QUOTE(kEazYc @ Aug 3 2011, 07:57 PM)
I would like to share mine, i decided to get d7000 + kit + 35mm f1.8g, reason why i get that prime is because i know i'm going to shoot a lot of portrait shot + the bokehness, and of course some family photos or friends, and i know most of the place i will be are low lights, the f1.8 will helps a lot.
Fair enough. Hopefully you realise that owning the 35mm f/1.8 (or any good lens for that matter) does not do magic and automatically get you better pictures. You will be faced with different problems which is mostly user related.
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Aug 3 2011, 09:19 PM)
see the review shared by hidden, the G is way better than the D version..
the 50mm lens would be a 75mm lens due to the fact its an fx lens and you're having a dx body!
On a side note, it does not matter if it's FX or DX lens. Once mounted on a DX body, the 50mm FX lens gets a 75mm FOV.
A 35mm f/1.8 DX lens gets an equivalent of 52.5mm for FOV.
QUOTE(zizheng @ Aug 3 2011, 10:24 PM)
hello boys and girls. i'm rather new to cameras. but somehow i've spotted the coolpix p300. read some reviews and saw some videos. looks rather good and the disadvantages which comes with the camera is acceptable to me. any suggestions/recommendations/thoughts on P300? please do share. would also like to know if anyone has got one and whats the best bargain in KL? thanks!
Thom Hogan just posted a mini review of it. Have a read.
http://bythom.com/nikon-p300-review.htmQUOTE(chianping @ Aug 3 2011, 10:50 PM)
i have being using kit lens for the past year. wanna try to take some potrait with bigger aperture. Recently seen too many impressive bokeh pic so wanna try it out .Some might think it is a waste of money as it might be the photographer skill and not the lens or equip.
Yes, skill + equipment goes hand in hand.
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Aug 4 2011, 01:24 AM)
Thanks. I wonder what's causing the AF accuracy, possibly not enough contrast? It's on wide angle at f/5.6 shooting group, sometimes get these kind of "muddy" shot, not sure where it locks on, re-take again might be able to get it right. If happen at longer focal length on smaller subject, I suppose it's higher chance of back focusing? The main problem is it's not really visible in the viewfinder... what about FX viewfinder?
Muddy? In the centre part or at the side of the image? If you look at other objects in the image, do you get them sharp or the whole image is muddy? What wide angle lens is this?
f/5.6 on wide angle should dispel most problems with misfocus as it gives quite a huge DoF.