Glad you brought this up. I myself am wondering why you lost see it fit to say something about us everyday without provocation when we aren't considered worthy rivals?

Now let me look into this article.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/sports/2011-1...nt_14111071.htm?

So the FA has decided to charge Suarez over an alleged racial comment and Suarez is still pleading "not guilty". If indeed he did use the term, "Negrito", as alleged by Evra, then he is guilty regardless of how acceptable it is in South America. This is after all England, where anti-racism sentiments are strong. Forget the allegations (I like how often this word is used a lot in this case) that his manc buddies call him the same name. It's a case of "only my friends can call me that". It is true however that the term, "Negrito" is indeed a term of endearment in South America.
However Suarez should be sensitive to the fact that those from other continents may take offence to it. If he did utter the word, I think it was more out of naivety than hostility but should be fined nonetheless for when in someone else's house, we should respect their rules. I can understand him not wanting to please guilty though especially if he didn't mean it as an insult. It's what I would do and if anyone here tells me they'll plead guilty to a crime they didn't intend to commit, then you're a bigger man than me. This is all assuming the allegations turn out to be true.

Wonder what the outcome of Terry's case will be now given that there is alleged (here's that word again) video evidence of him uttering a racist word.

To anyone who thinks these cases are that straightforward, not bothering to do research of reading before commenting, it's why there are people with different intelligence levels around.

Bringing up the Giggs or Rooney debacles doesn't mean it's ok for any of our players to commit similar heinous acts. It does however lend credit to the fact that there are so many hypocrites out there who are so willing to air someone else's dirty laundry without first cleaning up their own house. I don't care why Giggs did what he did, maybe he slipped and fell into her ***** or maybe they really are in love, I could care less. His personal life is his. All I know is I've always looked up to him as a model pro and that incident has kind of tarnished his image because I do not think you can accidentally do what he did. That being said, this is a separate issue and nothing to do with Suarez. All I ask is for people not to be hypocrites and if they have lost respect for Suarez, you have to have lost respect for Giggs as well.

Worse case, Suarez said what he said but I really doubt it was with malicious intent. He's played in Holland for years and there are a lot of dark skinned players and people there. If he was racist, it would have surfaced earlier although I'm sure there are those who will fail to comprehend logic like this. Like I said, he was naive but an example needs to be made and unfortunately for Suarez, it looks like he's on display. I believe they'll prove that he's guilty of saying it, but I doubt they'll prove he meant is as an insult and not as other South Americans mean it.

Right. You should know because you are suarez.

Wonder why they so eager to come here and post.Not like they have more than a brain cell to post anything proper and decent.
They should know better than anyone else that karma is biatch.We said come back when you have 18,it haunts us now.

Well they're doing it worse than what we did last time,so in the future they will pay for it.Though,it's too bad that they are all too short sighted
to realise it.

like you know? 

Right. You should know because you are suarez.

Right and those giving the verdict are mind readers.

Since juries and judged don't mid read, you base it on priors and he has none despite having playing in Holland for 5 years where if I recall there are a fair amount of dark skinned people who are either native to the country or surrounding countries like Surinam, and getting involved in charity work supporting solidarity, and fighting social inequality during the 2010 World Cup.

Do you disagree that it is used as a term of endearment in South America?

Ah but I may be biased of course so why don't you provide counter evidence?

If we go by your logic, the law only punishes repeat offenders?

First time I kill someone, no priors right? Drop the case then.

There is always a first time for everything.

If we go by your logic, the law only punishes repeat offenders?

First time I kill someone, no priors right? Drop the case then.

There is always a first time for everything.

Unlike in some courtrooms where a person is assumed guilty until he can be proven innocent, I believe in the opposite. Suarez may be proven guilty of uttering the word, "Negrito" and he may be banned a few games for it.

As for intent, he is innocent until proven guilty, no? Or do you all have a different belief system? The same one adopted by our courts in the prosecution of opposition members. How can we prove intent? I'm not genius but to me, it comes back to your prior convictions (or absence of them) and behaviour and as I have stated earlier, there are no priors to support his intent was malicious, in fact I've just stated evidence supporting quite the opposite. Well if you do believe that a person is guilty until proven innocent, then we really have nothing further to discuss. So you can ask me how I know to which I don't but let me ask you this is return. How do you know otherwise? Any prior offences to support your case?

No doubt some braniac will interject soon by going, "ah he said it so he's racist la" without giving it a single though whether through choice or merely absent of the ability to do so.