Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 12:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 31 2011, 12:45 AM)
Then I suggest you try to stay away, especially from holding one  tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
*
No no, buy one ASAP and caress it day and night! Ahh! I need to change my pants. rclxm9.gif
Andy214
post Jan 31 2011, 12:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 12:44 AM)
I'm already poisoned! Siggy or tammy 17-50mm f2.8? Siggy 24-70mm/18-50mm f2.8? 50 1.8D/1.4D/ 35 1.8G? 85 1.8D? So many lens I'm getting sick!  laugh.gif Too bad I can't have it all. Having choice is great, but having too little money with too many choice sucks.  rclxms.gif
*
24 on DX is not wide enough, if you like to capture landscape and/or group photo. Test the Sigma or Tammy 17-50mm f/2.8.

for the 50mm prime, get the f/1.8D if you're on budget, forget about the 1.4D; IMO, not worth spending on it, if you want to get the 1.4D, might be better to spend a little more and get the G or Sigma.
50mm on DX indoors is a bit tight too, 35mm on DX is just about right. Even with the 35mm on DX, it can still get a bit tight depend on the situation.
But you already have 18-55mm right? I think you know the range well and what range you use more indoors.

pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 12:58 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Jan 31 2011, 12:51 AM)
24 on DX is not wide enough, if you like to capture landscape and/or group photo. Test the Sigma or Tammy 17-50mm f/2.8.

for the 50mm prime, get the f/1.8D if you're on budget, forget about the 1.4D; IMO, not worth spending on it, if you want to get the 1.4D, might be better to spend a little more and get the G or Sigma.
50mm on DX indoors is a bit tight too, 35mm on DX is just about right. Even with the 35mm on DX, it can still get a bit tight depend on the situation.
But you already have 18-55mm right? I think you know the range well and what range you use more indoors.
*
Yeah, I didn't really like the 35 1.8 coz if I have the 17-50 f2.8 then there's hardly any difference really and another thing bout the 35mm is that it isn't a macro lens. I think the 17-50 will work just fine for indoors, just looking for a prime that will be good enough for outdoor, so my choice is 50mm but i've just do some search on flickr and found many d7000 uses the 85 1.8D too. Might test it out at the shop. Also, how do you normally test the camera at the shop? Do you think they will let me bring it to outdoor to test the low lights for the lens?
Andy214
post Jan 31 2011, 01:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 12:58 AM)
Yeah, I didn't really like the 35 1.8 coz if I have the 17-50 f2.8 then there's hardly any difference really and another thing bout the 35mm is that it isn't a macro lens. I think the 17-50 will work just fine for indoors, just looking for a prime that will be good enough for outdoor, so my choice is 50mm but i've just do some search on flickr and found many d7000 uses the 85 1.8D too. Might test it out at the shop. Also, how do you normally test the camera at the shop? Do you think they will let me bring it to outdoor to test the low lights for the lens?
*
85mm f/1.8D focus is fast! Bokeh and picture quality is nice too, way better than 50mm f/1.4D; It's a sweets lens for the price. It's tight indoors, say if you want to capture half body portrait.

Not sure if they let you bring outdoor.
Anyway, for Nikon lens, you can go to Nikon BTS and test all the lens you want..... There are miniature model you can snap snap.....
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 01:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


Any nice and cheap flashgun to recommend? HAHA
chiahau
post Jan 31 2011, 01:47 AM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 01:36 AM)
Any nice and cheap flashgun to recommend? HAHA
*
Nissin or Yuong nuo stg.
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 01:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(chiahau @ Jan 31 2011, 01:47 AM)
Nissin or Yuong nuo stg.
*
Which model? Budget below 460. laugh.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 31 2011, 02:37 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 01:51 AM)
Which model? Budget below 460.  laugh.gif
*
go grab nissin di622
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 02:44 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 31 2011, 02:37 AM)
go grab nissin di622
*
compatible with d7000?
What's the difference with those expensive nikon flash e.g. sb600/700/900?
do i find those in the supermarket noodle section? laugh.gif just joking...... rclxm9.gif
aldosoesilo
post Jan 31 2011, 02:49 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


if I have 8k I will grab d7000 (body) + 50mm 1.8 + tammy 1750 + and lastly sigma 70200 smile.gif


