
So basically you're just branding yourself as a sheep.. who only follow what others do, without having any standpoint of your own. How sad.
aquos
post Jul 31 2012, 04:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
215 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 31 2012, 02:56 AM)
So basically you're just branding yourself as a sheep.. who only follow what others do, without having any standpoint of your own. How sad.
*
Don't be sad because many people feel this way about Sony. Only Sony think they
are still a premium brand and can charge a premium price for their products. Many
consumers dont agree thats why they are loosing billions every year. That being said
I think RX100 is at the top of its class now and I will buy it but I still wish it was some
other brand instead of Sony tongue.gif

This post has been edited by aquos: Jul 31 2012, 04:08 AM
0300078
post Jul 31 2012, 08:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,447 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 31 2012, 02:56 AM)
So basically you're just branding yourself as a sheep.. who only follow what others do, without having any standpoint of your own. How sad.
*
i nvr said i am following anyone. Just that what makes Sony thinks they can sell that camera premium?

Yes the sensor of it is just tat bit bigger than those enthusiastic P&S. But then it does not shine in any other things, first design it is seriously outmatch by Fuji x series (for the classy and elegant premium look), second it is not have the fastest lens in it rank (it doesn't even win the year old Olympus XZ-1), third it does not look like a serious P&S like G1X (yes the size is big but hey at least the main sell point is the sensor size + all the control). fourth its feature doesnt even come near Nikon 1 series which is really wow in this factor. Last but to least, it is not the smallest in the rank too (canon still give us a good s series).

So what i see Sony is... they are trying to achieve everything but end up does not do anything as good as their opponent. For the price they ask for, i think is still abit too much for a jack of all trade master of none P&S.
zstan
post Jul 31 2012, 09:04 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(aquos @ Jul 31 2012, 04:04 AM)
Don't be sad because many people feel this way about Sony. Only Sony think they
are still a premium brand and can charge a premium price for their products. Many
consumers dont agree thats why they are loosing billions every year. That being said
I think RX100 is at the top of its class now and I will buy it but I still wish it was some
other brand instead of Sony  tongue.gif
*
Seriously? The cameras that Sony offer for the same price compared to its competitors offers much much more features and value for me.

And only Sony Malaysia is pricing it this high. Like what other forummers have mentioned, Taiwan/Singapore/Hong Kong are selling it at much cheaper prices. If you wanna bash also bash the correct entity la.


Added on July 31, 2012, 9:21 am
QUOTE(0300078 @ Jul 31 2012, 08:57 AM)
i nvr said i am following anyone. Just that what makes Sony thinks they can sell that camera premium?

Yes the sensor of it is just tat bit bigger than those enthusiastic P&S. But then it does not shine in any other things, first design it is seriously outmatch by Fuji x series (for the classy and elegant premium look), second it is not have the fastest lens in it rank (it doesn't even win the year old Olympus XZ-1), third it does not look like a serious P&S like G1X (yes the size is big but hey at least the main sell point is the sensor size + all the control). fourth its feature doesnt even come near Nikon 1 series which is really wow in this factor. Last but to least, it is not the smallest in the rank too (canon still give us a good s series).

So what i see Sony is... they are trying to achieve everything but end up does not do anything as good as their opponent. For the price they ask for, i think is still abit too much for a jack of all trade master of none P&S.
*
Lol. You have to use so many cameras to compare against this rx100 to find its flaws? I fail to see your analysis is fair when you dont even bother to mention about detail rendering/high ISO performance/ AF speed/ video mode/ Etc.

An have you even tried the rx100 by yourself before claiming that other cameras are much better? laugh.gif by the way te sensor is not a bit bigger than P&S sensors, it's at least twice the size bigger. It's not a jack of all trades, the whole point of the camera is having a large sized sensor P&S with a bright f1.8 Zeiss lens on the wide end that is pocketable. It doesn't look 'serious' because buyers would like to be discreet with theis camera. If they wanted attention they would have used their DSLRs. If you are looking to shoot far away objects with this camera in low light then I totally agree with you that this camera is not for you.

Just wondering, how do you define 'wow' factor though?'wow because the button layouts for the Nikon 1 is so thoughtfully arranged?'

This post has been edited by zstan: Jul 31 2012, 09:21 AM
Joseph Hahn
post Jul 31 2012, 09:27 AM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
QUOTE(0300078 @ Jul 30 2012, 05:59 PM)
i dunno for that much price paid i dont get much differences from s100 and xz-1, and lets see what the LX6 gonna be price at? I seriously hope that Canon next installment gonna kill all this overprice enthusiastic P&C and make them back to the price they should be.That is RM1600-RM1800.
*
Well that's the point of having competition. nod.gif
0300078
post Jul 31 2012, 09:33 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,447 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


QUOTE(zstan @ Jul 31 2012, 09:04 AM)
Seriously? The cameras that Sony offer for the same price compared to its competitors offers much much more features and value for me.

