QUOTE(Ramjade @ Oct 28 2024, 11:59 PM)
There are few ways to go about it.
1. Just buy any fund and be done with it. That is what most people does.
2. For me, I want to have my cake and eat it too. That's means I want income tax relief and maximise my gains.
If you see majority of the funds sold by prs all focus on Malaysia market only (maybe ? directive from SEC/BMM behind close doors) I choose the fund which have the most overseas exposure (US). Remember, I am always negative towards ringgit and Malaysin market. Before this I was a principal prs Asia Pacific dynamic investor. I switch for more US exposure after emperor Xi fiasco and when principal intro fund with exposure to US.
It's not actively managed per se but I do monitor the performance and any new fund which is intro to FSM like once a year. If and when they have a fund that track the S&P500 or the US market like 40-50% of it, I will move my money into the fund. Remember it's a long term fund. So if you can get say 10%p.a why not over a measly 2-4%p.a. The difference over long term is significant.
QUOTE
If you see majority of the funds sold by prs all focus on Malaysia market only (maybe ? directive from SEC/BMM behind close doors) I choose the fund which have the most overseas exposure (US). Remember, I am always negative towards ringgit and Malaysin market. Before this I was a principal prs Asia Pacific dynamic investor. I switch for more US exposure after emperor Xi fiasco and when principal intro fund with exposure to US.
When PRS first entered the market, there were concerns that because it was a new fund, it may not be able to scale to a certain size. As such, most fund house either do via feeder (like principal) or fund of fund (AHAM) structure, this is to reduce cost and build track record.
Those funds that focus mainly on Malaysia, most likely invest directly in securities/stocks, therefore would likely mean they went for the cheapest path and easiest to build track record because that is where most of their expertise lies.
Therefore, it is not a directive by SC or BNM but rather fund houses considered the fact that its a slow product and difficult to scale to size.
This post has been edited by aurora97: Oct 29 2024, 04:50 PM