QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 31 2011, 12:45 AM)
No no, buy one ASAP and caress it day and night! Ahh! I need to change my pants. Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 12:49 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 12:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 12:44 AM) I'm already poisoned! Siggy or tammy 17-50mm f2.8? Siggy 24-70mm/18-50mm f2.8? 50 1.8D/1.4D/ 35 1.8G? 85 1.8D? So many lens I'm getting sick! 24 on DX is not wide enough, if you like to capture landscape and/or group photo. Test the Sigma or Tammy 17-50mm f/2.8.for the 50mm prime, get the f/1.8D if you're on budget, forget about the 1.4D; IMO, not worth spending on it, if you want to get the 1.4D, might be better to spend a little more and get the G or Sigma. 50mm on DX indoors is a bit tight too, 35mm on DX is just about right. Even with the 35mm on DX, it can still get a bit tight depend on the situation. But you already have 18-55mm right? I think you know the range well and what range you use more indoors. |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 12:58 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 31 2011, 12:51 AM) 24 on DX is not wide enough, if you like to capture landscape and/or group photo. Test the Sigma or Tammy 17-50mm f/2.8. Yeah, I didn't really like the 35 1.8 coz if I have the 17-50 f2.8 then there's hardly any difference really and another thing bout the 35mm is that it isn't a macro lens. I think the 17-50 will work just fine for indoors, just looking for a prime that will be good enough for outdoor, so my choice is 50mm but i've just do some search on flickr and found many d7000 uses the 85 1.8D too. Might test it out at the shop. Also, how do you normally test the camera at the shop? Do you think they will let me bring it to outdoor to test the low lights for the lens?for the 50mm prime, get the f/1.8D if you're on budget, forget about the 1.4D; IMO, not worth spending on it, if you want to get the 1.4D, might be better to spend a little more and get the G or Sigma. 50mm on DX indoors is a bit tight too, 35mm on DX is just about right. Even with the 35mm on DX, it can still get a bit tight depend on the situation. But you already have 18-55mm right? I think you know the range well and what range you use more indoors. |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 01:05 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 12:58 AM) Yeah, I didn't really like the 35 1.8 coz if I have the 17-50 f2.8 then there's hardly any difference really and another thing bout the 35mm is that it isn't a macro lens. I think the 17-50 will work just fine for indoors, just looking for a prime that will be good enough for outdoor, so my choice is 50mm but i've just do some search on flickr and found many d7000 uses the 85 1.8D too. Might test it out at the shop. Also, how do you normally test the camera at the shop? Do you think they will let me bring it to outdoor to test the low lights for the lens? 85mm f/1.8D focus is fast! Bokeh and picture quality is nice too, way better than 50mm f/1.4D; It's a sweets lens for the price. It's tight indoors, say if you want to capture half body portrait.Not sure if they let you bring outdoor. Anyway, for Nikon lens, you can go to Nikon BTS and test all the lens you want..... There are miniature model you can snap snap..... |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 01:36 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
Any nice and cheap flashgun to recommend? HAHA
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 01:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,082 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Malaysia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 01:51 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 02:37 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 02:44 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 02:49 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur |
if I have 8k I will grab d7000 (body) + 50mm 1.8 + tammy 1750 + and lastly sigma 70200
Added on January 31, 2011, 2:50 am QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 02:44 AM) compatible with d7000? yeah it is compatible. Check on Google for the difference I myself didn't memorized thatWhat's the difference with those expensive nikon flash e.g. sb600/700/900? do i find those in the supermarket noodle section? This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 31 2011, 02:50 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 02:52 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
168 posts Joined: Jul 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 03:03 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 31 2011, 02:49 AM) if I have 8k I will grab d7000 (body) + 50mm 1.8 + tammy 1750 + and lastly sigma 70200 not familiar with all the flash terms, so even google doesn't help. Added on January 31, 2011, 2:50 am yeah it is compatible. Check on Google for the difference I myself didn't memorized that so have you bought the tammy yet? mind to share the quality of it? am worried bout the auto focus in low light situations. |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 03:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
I suffered AF problem on my tammy in low light. But after attached with my flash unit and it turned great. Assist light yo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 03:48 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
Mine is VC version. low lights situation. You can feel it's trying to focus the subject for 3~5 seconds or more, af motor sound keeps going to focus the subject else you might need to chance position so that you can focus it right. If it's on still subject it's acceptable, but a big No to a moving subject.
This post has been edited by Kiki-Lala: Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
273 posts Joined: Dec 2010 |
QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM) Mine is VC version. low lights situation. You can feel it's trying to focus the subject for 3~5 seconds or more, af motor sound keeps going to focus the subject else you might need to chance position so that you can focus it right. If it's on still subject it's acceptable, but a big No to a moving subject. How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary? This post has been edited by pikipiki: Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 04:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
Mostly if i shoot landscape in low light, Manual focus and VC off(on tripod).
Overall this lens, worth a shot. Can get lower than 1.5k for second hand in Garage Sales as new one around 1.7k~ with 2 years warranty. VC does help especially you're taking handheld shot on low shutter speed. |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 08:43 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010 |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 01:36 AM) Save your money better , go to get sb-900 or sb-700.Do you think a flashgun is important to you now? If not , save money and go for the best one like what i done. Added on January 31, 2011, 8:46 am QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM) How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... I think you should think whether VC is necessary for you and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary? Some ppl dont need VC Some Yes , so you should be the one who answer this question , because you are the one who want to use the len This post has been edited by bbuser91: Jan 31 2011, 08:46 AM |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 08:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM) How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... Usually when you do landscape it would be focused at infinity anyways. So just manual then focus to infinity.and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary? |
|
|
Jan 31 2011, 10:14 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Not necessary infinity la. There is something called hyper focal
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0221sec
0.47
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 05:11 AM |