And only Sony Malaysia is pricing it this high. Like what other forummers have mentioned, Taiwan/Singapore/Hong Kong are selling it at much cheaper prices. If you wanna bash also bash the correct entity la.


Added on July 31, 2012, 9:21 am
Lol. You have to use so many cameras to compare against this rx100 to find its flaws? I fail to see your analysis is fair when you dont even bother to mention about detail rendering/high ISO performance/ AF speed/ video mode/ Etc.

An have you even tried the rx100 by yourself before claiming that other cameras are much better? laugh.gif  by the way te sensor is not a bit bigger than P&S sensors, it's at least twice the size bigger. It's not a jack of all trades, the whole point of the camera is having a large sized sensor P&S with a bright f1.8 Zeiss lens on the wide end that is pocketable. It doesn't look 'serious' because buyers would like to be discreet with theis camera. If they wanted attention they would have used their DSLRs.  If you are looking to shoot far away objects with this camera in low light then I totally agree with you that this camera is not for you.

Just wondering, how do you define 'wow' factor though?'wow because the button layouts for the Nikon 1 is so thoughtfully arranged?'
*
guess we all have different point of view. Just enjoy the camera. No point argue also. Ppl like it will still buy it. Not like i hate the camera just i dont like the way they price it only. Ok peace peace for all the others. icon_rolleyes.gif
lwliam
post Jul 31 2012, 09:36 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


as quoted from my friend:

Ferrari good meh?
I read from a proton reviewer said lousy wei...
the brake no as good as BMW
Low power vs veyron
no aero like lambo
Lousy la
Lucky I didn't test drive it...
Problem?

This post has been edited by lwliam: Jul 31 2012, 09:46 AM
Joseph Hahn
post Jul 31 2012, 09:43 AM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
Oh look. RM2388 at Shashinki.

http://j.mp/NgB0Le
zstan
post Jul 31 2012, 10:08 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ Jul 31 2012, 09:43 AM)
Oh look. RM2388 at Shashinki.

http://j.mp/NgB0Le
*
If Shashinki can sell it at 2388 I believe street prices should be around 21XX
sniper on the roof
post Jul 31 2012, 10:29 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 31 2012, 02:56 AM)
So basically you're just branding yourself as a sheep.. who only follow what others do, without having any standpoint of your own. How sad.
*
Admittedly.. My first reaction was also "uh-oh.. Where's sony gonna screw up this time".

Cant help it as my previous limited experience with Sony is that their products are designed by marketing department for uber specs to look good on paper. Like my hx9v.. Awesome vid but as a camera.. Exp comp is in a menu.. P and M mode is there for show only.. Totally unusable etc.

But looking at the RX100 thus far.. Shud applaud Sony for finally getting out of their variation of a theme mentality and making an enthusiast product lo.

QUOTE(0300078 @ Jul 31 2012, 08:57 AM)
i nvr said i am following anyone. Just that what makes Sony thinks they can sell that camera premium?

Yes the sensor of it is just tat bit bigger than those enthusiastic P&S. But then it does not shine in any other things, first design it is seriously outmatch by Fuji x series (for the classy and elegant premium look), second it is not have the fastest lens in it rank (it doesn't even win the year old Olympus XZ-1), third it does not look like a serious P&S like G1X (yes the size is big but hey at least the main sell point is the sensor size + all the control). fourth its feature doesnt even come near Nikon 1 series which is really wow in this factor. Last but to least, it is not the smallest in the rank too (canon still give us a good s series).

So what i see Sony is... they are trying to achieve everything but end up does not do anything as good as their opponent. For the price they ask for, i think is still abit too much for a jack of all trade master of none P&S.
*
I think their pricing make sense since X10 started this price point. G1X also at this price point and RX100 as a package has strong enough sell point to counter them. Biz must make money wat... But as cheapo consumer.. Probably will wait for price drop tongue.gif
gregy
post Jul 31 2012, 10:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
411 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ Jul 30 2012, 04:50 PM)
Overprice is a relative term. It's like saying normal mortals won't buy Leica because it's stupidly overpriced. But it still sells.

To me RX100 is a very interesting package. And i also blame Fuji for overpricing the X10 lol but they have a tough job to come up with a successor to beat Sony. The X Pro-1 is even more over inflated but still sells like hot cakes. rclxub.gif
*
The X-Pro1 is fairly priced, considering the sensor technology that it has. Fuji's X-Trans CMOS sensor cost a lot to build from scratch, plus it doesn't have the numbers as traditional 2x2 pixel Bayer layouts. So, regardless of who makes the sensor for Fujfilm, you can bet that it costs way more simply because it doesn't have economies of scale, same thing as the Foveon. However, the output from that X-Trans sensor needs to be experienced firsthand to believe just how much better it is compared to Bayer (though it does still lose out to Foveon albeit slightly).

