QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 8 2012, 10:36 AM)
Hi sifu Andy. Big rant there. I generally agree with your rant. Let me just add in somemore.
WP7 wasn't meant to replace Windows Mobile. As you've mentioned, it started out from Zune Music player. They went with clean slate approach for making a new mobile phone OS with no input from the Windows Mobile ppl. Basically a new perspective, fresh set of eyes & ideas approach. Of course you'll notice there's a lot of iPhone traits in there but at the same time it's also very different. The approach though is the same, strip all complexity out & make it as simple as possible to do something. Of course for us who are used to Symbian/Windows Mobile this will come as a shock, but quite honestly it wasn't meant to target us. It's meant to be a 3rd choice in between the iPhone & Android, to sit in the middle & show that there's another way, maybe better way to do things. Though honestly this is mostly targeted at ppl who have not used Symbian/Windows Mobile. In this regard, WP7 actually is very good & succeeds in my opinion. Go to Youtube & search for those 'Smoked by Windows Phones' videos, you'll be surprised how good it is.

Good info there; Yes, that's how I see it too, to sit between iOS and Android, but if we put in MeeGo, it's a better choice; It's just sad that it was abandon and born pre-maturely. It has many potential, when it matures, it can easily outclass all the other OS, it has the smoothness and reliability of iOS, it can also be more flexible and powerful than Android (they should add a proper Desktop homescreen on MeeGo as it matures, it can be an option for user who prefers it).
As for the reason about "strips all the complexity out & make it simple as possible to do something". If the complexity you mean is the power and flexibility, then I STRONGLY DISAGREE this part.
I'm a software developer myself, this is SO WRONG. you don't STRIP, you MAKE IT SIMPLE but still maintain what it can do.
Example:
Photoshop is a powerful tool, complex, etc. You don't STRIP away what it can do to, you make things simple and provide easy access to features, make it more user/beginner friendly.
Cameras can be very complex, but you don't STRIP away, you make easy access or functions for users, like "SCENE modes", "Intelligent Auto", etc.
In you talk about iOS and Windows Phone, the OS is like removing everything, and only provide you with AUTO and SCENE modes.
That is so wrong to me and it's not the way... BUT think about it... in a way, it benefits them:
1. User will never improve and advance, they will rely on it.
2. When they touch something more complex, they can't cope and will not use it. HARD FACTS: Change is hard. (somemore trying something new)
This way, in a way, they will make their users stick to them (except those that will explore and want freedom or soemething more).
QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 8 2012, 10:36 AM)
Non-user replaceable battery is not a bad design trait to me, but what happens when sometimes you explore different materials to use to make a phone chassis. I applaud Nokia for daring to be different to try other materials even though I ended up with 2 phones that have non-user replaceable battery. U now see other ppl start to copy Nokia designs instead.
Yes, not a bad design, but many people dislike this idea. It makes the design of the phone nicer, but make people still don't like it because you remove their freedom to replace battery; Or when the device refuse to start, you have no options to remove the battery and try another battery, and so many other reasons.
QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 8 2012, 10:36 AM)
I thought EDOF cameras are only used by Nokia? Actually it's not bad at all. I've recommended 2 colleagues to get Nokia 701 & my sis to get Nokia E6, all with EDOF cameras. Surprisingly they all loved the camera & I've seen the pics they've taken. EDOF also takes idiot-proof videos since everything is clear & in focus all the time. No focus hunting. Of course u can't do macro shots but none of them are complaining at all.
It were used by Nokia before, iPhone too. Later Nokia have autofocus is most (if not all) their high end devices. I think in somewhere sometimes, there were talk/critisize about iPhone's EDOF.
If not wrong, Jobs gives lame excuses like "it's fast, there's no need to waste time to focus" or something like that.
That's just plain lame.
First of all, auto-focus is a feature, you should made it available and let user to turn it OFF or ON. It should also have options like "only capture when focus is lock, or you can capture even not lock" which is for continuous auto-focus mode. Even with those that have no option, I simply just switch to LANDSCAPE mode, it works like EDOF........
Somehow later, Nokia adop EDOF on the E7, which looks like the N8 but with qwerty.
Then, they give the similar lame reasoning.