Well I bet 95% people here also don't own their properties as well. i will not expect all will accept my comments. As I repeat again, I'm staying neutral on it, respect you all the freedom of speech.

If those investor and owner knows, once the thing collapsez, non of them get their benefits at the end but just a statement of "you get ur justice"

Kthxbye~

This post has been edited by youknowwhoami: Mar 16 2016, 01:51 PM

Sir, may I know how to issue notice of VP when there is no CCC? Did you experience this before? If yes, I am interested to know which project. And if this is possible, what would happen if buyer VP and CCC only comes 2 years later? Leave the unit empty and let the LAD lapsed? Please enlighten me. I am newbie. Thanks in advance.

I'm just small practice architect here, I better don't answer your question as in all flame on me ..etc.

Seems more expert will explain to you better than me

it's getting too hot here.

juz chill down guys

and another one thing. please refrain from name calling like monkeys, dog etc.

don't spoil your good image.

again if what ever the issue here is, the company have not issued any official statements meaning to say that what that have presented is true

oh well...

my understanding is CCC not mean VP
but VP must CCC

I always saw/hear this BS from our politician when we ask for change. Cannot argue, threaten/scare ppl.

And here I got the same BS again. Really Bolehland

A piece of advice for our inspiring architect, don't simply sign the dotted line in the cert in future.

Thank you.

From a concern investor.

Bon appetite

i can confirm u r not neutral lah with this statement.....so obvious l
all u say like the few cyber troopers is the same old words....have to be as u r one of them.....same old phrase
IF DEVELOPER FALL U ALL GET NOTHING
so pls share all assets bentley ferrari all branded staffs now with the buyers lah

CCC is authority compliance. Issued by architect to signify completion of the building.

CCC is precondition to issue VP. VP is issued by Dev to purchasers. Typically, a sensible Dev will buffer some time after construction complete to ensure CCC can be be issued prior to VP, in case authority got some comments that need to be rectified before can issue CCC.

yes.
Any accident happen in building without CCC is not cover by insurance.

better get ur part 2 and part 3 pass 1st before misleading others here. Mr. Architect

This post has been edited by godlikexioo: Mar 16 2016, 02:11 PM

deleted

This post has been edited by godlikexioo: Mar 16 2016, 02:09 PM

VP and CCC. This issue being discussed and rectified by legal basis, but only for HDA project. Non-hda, not sure. But if a developer use it as excuse for "non-HDA" project, then definately is a lao sai developer..


" In the year 2007, Parliament again tried to address the grievances of house buyers. The CCC was introduced and the SPA was amended to make it mandatory for delivery of vacant possession to be supported by the CCC. "


http://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...-late-delivery/

This post has been edited by samkps: Mar 16 2016, 02:12 PM

Been following this EC thread since the huge fire broke out some time ago (was it 2013?). Pics of VP from Halo seems livable, though with poor workmanship and finishing (but nowhere near as bad as the ones posted by "Mr Lim" that went viral on FB).

The main question will lead to different question(s) that might shed some light to this highly interested topic.

1) Are the photos posted (the ones that went viral, not livable at all) comes from the actual unit that developer had passed for VP?
a) If yes, why would developer do so, as reputation is much more expensive than paying LAD
b) if no,
b-i) is this an honest mistake by Mr Lim to have taken the photos at a unit that developer has not yet pass for VP?
b-ii) is this a deliberate act by Mr Lim to mislead the public regarding the development?

2) Why hasn't the developer made any official statement regarding this matter which has went viral and receive many public interest whether or not they're directly or indirectly involved or not?

3) What are the excuse/explanation/justification from developer regarding such overdue completion for this development as a whole (AFAIK, already delayed twice) irregardless of the photos posted.

Bro, u have a vested unit here?

His analogy that he is using is indeed quite sickening. True that, to your statement, a sick bastard he is.

Bro, no woh.. but my fren did.. Why?

Aiyo,
I m not lawyer lah... don't tell whether conned by developer, what is in SPA...
I m not inspector lah... don't tell me the reason lah, discrepancy lah...
I m not Architect or Engineer lah.. don't tell me whether how to define CCC / VP lah..

As a layman purchaser, can you accept your developer handover the unit in this condition?
If you will happy with it, then means you r with developer...
If you not happy with it, then it's sucks.......

can ask your friend is this real??
can snap some photo ??


the argument still here since developer said below 20 floor is complete and the photo taken should be hotel

1000% agree......which owner will be happy?????
no need to look far far lah.....the ones bad bad repo MKland.....recent few buildings VPed in DP is by far much much much better than this ED EC ER

all these meh "very worry" under instruction cyber staff.....if u still have a little bit of pride and integrity as a decent humab being....STOP confusing these angry owners
VP and CCC is all at one time ......only cunning and bad intention dev will explore the loophole

I tot u have a unit here
Anyway, m an indirect victim coz leased a retail unit from them