Here, download this photo and see for yourself. http://www.magezinepublishing.com/equipmen..._1331483113.jpg

Mind you, no AA filter, yet no moire. Try sharpening the file just slightly and see if you like it better.

This post has been edited by gregy: Jul 31 2012, 10:42 AM
Joseph Hahn
post Jul 31 2012, 10:39 AM

kpop k
*******
Senior Member
6,410 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: MLK
You're right. I forgot that they make their own sensor. Must've cost a lot for R&D and stuffs.

QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 31 2012, 10:29 AM)
But as cheapo consumer.. Probably will wait for price drop tongue.gif
*
Maybe you're waiting for XZ-2? tongue.gif
lwliam
post Jul 31 2012, 10:56 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Sniper, I've tested the rx100. Overall it's a good PnS. But coming from a dslr background, the only thing lacking in a PnS is the ability to quickly shift focusing points. Something which can be easily overcome with a touchscreen. Wide area AF sometimes just doesn't cut it. It's unpredictable. My dad's GF3 is nice to use because of that, can't say the same of my nex3. Makes me feel like wanting to upgrade to NEX 5n for the same reason. In the rx100, I feel it's missing this feature. Else it's a very very capable camera esp with the f/1.8 at the wide end.
sniper on the roof
post Jul 31 2012, 11:28 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(lwliam @ Jul 31 2012, 10:56 AM)
Sniper, I've tested the rx100. Overall it's a good PnS. But coming from a dslr background, the only thing lacking in a PnS is the ability to quickly shift focusing points. Something which can be easily overcome with a touchscreen. Wide area AF sometimes just doesn't cut it. It's unpredictable. My dad's GF3 is nice to use because of that, can't say the same of my nex3. Makes me feel like wanting to upgrade to NEX 5n for the same reason. In the rx100, I feel it's missing this feature. Else it's a very very capable camera esp with the f/1.8 at the wide end.
*
Haven't personally played with one so reserve judgement first.

You mean cannot switch to single AF point and move it around? hmm.gif


Added on July 31, 2012, 11:30 am
QUOTE(Joseph Hahn @ Jul 31 2012, 10:39 AM)
Maybe you're waiting for XZ-2? tongue.gif
*
*fingers crossed*

Hopefully Oly and Sony are now good friends.

This post has been edited by sniper on the roof: Jul 31 2012, 11:30 AM
lwliam
post Jul 31 2012, 11:56 AM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


Can, but it's very slow to move from one side of the screen to the other. It's faster on a dedicated system like a dslr/t, and not to mention, touchscreen.
Ryou
post Jul 31 2012, 11:13 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
866 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(0300078 @ Jul 31 2012, 08:57 AM)
i nvr said i am following anyone. Just that what makes Sony thinks they can sell that camera premium?

Yes the sensor of it is just tat bit bigger than those enthusiastic P&S. But then it does not shine in any other things, first design it is seriously outmatch by Fuji x series (for the classy and elegant premium look), second it is not have the fastest lens in it rank (it doesn't even win the year old Olympus XZ-1), third it does not look like a serious P&S like G1X (yes the size is big but hey at least the main sell point is the sensor size + all the control). fourth its feature doesnt even come near Nikon 1 series which is really wow in this factor. Last but to least, it is not the smallest in the rank too (canon still give us a good s series).

So what i see Sony is... they are trying to achieve everything but end up does not do anything as good as their opponent. For the price they ask for, i think is still abit too much for a jack of all trade master of none P&S.
*
It's only Sony Malaysia doing this. They overprice their products which are priced comparatively cheaper in other countries.

In fact, Nikon & Canon do tend to overprice their products globally.
aquos
post Aug 2 2012, 11:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
215 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Scenes of Jalan Alor shot by someone with RX100 and posted on Dpreview.
Nice rclxms.gif

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...thread=42172185
sniper on the roof
post Aug 3 2012, 12:47 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
VIP
23,414 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Taipei
QUOTE(aquos @ Aug 2 2012, 11:34 PM)
Scenes of Jalan Alor shot by someone with RX100 and posted on Dpreview.
Nice rclxms.gif

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...thread=42172185
*
Hmmm... the dynamic range doesn't look too good here.
alangeorge
post Aug 4 2012, 04:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
205 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
Sony Msia RM2499
YL Camera RM2480
Shashinki RM2388

anyone know any other prices in KL?
zstan
post Aug 4 2012, 05:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Aug 3 2012, 12:47 AM)
Hmmm... the dynamic range doesn't look too good here.
*
could always use DRO to boost to DR. hmm.gif

QUOTE(alangeorge @ Aug 4 2012, 04:45 PM)
Sony Msia RM2499
YL Camera RM2480
Shashinki RM2388

anyone know any other prices in KL?
*
someone told me he found 22XX but not sure where

167 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0194sec    0.52    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:43 AM