Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 EMPIRE CITY @ Damansara Perdana/Mutiara Damansara, Mixed Development Project in Damasara KL

views
     
davwon
post Mar 14 2016, 01:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 11:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(xtracooljustin @ Mar 16 2016, 11:48 AM)
Actually, so far last 20pages, I still dont get a clear picture of the situation:
a) Is Mr Lim the actual purchaser?
b) Was Mr Lim shown his actual unit (if indeed he purchased it)?
c) Did the photos that Mr Lim take and uploaded, was of his actual unit and floor?
*
https://www.facebook.com/superlang.rich

Go check this guy page. He already put all details in there.

Enjoy with popcorn
davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 12:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(youknowwhoami @ Mar 16 2016, 12:09 PM)
a) From what i see is, that not his unit but all the reminders from developer is to his email add... looks weird...

b) As i got the news from my frn, Mr Lim took construction lift (which is the lift including the 3 lvls of podium floor), means if unit is in 18th floor.. 18+3 = 21 floor. If passenger lift (not including the 3 lvls of podium floor), of course press 18th floor no prob. ** not many people knows the difference of construction lift and passenger lift **

c) Related back to (B), means that is not the actual unit & floor. Obviously he went to wrong floor, aiks! 

I'm not helping any side, just as profession practice architect here. Need to correct something if that possible is cause all these happened
*
Very interesting comment from practising architect...

So means that I can go up by MYSELF (or with friends) after paying everything, on my OWN into construction site, as I know where the lift & know how to operate it, to my unit, to VP on my own & Acknowledge VP by MYSELF (if i ok with the conditions).

Very interesting. Mind share which architect firm you're attached with?
davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 12:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(youknowwhoami @ Mar 16 2016, 12:25 PM)
http://www.arkitekmaa.com/

I know there's always someone doubt it i stand out to correct it. but when the info is wrong means is wrong.

Then, im not really sure how they go up by using that la...Not that kepo ask till that details. But i tot the real owner with mr lim go vp by appointment..? not?

I read all the post n news till now from Mr lim and comments here...

"Takkan i keep saying you have HIV but you dont have in fact"

Just being neutral to look into this matter, dont blind to follow the statements and forget to analyst it. Who knows there's hidden statement never disclose it out? we never know at ll. 

its just my 2 cent~
*
You don't get what I mean is it?

Let me tell you a bit on VP.

Normally you don't go up by yourself, you'll be accompany by staff/agent to the unit, to ensure you at the right floor & right unit, then baru the staff left you there to inspect the unit for defect......but if you on normal completed/ready unit la...

This is MEH, and as you can see the conditions is so bad that I don't think the staff would left you there to check for defect or strolling around.

If you want me to say it directly, its impossible Mr. Lim is trespassing if not allowed by the staff & definitely won't be at wrong unit/floor if they follow SOP of VP, i.e: the purchaser/appointed proxy follow the staff till the promised unit/floor.

You see, we also buy & sell prop before, and definitely not the 1st time for us go through VP, we know what we saying.

Try take a look at recent VP of Mcity ampang... definitely a huge different.


davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 01:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(youknowwhoami @ Mar 16 2016, 12:53 PM)
That's why i said, there a hidden statement one of the party didn't voice it. Now Mr lim also said is misleading the info, but never explain why and how he get into that level when there's staff bringing them up. From the moment he said misleading, why he still keep quiet on that part of statements? I just find it weird, if you want to accuse someone...the A to Z statement must be crystal clear and wont be gone half way and come ending just simple like that?

I apologize if my knowledge is not strong as anyone here, i just wanna share what is truth and not truth. Never think of side any side of them.

2 cent .
*
Hi Mr. Still Practising Architect,

I don't see any statement issued by Mr. Lim said he been misleaded.
Pls refrain for putting words into ppl mouth.
If you have time during lunch time, pls go through the FB link to Mr.Lim (provided by me), throw him some question to get straight of your confusion.
I believe he reply everyone on any question throw at him to date.

If your really really have free time to reply me in this lunch break, pls go through his past posting on the issue to enlighten yourselves.


Bon Appetite




in case if you really miss it https://www.facebook.com/superlang.rich

This post has been edited by davwon: Mar 16 2016, 01:09 PM
davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 01:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(kokwah18 @ Mar 16 2016, 01:10 PM)
Noob statement. Not ur issue, dont comment. It may harm Mr Lim more since legal team can raise the point that Mr Lim has intention to mislead and some stupid fellow believe without validating the fact.
*
Aiseh another fellow shooting blank,

Who say Mr Lim mislead, and who said he intended too.
That let the lawyar to decide.
No body try to bail Mr Lim here.
We all here as investor have few opinion on the way the developer handle the situation.
We talk fact, SOP, and underhand tactic by developer.
This just tip of the iceberg, lots of ppl don't raise up becos they think they have small voice.
The statement you throw at me also can be use back to you. Who are you to comment Mr.Lim predicament?

Anyway if wanna see fact, please visit Mr.Lim FB, he has upload all email correspondence & document to support his claims.

Bon appetite

This post has been edited by davwon: Mar 16 2016, 01:26 PM
davwon
post Mar 16 2016, 02:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(youknowwhoami @ Mar 16 2016, 01:49 PM)
Well I bet 95% people here also don't own their properties as well. i will not expect all will accept my comments. As I repeat again, I'm staying neutral on it, respect you all the freedom of speech. smile.gif

If those investor and owner knows, once the thing collapsez, non of them get their benefits at the end but just a statement of "you get ur justice" [U]

Kthxbye~
*
I always saw/hear this BS from our politician when we ask for change. Cannot argue, threaten/scare ppl.

And here I got the same BS again. Really Bolehland

A piece of advice for our inspiring architect, don't simply sign the dotted line in the cert in future.

Thank you.

From a concern investor.

Bon appetite
davwon
post Mar 19 2016, 09:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
davwon
post Mar 21 2016, 12:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(The Jedi @ Mar 21 2016, 10:43 AM)
Hey architect wannabe, you better spend more time in your work and not here "wandering why" and making many assumptions and missing the points...haha
*
My Friend,

I very salute you.
I don't even want to reply to his childish statement and was eating popcorn & watched this tread flourish.

This apprentice sometimes say like he not related, very neutral one, too young to comment, 'I tak Tahu' and then suddenly talk very gungho about the mistake of owner/visitor to wrong floor & say wrongly accused the developer.

As I said earlier, no one would be in the wrong place if not cause by someone else.

Show me mockup for what? my gosh.... for syoik sendiri, imagine i at my unit & assume VP issit??

Really Bolehland...


davwon
post Apr 4 2016, 01:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
168 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

QUOTE(xtracooljustin @ Apr 4 2016, 11:33 AM)
As far as I am pro-purchasers in this project, however, Aspartame has a point and the law will not look at purchasers favorably if purchasers themselves do not conduct accordingly to the terms and conditions, ie to diligently pay maintenance fee. Not paying maintenance will open up purchasers to other liabilities under the new Strata Management Act.  

If any purchasers intend to not pay the maintenance fee, IMHO they should only do so via legal interventions such as injunction.

Nobody likes to condone wrongdoings and 2 wrongs doesnt make a right.
*
Lol... pls la..

If MEH use the latest strata title act as the defence, he'll screw himself kaw kaw already..... MEH won't use it.... guarantee... lol

you can't applied part of the act & ignored others part that disavantage to them.... as whole only effective.... u think they berani ka?

This sword work both ways, u wan owner to follow, u need to follow to the dot too...

Lol

This post has been edited by davwon: Apr 4 2016, 01:32 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0551sec    0.38    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 06:36 AM