Is hybrid worth it?

d way u god praise a forte gives d assumption that u feel ur driving an audi. No more to that. Period.

Best value 2.0L is forte.  Give u d benefit of doubt (which ur alr most definite wrong), even ur forte is d best value for money NOW, what happens when u sell 5 yrs later? u gonna bleed like a girl menstruating kiddo.  money lost then can cover value gained now?  Value is perception, but real money lost when u sell then its d real thing.  Y are u so less intelligent?

Unless u keep ur forte for 20yrs, then i lose.  but not impossible looking at u driving a vios for 9 yrs. 20 yrs is just 9 X 2, + another 2. way to go dude!

Just now mazda 6, now camry, next?

what i drive is my problem. i dun need u to know what i drive.

If u compare even a vios and forte, industry players are not stupid to put a 1.5l car similar price to a 2.0l kiddo.

remember this rule - gd things r not cheap, cheap things are not good.

u have a long long way to go and learn.

sad but true

Bro ure not getting the point. Would Americans still buy the Camry if it came with 2 airbags and a 10 yr old gearbox and engine? But Malaysians are still doing that despite having to pay so much more. So u cant compare Americans and Malaysians and say both are the same. Yes both may support the same brand but they are not supporting the same specs at the same price level. If the current Camry came with the same specs as its American counterparts, even i might be tempted to get the Camry ( that is if i can overcome the poor design). 

if everybody in Mysia buys Vios,City,Civic,Avanza we will be like Bangladesh, Indonesia and Cambodia in no time..

Sorry no offense.

What taste or intelligence you think you have if u can't even differentiate some finer things in  life such as soft-padded dashboard and trip computers? (fd2 didn't even come with one mind you).

Cheers..

fd2 was produced in 2006, most prob design in 2003 onwards. touch screen, navigation tat time was considered high end features.

if im brainless like the way u think and talk, even a 520i today RM330k does not come with a reverse camera.

Alza today comes with a reverse camera

Based on ur brainless comment, alza is a finer car?

what utter rubbish

yeh bro, i totally get your point. as you can see, i'm not saying that the camry or the civic ain't overpriced, they are in fact overpriced when compared to the korean marques, but hey kia and hyundai are represented by AP king Naza and  government owned SDAC... they are not playing on the same ground since day 1.

my argument is actually directed to those that are trying to convince everyone that the rest of the world had abandoned the japanese which ain't true at all.

I dont think anybody has said that the world has abandoned the Japs. The sales figures are proof of that. But what many ppl are saying is that the Japanese will become irrelevent in time if they dont keep up with the tech especially when not only the Koreans but also the Europeans are starting to better equip their cars in Asia while still offering affordable pricing.

I dont think anybody has said that the world has abandoned the Japs. The sales figures are proof of that. But what many ppl are saying is that the Japanese will become irrelevent in time if they dont keep up with the tech especially when not only the Koreans but also the Europeans are starting to better equip their cars in Asia while still offering affordable pricing.

Plus Cody did highlight upon one fact, both Hyundai and KIA are carried by government linked companies so who knows what sort of benefits they have when their cars are assembled and imported here? Not sure if UMW is the same, but it probably has some government links as well.

i would say yes. but, just.

the premium over the basic spec 1.8L is nearly 5k. and with all the gadgetry i.e leather seats (outside install maybe 2k average), push start button keyless entry keyless start ( another 2k? if install outside ), etc, however the best bit the hybrid is CBU which means quality should be top notch.
a new powerful engine is another new stuff but i dont quite agree with the price tag actually.

people keep asking about test driving the hybrid, but so far i dont see any branch offering it

NEWS - Honda planned to CKD Hybrid in Melaka starting end 2012. First car = Jazz Hybrid.

Typical Malaysian mentality. Just becoz Honda made a few good model like eg, ek, fd doesn't mean fb will be great. In everyone's mind, Honda resale value must be good. This is not true. Go check out a 10 year old accord. S86 trade in price is less than 25k. Retail for 140k back in 2002. U r getting less than 20% of what u have paid. Even a 10 year old wira beat accord, it gets 10k for trade in vs 45k when it was new.

I have nothing against Honda but Neither i worship them. They made a few great models and at d same time, they fail big time e.g. city cvt gearbox.

IMHO, car manufacturers in Malaysia are just being greedy. They know how to take full advantage of car lovers here. Seriously, just look at jazz hybrid. US could sell them at 20k usd yet we r paying close to 100k eventhough it is tax free. Imagine how much Honda Malaysia pocket?

One big question. Comparing Civic 1.8 Vs Civic Hybrid, which one would have better RSV? I am looking at both. However CH seems to have better value for money. Pay additional 3k - get more features. Maintenance wise, CH is slightly more exp than C1.8.
Thanks for comments =).

i heard excise and import duty waiver will end in dec 2013 for hybrid cars . it mean to say fully imported CBU hybrid will be very expensive.

thats why Honda will be manufacturing Hybrid cars locally with Jazz as the appetizer .

if you want and like fully imported japanese made Hybrid car , do consider to buy before Dec2013.

btw , i have booked a Civic Hybrid a few days ago. so hard for me to choose between the Teana 2.0L and this Honda City hybrid
as the Teana is about 15K more only.

anybody booked civic?