yea i got the letter too! awesome.. finally we see the light at the end of the tunnel! woohoo!!
Mah Sing Group to launch new M Residence@Rawang, from the star
Mah Sing Group to launch new M Residence@Rawang, from the star
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 08:31 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
46 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
yea i got the letter too! awesome.. finally we see the light at the end of the tunnel! woohoo!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 08:51 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
176 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Congratulations to all phase 1 & 2 owners. Although mr 2 still long time to wait, but also happy to heard that
|
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 09:23 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
121 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(koigh @ Jun 24 2014, 05:59 PM) Yes, i also received letter from MS that VP is expected on 31 July.... Please do not sign for the reason :-But guys, need your advice, should i sign the below letter? How about if i not agree with the amount later? 1. No certified architect certification showing in the document that the vp will be on end of July 2. Ms did not disclose how much $ and rates they will compensate on late vp. 3. Once you signed the document, you are legally agree on whatever payment term from MS in whatever amount |
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
73 posts Joined: Nov 2013 |
QUOTE(Jigjig @ Jun 24 2014, 09:23 PM) Please do not sign for the reason :- I think you should read letter properly first.1. No certified architect certification showing in the document that the vp will be on end of July 2. Ms did not disclose how much $ and rates they will compensate on late vp. 3. Once you signed the document, you are legally agree on whatever payment term from MS in whatever amount The letter mention ".... the payment of liquidated damages for the late delivery of the Vacant Possession (VP) pursuant to Clause 22 of the SPA shall be issued in favor of ________" In SPA, the Clause 22 states that "If the vendor fails to deliver VP of the said bulding in manner stipulated in Clause 23 within time stipulated in subclause (1), the Vendor shall be liable to pay to the Purchaser liquidated damages calculated from day to day at the rate of 10% per annum of the purchase price from the expiry date of the delivery of VP in subclause (1) until the date the purchaser take VC of the said building......" So I don't think they can simply decide funny T&C to cheat us. Also, 31st July is just an indication, it might be earlier, or later. Doesn't matter when the VP will be, it will be taken into account to the liquidated damages payment. Just my 2 cents This post has been edited by bennycfw: Jun 24 2014, 10:15 PM |
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 11:01 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
121 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
QUOTE(bennycfw @ Jun 24 2014, 10:14 PM) I think you should read letter properly first. Can you tell me why need to sign this document if all terms and conditions already implicated in s&p ? Are they doing 2x job ?The letter mention ".... the payment of liquidated damages for the late delivery of the Vacant Possession (VP) pursuant to Clause 22 of the SPA shall be issued in favor of ________" In SPA, the Clause 22 states that "If the vendor fails to deliver VP of the said bulding in manner stipulated in Clause 23 within time stipulated in subclause (1), the Vendor shall be liable to pay to the Purchaser liquidated damages calculated from day to day at the rate of 10% per annum of the purchase price from the expiry date of the delivery of VP in subclause (1) until the date the purchaser take VC of the said building......" So I don't think they can simply decide funny T&C to cheat us. Also, 31st July is just an indication, it might be earlier, or later. Doesn't matter when the VP will be, it will be taken into account to the liquidated damages payment. Just my 2 cents |
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 11:12 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
73 posts Joined: Nov 2013 |
QUOTE(Jigjig @ Jun 24 2014, 11:01 PM) Can you tell me why need to sign this document if all terms and conditions already implicated in s&p ? Are they doing 2x job ? This letter is not to ask you whether you agree or not, this is to let you decide what name(s) to be put on the cheque. If you do not reply, they will still issue the cheque with the purchaser name(s) stated in the SPA. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 24 2014, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
205 posts Joined: Apr 2012 |
QUOTE(bennycfw @ Jun 24 2014, 11:12 PM) This letter is not to ask you whether you agree or not, this is to let you decide what name(s) to be put on the cheque. If you do not reply, they will still issue the cheque with the purchaser name(s) stated in the SPA. I just curious about last paragraph"Upon receipt of the payment, i shall have no futher claims...." Why we need to agree that before received actual calculation? If name for the cheque, they can follow s&p, no doubt coz that are the owner. Cannot be i bought the house but put other people name on s&p, right? |
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
205 posts Joined: Apr 2012 |
QUOTE(Jigjig @ Jun 24 2014, 09:23 PM) Please do not sign for the reason :- Yes, i not going sign this letter. They can follow s&p for the name on cheque....s&p is my name, why need do this double job.....cannot see the logic behind...1. No certified architect certification showing in the document that the vp will be on end of July 2. Ms did not disclose how much $ and rates they will compensate on late vp. 3. Once you signed the document, you are legally agree on whatever payment term from MS in whatever amount |
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 06:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
121 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 09:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: West Malaysia |
QUOTE(koigh @ Jun 25 2014, 12:07 AM) Yes, i not going sign this letter. They can follow s&p for the name on cheque....s&p is my name, why need do this double job.....cannot see the logic behind... some snp have more than 1 names, if cheque written there two or more names, means need to open a new bank account with joint names? |
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 09:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,096 posts Joined: Oct 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 09:53 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Apr 2009 From: West Malaysia |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 10:11 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
37 posts Joined: Jan 2012 |
Anyone can share thoughts on renovation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2014, 10:20 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
73 posts Joined: Nov 2013 |
QUOTE(cmk96 @ Jun 25 2014, 09:46 AM) the buyers should hv a joint name account already when they applied the loan. just bank in to the same bank. thats it. This is not always true, like what spreeee said, the buyers might not have the joint account as they might be siblings. MS give you the convenience to decide the payee name. Whatever it is, I am just sharing my thought, if it doesn't sound favorable to you, you can just ignore it. This post has been edited by bennycfw: Jun 25 2014, 10:24 AM |
|
|
Jun 26 2014, 07:49 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
36 posts Joined: Mar 2014 |
I think ms should pay according to Snp. As all of them have the share if the house. It might have dispute later it payment is make to 1 of them only
|
|
|
Jun 26 2014, 08:48 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Aug 2012 |
Hi all~ I'm interested in phase 1 corner lot sub-sale, plz pm me~
|
|
|
Jun 26 2014, 11:01 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Jun 2014 |
hi
|
|
|
Jun 26 2014, 11:03 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Jun 2014 |
may i know the m residence will hand over the key b4 31 july? bcoz recently received a letter and afraid that will postpone and postpone again, haizz.. and anyone know m1 phase 1 have guard house or not?
|
|
|
Jun 27 2014, 12:36 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
478 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2014, 12:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,559 posts Joined: Oct 2004 |
according to Mah Sing, Architect advice VP on 31st July 2014. This mean by the time owner receive the letter, it will be August. IMO, it will be either August or September looking at Hari Raya holiday at end of July.
IMO, the letter just indication of Cheque Bearing name. My SnP has 2 names (mine and my sister in law) but loan under 1 name (sister in law). If the cheque issue under 2 name, then i'll have problem banking in. I help my sister in law to purchase a unit and i can't cancel my name according to Mah Sing rules. This post has been edited by jason_chee: Jun 30 2014, 12:18 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0343sec
0.93
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 11:03 AM |