Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 108 109 110 111 112 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
aldosoesilo
post Feb 14 2011, 01:08 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


guys. how often u use UWA? and do you find 18mm is not wide enough?
I am curious. hahaha
razuryza
post Feb 14 2011, 01:16 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 14 2011, 01:08 AM)
guys. how often u use UWA? and do you find 18mm is not wide enough?
I am curious. hahaha
*
my UWA is my main lens... so.. u think how often i use it? whistling.gif laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 14 2011, 01:20 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
18mm ? Wide meh ? sleep.gif
Str33tBoY
post Feb 14 2011, 01:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,874 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Malacca



for me ar...
in FX is quite wide...
if in DX is acceptable wide...
razuryza
post Feb 14 2011, 01:23 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 14 2011, 01:20 AM)
18mm ? Wide meh ? sleep.gif
*
18mm on DX is Wide
18mm on FX is UltraWide
TSKTCY
post Feb 14 2011, 01:23 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Using 12mm on FX ! So you think 18mm wide ? laugh.gif
razuryza
post Feb 14 2011, 01:25 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 14 2011, 01:23 AM)
Using 12mm on FX ! So you think 18mm wide ? laugh.gif
*
that one UWA edi.. more to fisheye d


Added on February 14, 2011, 1:25 amUWA and Wide differ tau

This post has been edited by razuryza: Feb 14 2011, 01:25 AM
scotty
post Feb 14 2011, 01:29 AM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



some qustion i need to ask. why is there diff between a 50mm f1.4 nikkor and a 24-70f2.8 nikkor in terms of brightness. i set both on the exact same setting and yet the 50mm are much more brighter. settings are F5.6 iso 200 1/250
razuryza
post Feb 14 2011, 01:32 AM

\('o')/~fewwwiitttt~\("0")/
*******
Senior Member
5,515 posts

Joined: Jan 2006


QUOTE(scotty @ Feb 14 2011, 01:29 AM)
some qustion i need to ask. why is there diff between a 50mm f1.4 nikkor and a 24-70f2.8 nikkor in terms of brightness. i set both on the exact same setting and yet the 50mm are much more brighter. settings are F5.6 iso 200 1/250
*
i also donno. but if i compare primes and zoom, primes will be brighter...
Agito666
post Feb 14 2011, 01:34 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 14 2011, 01:32 AM)
i also donno. but if i compare primes and zoom, primes will be brighter...
*
because prime lens is shorter so lesser "black" objects to absorb light when light travel through the lens? laugh.gif whistling.gif
pikipiki
post Feb 14 2011, 01:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


how much are the 85mm 1.4D?
Digitalrev is selling at 1038USD, kinda cheap isn't it?
daze
post Feb 14 2011, 01:51 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
857 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Feb 14 2011, 01:03 AM)
but does the price fit my original question or not .. 1.5k below ... or 2.0k below? tongue.gifsad.gif
i was asking if with 1.5k what lens is nice to replace 18-55 ...  and then with <2k what lens i can get also. (best bang for buck of course)
*
16-85mm seems a good choice. but might burst ur budget.
else.. get a 18-105mm VR. thou is a kit lens for D90. but it's certainly a good lens.
keep d rest of ur budget for a 3rd party UWA lens like tokina 12-24 or 11-16mm.


Added on February 14, 2011, 1:53 am
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 14 2011, 01:08 AM)
guys. how often u use UWA? and do you find 18mm is not wide enough?
I am curious. hahaha
*
depedns wat u shot lo.
for walkabout, travel... i suppose my UWA is on my camera most of the time.
hardly shoot anything above 100mm
unless u're are shooting like a sniper, zoom into the small details and cant walk towards it tongue.gif

This post has been edited by daze: Feb 14 2011, 01:53 AM
TSKTCY
post Feb 14 2011, 01:53 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 14 2011, 01:25 AM)
that one UWA edi.. more to fisheye d


Added on February 14, 2011, 1:25 amUWA and Wide differ tau
*
Sigma 12-24 fisheye meh ? tongue.gif

QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 14 2011, 01:32 AM)
i also donno. but if i compare primes and zoom, primes will be brighter...
*
Aperture f/1.4 bigger hole compare to f/2.8 ! smile.gif
celciuz
post Feb 14 2011, 01:55 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
I think it is because of the shorter barrels (usually, and also lesser elements).

Take 85G and 70200 VRII for example, more light loss due to the longer barrel of VR2 and also more elements inside.
TSKTCY
post Feb 14 2011, 01:57 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 14 2011, 01:55 AM)
I think it is because of the shorter barrels (usually, and also lesser elements).

Take 85G and 70200 VRII for example, more light loss due to the longer barrel of VR2 and also more elements inside.
*
Not really la. I tried Sigma 12-24 and Nikkor 24mm f/1.4G
Sigma makes the VF damn dark while 24mm bloody bright sweat.gif
Sigma so short also ma
celciuz
post Feb 14 2011, 01:59 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
Bear in mind the 1224 is a zoom lens, more elements inside.
TSKTCY
post Feb 14 2011, 02:01 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 14 2011, 01:59 AM)
Bear in mind the 1224 is a zoom lens, more elements inside.
*
Probably but the aperture play a big factor, I guess tongue.gif
scotty
post Feb 14 2011, 02:04 AM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



well both closes at the same f-stop. most likely is the elements then smile.gif
celciuz
post Feb 14 2011, 02:05 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 14 2011, 02:01 AM)
Probably but the aperture play a big factor, I guess tongue.gif
*
Let's say everything else is the same, light loss and etc in the 2 lens the 24 f/1.4 would be brighter in the viewfinder. But when you shoot at same settings, let's say 24 f/2.8 for both lens. Outcome should be same, but the 24mm would be brighter at even f/2.8 due to lesser elements thus lesser light loss.
bbuser91
post Feb 14 2011, 02:28 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
KTCY no go penang shooting or jalan jalan yesterday ? i mean the "miao hui" .





126 Pages « < 108 109 110 111 112 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0278sec    1.20    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 01:31 PM