Added on January 31, 2011, 2:50 am
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 02:44 AM)
compatible with d7000?
What's the difference with those expensive nikon flash e.g. sb600/700/900?
do i find those in the supermarket noodle section?  laugh.gif just joking...... rclxm9.gif
*
yeah it is compatible. Check on Google for the difference I myself didn't memorized that

This post has been edited by aldosoesilo: Jan 31 2011, 02:50 AM
g_pentium
post Jan 31 2011, 02:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 02:44 AM)
compatible with d7000?
What's the difference with those expensive nikon flash e.g. sb600/700/900?
do i find those in the supermarket noodle section?  laugh.gif just joking...... rclxm9.gif
*
im using d7k with nissin di622.the outcome is fine.
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 03:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 31 2011, 02:49 AM)
if I have 8k I will grab d7000 (body) + 50mm 1.8 + tammy 1750 + and lastly sigma 70200 smile.gif


Added on January 31, 2011, 2:50 am

yeah it is compatible. Check on Google for the difference I myself didn't memorized that
*
not familiar with all the flash terms, so even google doesn't help. laugh.gif
so have you bought the tammy yet? mind to share the quality of it? am worried bout the auto focus in low light situations. smile.gif
Kiki-Lala
post Jan 31 2011, 03:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
330 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: East, KL

I suffered AF problem on my tammy in low light. But after attached with my flash unit and it turned great. Assist light yo! biggrin.gif
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 03:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 31 2011, 03:24 AM)
I suffered AF problem on my tammy in low light. But after attached with my flash unit and it turned great. Assist light yo! biggrin.gif
*
Are yours VC or non VC? How bad is it the AF, mind to elaborate? Thanks. smile.gif
Kiki-Lala
post Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
330 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: East, KL

Mine is VC version. low lights situation. You can feel it's trying to focus the subject for 3~5 seconds or more, af motor sound keeps going to focus the subject else you might need to chance position so that you can focus it right. If it's on still subject it's acceptable, but a big No to a moving subject.

This post has been edited by Kiki-Lala: Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM
pikipiki
post Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Kiki-Lala @ Jan 31 2011, 03:55 AM)
Mine is VC version. low lights situation. You can feel it's trying to focus the subject for 3~5 seconds or more, af motor sound keeps going to focus the subject else you might need to chance position so that you can focus it right. If it's on still subject it's acceptable, but a big No to a moving subject.
*
How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... hmm.gif

and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary?

This post has been edited by pikipiki: Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM
Kiki-Lala
post Jan 31 2011, 04:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
330 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: East, KL

Mostly if i shoot landscape in low light, Manual focus and VC off(on tripod).

Overall this lens, worth a shot. Can get lower than 1.5k for second hand in Garage Sales as new one around 1.7k~ with 2 years warranty. VC does help especially you're taking handheld shot on low shutter speed.
bbuser91
post Jan 31 2011, 08:43 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 01:36 AM)
Any nice and cheap flashgun to recommend? HAHA
*
Save your money better , go to get sb-900 or sb-700.

Do you think a flashgun is important to you now? If not , save money and go for the best one like what i done.


Added on January 31, 2011, 8:46 am
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM)
How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... hmm.gif

and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary?
*
I think you should think whether VC is necessary for you sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif

Some ppl dont need VC Some Yes , so you should be the one who answer this question , because you are the one who want to use the len

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Jan 31 2011, 08:46 AM
celciuz
post Jan 31 2011, 08:51 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Jan 31 2011, 04:06 AM)
How about shooting landscape in low lights? Coz flash won't really help in that case... hmm.gif

and overall would you recommend the lens? And do you think the VC is necessary?
*
Usually when you do landscape it would be focused at infinity anyways. So just manual then focus to infinity.
TSKTCY
post Jan 31 2011, 10:14 AM

BumbleBeeā„¢
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Not necessary infinity la. There is something called hyper focal smile.gif


126 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0221sec    0.47    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 05:11 AM